Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 123 references

Citizen Science Games on the Timeline of Quantum Games

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Citizen science runs through all three eras of quantum games.

desk verdict A genuinely useful review of citizen-science quantum games; the three-forces framing is valuable, but the abstract overstates citizen science's role in the quantum-computer branch. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09169 v1 pith:AMOYTAJI submitted 2025-02-13 quant-ph cs.CY

Laura Piispanen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcs.CY
keywords QuantumGamesScienceGameJamSeriousWithAPurposeCitizenCrowdsourcingGamification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review attempts to organize the history of quantum games—rule-based games that reference or use quantum physics—around the role of citizen science, and it argues that the field has been shaped by three driving forces: the serious use of games for research and education, the evolution of quantum computers, and open development events such as Quantum Game Jams. The paper inventories eleven citizen science quantum games and prototypes, plus a crowdsourcing platform and an interactive art installation, and observes that citizen science contributions appear in all three driving forces. It further claims that every one of these citizen science projects has been discontinued, despite collectively reaching millions of players, and that public interest in quantum technologies has grown since their most active years. For a reader, the payoff is a concrete map of what has been tried, why the projects stalled, and what design guidance and collaborative models exist for future attempts.

What carries the argument

The organizing object is the 'dimension of scientific purposes' in the paper's three-dimensional definition of quantum games, paired with a historical timeline that sorts games by what drove their creation. The mechanism doing the analytic work is the mapping of a quantum research problem into a playable visual task built on numerical simulation: laser-controlled movement of a simulated wave function in Quantum Moves, simplification of knot-like topological circuits in meQuanics, puzzle-based error correction in Decodoku, and randomness generation through binary choices in The BIG Bell Quest. The Quantum Black Box simulator, developed for Quantum Game Jams and reused in QWiz and Quantum Garden, is the concrete tool that lets game jam participants prototype citizen science games against a numerical simulation of a Bose-Einstein condensate. These mappings let the author read each game as an instance of one or more driving forces and connect design choices to research outcomes.

What would settle it

A comprehensive multilingual census of quantum games that uncovers active or recently active citizen science quantum games outside the Western-language sources—especially any developed after 2019 with a stated citizen science goal—would contradict the paper's observation that all such projects are discontinued and its claim that the three named forces fully drive the landscape.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the current landscape of quantum games is not a random collection but the product of three distinct driving forces: the serious application of games (education, training, citizen science), the development of quantum computers and their public availability, and open game development events like Quantum Game Jams. It traces eleven citizen science quantum games—including Quantum Moves and Quantum Moves 2 for quantum optimal control, meQuanics for topological quantum error correction, Decodoku for qudit error correction, The BIG Bell Quest for human-generated randomness in Bell tests, and Quantum Awesomeness for benchmarking early quantum devices—and finds that citizen science is woven through all three forces. The paper also reports that all of these citizen science projects have been discontinued, often due to limited time, funding, manpower, or shifted research aims, even though they reached millions of players and produced useful data, such as players' solutions in Quantum Moves and 97 million human binary choices in The BIG Bell Quest. On the paper's own terms, the claim is that these three forces explain both the past trajectory of quantum games and the promising conditions for future citizen science quantum games in an era of open-access quantum computers and human-machine collaboration.

Load-bearing premise

The whole classification depends on the compiled list of games and sources being complete and representative; the paper itself notes that most accessible material is in Western languages, so unlisted or non-Western citizen science quantum games could change the three-force picture.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the three-force account is correct, future citizen science quantum games will most plausibly emerge where serious research needs, accessible quantum hardware, and open development events overlap—such as benchmarking or error correction on near-term devices.
  • Because all eleven inventoried citizen science projects were discontinued, any new project should follow the recommended design guidance: early involvement of both game design and quantum physics expertise, early decisions about the citizen science goal, and strong visual communication.
  • The rise in public interest in quantum technologies since the games' most active years implies a wider potential player pool for a renewed citizen science quantum game.
  • The tournament model proposed for limited quantum-computer access—tutorial rounds on classical simulations, then finale rounds on real hardware, as in The BIG Bell Quest—could make scarce quantum resources go further.
  • A shared, community-run platform for quantum citizen science, similar in spirit to established astronomy and biology citizen science platforms, would let projects pool resources instead of each starting from scratch.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the three-force account is right, the uniform discontinuation pattern suggests a structural cycle—projects are born around hardware-access milestones and fade when funding or research focus shifts—so the next wave is likely to arrive with the next round of accessible quantum computers.
  • Editorial inference: Because successful citizen science in astronomy and biology taps pattern recognition on familiar visual data, quantum citizen science may need to build visual intuition slowly through tutorial layers; the paper's tournament idea is one testable way to do that.
  • Editorial inference: A comparative study of numerical-simulation-based versus real-quantum-computer-based games, which the paper calls for, would also test whether human intuition formed on simulations transfers to actual quantum devices; this is a concrete next experiment the paper implies but does not run.
  • Editorial inference: The focus on optimal control problems with transferable metrics suggests a broader design principle: quantum citizen science games are most viable when the research task can be expressed as a visual optimization with clear feedback, which could guide game jams beyond quantum physics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a narrative review of quantum-physics-related games, focusing on citizen science quantum games and their historical development. It adopts a previously published definition of quantum games, documents eleven citizen science quantum games and prototypes plus one crowdsourcing platform and one interactive art installation, and organizes the landscape around three 'driving forces': serious games, the evolution of quantum computers, and Quantum Game Jams. The author claims that citizen science is influential in all three forces, discusses design guidelines, and outlines future directions involving hybrid intelligence and open access quantum computers.

Significance. The paper offers a valuable, carefully referenced historical synthesis of a small but active niche at the intersection of citizen science, quantum physics, and game design. Its strengths include the detailed game-by-game documentation, the explicit acknowledgment of source limitations such as Western-language bias and non-archived web materials, and the connection to existing design guidelines. The three-forces framework is a plausible and useful interpretive lens for organizing the field's history. The main weakness is that the abstract and conclusions overstate the role of citizen science in the quantum-computer force, while the body itself acknowledges that almost no implemented citizen science games exist on quantum computers.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, §3.2, §6] The claim that 'citizen science plays an influential role in all three aspects' is not supported for the quantum-computer force. Section 3.2 explicitly states that 'For the use of citizen science, not many realisations have existed that run on a quantum computer.' The only candidate, Quantum Awesomeness, is described as having been 'proposed also as a benchmarking tool,' but the paper also says 'no specific problems suitable for citizen science engagement were identified during its development' and that its revival is 'currently uncertain.' The first games on quantum computers, Rock-Paper-Scissors and Battleship, are presented without any citizen science component. Because the abstract and conclusions present citizen science as woven into all three driving forces, this is a load-bearing overstatement. Please revise the abstract and conclusions to distinguish the well-supported claim that the evolution of quantum computers is a driving force for quantum games from the much weaker claim that citizen science has shaped this force; the latter should be framed as prospective or potential rather than influential.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§4] The sentence 'These citizen science games on quantum physics were able to reach millions of players world-wide' is not supported by the cited sources; the only participant number given in the paper is 100,000 for The BIG Bell Quest. Please add a citation or qualify the claim.
  2. [§4] The acknowledgment that 'The available literature and resources, particularly those accessible for review, are primarily in Western languages' is commendable and important; consider moving this caveat to the Introduction or Abstract so that readers encounter it before the main analysis.
  3. [§1] The sentence 'Today, there exists over three hundred games that reference quantum physics' should be 'there exist'; similarly, 'Nowadayssecond generation quantum technologies' is missing a space.
  4. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption contains 'the 20 qubit QS1 1 device,' which appears to be a typo; please correct it to 'QS1 1' or the intended device name.
  5. [References] Reference [102] lists '(2010)' as the year, which is inconsistent with the blog post's topic and the stated access date of 21st December 2023; please correct the year.
  6. [Data Availability Statement] The Data Availability Statement cites 'The List of Quantum Games' at a personal website; for long-term accessibility, please consider adding an archived version, a DOI, or a versioned identifier.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a self-contained historical synthesis whose self-citations set scope and data sources but do not force the central observation.

full rationale

The paper is a review, not a derivation or prediction exercise. Its central observation—that the quantum games landscape is shaped by serious applications, quantum computer development, and Quantum Game Jams—is an interpretive synthesis of documented games and projects. The author's own definition of quantum games [10] and The List of Quantum Games [16] are used to delimit the scope and to provide a dataset, but the individual games are independently supported by academic references, developer blog posts, conference materials, and other primary sources cited throughout the text. Adopting one's own definition as a scope statement is not circular: the definition is stipulated, and the three driving forces are not derived from it by construction. The paper makes no fitted prediction and invokes no uniqueness theorem. It also explicitly acknowledges a limitation: the available literature is primarily in Western languages, which affects representativeness but not circularity. The relatively weak evidence in §3.2 for citizen science on actual quantum computers, where the paper states that 'not many realisations have existed that run on a quantum computer' and the sole candidate game 'was proposed also as a benchmarking tool' with 'no specific problems suitable for citizen science engagement were identified,' is an evidentiary weakness in support of the abstract's broad claim, not a circular reduction. Overall, the manuscript is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing self-citation chain or definitional equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on established definitions of quantum games, citizen science, and serious games, and on the reliability of its diverse sources.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The definition of quantum games with three dimensions is adopted from Piispanen et al. [10].
    The paper uses this definition to delimit which games are included in the review (Section 1, Table 1).
  • domain assumption The categories of 'citizen science game' and 'serious game' are applied as defined by prior literature (e.g., [6, 32, 51]).
    These definitions determine which projects are selected for review.
  • domain assumption The compiled non-academic sources, including blog posts and personal communication, are reliable representations of game status and project history.
    The review relies on these sources for several games, as stated in the abstract and data availability statement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Citizen Science Games on the Timeline of Quantum Games." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AMOYTAJI

@misc{pith2026250209169,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Citizen Science Games on the Timeline of Quantum Games},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AMOYTAJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09169}
}
read the original abstract

This article provides an overview of existing quantum physics-related games, referred to as \textit{quantum games}, that serve citizen science research in quantum physics. Additionally, we explore the connection between citizen science and \textit{quantum computer games}, games played on quantum computers. The information presented is derived from academic references and supplemented by diverse sources, including social media publications, conference presentations, and blog posts from research groups and developers associated with the presented games. We observe that the current landscape of quantum games is shaped by three distinct driving forces: the serious application of games, the evolution of quantum computers, and open game development events such as \textit{Quantum Game Jams}. Notably, citizen science plays an influential role in all three aspects. The article points to existing design guides for citizen science quantum games and views future prospects of citizen science projects and quantum games through collaborative endeavours, human-machine collaboration, and open access quantum computers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    https: //explodingtopics.com/blog/number-of-gamers

    Howarth, J.: How Many Gamers Are There? (New 2023 Statistics). https: //explodingtopics.com/blog/number-of-gamers. Accessed February 13th 2024 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (2015)

    Haklay, M.: Citizen science and policy: A European perspective. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (2015). Accessed 21st December 2023

    2015

  3. [3]

    Science 343(6178), 1436–1437 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554

    Bonney, R., Shirk, J.L., Phillips, T.B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H.L., Miller- Rushing, A.J., Parrish, J.K.: Next steps for citizen science. Science 343(6178), 1436–1437 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554

    doi:10.1126/science.1251554 2014

  4. [4]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(17), 8089–8092 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903393116

    Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K.T., Uhlik, J., D¨ orler, D.: Toward an inter- national definition of citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(17), 8089–8092 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903393116

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1903393116 2019

  5. [6]

    University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (2011)

    Cooper, S.: A Framework for Scientific Discovery Through Video Games. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (2011). [Doctoral Dissertation]

    2011

  6. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games

    Cooper, S., Sterling, A.L.R., Kleffner, R., Silversmith, W.M., Siegel, J.B.: Repur- posing citizen science games as software tools for professional scientists. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. FDG ’18. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3235765.3235770

    work page arXiv 2018

  7. [9]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Miller, J.A., Cooper, S.: Barriers to expertise in citizen science games. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’22. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517541

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [10]

    Defining Quantum Games

    Piispanen, L., Pfaffhauser, M., Kultima, A., Wootton, J.R.: Defining quantum games. arXiv (2022) arXiv:2206.00089 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

Show all 123 references
  1. [11]

    In: 2023 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), pp

    Piispanen, L.J., Morrell, E., Park, S., Pfaffhauser, M., Kultima, A.: The history of quantum games. In: 2023 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), pp. 1–8 (2023). IEEE 17

    2023

  2. [12]

    Lecture Notes in Physics

    Busch, P., Grabowski, M., Lahti, P.J.: Operational Quantum Physics. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, New York, NY (1995)

    1995

  3. [13]

    In: More Things in Heaven and Earth, pp

    Zeilinger, A.: Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics. In: More Things in Heaven and Earth, pp. 482–498. Springer, New York, NY (1999)

    1999

  4. [14]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

    Dowling, J.P., Milburn, G.J.: Quantum technology: the second quantum rev- olution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 361(1809), 1655–1674 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2003.1227

    2003

  5. [15]

    PRX Quantum 1, 020101 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020101

    Deutsch, I.H.: Harnessing the power of the second quantum revolution. PRX Quantum 1, 020101 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020101

    2020 doi

  6. [16]

    https://kiedos.art/ quantum-games-list/

    Piispanen, L.: The List of Quantum Games. https://kiedos.art/ quantum-games-list/. Accessed 15th December 2023

    2023

  7. [17]

    American Journal of Physics (74), 962–973 (2006) https://doi

    Goff, A.: Quantum tic-tac-toe: A teaching metaphor for superposition in quan- tum mechanics. American Journal of Physics (74), 962–973 (2006) https://doi. org/10.1119/1.2213635

    2006 doi

  8. [18]

    arXiv (2019) arXiv:1906.05836v2 [quant-ph]

    Cantwell, C.: Quantum chess: Developing a mathematical framework and design methodology for creating quantum games. arXiv (2019) arXiv:1906.05836v2 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [19]

    International Journal of Designs for Learning 11(1), 1–20 (2020)

    Anupam, A., Gupta, R., Gupta, S., Li, Z., Hong, N., Naeemi, A., Parvin, N.: Design challenges for science games: The case of a quantum mechanics game. International Journal of Designs for Learning 11(1), 1–20 (2020)

    2020

  10. [20]

    SSRN (2022)

    Carberry, D., Shou Neergaard-Nielson, J., Nieuwenburg, E., Andersson, M.: Board games to teach quantum technologies to engineers: A peer instruc- tion approach. SSRN (2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract= 4258302

    2022

  11. [21]

    : Quantum games and interactive tools for quantum technologies outreach and education

    Seskir, Z.C., Migda l, P., Weidner, C., Anupam, A., Case, N., Davis, N., Decaroli, C., Ercan, ˙I., Foti, C., Gora, P., et al. : Quantum games and interactive tools for quantum technologies outreach and education. Optical Engineering 61(8), 081809–081809 (2022)

    2022

  12. [22]

    American Journal of Physics 91(6), 458–458 (2023)

    Kopf, L., Hiekkam¨ aki, M., Prabhakar, S., Fickler, R.: Endless fun in high dimen- sions—a quantum card game. American Journal of Physics 91(6), 458–458 (2023)

    2023

  13. [23]

    AGB Stars and Related Phenomenastro 2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey 2010, 46 (2009) 18

    Raddick, M.J., Bracey, G., Carney, K., Gyuk, G., Borne, K., Wallin, J., Jacoby, S., Planetarium, A.: Citizen science: status and research directions for the com- ing decade. AGB Stars and Related Phenomenastro 2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey 2010, 46 (2009) 18

    2009

  14. [24]

    Citizen science: Theory and practice, 1–20 (2017)

    Eitzel, M., Cappadonna, J., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R., West, S.E., Virapongse, A., Kyba, C., Bowser, A., Cooper, C., Sforzi, A., et al.: Citizen science termi- nology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen science: Theory and practice, 1–20 (2017)

    2017

  15. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp

    Wiggins, A., Crowston, K.: From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207

    2011 doi

  16. [27]

    Stanford University, California (2018)

    Keep, B.E.: Becoming Expert Problem Solvers: A Case Study in What Develops and How. Stanford University, California (2018)

    2018

  17. [28]

    gamification

    Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9–15 (2011)

    2011

  18. [29]

    Hamari, J.: Gamification. In: G. Ritzer, C. Rojek (Eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York (2019)

    2019

  19. [30]

    Biological conservation 142(10), 2282–2292 (2009)

    Sullivan, B.L., Wood, C.L., Iliff, M.J., Bonney, R.E., Fink, D., Kelling, S.: eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological conservation 142(10), 2282–2292 (2009)

    2009

  20. [31]

    In: Proceed- ings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications, pp

    Bowser, A., Hansen, D., He, Y., Boston, C., Reid, M., Gunnell, L., Preece, J.: Using gamification to inspire new citizen science volunteers. In: Proceed- ings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications, pp. 18–25 (2013)

    2013

  21. [32]

    Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 7(1), 34 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.5334/cstp.500

    Miller, J.A., Gandhi, K., Gander, A., Cooper, S.: A survey of citizen science gaming experiences. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 7(1), 34 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.5334/cstp.500

    2022 doi

  22. [33]

    Nature 466, 756–760 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature09304

    Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Treuille, A., Barbero, J., Lee, J., Beenen, M., Leaver- Fay, A., Baker, D., Popovi´ c, Z., players, F.: Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466, 756–760 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature09304

    2010

  23. [34]

    PLoS ONE 7(3): e31362 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031362

    Kawrykow, A., Roumanis, G., Kam, A., Kwak, D., Leung, Wu, al.: Phylo: A citizen science approach for improving multiple sequence alignment. PLoS ONE 7(3): e31362 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031362

    2012 doi

  24. [35]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(6), 2122–2127 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313039111

    Lee, J., Kladwang, W., Lee, M., Cantu, D., Azizyan, M., Kim, H., Limpaecher, 19 A., Gaikwad, S., Yoon, S., Treuille, A., Das, R., null: RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(6), 2122–2127 (2014) https://doi.org/10....

    2014 doi

  25. [36]

    Computers in Human Behavior 73(527), 40 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.074

    Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E., Hall, W.: An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior 73(527), 40 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.074

    2017 doi

  26. [37]

    https://citizensciencegames.com/ games/

    Online: Citizen Science Games Listing. https://citizensciencegames.com/ games/

  27. [38]

    IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 5(1), 9–19 (2018)

    Yadav, P., Charalampidis, I., Cohen, J., Darlington, J., Grey, F.: A collaborative citizen science platform for real-time volunteer computing and games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 5(1), 9–19 (2018)

    2018

  28. [39]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series 331(6), 062022 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/331/6/062022

    Sanchez, C.A., Blomer, J., Buncic, P., Chen, G., Ellis, J., Quintas, D.G., Haru- tyunyan, A., Grey, F., Gonzalez, D.L., Marquina, M., Mato, P., Rantala, J., Schulz, H., Segal, B., Sharma, A., Skands, P., Weir, D., Wu, J., Wu, W., Yadav, R.: Volunteer clouds and citizen cybersc...

    2011

  29. [40]

    In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp

    Simpson, R., Page, K.R., De Roure, D.: Zooniverse: observing the world’s largest citizen science platform. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1049–1054 (2014)

    2014

  30. [41]

    https://www.zooniverse.org/about/publications# physics

    Zooniverse.org: Publications. https://www.zooniverse.org/about/publications# physics. Accessed 21st December 2023

    2023

  31. [42]

    https://science.nasa.gov/citizen-science/

    NASA: Citizen Science Projects. https://science.nasa.gov/citizen-science/. Accessed 31st December 2023

    2023

  32. [43]

    https://scistarter.org/

    SciStarter: Global online citizen science hub. https://scistarter.org/. Accessed 13th December 2023

    2023

  33. [44]

    Physics World 31(12), 31 (2018) https://doi.org/10

    Wootton, J.: Game on. Physics World 31(12), 31 (2018) https://doi.org/10. 1088/2058-7058/31/12/30

    2018

  34. [45]

    European Journal of Physics 31(6), 1441–1455 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/31/6/010

    Kohnle, A., Douglass, M., Edwards, T.J., D Gillies, A.: Developing and evaluat- ing animations for teaching quantum mechanics concepts. European Journal of Physics 31(6), 1441–1455 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/31/6/010

    2010 doi

  35. [46]

    American Journal of Physics 80(148) (2010) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3657800 20

    Kohnle, A., Cassettari, D., Edwards, T.J., Ferguson, C., Gillies, A.D., Hooley, C.A., Korolkova, N., Llama, J., Sinclair, B.D.: A new multimedia resource for teaching quantum mechanics concepts. American Journal of Physics 80(148) (2010) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3657800 20

    2010 doi

  36. [47]

    Physical Review Physics Education Research 15(1) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010110

    Passante, G., Kohnle, A.: Enhancing student visual understanding of the time evolution of quantum systems. Physical Review Physics Education Research 15(1) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010110

    2019 doi

  37. [48]

    https://www

    ScienceAtHome: Games to lower the barrier of entry into the quantum world by giving everyone the capability to contribute to quantum research. https://www. scienceathome.org/quantum/games/. Accessed 13th December 2023

    2023

  38. [49]

    http://qplaylearn.com/ (2020)

    QPlayLearn: An online platform designed for interactive learning in quantum physics. http://qplaylearn.com/ (2020)

    2020

  39. [50]

    https://helloquantum.mybluemix.net/ (2010)

    HelloQuantum: A game for introducing basics concepts in quantum computing. https://helloquantum.mybluemix.net/ (2010)

    2010

  40. [51]

    American Behavioral Scientist 14(1), 176 (1970) https: //doi.org/10.1177/000276427001400113

    Abt, C.C.: Serious games. American Behavioral Scientist 14(1), 176 (1970) https: //doi.org/10.1177/000276427001400113

    1970 doi

  41. [52]

    Computer Graphics forum 26, (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007

    Sawyer, B.: Serious games: Broadening games impact beyond entertainment. Computer Graphics forum 26, (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007. 01044.x

    2007

  42. [53]

    Serious games: Mechanisms and effects, 10–24 (2009)

    Ratan, R., Ritterfeld, U.: Classifying serious games. Serious games: Mechanisms and effects, 10–24 (2009)

    2009

  43. [54]

    In: Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation Through Edu- cational Games: Multidisciplinary Approaches, pp

    Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J.-P.: Classifying serious games: the g/p/s model. In: Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation Through Edu- cational Games: Multidisciplinary Approaches, pp. 118–136. IGI global, Hershey, Pennsylvania (2011). https://doi.org/...

    2011 doi

  44. [55]

    A.and Allbeck, Sood, A., Janssen: T.l

    Nagarajan, J.M. A.and Allbeck, Sood, A., Janssen: T.l. exploring game design for cybersecurity training. In Proceedings of IEEE Cyber, 256–262 (2012)

    2012

  45. [56]

    https://youtu.be/p5rWZh7M0aY

    ScienceAtHome: Quantum Moves demo. https://youtu.be/p5rWZh7M0aY. Accessed 21st December 2023

    2023

  46. [57]

    Human Computation 1(2) (2014) https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v1i2.11

    Lieberoth, A., Pedersen, M.K., Marin, A.C., Planke, T., Sherson, J.F.: Getting humans to do quantum optimization - user acquisition, engagement and early results from the citizen cyberscience game quantum moves. Human Computation 1(2) (2014) https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v1i2.11

    2014 doi

  47. [58]

    Nature 532(7598), 210–213 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17620

    Sorensen, J., Pedersen, M., Munch, M., Haikka, P., Jensen, J., Planke, T., Lieberoth, A., Sherson, J.: Exploring the quantum speed limit with computer games. Nature 532(7598), 210–213 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17620

    2016 doi

  48. [59]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 201716869 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716869115

    Heck, R., Vuculescu, O., Sørensen, J., Zoller, J., Andreasen, M., Bason, M., Ejlertsen, P., El ´ ıasson, O., Haikka, P., Laustsen, J., Nielsen, L., Mao, A., M¨ uller, R., Napolitano, M., Pedersen, M., Thorsen, A., Bergenholtz, C., Calarco, T., 21 Montangero, S., Sherson, J.: R...

    2018 doi

  49. [60]

    Physical Review Research 3 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.3.013057

    Jensen, J., Gajdacz, M., Ahmed, S., Czarkowski, J., Weidner, C., Rafner, J., Sørensen, J., Mølmer, K., Sherson, J.: Crowdsourcing human common sense for quantum control. Physical Review Research 3 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.3.013057

    2021

  50. [61]

    New Journal of Physics 12(7), 075008 (2010) https://doi

    Brif, C., Chakrabarti, R., Rabitz, H.: Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future. New Journal of Physics 12(7), 075008 (2010) https://doi. org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075008

    2010 doi

  51. [62]

    Journal of physics

    Koch, C.: Controlling open quantum systems: Tools, achievements, and limita- tions. Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal 28 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/21/213001

    2016 doi

  52. [63]

    [Doctoral Dissertation] (2021)

    Ahmed, S.Z.: Quantum Games and Simulations: Applications in Education, Outreach and Research. [Doctoral Dissertation] (2021)

    2021

  53. [64]

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5etAcp2 G2L3DGvXhopNQ cnHHa7XTqK (2016)

    ScienceAtHome: Game Demonstrations of the games by Science At Home. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5etAcp2 G2L3DGvXhopNQ cnHHa7XTqK (2016)

    2016

  54. [65]

    Short documentary film by Science & Cocktails

    Sherson, J.: Quantum intuition. Short documentary film by Science & Cocktails. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbKkQQbexJU (2019)

    2019

  55. [66]

    European Journal of Physics 43 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac93c7

    Ahmed, S., Weidner, C., Jensen, J., Sherson, J., Lewandowski, H.: Student use of a quantum simulation and visualization tool. European Journal of Physics 43 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac93c7

    2022 doi

  56. [67]

    http://www.mequanics.com

    h-bar: The prototype quantum game meQuanics. http://www.mequanics.com. au/

  57. [68]

    Reports on Progress in Physics 76(7), 076001 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0034-4885/76/7/076001

    Devitt, S., Munro, W., Nemoto, K.: Quantum error correction for beginners. Reports on Progress in Physics 76(7), 076001 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0034-4885/76/7/076001

    2013

  58. [69]

    XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 23 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1145/2983545

    Devitt, S.: Programming quantum computers using 3-d puzzles, coffee cups, and doughnuts. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 23 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1145/2983545

    2016 doi

  59. [70]

    https: //github.com/decodoku/decodoku iOS

    Wootton, J.R.: Source code for iOS version of the first Decodoku app. https: //github.com/decodoku/decodoku iOS. Accessed 13th December 2023 (2016)

    2016

  60. [71]

    In: ´Editions HE-Arc, HES-SO (2017) 22

    Wootton, J.R.: Getting the public involved in quantum error correction. In: ´Editions HE-Arc, HES-SO (2017) 22

    2017

  61. [72]

    American Journal of Physics 70(5), 558–559 (2002)

    Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I., Grover, L.K.: Quantum computation and quantum information. American Journal of Physics 70(5), 558–559 (2002)

    2002

  62. [73]

    https://www.reddit.com/r/decodoku/

    Wootton, J.R.: r/decodoku, a subreddit for the players of Decodoku to examine their methods. https://www.reddit.com/r/decodoku/. Accessed 13th December 2023 (2017)

    2017

  63. [74]

    https://nccr-qsit.ethz.ch/ technology-transfer/qstarter/awards.html (2017)

    QSit: QStarter Awards, inventions or business ideas made alongside research in Quantum Science and Technology. https://nccr-qsit.ethz.ch/ technology-transfer/qstarter/awards.html (2017)

    2017

  64. [75]

    Physics 195 (1964)

    Bell, J.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 195 (1964)

    1964

  65. [76]

    : Challenging local realism with human choices

    Abell´ an, C., et al. : Challenging local realism with human choices. Nature (London) 557(7704), 212–216 (2018). BIG Bell Test Collaboration

    2018

  66. [77]

    (Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy)

    Bell, J.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. (Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy). Cambridge University Press, New York / New Rochelle, N.Y. (1987)

    1987

  67. [78]

    J Stat Phys 22, 563–591 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011339

    Benioff, P.: The computer as a physical system: A microscopic quantum mechan- ical Hamiltonian model of computers as represented by Turing machines. J Stat Phys 22, 563–591 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011339

    1980 doi

  68. [79]

    Int J Theor Phys 21, 467– 488 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

    Feynman, R.P.: Simulating physics with computers. Int J Theor Phys 21, 467– 488 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

    1982 doi

  69. [80]

    Deutsch, D.: Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97–117 (1985) https://doi.org/ 10.1098/rspa.1985.0070

    1985

  70. [81]

    Proceedings of the Royal Soci- ety of London

    DiVincenzo, D.P.: Quantum gates and circuits. Proceedings of the Royal Soci- ety of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 454(1969), 261–276 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0159

    1969

  71. [82]

    Fortschritte der Physik 48(9-11), 771–783 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1002/ 1521-3978(200009)48:9/11⟨771::AID-PROP771⟩3.0.CO;2-E

    DiVincenzo, D.P.: The physical implementation of quantum computation. Fortschritte der Physik 48(9-11), 771–783 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1002/ 1521-3978(200009)48:9/11⟨771::AID-PROP771⟩3.0.CO;2-E

    2000

  72. [83]

    Nature 464(7285), 45–53 (2010)

    Ladd, T.D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., O’Brien, J.L.: Quantum computers. Nature 464(7285), 45–53 (2010)

    2010

  73. [84]

    https:// quantumalgorithmzoo.org/

    Jordan, S., Quantum, M.: Quantum Algorithm Zoo. https:// quantumalgorithmzoo.org/

  74. [85]

    In: Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp

    Shor, P.W.: Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and fac- toring. In: Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 124–134 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700 23

    1994

  75. [86]

    National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., DC (2019)

    Horowitz, M., Grumbling, E.: Quantum Computing. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., DC (2019)

    2019

  76. [87]

    Wiley Interdiscip

    Outeiral, C., Strahm, M., Shi, J., Morris, G.M., Benjamin, S.C., Deane, C.M.: The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 11(1) (2021)

    2021

  77. [88]

    Fox, M., Zwickl, B., Lewandowski, H.: Preparing for the quantum revolu- tion - what is the role of higher education? arXiv (2020) arXiv:2006.16444v2 [physics.ed-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  78. [89]

    Marsh, S., Wang, J.B.: Combinatorial optimization via highly efficient quan- tum walks. Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023302 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.2.023302

    2020

  79. [90]

    In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Com- puting

    Grover, L.K.: A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Com- puting. STOC ’96, pp. 212–219. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (1996). https://doi.org/10.1145/237814.237866

    1996

  80. [91]

    Npj Quantum Inf

    Robert, A., Barkoutsos, P.K., Woerner, S., Tavernelli, I.: Resource-efficient quantum algorithm for protein folding. Npj Quantum Inf. 7(1) (2021)

    2021

  81. [92]

    https://decodoku.medium.com/ the-history-of-games-for-quantum-computers-a1de98859b5a

    Wootton, J.R.: The History of Games for Quan- tum Computers. https://decodoku.medium.com/ the-history-of-games-for-quantum-computers-a1de98859b5a. Accessed 21st December 2023 (2018)

    2018

  82. [93]

    Du, J., Li, H., Xu, X., Shi, M., Wu, J., Zhou, X., Han, R.: Experimental real- ization of quantum games on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 137902 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.137902

    2002 doi

  83. [94]

    Quantum Inf

    Khan, F.S., Solmeyer, N., Balu, R., Humble, T.S.: Quantum games: a review of the history, current state, and interpretation. Quantum Inf. Process. 17(11) (2018)

    2018

  84. [95]

    In: 2023 14th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp

    Szab´ o, M., Fodor, S.: Practical quantum game theory. In: 2023 14th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp. 000115–000116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom59411.2023. 10397541

    2023

  85. [96]

    Meyer, D.A.: Quantum strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1052–1055 (1999) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1052

    1999 doi

  86. [97]

    arXiv (2018) arXiv:1806.02736 [quant-ph] 24

    Wootton, J.R.: Benchmarking of quantum processors with random circuits. arXiv (2018) arXiv:1806.02736 [quant-ph] 24

    2018 arXiv

  87. [98]

    Medium 5 (2018)

    Wootton, J.R.: Benchmarking near-term devices with quantum error correction. Medium 5 (2018)

    2018

  88. [99]

    Quantum Science and Technology 5(4), 044004 (2020)

    Wootton, J.R.: Benchmarking near-term devices with quantum error correction. Quantum Science and Technology 5(4), 044004 (2020)

    2020

  89. [100]

    Nature Physics 14(6), 595–600 (2018)

    Boixo, S., Isakov, S.V., Smelyanskiy, V.N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., Bremner, M.J., Martinis, J.M., Neven, H.: Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices. Nature Physics 14(6), 595–600 (2018)

    2018

  90. [101]

    https://github.com/decodoku/A Game to Benchmark Quantum Computers

    Wootton, J.R.: Quantum Awesomeness, A Game to Benchmark Quantum Computers. https://github.com/decodoku/A Game to Benchmark Quantum Computers. Accessed 13th December 2023 (2017)

    2017

  91. [102]

    https://research.ibm.com/blog/quantum-metric-layer-fidelity

    Wack, A., McKay, D.: Updating how we measure quantum quality and speed. https://research.ibm.com/blog/quantum-metric-layer-fidelity. Accessed 21st December 2023 (2010)

    2010

  92. [103]

    https: //itch.io/jam/quantum-wheel/entries

    Itch.io: Submissions to Quantum Wheel, Quantum Game Jam of 2019. https: //itch.io/jam/quantum-wheel/entries. Accessed 19 June 2024

    2019

  93. [104]

    Master’s thesis, Department of Computing, University of Turku (2024)

    Piispanen, L.: Developing quantum games, quantum art and simulation tools for exploring quantum physics. Master’s thesis, Department of Computing, University of Turku (2024)

    2024

  94. [105]

    In: Academic Mindtrek 2021, pp

    Kultima, A., Piispanen, L., Junnila, M.: Quantum game jam – making games with quantum physicists. In: Academic Mindtrek 2021, pp. 134–144. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2021)

    2021

  95. [107]

    Ramzan, R., Reid, A.: The importance of game jams in seri- ous games. (2016). https://rke.abertay.ac.uk/en/publications/ the-importance-of-game-jams-in-serious-games

    2016

  96. [108]

    In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation Events

    Abbott, D., Chatzifoti, O., Ferguson, J., Louchart, S., Stals, S.: Serious ’slow’ game jam - a game jam model for serious game design. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation Events. ICGJ ’23, pp. 28–36. Association for Co...

    2023

  97. [109]

    Sabrina Maniscalco (U

    meQuanics: Meet the meQuanics - E27 - Prof. Sabrina Maniscalco (U. Turku). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RE0uWNcmhBM. Accessed 13th Decem- ber 2023 (2016) 25

    2016

  98. [110]

    In: 2023 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), pp

    Piispanen, L.J.: Designing quantum games and quantum art for exploring quan- tum physics. In: 2023 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), pp. 1–8 (2023). IEEE

    2023

  99. [111]

    https://gitlab.utu.fi/matros/quantum-black-box

    Rossi, M.: Quantum Black Box, a numerical simulator developed for citi- zen science game prototyping. https://gitlab.utu.fi/matros/quantum-black-box. Accessed 21st December 2023

    2023

  100. [112]

    http://quantum.garden (2018)

    QuantumGarden: Quantum Garden is an interactive art installation demonstrat- ing key concepts of quantum physics. http://quantum.garden (2018)

    2018

  101. [113]

    Education Sciences 11(11), 699 (2021)

    Bitzenbauer, P.: Quantum physics education research over the last two decades: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences 11(11), 699 (2021)

    2021

  102. [114]

    meQuanics: Meet the meQuanics - E08 - Assoc. Prof. Jacob Sher- son (Aarhus University). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLmLdET PhI. Accessed 13th December 2023 (2016)

    2016

  103. [115]

    Quantum 2, 79 (2018) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

    Preskill, J.: Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

    2018 doi

  104. [116]

    The Science of Citizen Science 183 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4

    Franzen, M., Kloetzer, L., Ponti, M., Trojan, J., Vicens, J.: Machine learning in citizen science: Promises and implications. The Science of Citizen Science 183 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4

    2021 doi

  105. [117]

    arXiv (2021) arXiv:2104.14961 [cs.HC]

    Rafner, J., Gajdacz, M., Kragh, G., Hjorth, A., Gander, A., Palfi, B., Berditchevskaia, A., Grey, F., Gal, K., Segal, A., et al.: Revisiting citizen science through the lens of hybrid intelligence. arXiv (2021) arXiv:2104.14961 [cs.HC]

    2021 arXiv

  106. [118]

    Human Computation 9(1), 66–95 (2022) https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v9i1.133

    Rafner, J., Gajdacz, M., Kragh, G., Hjorth, A., Gander, A., Palfi, B., Berditchevskiaia, A., Grey, F., Gal, K., Segal, A., Wamsley, M., Miller, J., Dellermann, D., Haklay, M., Michelucci, P., Sherson, J.: Mapping citizen science through the lens of human-centered ai. Human Com...

    2022 doi

  107. [119]

    In: HHAI, pp

    Sherson, J.F., Rabecq, B., Dellermann, D., Rafner, J.: A multi-dimensional development and deployment framework for hybrid intelligence. In: HHAI, pp. 429–432 (2023)

    2023

  108. [120]

    Master’s thesis, Aalto Univer- sity

    Archer, N.: Visual design of quantum physics – Lessons learned from nine gamified and artistic quantum physics projects. Master’s thesis, Aalto Univer- sity. School of Arts, Design and Architecture (2022). http://urn.fi/URN:NBN: fi:aalto-202301291591

    2022

  109. [121]

    https://medium

    Ashoori, M.: Designing a Quantum Computing Board Game. https://medium. com/design-ibm/designing-a-quantum-computing-board-game-de4a450cad8c. Accessed 21st December 2023 (2018) 26

    2018

  110. [122]

    https://entanglion.github.io/

    Weisz, J.D., Ashoori, M., Ashktorab, Z.: Entanglion: A Board Game for Teaching the Principles of Quantum Computing. https://entanglion.github.io/. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242696

  111. [123]

    https://medium.com/qiskit/ how-to-program-a-quantum-computer-982a9329ed02

    Wootton, J.R.: How to program a quantum computer - How to make Battleships from quantum NOT gates. https://medium.com/qiskit/ how-to-program-a-quantum-computer-982a9329ed02. Accessed 13th December 2023 (2017)

    2017

  112. [124]

    arXiv (2019) arXiv:1910.08238 [quant-ph]

    Becker, K.: Flying unicorn: Developing a game for a quantum computer. arXiv (2019) arXiv:1910.08238 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  113. [125]

    https://youtu.be/V Aw10rGT6jM? feature=shared

    Wootton, J.R.: Create a Quantum Game. https://youtu.be/V Aw10rGT6jM? feature=shared. Accessed 20th April 2024

    2024

  114. [126]

    Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, Massachusetts (2004)

    Kirk, D.E.: Optimal Control Theory: an Introduction. Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, Massachusetts (2004)

    2004

  115. [127]

    Educational Studies in Mathematics 75, 107–130 (2010) 27

    Malaspina, U., Font, V.: The role of intuition in the solving of optimization problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics 75, 107–130 (2010) 27

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.