Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What changes when you randomly choose BPE merge operations? Not much

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.03029 v1 pith:AMPZEUNN submitted 2023-05-04 cs.CL cs.AI

What changes when you randomly choose BPE merge operations? Not much

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords mergeoperationsstandardtasktranslationvariantsaffectsalthough
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce three simple randomized variants of byte pair encoding (BPE) and explore whether randomizing the selection of merge operations substantially affects a downstream machine translation task. We focus on translation into morphologically rich languages, hypothesizing that this task may show sensitivity to the method of choosing subwords. Analysis using a Bayesian linear model indicates that two of the variants perform nearly indistinguishably compared to standard BPE while the other degrades performance less than we anticipated. We conclude that although standard BPE is widely used, there exists an interesting universe of potential variations on it worth investigating. Our code is available at: https://github.com/bltlab/random-bpe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.