REVIEW 1 cited by
Fine-tuning vs Prompting, Can Language Models Understand Human Values?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Fine-tuning vs Prompting, Can Language Models Understand Human Values?
read the original abstract
Accurately handling the underlying support values in sentences is crucial for understanding the speaker's tendencies, yet it poses a challenging task in natural language understanding (NLU). In this article, we explore the potential of fine-tuning and prompt tuning in this downstream task, using the Human Value Detection 2023. Additionally, we attempt to validate whether models can effectively solve the problem based on the knowledge acquired during the pre-training stage. Simultaneously, our interest lies in the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) aligned with RLHF in this task, and some preliminary attempts are presented.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond Independent Labels: Schwartz-Geometry Decoding for Human Value Detection
A Schwartz-aware energy decoder improves theory-coherent label sets on 19 refined values at no F1 cost, while training-time geometry and LLM prompting do not match it.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.