Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

TIMER: Temporal Instruction Modeling and Evaluation for Longitudinal Clinical Records

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04176 v1 pith:AQNQPNG3 submitted 2025-03-06 cs.AI cs.CEcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CEcs.CLcs.LG
keywords longitudinaltemporalrecordsclinicalevaluationinstructionllmsreasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting in medical tasks, yet processing Electronic Health Records (EHRs) presents unique challenges due to their longitudinal nature. While LLMs' capabilities to perform medical tasks continue to improve, their ability to reason over temporal dependencies across multiple patient visits and time frames remains unexplored. We introduce TIMER (Temporal Instruction Modeling and Evaluation for Longitudinal Clinical Records), a framework that incorporate instruction-response pairs grounding to different parts of a patient's record as a critical dimension in both instruction evaluation and tuning for longitudinal clinical records. We develop TIMER-Bench, the first time-aware benchmark that evaluates temporal reasoning capabilities over longitudinal EHRs, as well as TIMER-Instruct, an instruction-tuning methodology for LLMs to learn reasoning over time. We demonstrate that models fine-tuned with TIMER-Instruct improve performance by 7.3% on human-generated benchmarks and 9.2% on TIMER-Bench, indicating that temporal instruction-tuning improves model performance for reasoning over EHR.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLIR-Bench shows generalist and time-series LLMs struggle to ground clinical answers in sparse irregular ICU evidence, with top accuracy near 50% and weak causal evidence use.

  2. Traj-CoA: Patient Trajectory Modeling via Chain-of-Agents for Lung Cancer Risk Prediction

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Traj-CoA is a multi-agent LLM framework that sequentially processes noisy five-year EHR data via worker agents into EHRMem for manager-agent lung cancer risk prediction and outperforms four categories of baselines in ...

  3. Reasoning LLMs in the Medical Domain: A Literature Survey

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject

    A literature review of reasoning-LLM techniques for medicine, from CoT prompting to RL-trained medical models, with no new experiments and several placeholder citations.

Pith tools