Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ML4PhySim : Machine Learning for Physical Simulations Challenge (The airfoil design)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.01623 v1 pith:ARCYUJ3U submitted 2024-03-03 cs.LG cs.CE

classification cs.LGcs.CE
keywords physicallearningcompetitionevaluationairfoilcalledcriteriadesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of machine learning (ML) techniques to solve complex physical problems has been considered recently as a promising approach. However, the evaluation of such learned physical models remains an important issue for industrial use. The aim of this competition is to encourage the development of new ML techniques to solve physical problems using a unified evaluation framework proposed recently, called Learning Industrial Physical Simulations (LIPS). We propose learning a task representing a well-known physical use case: the airfoil design simulation, using a dataset called AirfRANS. The global score calculated for each submitted solution is based on three main categories of criteria covering different aspects, namely: ML-related, Out-Of-Distribution, and physical compliance criteria. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first competition addressing the use of ML-based surrogate approaches to improve the trade-off computational cost/accuracy of physical simulation.The competition is hosted by the Codabench platform with online training and evaluation of all submitted solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NeurIPS 2024 ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A retrospective of the ML4CFD competition shows a Gaussian-process-based entry outranking deep learning models and the OpenFOAM solver on a tailored multi-criteria score.

Pith tools