pith. sign in

arxiv: 1803.04792 · v4 · pith:AT26H3QBnew · submitted 2018-03-10 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CV· cs.SE

Testing Deep Neural Networks

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CVcs.SE
keywords testcriteriadnnscoveragedeepgeneratednetworksneural
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have a wide range of applications, and software employing them must be thoroughly tested, especially in safety-critical domains. However, traditional software test coverage metrics cannot be applied directly to DNNs. In this paper, inspired by the MC/DC coverage criterion, we propose a family of four novel test criteria that are tailored to structural features of DNNs and their semantics. We validate the criteria by demonstrating that the generated test inputs guided via our proposed coverage criteria are able to capture undesired behaviours in a DNN. Test cases are generated using a symbolic approach and a gradient-based heuristic search. By comparing them with existing methods, we show that our criteria achieve a balance between their ability to find bugs (proxied using adversarial examples) and the computational cost of test case generation. Our experiments are conducted on state-of-the-art DNNs obtained using popular open source datasets, including MNIST, CIFAR-10 and ImageNet.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. testRNN: Coverage-guided Testing on Recurrent Neural Networks

    cs.NE 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    testRNN is the first coverage-guided testing tool for LSTMs that uses mutation-based test generation and three novel structural coverage metrics to evaluate network robustness.