pith. sign in

arxiv: 1405.7661 · v1 · pith:AU7SQ4DNnew · submitted 2014-05-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.chem-ph

Why do nanotubes grow chiral?

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.chem-ph
keywords growthcarboncatalystchiralchiralitynanotubesnear-armchairpreference
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNT) hold enormous technological promise. It can only be harnessed if one controls in a practical way the CNT chirality, the feature of the tubular carbon topology that governs all the CNT properties---electronic, optical, mechanical. Experiments in catalytic growth over the last decade have repeatedly revealed a puzzling strong preference towards minimally-chiral (near-armchair) CNT, challenging any existing hypotheses and turning chirality control ever more tantalizing yet leaving its understanding elusive. Here we combine the CNT/catalyst interface thermodynamics with the kinetic growth theory to show that the unusual near-armchair peaks emerge from the two antagonistic trends: energetic preference towards achiral CNT/catalyst interfaces vs. faster growth of chiral CNT. This narrow distribution is profoundly related with the peaked behavior of a simple function, x*exp(-x).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.