Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 14 references

The paper claims that optimized kilopixel silicon lenslet arrays for PRIMA's FIRESS spectrometer now meet fabrication, anti-reflection coating, and bonding requirements at the two extreme spectral bands, ready for cryogenic optical testing.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:20 UTC pith:AUOFB3HS

load-bearing objection A solid, metrology-backed fabrication and bonding advance for PRIMA lenslets; the 14% optical gain claim and the 5 K-to-120 mK material extrapolation are the soft spots that need shoring up. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2511.10773 v2 pith:AUOFB3HS submitted 2025-11-13 astro-ph.IM

Optimization of lenslet arrays for PRIMA Kinetic Inductance Detectors

Sumit Dahal , Thomas R. Stevenson , Nicholas P. Costen , Nat DeNigris , Jason Glenn , Gang Hu , Christine A. Jhabvala , Ricardo Morales-Sanchez
show 5 more authors
Jessica B. Patel Manuel A. Quijada Ian Schrock Frederick H. Wang Edward J. Wollack
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords PRIMAFIRESSkinetic inductance detectorslenslet arraysgrayscale lithographydeep reactive ion etchingParylene-C anti-reflection coatingepoxy bonding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Optimized silicon lenslet arrays for PRIMA's FIRESS spectrometer now meet the instrument's fabrication, anti-reflection coating, and bonding requirements at the two extreme wavelength bands. The key improvement is a fabrication model that accounts for 65–75 percent isotropic etching, allowing compensated resist profiles that yield deeper, wider lenses and hexagonal-corner shapes that collect about 14 percent more optical power. The paper also shows stepped-thickness Parylene-C coatings matched to the spectrometer dispersion and epoxy bond layers under 1 µm for the short-wavelength band and 1–4 µm for the long-wavelength band, keeping coupling losses below 5 percent. If these results hold, the kilopixel lenslet arrays are ready to bond to detector arrays and proceed to cryogenic optical testing, with the two intermediate FIRESS bands expected to follow by interpolation.

Core claim

The central claim is that the combination of lateral-etch-compensated grayscale lithography, quarter-wave Parylene-C anti-reflection coatings, and thin epoxy bonding now satisfies PRIMA's requirements for both FIRESS Band 1 (24–43 µm) and Band 4 (130–235 µm). Profilometry shows lens-profile residuals below 0.9 µm for Band 1 dies, and the redesigned Band 4 lenses with hexagonal corners direct approximately 14 percent more optical power to the detectors than the previous circular lenses. FTS measurements at 5 K give a Parylene-C refractive index of 1.66–1.68, setting AR-coating thicknesses of about 5 µm and 28 µm for Bands 1 and 4, and the same measurements establish epoxy thickness thresholds

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a modified grayscale-lithography and deep reactive ion etching process in which the etch is modeled as 65–75 percent isotropic, so an initial photoresist profile is deliberately over-deepened at larger radii to compensate for lateral etching. This correction is what allows deep lenses with hexagonal corners to be etched into thin dies. Around it sit two auxiliary mechanisms: quarter-wave Parylene-C anti-reflection coatings, stepped in thickness along the array to follow the spectrometer's dispersion, and an epoxy bonding process using a flip-chip bonder with modeled bond force to hold the adhesive layer thin enough to stay inside a 5 percent coupling-loss budget

Load-bearing premise

The whole thickness budget rests on assuming that the optical properties of Parylene-C and Epo-Tek 301 measured at 5 K are identical at the 120 mK operating temperature, and that the two extreme-band designs interpolate cleanly to the two intermediate FIRESS bands; neither assumption is directly validated in the paper.

What would settle it

Cool free-standing Parylene-C and Epo-Tek 301 films to 120 mK and remeasure their far-infrared transmission with an FTS; if the extracted refractive index or absorption differs from the 5 K values by more than the design tolerance, the reported AR-coating thicknesses and 1 µm/6 µm bond thresholds would no longer meet the 5 percent loss requirement.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Band 1 and Band 4 lenslet arrays can now be bonded to KID arrays and tested at cryogenic temperatures with the expectation that the as-fabricated optics meet PRIMA's requirements.
  • The same fabrication process can be applied to the remaining FIRESS bands and to PRIMA Imager lenslets, since the two extreme bands bound the parameter space.
  • The 14 percent gain in collected optical power from hexagonal-corner lenses, combined with lower stray light, directly improves spectrometer sensitivity if reproduced in bonded arrays.
  • Stepped-thickness AR coatings should let each FIRESS band maintain near-peak transmission across its full 1.8:1 wavelength range.
  • The measured bond thicknesses (<1 µm for Band 1, 1–4 µm for Band 4) make the 5 percent loss requirement achievable for both extreme bands.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: A direct measurement of Parylene-C and Epo-Tek 301 optical constants at 120 mK, not just 5 K, would test the main extrapolation; if the refractive index shifts by even a few percent, the optimum AR thicknesses and loss thresholds would move.
  • Inference: The 'straightforward interpolation' to FIRESS Bands 2 and 3 is asserted but not shown; a validation run with band-center test lenses would confirm whether the two extreme designs truly bound the intermediate ones.
  • Inference: The 14 percent optical-power gain is based on geometry; a before-and-after measurement of optical efficiency of circular versus hexagonal-corner lenslets on a bonded KID array would put the number on firmer footing.
  • Inference: If the 5 percent bond-loss budget is later tightened after system-level error budgeting, the demonstrated <1 µm Band 1 bond thickness leaves little margin, so the process may need re-optimization for any more stringent requirement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports process refinements for the fabrication, anti-reflection (AR) coating, and bonding of monolithic silicon lenslet arrays for the PRIMA FIRESS instrument. The authors focus on the two extreme spectral bands (Band 1: 24–43 µm and Band 4: 130–235 µm). They describe a grayscale lithography and DRIE process with lateral etch compensation that enables deeper and wider lenses, including hexagonal-corner designs. For Band 1 they report profilometry residuals <0.9 µm; for Band 4 they show SEM/3D-profilometry images of the improved lens shape. They present FTS measurements at 5 K of Parylene-C and Epo-Tek 301, from which they derive AR-coating thicknesses (5 µm and 28 µm) and epoxy bond-thickness thresholds (<1 µm and <6 µm). Destructive bond metrology yields 1–4 µm for Band 4 and <1 µm for Band 1 dies, claimed to meet PRIMA requirements. Stepped-thickness AR coatings are demonstrated on a two-level test wafer, and a 28-µm Parylene-C coating survives 10 thermal cycles between 77 K and 323 K. The paper concludes that the optimized arrays for the two extreme bands are ready for bonding and cryogenic optical testing, with intermediate bands expected to follow by interpolation.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a valuable engineering contribution: it shows a practical route to kilopixel, monolithic silicon lenslet arrays for background-limited far-infrared KID spectrometers, with quantified fabrication tolerances, material characterization, and bonding metrology. The paper provides concrete data on profilometry residuals, destructive bond-thickness measurements, thermal cycling, and FTS-derived material transmission. The lateral-etch compensation and hexagonal-corner lens design are plausible and potentially transferable to other FIR/THz instruments. However, two load-bearing elements are not directly demonstrated: the 14% optical-power gain from the hexagonal-corner lenses is asserted without simulation or measurement, and the extrapolation of 5-K FTS material data to the 120-mK operating temperature is unvalidated. These do not invalidate the fabrication results but weaken the 'meets PRIMA requirements' conclusion. The paper is well within the scope of IEEE TAS and will be of interest to the detector and instrumentation community.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III (last paragraph)] The claim that the upgraded hexagonal-corner lenses 'direct ≈14% more optical power to the detectors' is presented as a quantitative result, but no derivation, simulation setup, ray-trace output, or measured throughput comparison is given. This number is load-bearing for the stated efficiency increase and for the value of the redesign. Please provide the supporting optical model (including the assumed focal-plane illumination, lens geometry, and absorber size) or a direct measurement, or adjust the claim to reflect an estimate based on geometric area only.
  2. [Sections IV and V (FTS extrapolation)] The FTS measured at a 5 K bath temperature are stated (Section IV) to represent the material's optical properties at the PRIMA operating temperature of 120 mK. This extrapolation is not justified. The AR-coating thicknesses (5 µm and 28 µm) and the bond-loss thresholds (<1 µm and <6 µm) are directly derived from these data. If the complex dielectric function of Parylene-C or epoxy changes between 5 K and 120 mK (e.g., from two-level systems or low-frequency phonon absorption), the coating and bond thickness requirements could shift, and the conclusion that the measured bond thicknesses 'meet the PRIMA requirements' would be insecure. Please provide a concrete argument for temperature insensitivity, low-temperature validation data, or quantitative uncertainty bounds on the FTS fits and their propagation to the thickness budgets.
  3. [Section III, Band 4 profile accuracy] Quantitative profile residuals are reported only for Band 1 (RMS <0.9 µm in Figure 2). For Band 4, the improved lens shape is shown in SEM and 3D profilometry, but no numerical comparison of the etched profile to the design (e.g., RMS residual, maximum deviation) is given. Since the paper claims the fabrication process meets FIRESS requirements for the extreme bands, and Band 4 required the lateral-etch compensation, the absence of a quantitative Band 4 profile error leaves the requirement verification incomplete. Please include a measured residual map or table for the Band 4 lenses.
  4. [Section V, bond-loss calculation] The derivation of the '5% loss' bond-thickness thresholds is not shown. The text states 'we calculated' and gives the resulting values (<1 µm for Band 1, <6 µm for Band 4) without presenting the model, the fringe- or absorption- loss formulation, or the material optical constants used. Because these thresholds are the basis for declaring the measured bond thicknesses compliant, please provide the calculation in sufficient detail to allow reproduction, or cite a publication containing it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II] The statement that intermediate-band designs 'are expected to be relatively straightforward interpolations' is an assertion. Since the paper's title and abstract focus on PRIMA FIRESS generally, please either show a basis for this expectation (e.g., similarity of the two extreme designs) or explicitly cap the claim to Bands 1 and 4.
  2. [Section IV] The complex dielectric function fit is deferred to 'Wollack et al., in prep.' which is not accessible for review. At minimum, give the retrieved values of n and k (or loss tangent) and the uncertainty, so that the thickness calculations are reproducible.
  3. [Figure 4] No error bars or measurement uncertainties are shown on the FTS transmission spectra. Adding typical uncertainty envelopes (including thickness uncertainty of the free-standing samples) would strengthen the derived thickness budgets.
  4. [Abstract and Section IV] The abstract says 'demonstrate stepped-thickness AR-coatings to achieve high efficiency across broad wavelength ranges,' but the demonstration is a two-thickness test wafer, not a full four-step coating on a kilo-pixel array, and no optical efficiency measurement is reported. Please qualify the claim to 'process demonstration' and note that the final four-step arrays are under fabrication.
  5. [Section V] The destructive bond-thickness measurements are reported as ranges ('1–4 µm' for Band 4, '<1 µm' for Band 1) without stating the number of dies/locations measured or the measurement uncertainty. Adding this information would allow readers to judge the uniformity and reliability of the metrology.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: every load-bearing result is a direct measurement or comparison to an independently derived threshold; the 5K-to-120mK extrapolation is a correctness risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing results are direct measurements: profilometry residuals against design (Figure 2), SEM and 3D profilometry of etch depth (Figure 3), FTS spectra of free-standing Parylene-C and Epo-Tek 301 samples (Figure 4), and destructive sectioning to measure epoxy bond thickness (Section V). The etch-compensation model is fitted to etch data, but the claim that the process meets FIRESS requirements is validated by comparing final as-fabricated lens profiles to design, which is an independent check rather than a prediction from the fitted parameters. The AR-coating thicknesses and epoxy bond-thickness thresholds are computed from measured FTS transmission using standard quarter-wave and transmission-loss relations; the reported bond thicknesses are then compared to those thresholds, not generated by the same fit. Citations to [4] supply baseline process background and prior observations such as the lateral etching effect, but the present paper's conclusions do not reduce to [4] because the outcomes are measured here. The 5 K-to-120 mK extrapolation of material optical properties and the asserted interpolation to Bands 2 and 3 are unvalidated assumptions and correctness risks, but they are assumptions, not results equivalent to their inputs by construction. Therefore no circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central engineering claims rest on measured material properties (Parylene-C, Epo-Tek 301), a fitted etch model, and standard thin-film optics. No new physical entities are introduced. The main ledger items are the 65–75% isotropic etch split, the measured refractive index, and the unvalidated 5 K-to-120 mK extrapolation.

free parameters (3)
  • Isotropic etch fraction = 65–75%
    Section II: fit to etch data models total etch rate as 65–75% isotropic plus the remainder anisotropic; this split drives the resist-profile compensation that allows deep Band 4 lenses with hexagonal corners.
  • Parylene-C refractive index n(λ) = 1.66–1.68
    Section IV: extracted by fitting FTS transmission of a 30 µm free-standing sample at 5 K; sets AR-coating thickness d=λ/(4n) for Band 1 and Band 4. Material characterization rather than ad hoc tuning, but a fitted value not independently reproduced here.
  • Epoxy bond force / thickness target = <1 µm (Band 1), 1–4 µm (Band 4)
    Section V: bond forces and viscous-flow/elastic simulations chosen so epoxy absorption and reflection loss stays below 5%; thresholds derived from FTS data on Epo-Tek 301.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption FTS optical properties of Parylene-C and Epo-Tek 301 at 5 K equal the properties at 120 mK.
    Section IV states the equivalence explicitly; no cryogenic measurement below 5 K is provided. Load-bearing for AR-coating and bond-loss budgets.
  • standard math Quarter-wave AR-coating condition d=λ/(4n) is sufficient to compute near-unity transmission for the Parylene-C/silicon interface across each band.
    Standard thin-film optics; the paper uses it to set coating thicknesses.
  • domain assumption The 65–75% isotropic-plus-anisotropic etch model describes grayscale/DRIE transfer at all radii including hexagonal corners.
    Section II introduces this process model; it is fitted to etch data and used to design the compensating resist profile, and is only qualitatively validated by SEM/profilometry.
  • ad hoc to paper FIRESS Band 2 and Band 3 lenslet designs can be obtained by straightforward interpolation from Band 1 and Band 4.
    Section II asserts interpolation without demonstration; load-bearing for the claim that all four FIRESS bands are covered.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 7929 in / 12421 out tokens · 106672 ms · 2026-08-03T22:20:37.050875+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The PRobe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics (PRIMA) is a cryogenically cooled 1.8-m space telescope designed to address fundamental questions about the evolution of galactic ecosystems, the origins of planetary atmospheres, and the buildup of dust and metals over cosmic time. PRIMA will achieve unprecedented sensitivity in the 24 - 261 $\mu$m wavelength range, enabled by background-limited kinetic inductance detectors (KIDs) cooled to 120 mK. For PRIMA's Far-InfraRed Enhanced Survey Spectrometer (FIRESS) instrument, we have developed monolithic kilopixel silicon lenslet arrays to efficiently couple incident radiation from the telescope's fore-optics onto the KID absorber elements. These three-dimensional lenslet arrays are fabricated using grayscale lithography, followed by deep reactive ion etching (DRIE), and are anti-reflection (AR) coated with a quarter-wavelength thick deposition of Parylene-C. The lenslet arrays are aligned and bonded to the KID arrays using a thin layer of epoxy through a flip-chip bonder. In this work, we report on the optimized fabrication, lens design, AR coating, and bonding processes developed for the FIRESS lenslet arrays. We characterize brassboard lenslet arrays fabricated to meet the specifications of the FIRESS low and high spectral bands, demonstrate stepped-thickness AR-coatings to achieve high efficiency across broad wavelength ranges, and present spectral transmission measurements of the AR coating and the epoxy bonding layers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.10773 by Christine A. Jhabvala, Edward J. Wollack, Frederick H. Wang, Gang Hu, Ian Schrock, Jason Glenn, Jessica B. Patel, Manuel A. Quijada, Nat DeNigris, Nicholas P. Costen, Ricardo Morales-Sanchez, Sumit Dahal, Thomas R. Stevenson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top: Illustration of PRIMA lenslet-detector array configuration. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Profilometer measurements of a FIRESS Band 1 array. The top plot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The two prominent absorption lines lie safely below [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top: Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a FIRESS Band 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Measured spectral transmission for free-standing Epo-Tek 301 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    PRIMA: the probe far-infrared mission for astrophysics,

    J. Glenn, M. Meixner, C. M. Bradford, K. M. Pontoppidan, E. A. Pope, T. Kataria, E. Luthman, M. C. Foote, M. B. Johnson, M. Cannella, A. M. Didion, R. Dissly, J. M. Rocca, J. K. Ziemer, L. Armus, J. Baselmans, C. Battersby, A. Bolatto, D. Burgarella, L. Ciesla, A. M. D. Giorgio, C. Gruppioni, T. Henning, O. Krause, B. S. Hensley, W. Jellema, E. Mills, A. ...

    2024

  2. [2]

    A 25-micrometer single-photon-sensitive kinetic inductance detector,

    P. K. Day, N. F. Cothard, C. Albert, L. Foote, E. Kane, B. H. Eom, R. Basu Thakur, R. M. J. Janssen, A. Beyer, P. M. Echternach, S. van Berkel, S. Hailey-Dunsheath, T. R. Stevenson, S. Dabironezare, J. J. A. Baselmans, J. Glenn, C. M. Bradford, and H. G. Leduc, “A 25-micrometer single-photon-sensitive kinetic inductance detector,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 14, p...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.041005 2024

  3. [3]

    Demonstration of ultrasensitive kids for future thz space borne polarimeters,

    S. J. C. Yates, A. P. Laguna, W. Jellema, E. Castillo-Dominguez, L. Ferrari, B. Lap, V . Murugesan, J. R. G. Silva, D. Thoen, I. Veenendaal, and J. J. A. Baselmans, “Demonstration of ultrasensitive kids for future thz space borne polarimeters,”IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 558–565, 2025. [Online]. Available: ht...

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Monolithic silicon microlens arrays for far-infrared astrophysics,

    N. F. Cothard, T. Stevenson, J. Mateo, N. Costen, K. Denis, J. Perido, I. Schrock, F. Wang, and J. Glenn, “Monolithic silicon microlens arrays for far-infrared astrophysics,” Appl. Opt., vol. 63, no. 6, p. 1481, Feb

  5. [5]

    The far-infrared enhanced survey spectrometer (FIRESS) for PRIMA,

    C. M. Bradford, J. Glenn, M. Meixner, K. Pontoppidan, A. Kogut, A. Pope, W. Jellema, J. Baselmans, D. Naylor, R. Janssen, S. Hailey- Dunsheath, P. Echternach, P. Day, H. LeDuc, N. Cothard, T. Stevenson, M. Foote, C. D. Dowell, J. McGuire, M. Rodgers, T. S. Pagano, L. M. Foote, E. Kane, and C. Albert, “The far-infrared enhanced survey spectrometer (FIRESS)...

    2024

  6. [6]

    PRIMA: PRIMAger, a far infrared hyperspectral and polarimetric instrument,

    L. Ciesla, D. Burgarella, C. D. Dowell, M. Sauvage, J. Baselmans, C. M. Bradford, L. Ferrari, J. Floriot, J. Glenn, M. J. Griffin, W. Jellema, E. Luthman, L. Martin, T. Pamplona, ´E. Prieto, T. Prouv ´e, J. Staguhn, and C. Tucker, “PRIMA: PRIMAger, a far infrared hyperspectral and polarimetric instrument,” inSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Opti...

    2024

  7. [7]

    Feedhorn development and scalability for Simons Observatory and beyond,

    S. M. Simon, J. E. Golec, A. Ali, J. Austermann, J. A. Beall, S. M. M. Bruno, S. K. Choi, K. T. Crowley, S. Dicker, B. Dober, S. M. Duff, E. Healy, C. A. Hill, S.-P. P. Ho, J. Hubmayr, Y . Li, M. Lungu, J. McMahon, J. Orlowski-Scherer, M. Salatino, S. Staggs, E. J. Wollack, Z. Xu, and N. Zhu, “Feedhorn development and scalability for Simons Observatory an...

    2018

  8. [8]

    Design and testing of kinetic inductance detector package for the terahertz intensity mapper,

    L. J. Liu, R. M. J. Janssen, C. M. Bradford, S. Hailey-Dunsheath, J. P. Filippini, J. E. Aguirre, J. S. Bracks, A. J. Corso, J. Fu, C. Groppi, J. Hoh, R. P. Keenan, I. N. Lowe, D. P. Marrone, P. Mauskopf, R. Nie, J. Redford, I. Trumper, and J. D. Vieira, “Design and testing of kinetic inductance detector package for the terahertz intensity mapper,” inMill...

    2022

  9. [9]

    Dual- polarized sinuous antennas on extended hemispherical silicon lenses,

    J. M. Edwards, R. O’Brient, A. T. Lee, and G. M. Rebeiz, “Dual- polarized sinuous antennas on extended hemispherical silicon lenses,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 4082–4091, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP. 2012.2207048

    arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Flat Low-Loss Silicon Gradient Index Lens for Millimeter and Submillimeter Wavelengths,

    F. Defrance, C. Jung-Kubiak, S. Rahiminejad, T. Macioce, J. Sayers, J. Connors, S. J. E. Radford, G. Chattopadhyay, and S. R. Golwala, “Flat Low-Loss Silicon Gradient Index Lens for Millimeter and Submillimeter Wavelengths,”Journal of Low Temperature Physics, vol. 199, no. 1-2, pp. 376–383, Apr. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-01...

    work page doi:10.1007/s10909-019-02255-x 2020

  11. [11]

    Development of a deep silicon phase fresnel lens using gray-scale lithography and deep reactive ion etching,

    B. Morgan, C. Waits, J. Krizmanic, and R. Ghodssi, “Development of a deep silicon phase fresnel lens using gray-scale lithography and deep reactive ion etching,”Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2003.823220

    arXiv 2004

  12. [12]

    Compensated aspect ratio dependent etching (carde) using gray-scale technology,

    B. Morgan, C. M. Waits, and R. Ghodssi, “Compensated aspect ratio dependent etching (carde) using gray-scale technology,”Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 85–94, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2004.09.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mee.2004.09.004 2005

  13. [13]

    Design and simulation of comb-drive actuators incorporating gray-scale technology for tailored actuation characteristics,

    B. Morgan and R. Ghodssi, “Design and simulation of comb-drive actuators incorporating gray-scale technology for tailored actuation characteristics,” inSmart Sensors, Actuators, and MEMS II, C. Cane, J.-C. Chiao, and F. V . Verdu, Eds., vol. 5836, International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2005, pp. 468 – 476. [Online]. Available: https://doi.o...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.608529 2005

  14. [2024]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.510409

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.510409

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.510409