Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Policy-Based Bayesian Experimental Design for Non-Differentiable Implicit Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.04272 v1 pith:AWCH7RID submitted 2022-03-08 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ME

Policy-Based Bayesian Experimental Design for Non-Differentiable Implicit Models

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ME
keywords designexperimentalexperimentsimplicitmodelspriorrl-dadbayesian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

For applications in healthcare, physics, energy, robotics, and many other fields, designing maximally informative experiments is valuable, particularly when experiments are expensive, time-consuming, or pose safety hazards. While existing approaches can sequentially design experiments based on prior observation history, many of these methods do not extend to implicit models, where simulation is possible but computing the likelihood is intractable. Furthermore, they often require either significant online computation during deployment or a differentiable simulation system. We introduce Reinforcement Learning for Deep Adaptive Design (RL-DAD), a method for simulation-based optimal experimental design for non-differentiable implicit models. RL-DAD extends prior work in policy-based Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) by reformulating it as a Markov Decision Process with a reward function based on likelihood-free information lower bounds, which is used to learn a policy via deep reinforcement learning. The learned design policy maps prior histories to experiment designs offline and can be quickly deployed during online execution. We evaluate RL-DAD and find that it performs competitively with baselines on three benchmarks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FairBED: A Bayesian Experimental Design Approach to Gathering Fairer Data

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FairBED quantifies dataset fairness as uninformative about sensitive attributes and uses fairness-aware BED to gather data yielding better fairness-accuracy trade-offs than random or standard BED acquisition.

  2. Efficient Adaptive Data Acquisition via Pretrained Belief Representations

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    POLAR uses pretrained predictive foundation models as fixed belief-state encoders and trains only a lightweight policy head on top for amortised Bayesian experimental design, optimisation, and active learning.

  3. Constrained Bayesian Experimental Design via Online Planning

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Combines offline amortized pre-training with online scenario-tree planning to optimize constrained Bayesian experimental designs, producing more informative sequences than prior methods.