REVIEW 2 cited by
Calibrating Language Models with Adaptive Temperature Scaling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) is not only measured by their ability to generate accurate outputs but also by their calibration-how well their confidence scores reflect the probability of their outputs being correct. While unsupervised pre-training has been shown to yield LLMs with well-calibrated conditional probabilities, recent studies have shown that after fine-tuning with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), the calibration of these models degrades significantly. In this work, we introduce Adaptive Temperature Scaling (ATS), a post-hoc calibration method that predicts a temperature scaling parameter for each token prediction. The predicted temperature values adapt based on token-level features and are fit over a standard supervised fine-tuning (SFT) dataset. The adaptive nature of ATS addresses the varying degrees of calibration shift that can occur after RLHF fine-tuning. ATS improves calibration by over 10-50% across three downstream natural language evaluation benchmarks compared to prior calibration methods and does not impede performance improvements from RLHF.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
NOVA: NOise-aware Verbal Confidence CAlibration for Robust Large Language Models in RAG Systems
A rule-guided self-generated fine-tuning method reduces verbal confidence miscalibration (ECE) in RAG question-answering by roughly 0.1 absolute across four open-weight models.
-
The Paradox of Stochasticity: Limited Creativity and Computational Decoupling in Temperature-Varied LLM Outputs of Structured Fictional Data
In three LLMs generating fictional names and birthdates, model choice dominates processing time and default name archetypes persist across temperature, while rare names appear mainly at mid-range temperatures.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.