Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Distilling and Retrieving Generalizable Knowledge for Robot Manipulation via Language Corrections

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.10678 v2 pith:B2NGG5DH submitted 2023-11-17 cs.RO cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.LG
keywords correctionsdrocfeedbackhumanknowledgelanguageonlinerespond
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Today's robot policies exhibit subpar performance when faced with the challenge of generalizing to novel environments. Human corrective feedback is a crucial form of guidance to enable such generalization. However, adapting to and learning from online human corrections is a non-trivial endeavor: not only do robots need to remember human feedback over time to retrieve the right information in new settings and reduce the intervention rate, but also they would need to be able to respond to feedback that can be arbitrary corrections about high-level human preferences to low-level adjustments to skill parameters. In this work, we present Distillation and Retrieval of Online Corrections (DROC), a large language model (LLM)-based system that can respond to arbitrary forms of language feedback, distill generalizable knowledge from corrections, and retrieve relevant past experiences based on textual and visual similarity for improving performance in novel settings. DROC is able to respond to a sequence of online language corrections that address failures in both high-level task plans and low-level skill primitives. We demonstrate that DROC effectively distills the relevant information from the sequence of online corrections in a knowledge base and retrieves that knowledge in settings with new task or object instances. DROC outperforms other techniques that directly generate robot code via LLMs by using only half of the total number of corrections needed in the first round and requires little to no corrections after two iterations. We show further results, videos, prompts and code on https://sites.google.com/stanford.edu/droc .

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.

  2. Try Once, Then Optimal: De-Redundified Procedure Memory for Cross-Episode Exploration Amortization

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Object-centric procedure memory amortizes hidden-state exploration across encounters, cutting robot manipulation operations 16–30% at non-regressing success.

  3. iLearnRobot: An Interactive Learning-Based Multi-Modal Robot with Continuous Improvement

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An interactive robot pipeline that clarifies user intent, retrieves past corrected answers, and fine-tunes an MLLM on dialogue history improved accuracy on a 10-bottle medicine recognition task from 28.8% to 71.6%.

Pith tools