Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Figuring out Figures: Using Textual References to Caption Scientific Figures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.11008 v1 pith:B5FY6GXN submitted 2024-06-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords textualfiguremetadatafiguresmodelscibertcaptionsclip
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Figures are essential channels for densely communicating complex ideas in scientific papers. Previous work in automatically generating figure captions has been largely unsuccessful and has defaulted to using single-layer LSTMs, which no longer achieve state-of-the-art performance. In our work, we use the SciCap datasets curated by Hsu et al. and use a variant of a CLIP+GPT-2 encoder-decoder model with cross-attention to generate captions conditioned on the image. Furthermore, we augment our training pipeline by creating a new dataset MetaSciCap that incorporates textual metadata from the original paper relevant to the figure, such as the title, abstract, and in-text references. We use SciBERT to encode the textual metadata and use this encoding alongside the figure embedding. In our experimentation with different models, we found that the CLIP+GPT-2 model performs better when it receives all textual metadata from the SciBERT encoder in addition to the figure, but employing a SciBERT+GPT2 model that uses only the textual metadata achieved optimal performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes AI-for-research work into five tasks, comprehension, survey, discovery, writing, and peer review, and compiles associated tools and benchmarks.

Pith tools