Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 127 references

Black hole radiation at null infinity obeys a grand-canonical second law, and non-thermal Hawking radiation can yield work.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 06:24 UTC pith:B5LAZZZZ

load-bearing objection The Unruh-vacuum payoff rests on an explicitly unproven modular Hamiltonian; the rest of the framework is a credible and useful contribution. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.03356 v2 pith:B5LAZZZZ submitted 2026-01-06 hep-th gr-qc

Black hole thermodynamics at null infinity. Part 2: Open systems, Markovian dynamics and work extraction from non-rotating black holes

Antoine Rignon-Bret , Matthieu Vilatte This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc MSC 83C5781T20 PACS 04.70.Dy
keywords generalized second lawnull infinityUnruh vacuummodular Hamiltonianopen quantum systemsgreybody factorsgrand potentialwork extraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that the thermodynamics of quantum fields on future null infinity is the same physics as an open quantum system coupled to equilibrium reservoirs: choosing a vacuum is choosing a reservoir, and the modular Hamiltonian is a thermodynamic potential. The authors show that the 'extra' terms in the dual generalized second law—chemical-potential and angular-momentum terms—are work contributions, so that non-thermal vacua at null infinity are non-passive states. For the physically relevant Unruh vacuum around Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes, they derive a grand-potential law, ΔM − Ω_H ΔJ − Σ μ Δn − T_H ΔS ≤ 0, where the chemical potentials are fixed by greybody transmission factors. If correct, Hawking radiation is an open, work-extractable resource, and black hole thermodynamics becomes a fully grand-canonical theory. The authors are explicit that a direct algebraic proof of the Unruh modular Hamiltonian is still missing, so the Unruh-vacuum law rests on a stated assumption.

Core claim

The central claim is that the spontaneous evolution of a quantum field at future null infinity is governed by a grand potential rather than a free energy. In the Unruh vacuum—the state produced by gravitational collapse—the one-sided modular Hamiltonian decomposes into a geometric energy term plus chemical-potential terms determined by greybody transmission coefficients; for Kerr an additional angular-momentum term Ω_H ΔJ appears. Monotonicity of relative entropy then yields ΔM − Ω_H ΔJ − Σ μ Δn − T_H ΔS ≤ 0. The same structure shows that the κ_l vacua, being non-thermal, are not passive states: an autonomous engine can lift a load, and the maximum work equals the chemical potential.

What carries the argument

The central object is the one-sided modular Hamiltonian of a vacuum state restricted to the algebra of observables above a cut at future null infinity. It plays the role of a grand-canonical Hamiltonian: a geometric piece tied to Bondi mass plus chemical-potential terms. In the Unruh vacuum those chemical potentials are fixed by the greybody transmission coefficients t_{ωl} (and by Ω_H in Kerr); in the κ_l vacua they are fixed by the effective temperatures κ_l/2π. Monotonicity of relative entropy under algebra restriction turns this Hamiltonian into a decreasing thermodynamic potential, which is what produces the inequality.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Unruh vacuum, restricted to observables at future null infinity, is thermal with respect to the one-sided modular Hamiltonian written in Eqs. (5.15)/(5.49); the paper states that a direct algebraic proof of this is still missing.

What would settle it

Compute the modular Hamiltonian of the Unruh vacuum restricted to the algebra of observables above a cut at future null infinity directly from the asymptotic Weyl algebra; if the resulting chemical potentials differ from μ_{ωl} = T_H ln( |t|^2 / (1 − (1 − |t|^2) e^{−βω}) ), then Eq. (5.58) fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The Unruh-vacuum dual second law takes the explicit grand-potential form ΔM − Ω_H ΔJ − Σ μ Δn − T_H ΔS ≤ 0, with μ fixed by greybody factors.
  • Hawking radiation is not a passive thermal bath: in κ_l vacua, and in the Unruh state, autonomous engines can extract work; the maximum extractable work per mode equals the chemical potential.
  • For Kerr, angular momentum flux appears as a work term, so rotation contributes to the extractable work in the quantum thermodynamic description.
  • The dictionary aligns generalized-second-law proofs at null infinity with Markovian open-system thermodynamics: vacuum equals reservoir, modular Hamiltonian equals thermodynamic potential.
  • This reframes black hole thermodynamics as grand-canonical, with particle and angular-momentum exchange rather than pure heat exchange.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the greybody chemical potentials vary with frequency and angular momentum, the Unruh state at null infinity is effectively a continuum of reservoirs at different temperatures; this suggests Hawking radiation could be harvested by multi-reservoir machines beyond a simple two-qubit engine.
  • The grand-potential form implies that the primary observable for asymptotic observers is a Bondi-mass-based free energy rather than horizon area; a direct test would be to see whether the predicted work bound matches energy extraction from simulated Hawking spectra.
  • If the missing algebraic derivation is completed, the same machinery should extend to charged black holes, where electric work −Φ dQ should appear alongside the angular momentum term.
  • For near-extremal Kerr, the Ω_H m term can dominate and the effective temperature can become negative before backscattering is included; checking the grand-potential inequality against superradiant amplification would be a sharp test.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This is the second part of a two-part series (with [1]) on black hole thermodynamics at null infinity. The paper develops a dictionary between, on one side, open quantum systems with Markovian (Lindblad) dynamics and, on the other, quantum fields on asymptotically null hypersurfaces whose reference state is a vacuum selected by late-time boundary conditions. Sections 2 and 3 recapitulate and interpret the companion paper’s dual generalized second law (GSL), identifying the extra chemical-potential terms with thermodynamic work. Section 4 proposes that the non-thermal κ_l-vacua can drive an autonomous BLPS engine and extract work, with a maximum set by the chemical potential. Section 5 extends the formalism to the Unruh vacuum in Schwarzschild and Kerr backgrounds, obtaining grand-potential-type inequalities, Eq. (5.26) and (5.58), with greybody-factor chemical potentials (5.6) and (5.38), plus an angular-momentum work term in Kerr. The paper explicitly states that the algebraic derivation of the Unruh modular Hamiltonian remains an open problem and that the expression used is formal.

Significance. If the companion paper’s κ_l-vacuum results are taken as established, the dictionary with open quantum thermodynamics is instructive, and the BLPS-engine construction is a concrete, operational illustration of how non-thermal vacuum states at null infinity can yield work. The Unruh-vacuum grand-potential laws would, if proven, be a substantial extension of the dual GSL to physically realistic Hawking radiation, incorporating greybody factors and, in Kerr, angular momentum extraction. The paper is also commendably explicit about what is and is not proven: the summary in Section 2 is clear, the chemical potentials are presented as imported from [73], and the end of Section 5.2 states that a direct derivation from the asymptotic algebra is lacking. However, as it stands the Unruh-vacuum section is a formal extension that inherits its central thermodynamic structure from an assumed KMS property rather than establishing it, and the companion reference [1] is not available to the reader in a verifiable form.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1–5.2, Eq. (5.15)/(5.16), (5.19), (5.26)] The central claim — the dual GSL in the Unruh vacuum — is not derived. The monotonicity inequality (5.19) is a statement about relative entropy in the GNS Hilbert space of the Unruh vacuum; it becomes the charge-flux inequality (5.26) only if the reference state restricted to AI_i is KMS with respect to the one-sided modular Hamiltonian (5.16). The mode computation (5.10)–(5.14) shows that the adapted modes b^ε are normalized and spectrally concentrated near the Killing frequency; it does not show that the restricted state is thermal under the flow generated by (5.16). The manuscript itself states at the end of §5.2 that deriving the dual GSL directly from the asymptotic algebra AI_i remains an open problem and that the modular Hamiltonian is formal. Without the KMS property, (5.19) and (5.58) are conjectural. A direct check of the KMS condition on the restricted two-point function at I^
  2. [§5.1–5.2, Eq. (5.6)/(5.38), (5.16)/(5.50), (5.24)/(5.56)] There is a circularity in the Unruh-vacuum construction: the chemical potentials μ_ωl (and μ_ωlm) are taken from the earlier effective computation in [73] and inserted by hand into the formal modular operator (5.7)/(5.49) and modular Hamiltonian (5.16)/(5.50). The balance relation (5.24)/(5.56) — ΔM − Ω_H ΔJ − Σ μ Δn = T_H ΔS — is then exactly the relation that defines those chemical potentials. The resulting grand-potential inequality therefore largely reproduces the input assumption. To claim a derivation, the chemical potentials should follow from the modular Hamiltonian computed from the asymptotic algebra, or at least from a self-contained KMS analysis. As it stands, the section is best described as a consistency check of the framework of [73] in the present algebraic language.
  3. [References, [1]; also §2] The paper depends heavily on the companion paper [1] for the proofs of the dual GSL in the Hartle–Hawking, L-vacuum, and κ_l-vacuum cases, and for the central modular-Hamiltonian formulas used in Sections 2–4. Reference [1] is cited as “arXiv2601:????”, i.e. with an incomplete arXiv number, so the referee and readers cannot verify these foundations. Since the κ_l-vacuum results are load-bearing for the dictionary and for the work-extraction claims, the manuscript should either include the necessary derivations in an appendix or provide a complete, accessible reference to the companion paper.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title] The title reads “... from non-rotating black holes”, but Section 5.3 is devoted to Kerr (rotating) black holes and the angular-momentum term is one of the paper’s advertised results. The title should be adjusted to reflect the rotating case.
  2. [Eq. (5.54)] In the display for δE_ωlm, the exponential appears as e^{β(ω−Ω_H ω)}; this should be e^{β(ω−Ω_H m)} to agree with Eq. (5.53).
  3. [Eq. (4.13)] The identification of Q_2 with the frequency ω and the use of the Carnot bound should be made more explicit; as written, the equality |W_max| = (1 − T_l/T_H)ω = (T_H/T_l − 1)ω′ is correct only after using (4.12), but the reader must infer which reservoir is hot and which heat exchange corresponds to which frequency.
  4. [Throughout] Several typos and duplicated words appear, e.g. “satisfiesthe”, “Bolse-Einstein”, “tofinite cuts”, and “Weterms”. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  5. [§3, Table 1] The table is useful, but the entry “Evolution” could be clarified: in the null-infinity column “evolution” is kinematical restriction to a subalgebra rather than a genuine time evolution generated by a Lindbladian. The text explains this, but the table may mislead.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Unruh/Kerr dual GSL is a consequence of an assumed KMS modular Hamiltonian whose chemical potentials are imported from the authors' [73]; the derived grand-potential inequality reproduces that input by construction.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [§5.1 (Eqs. 5.5–5.7, 5.15–5.16) and §5.2/§5.3.2 (Eqs. 5.26, 5.58)]
    "we deduce that the restriction of the Unruh vacuum at I+_R satisfies the following KMS conditions ... μ_{ωl}=T_H ln |t_{ωl}|^2/(1-(1-|t_{ωl}|^2)e^{-β_H ω}) and μ_{ωl} is the chemical potential introduced in [73]. ... The expression (5.15) allows us to define the one-sided Hamiltonian of the Unruh as K ... we find that ΔM−Ω_H ΔJ−Σ_{lm}∫_0^∞ μ_{ωlm}⟨Δn_{ωlm}⟩_Ψ dω−T_H ΔS_Ψ≤0."

    The KMS state (5.15)/(5.49) is assumed to be a grand-canonical ensemble whose chemical potentials μ are taken from the authors' earlier work [73], Eq. (5.6)/(5.38). The one-sided modular Hamiltonian (5.16)/(5.50) is then defined from this assumed state, and the relative-entropy inequality is applied to it. The resulting dual GSL (5.26)/(5.58) contains exactly the same μ terms that were put into the assumed state; the only additional ingredient is the generic monotonicity of relative entropy. The paper itself concedes that the modular Hamiltonian is formal and that deriving the dual GSL directly from the asymptotic algebra remains an open problem, so the μ-dependent potential is not independently derived from the algebra.

full rationale

Most of Sections 2–4 are a recap of the companion paper [1] and a dictionary with open quantum thermodynamics; reliance on a companion in a two-part series is normal and not circular. The κ_l-vacuum work-extraction result is a consistency check (Carnot efficiency on a state defined by mode-dependent temperatures) rather than a hidden prediction. The genuinely circular element is in Section 5: the Unruh-vacuum grand-potential law is not obtained from a computed modular Hamiltonian at null infinity, but from an assumed KMS state whose chemical potentials are imported verbatim from [73]; the final inequality then returns those same chemical potentials in the thermodynamic potential. This is a partial construction-reduction: the greybody factors and transmission coefficients are independent physical inputs, and the paper is transparent about the missing algebraic derivation, so the result is not fully forced by definition (score 8) or fully equivalent to its input (score 10). The explicit admission that the direct derivation remains an open problem is a correctness/rigor gap that compounds, but does not by itself create, the circularity. Score 6 reflects the one load-bearing step where the 'predicted' grand potential is built into the assumed modular Hamiltonian.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims depend on a choice of vacuum state (κ_l sequence or cutoff), an assumed slow-variation condition, and for the Unruh section a formally assumed KMS modular Hamiltonian with chemical potentials imported from the authors' earlier work. No new physical entities are required beyond the toy κ_l-vacua.

free parameters (2)
  • κ_l sequence (effective surface gravities) = arbitrary decreasing sequence κ ≥ κ_l ≥ 0; candidate κ_l = e^{-α l(l+1)}
    Defines the kappa_l-vacua and the chemical potentials μ_ωl = ω(1 - κ/κ_l) in (2.62). The sequence is chosen by hand and is central to the work-extraction argument.
  • Cutoff L in L-vacuum = L < ∞ arbitrary
    Hard regularization of the Hartle-Hawking state; modes with l ≥ L are in the Minkowski vacuum. Results are expected to be cutoff-independent at large L, but L is a free choice.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Monotonicity of Araki relative entropy under restriction to subalgebras (2.12)
    The core inequality behind all dual GSL proofs in this paper and in [1].
  • domain assumption Condition (2.30): κ^{-1} ∂_u <T_uu> ≪ <T_uu> (slowly varying flux)
    Needed to relate Bondi mass to boost energy. It is assumed throughout Sections 2 and 5 and is not generally proven for arbitrary states.
  • ad hoc to paper Unruh vacuum restricted to subalgebras at I+ is KMS with modular Hamiltonian (5.15)/(5.49) and chemical potentials from [73]
    This formal assumption underpins the Unruh-vacuum second law; the paper explicitly states that an algebraic proof is still lacking.
  • domain assumption Semiclassical Einstein equations encoded in Bondi and Raychaudhuri flux-balance laws (2.25), (2.28)
    Links stress-tensor expectation values to Bondi mass and area variations; standard semiclassical gravity input.
  • domain assumption Massless scalar field on a non-expanding null hypersurface with Weyl algebra and symplectic structure
    The QFT setup on null infinity and the basis for defining vacua and modular Hamiltonians.
invented entities (1)
  • κ_l-vacua |Ω_{κ_l}> no independent evidence
    purpose: Toy vacuum states with mode-dependent effective temperatures T_l = κ_l/2π; they interpolate between Hartle-Hawking and Minkowski and enable work extraction.
    The family is chosen by hand and not tied to a concrete physical process or falsifiable prediction outside the paper's own construction.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 141 in / 8443 out tokens · 242269 ms · 2026-08-04T06:24:13.132132+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Black hole thermodynamics provides a unique setting in which general relativity, quantum field theory, and statistical mechanics converge. In semiclassical gravity, this interplay culminates in the generalized second law (GSL), whose modern proofs rely on information theoretic techniques applied to algebras of observables defined on null hypersurfaces. These proofs exhibit close structural parallels with the thermodynamics of open quantum systems governed by Markovian dynamics. In this work, we draw parallels between the dynamics of quantum fields in regions bounded by non expanding causal horizons and the thermodynamics of quantum systems weakly coupled to equilibrium reservoirs. We introduce a dictionary relating late time boundary conditions to the choice of reservoir, vacuum states to fixed points of the dynamics, and modular Hamiltonians to thermodynamic potentials. Building on results from a companion paper on dual generalized second laws at future null infinity, we show that additional terms appearing in the associated thermodynamic potentials admit a natural interpretation as work contributions. We demonstrate that certain non thermal vacuum states at null infinity allow for the operation of autonomous thermal engines and enable work extraction from the radiation. Extending the analysis to the Unruh vacuum in Schwarzschild and Kerr backgrounds, we obtain generalized grand potential type laws incorporating grey body effects and angular momentum fluxes. Altogether, our results clarify the thermodynamic description of black hole dynamics and place it within the broader framework of open quantum thermodynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.03356 by Antoine Rignon-Bret, Matthieu Vilatte.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conformal extension of the black hole spacetime centered on spacelike infinity. Figure taken [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Setup in which the hypersurfaces Σ1 and Σ2 both starts at the horizon bifurcation surface B and end at different cuts 𝑈 = 𝑈1 and 𝑈 = 𝑈2 respectively at I+ 𝑅 . Are also depicted the regions DH and DI 𝑖 . Figure taken from [1]. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A picture depicting the BLPS engine. Because of the population inversion, we are able to extract [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Here we represented the eigenbasis of the tensor space spanned by our two qubits. We depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: One region of the Penrose diagram of the maximal extension of the Kerr solution. The (anti)- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 79 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A.Rignon-BretandM.Vilatte,Black hole thermodynamics at null infinity Part 1: Dual Generalized Second Law,arXiv2601:???? (2026)

    2026

  2. [2]

    R.PenroseandR.M.Floyd,Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole,NaturePhysical Science229(1971),no.6,177–179

    1971

  3. [3]

    S.W.Hawking,Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes,Phys.Rev.Lett.26(1971) 1344–1346 46

    1971

  4. [4]

    S.W.HawkingandJ.Hartle,Energy and angular momentum flow into a black hole, Communicationsinmathematicalphysics27(1972),no.4,283–290

    1972

  5. [5]

    J.M.Bardeen,B.CarterandS.W.Hawking,The four laws of black hole mechanics, Communicationsinmathematicalphysics31(1973),no.2,161–170

    1973

  6. [6]

    J.D.Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,PhysicalReviewD7(1973),no.8,2333

    1973

  7. [7]

    J.D.Bekenstein,Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics,PhysicalReview D9(1974),no.12,3292

    1974

  8. [8]

    S.W.Hawking,Black hole explosions,Nature248(1974)30–31

    1974

  9. [9]

    World Scientific,1975

    S.W.Hawking,Particle creation by black holes,inEuclidean quantum gravity,pp.167–188. World Scientific,1975

    1975

  10. [10]

    R.M.Wald,On Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun.Math.Phys.45(1975)9–34

    1975

  11. [11]

    W.Israel,Thermo-field dynamics of black holes,PhysicsLettersA57(1976),no.2,107–110

    1976

  12. [12]

    J.B.HartleandS.W.Hawking,Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance,PhysicalReviewD 13(1976),no.8,2188

    1976

  13. [13]

    W.G.Unruh,Notes on black hole evaporation,Phys.Rev.D14(1976)870

    1976

  14. [14]

    R.M.Wald,The Thermodynamics of Black Holes,NATOSci.Ser.II60(2002)477–522

    2002

  15. [15]

    A.C.Wall,A Survey of Black Hole Thermodynamics,1804.10610

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    A.Perez,Black Hole Entropy and Planckian Discreteness,2310.19389

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    D.SudarskyandR.M.Wald,Extrema of mass, stationarity, and staticity, and solutions to the Einstein-Yang-Mills equations,PhysicalReviewD46(1992),no.4,1453

    1992

  18. [18]

    R.M.Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,PhysicalReviewD48(1993),no.8,R3427, gr-qc/9307038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  19. [19]

    V.IyerandR.M.Wald,Some properties of the Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,PhysicalreviewD50(1994),no.2,846,gr-qc/9403028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  20. [20]

    T.Jacobson,G.KangandR.C.Myers,On black hole entropy,PhysicalReviewD49(1994),no.12, 6587,gr-qc/9312023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  21. [21]

    Physical process version

    S.GaoandR.M.Wald,“Physical process version” of the first law and the generalized second law for charged and rotating black holes,PhysicalReviewD64(2001),no.8,084020,gr-qc/0106071 47

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    K.Prabhu,The first law of black hole mechanics for fields with internal gauge freedom,Classicaland QuantumGravity34(2017),no.3,035011,1511.00388

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    A.Rignon-Bret,Note on the physical process first law of black hole mechanics,Phys.Rev.D108 (2023),no.2,024005,2303.06731

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    T.Jacobson,Thermodynamics of spacetime: the Einstein equation of state,PhysicalReviewLetters 75(1995),no.7,1260,gr-qc/9504004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  25. [25]

    T.Jacobson,Entanglement equilibrium and the Einstein equation,Physicalreviewletters116(2016), no.20,201101,1505.04753

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    T.JacobsonandM.R.Visser,Gravitational thermodynamics of causal diamonds in (A) dS,SciPost Physics7(2019),no.6,079,1812.01596

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys.19(2022),no.Supp01,2230002,2112.06301

    A.Alonso-SerranoandM.Liška,Thermodynamics of spacetime and unimodular gravity,Int.J. Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys.19(2022),no.Supp01,2230002,2112.06301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    A.Alonso-Serrano,M.LiškaandM.Piotrak,Semi-classical spacetime thermodynamics, 2509.05052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    S.W.Hawking,Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse,PhysicalReviewD14(1976), no.10,2460

    1976

  30. [30]

    S.W.Hawking,The unpredictability of quantum gravity,CommunicationsinMathematical Physics87(1982),no.3,395–415

    1982

  31. [31]

    D.N.Page,Information in black hole radiation,Physicalreviewletters71(1993),no.23,3743

    1993

  32. [32]

    S.D.Mathur,The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review,FortschrittederPhysik: ProgressofPhysics53(2005),no.7-8,793–827,hep-th/0502050

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  33. [33]

    S.W.Hawking,The Information Paradox for Black Holes, 9,2015.1509.01147

    arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    S.W.Hawking,M.J.PerryandA.Strominger,Soft Hair on Black Holes,Phys.Rev.Lett.116(2016), no.23,231301,1601.00921

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    W.G.UnruhandR.M.Wald,Information loss,ReportsonProgressinPhysics80(2017),no.9, 092002,1703.02140

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    G.Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002,1905.08255

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    G.Penington,S.H.Shenker,D.StanfordandZ.Yang,Replicawormholesandtheblackholeinterior, JHEP03(2022)205,1911.11977 48

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    A.Almheiri,N.Engelhardt,D.MarolfandH.Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019)063,1905.08762

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    A.Almheiri,R.Mahajan,J.MaldacenaandY.Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020)149,1908.10996

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    A.Almheiri,T.Hartman,J.Maldacena,E.ShaghoulianandA.Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020)013,1911.12333

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    A.PerezandS.Viollet,Discreteness Unravels the Black Hole Information Puzzle: Insights from a Quantum Gravity Toy Model,Entropy25(2023),no.11,1479,2307.10254

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    V.Chandrasekaran,É.É.FlanaganandK.Prabhu,Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries,JHEP11(2018)125,1807.11499,[Erratum: JHEP07,224(2023)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    A.Rignon-Bret,Second law from the Noether current on null hypersurfaces,Phys.Rev.D108(2023), no.4,044069,2303.07262

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    G.Odak,A.Rignon-BretandS.Speziale,General gravitational charges on null hypersurfaces,JHEP 12(2023)038,2309.03854

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    V.ChandrasekaranandE.E.Flanagan,Horizon phase spaces in general relativity,JHEP07(2024) 017,2309.03871

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    L.Ciambelli,L.FreidelandR.G.Leigh,Null Raychaudhuri: canonical structure and the dressing time,JHEP01(2024)166,2309.03932

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    S.Hollands,R.M.WaldandV.G.Zhang,Entropy of dynamical black holes,Phys.Rev.D110(2024), no.2,024070,2402.00818

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    M.R.VisserandZ.Yan,Properties of dynamical black hole entropy,JHEP10(2024)029, 2403.07140

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    D.Kong,Y.Tian,H.ZhangandJ.Zhao,Dynamicalblackholeentropybeyondgeneralrelativityfrom the Einstein frame,Phys.Rev.D111(2025),no.8,084005,2412.00647

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    J.Zhao,The entropy of dynamical de Sitter horizons,Eur.Phys.J.C85(2025),no.7,750, 2503.16138

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    W.Jia,Q.QiandC.Gao,Entanglement Entropy and Thermodynamics of Dynamical Black Holes, 2509.05700

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    M.R.VisserandZ.Yan,Dynamical entropy of charged black objects,2510.20747

    arXiv

  53. [53]

    S.LeutheusserandH.Liu,Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,PhysicalReviewD108(2023),no.8,086019,2110.05497 49

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    E.Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022)008,2112.12828

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    V.Chandrasekaran,R.Longo,G.PeningtonandE.Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023)082,2206.10780

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    V.Chandrasekaran,G.PeningtonandE.Witten,Large N algebras and generalized entropy,JHEP 04(2023)009,2209.10454

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    K.Jensen,J.SorceandA.J.Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,JHEP12(2023)020,2306.01837

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    J.Kudler-Flam,S.LeutheusserandG.Satishchandran,Generalized Black Hole Entropy is von Neumann Entropy,2309.15897

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    S.AliAhmadandR.Jefferson,Crossed product algebras and generalized entropy for subregions, SciPostPhysicsCore7(2024),no.2,020,2306.07323

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    T.FaulknerandA.J.Speranza,Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law,JHEP11 (2024)099,2405.00847

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    J.DeVuyst,S.Eccles,P.A.HoehnandJ.Kirklin,Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent,JHEP 07(2025)146,2405.00114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    J.DeVuyst,S.Eccles,P.A.HoehnandJ.Kirklin,Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,JHEP07(2025)063,2412.15502,[Erratum: JHEP10,234(2025)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    R.D.Sorkin,The statistical mechanics of black hole thermodynamics,Blackholesandrelativistic stars(1998)177–194,gr-qc/9705006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  64. [64]

    H.Casini,Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,ClassicalandQuantumGravity25(2008), no.20,205021,0804.2182

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  65. [65]

    A.C.Wall,Proving the Achronal Averaged Null Energy Condition from the Generalized Second Law, Phys.Rev.D81(2010)024038,0910.5751

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Grav.30(2013)165003,1010.5513,[Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav.30,199501(2013)]

    A.C.Wall,The Generalized Second Law implies a Quantum Singularity Theorem,Class.Quant. Grav.30(2013)165003,1010.5513,[Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav.30,199501(2013)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    A.C.Wall,A Proof of the generalized second law for rapidly-evolving Rindler horizons,Phys.Rev.D 82(2010)124019,1007.1493

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    A.C.Wall,A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices,Phys.Rev.D85(2012)104049,1105.3445,[Erratum: Phys.Rev.D87,069904(2013)] 50

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  69. [69]

    A.C.Wall,A Second Law for Higher Curvature Gravity,Int.J.Mod.Phys.D24(2015),no.12, 1544014,1504.08040

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    D.Kapec,A.-M.RaclariuandA.Strominger,Area, Entanglement Entropy and Supertranslations at Null Infinity,Class.Quant.Grav.34(2017),no.16,165007,1603.07706

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    R.BoussoandN.Engelhardt,Generalized second law for cosmology,PhysicalReviewD93(2016), no.2,024025,1510.02099

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  72. [72]

    S.Hollands,Á.D.KovácsandH.S.Reall,The second law of black hole mechanics in effective field theory,JHEP08(2022)258,2205.15341

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    A.Rignon-Bret,Black hole thermodynamic potentials for asymptotic observers,Phys.Rev.D110 (2024),no.12,124002,2406.15843

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    J.Kirklin,Generalised second law beyond the semiclassical regime,JHEP07(2025)192,2412.01903

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    G.Lindblad,Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities,CommunicationsinMathematical Physics40(1975)147–151

    1975

  76. [76]

    A.Uhlmann,Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory,CommunicationsinMathematicalPhysics54(1977),no.1,21–32

    1977

  77. [77]

    H.Araki,Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras,PublicationsoftheResearchInstitute forMathematicalSciences11(1975),no.3,809–833

    1975

  78. [78]

    D.Petz,Monotonicity of quantum relative entropy revisited,ReviewsinMathematicalPhysics15 (2003),no.01,79–91,quant-ph/0209053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  79. [79]

    SpringerScience&BusinessMedia,2004

    M.OhyaandD.Petz,Quantum entropy and its use. SpringerScience&BusinessMedia,2004

    2004

  80. [80]

    H.Spohn,Entropy production for quantum dynamical semigroups,JournalofMathematicalPhysics 19(1978),no.5,1227–1230

    1978

Showing first 80 references.