Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 97 references

This paper presents the first fully quantum mechanical, gauge-invariant computation of the rovibrational quadrupole spectrum of molecular hydrogen in strong magnetic fields, using a Wilson-Hamiltonian grid approach with field-dependent CCSD

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-07-31 23:16 UTC pith:BABLJSYK

load-bearing objection First fully quantum 3D H2 rovibrational spectra in strong fields, but the 3D PES handling and a couple of internal inconsistencies need attention before the numbers are used. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27907 v1 pith:BABLJSYK submitted 2026-07-30 physics.chem-ph quant-ph

A Quantum Mechanical Approach to the Computation of Rovibrational Spectra of Diatomic Molecules in Strong Magnetic Fields

Nikhil Yenugu , Ashwani K Tiwari , Sangita Sen This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph quant-ph
keywords rovibrational spectrastrong magnetic fieldsWilson HamiltonianPeierls substitutionhydrogen moleculeelectric quadrupole transitionsgauge invarianceastrophysical spectra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish that the rovibrational spectrum of H2 in strong magnetic fields can be computed entirely quantum mechanically, with both electrons and nuclei treated as quantum particles, without relying on classical trajectory sampling. It claims that the Wilson-Hamiltonian/Peierls-substitution framework, extended to a 3D Cartesian grid and combined with CCSD/Lu-aug-cc-pVTZ field-dependent potential energy surfaces, yields accurate quadrupole-allowed transition energies and intensities. The computed zero-field spectrum matches experimental H2 quadrupole lines within 2–25 cm−1, and the method predicts systematic magnetic-field-induced shifts, splittings, merging, appearance, and disappearance of peaks. A sympathetic reader would care because this is the first concrete quantum-mechanical route to reliable IR spectra for astrochemical interpretation in magnetized white dwarf and neutron star environments, where no experimental data exist.

Core claim

The central claim is that the nuclear Schrödinger equation for a diatomic molecule in a strong uniform magnetic field can be solved on a 3D grid using the gauge-invariant Wilson Hamiltonian with Peierls substitution, and that this yields the first fully quantum mechanical rovibrational spectrum of 1H2 in fields up to 3 a.u. The authors separate the magnetic field effects into electron-only, nucleus-only, and combined contributions. They find that the dominant effect comes from field-induced changes to the electronic potential energy surface—shortening the bond, stiffening the vibration, and creating an angular rotational barrier—while the direct Lorentz force on the nuclei causes Zeeman-like

What carries the argument

The Wilson Hamiltonian is a lattice discretization of the kinetic energy operator in which the magnetic field enters through the Peierls phase, a complex exponential of the line integral of the vector potential along each grid bond. This substitution preserves gauge invariance exactly on the grid. The electronic potential energy surface is computed with CCSD using field-dependent gauge-including atomic orbitals (London orbitals), interpolated to form a smooth 3D function of internuclear distance and orientation. The nuclear wavefunction is obtained by sparse diagonalization of the resulting Hamiltonian matrix, and electric quadrupole transition moments are evaluated from grid-based nuclear w

Load-bearing premise

The computation sets the Berry-curvature electronic-nuclear gauge couplings (the geometric vector potential A and scalar potential Phi) exactly to zero, relying on earlier work that this screening is small for H2; if those corrections are not tiny at fields up to 3 a.u., the predicted peak splittings and the claim of fully quantum accuracy are incomplete.

What would settle it

Compute the neglected Berry terms A^(k)_alpha and Phi^(k) from the same CCSD wavefunctions for H2 at several field strengths up to 3 a.u. and evaluate their contribution to the nuclear Hamiltonian. If the resulting shifts or splittings of the lowest rovibrational levels exceed roughly 10 cm−1, the spectral predictions in this paper are incomplete. Alternatively, a high-resolution laboratory measurement of H2 quadrupole lines in pulsed fields above 1000 T could directly test the predicted field-dependent line positions and intensities.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At zero field, the computed quadrupole transition energies for H2 (352, 4140, 4473 cm−1) reproduce experimental values within 2–25 cm−1, establishing baseline accuracy for the grid and PES combination.
  • The electron-only contribution blue-shifts vibrational transitions by roughly 150% at B = 3 a.u., reflecting bond stiffening and a significantly shorter equilibrium bond length.
  • The nucleus-only contribution splits degenerate rotational peaks at approximately 60 cm−1 per a.u. (and 240 cm−1 per a.u. in 2D), producing characteristic cyclotron-like splitting patterns.
  • Quadrupole-forbidden rotational and rovibrational transitions become allowed at field strengths as low as 0.1–0.4 a.u., with oscillator strengths increasing by up to eight orders of magnitude before some transitions disappear at higher fields.
  • The computed spectra at 12,000 K, representative of magnetic white dwarf surfaces, are dense and convoluted, indicating that direct astrochemical interpretation will require forward modeling with the quantum line lists.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Berry-curvature corrections are indeed negligible for H2, the same computational pipeline could be extended to heteronuclear diatomics or molecular ions where the center-of-mass and relative motion do not decouple exactly; the paper does not attempt this.
  • The predicted appearance and disappearance of specific quadrupole transitions as a function of field strength could serve as a magnetic-field diagnostic for white dwarfs, provided synthetic spectra are convolved with atmospheric temperature and field distributions.
  • The additive behavior observed in the harmonic and 2D cases between electron and nuclear magnetic effects is likely to break down at intermediate and strong fields in 3D, where the paper already notes non-additive coupled dynamics; quantifying this breakdown could guide simpler models for other molecules.
  • A direct calculation of the omitted Berry vector potential and scalar term from the CCSD wavefunctions would test the paper's central approximation and could be used to assess whether the predicted splittings are quantitatively complete.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a grid-based, gauge-invariant solution of the nuclear Schrödinger equation for H2 in a uniform magnetic field, using the Wilson/Peierls framework. Field-dependent electronic potential energy surfaces are computed at CCSD/Lu-aug-cc-pVTZ for B = 0–3 a.u. and orientations θ = 0°–90°, then mapped onto a 3D Cartesian grid. The nuclear Hamiltonian is diagonalized for 2D and 3D cases, and electric quadrupole transition moments are used to construct rovibrational line spectra at T = 0, 1500, and 12000 K. The authors separate nuclear and electronic magnetic effects, compare harmonic and anharmonic potentials, and report field-induced shifting, splitting, merging, appearance, and disappearance of peaks. At zero field, the computed 3D transitions match experimental values to within 2–25 cm⁻¹, which validates the numerical protocol. The paper claims to provide the first fully quantum mechanical rovibrational spectra of ¹H₂ in strong magnetic fields.

Significance. If the technical gaps identified below are closed, this is a significant methodological contribution. The approach is non-perturbative in the field, gauge invariant by construction, and uses a correlated electronic-structure method appropriate for H2. The zero-field agreement with experiment is a genuine validation, not a fit to strong-field spectra. The separation of nuclear and electronic field effects, and the comparison of 2D/3D and harmonic/anharmonic models, provide physical insight. The fitted PES is promised in the SI, which aids reproducibility. The main risks concern the definition of the 3D PES in the lower hemisphere, the correctness of the printed discretized Hamiltonian, and the unchecked neglect of Berry/geometric couplings.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3 and §4.1] The construction of the 3D PES is incomplete. Electronic energies are computed only for θ ∈ [0°, 90°] (Sec. 3), and Sec. 4.1 states that V(R,θ) is rotated about the z-axis. A rotation about z changes only φ; it does not generate θ > 90°. The 3D Cartesian grid includes points with z < 0, i.e. polar angles θ ∈ (90°, 180°). For a homonuclear molecule the potential must satisfy V(R,θ) = V(R, π−θ) under nuclear inversion, but the text never states that this reflection is used to extend the PES. If it is not, the lower-hemisphere potential is undefined or extrapolated, breaking the required parity symmetry and invalidating the reported B>0 eigenvalues, degeneracies, and peak assignments. The zero-field validation does not test this issue because V is isotropic at B=0. Please state the extension explicitly and show the parity of eigenstates, or recompute with a PES defined on the full sphere.
  2. [§2.2, Eqs. (32)–(33)] As printed, Eq. (32) is not the Wilson Hamiltonian used in the calculations. The sum over η wraps all three coordinate-space finite-difference terms, so the kinetic energy is counted three times and the link operator U_η for direction η is inserted into all three directional terms. The standard Peierls substitution should have one sum over x, y, z of the corresponding directional term, each using U_x, U_y, or U_z. The same issue appears in Eq. (33). The numerical validation at B=0 indicates that the code presumably implements the correct form, but the printed equation must be corrected to match the implementation.
  3. [§4.2, grid parameters] The 3D grid parameters are arithmetically inconsistent. With L = 9.0 a.u., n_grid = 301, and Δx = 0.015 a.u., one obtains L = 4.5 a.u., not 9.0; if instead L = 9.0 and n_grid = 301, then Δx = 0.03 a.u. The 2D parameters (602 × 0.015 = 9.03) are also approximate. Because the convergence claim (< 10 cm⁻¹) depends on box size and spacing, please report the actual grid parameters, including the number of points per dimension, and demonstrate convergence for the excited states (up to n = 120) used at T = 1500/12000 K.
  4. [§4.3, Eq. (19)] The Berry vector potential A^(k) and scalar term Φ^(k) are set to zero without a quantitative estimate. The text cites Refs. 65 and 72 for the smallness of Berry screening in H2, but the present calculation extends to B = 3 a.u. and reports peak splittings of order 100 cm⁻¹; an omitted term of this size could change the central spectral predictions. Please provide a numerical estimate of the Berry/geometric contribution, for example by evaluating A^(k) at representative R, θ, B or by comparing with the non-BO results of Ref. 72, and state the expected error in the reported splittings. If the screening is not small, the 'all field strengths' claim should be qualified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.2] The text says the 3D calculations solve the nuclear equation 'as given in Eq. 33', but Eq. (33) is the 2D Hamiltonian; this should be Eq. (32).
  2. [§3.1 and §4.2] The transition threshold |Quad| > 10⁻² and the Lorentzian width of 20 cm⁻¹ are stated without justification. Since the 'appearance/disappearance' claims depend on the threshold, a brief sensitivity study would strengthen those conclusions.
  3. [Figure 10] The text states that in Fig. 10 all spectral lines with |Quad| > 10⁻² are drawn with equal intensity, but the surrounding discussion refers to oscillator strengths. Please clarify which quantity is plotted and how the threshold is applied.
  4. [Table 2] The rows for B = 0 and B = 0.1 are difficult to map to the column headings because the number of entries per row is inconsistent. Reorganize the table so each transition energy appears in the correct PES/method column.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the reported strong-field spectra are computed from CCSD field-dependent PESs and a gauge-invariant Wilson/Peierls nuclear Hamiltonian, validated against analytic Fock-Darwin states and zero-field experiment, with no spectral fitting to the predicted quantities.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The electronic PES is obtained from CCSD/Lu-aug-cc-pVTZ calculations in the LONDON program, and the nuclear Hamiltonian is discretized with the Peierls-substituted Wilson Hamiltonian; the reported transition energies and intensities are eigenvalues and quadrupole transition matrix elements, not fitted parameters. The self-citations (Refs. 79 and 82) concern the implementation and benchmarking of the grid Hamiltonian, but that benchmarking was carried out against analytic Fock-Darwin eigenstates, which is independent support rather than a self-referential premise. The zero-field comparison with experimental H2 quadrupole line positions (352, 4143, 4497 cm-1) is a validation of the method, not a calibration used to produce the field-dependent predictions. The neglect of Berry/geometric terms is presented as an explicit approximation justified by external references (65, 72) and acknowledged as a limitation, not hidden as a derived result. The possible incompleteness in constructing the 3D PES for the lower hemisphere (theta>90 degrees) is a correctness or documentation concern, not a circular reduction of the predictions to the inputs, so it does not affect the circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central computation rests on standard quantum-chemical and grid-discretization choices rather than on invented entities. The main unquantified premise is the neglect of Berry/geometric couplings in the nuclear Hamiltonian; the main hand-chosen numerical choices are the allowed-transition threshold, the Lorentzian width, and the harmonic force constants used only in model variants.

free parameters (3)
  • Quadrupole transition moment threshold = |Qmn| > 1e-2 a.u. (and f > 1e-27 a.u.)
    Chosen by hand to define which computed transitions count as 'allowed'; affects the appearance/disappearance of peaks in displayed spectra.
  • Lorentzian broadening width = ±20 cm^-1
    Applied to T=1500 K and T=12000 K spectra for visualization; arbitrary and affects apparent line merging and resolution.
  • Harmonic force constants k(B) = Morse fits to computed CCSD PECs
    Used only in the harmonic model variants to isolate force-constant effects; not used to generate the main electronic-PES spectra.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation and single-surface nuclear dynamics (Eqs. 10-13).
    Invoked throughout; standard for molecular spectroscopy, but less certain at B~3 a.u. where electronic and nuclear energy scales approach each other.
  • domain assumption Neglect of Berry/geometric couplings: A^(k)≈0 and Phi^(k)≈0 (Eq. 19).
    Load-bearing: if Berry screening of Lorentz forces is not small, the computed nuclear splittings and intensities are incomplete. The paper relies on Refs. 65 and 72 without quantifying this here.
  • domain assumption CCSD/Lu-aug-cc-pVTZ PES is essentially FCI-quality for two-electron H2 at all B considered.
    Used to justify accuracy; no explicit basis-set convergence study is shown in the main text.
  • standard math Electronic PES depends only on R and theta, not on azimuthal angle phi; the 3D PES is generated by rotating the 2D PEC.
    Cylindrical symmetry of the molecule-plus-uniform-field system; assumed without explicit demonstration.
  • domain assumption Electric quadrupole is the only relevant radiative transition mechanism; field-induced dipole contributions are ignored.
    Supported by inversion symmetry, but field-induced terms are not computed, so selection-rule completeness is assumed.
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic Hamiltonian is sufficient at B up to 3 a.u.
    No relativistic corrections are included; standard for B~B0 but increasingly questionable at very high fields.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 29667 in / 29966 out tokens · 284529 ms · 2026-07-31T23:16:21.907919+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In the absence of experimental data for molecular spectra in strong magnetic fields, high resolution and reliable computational spectra are required for the interpretation of spectra collected from highly magnetic astrophysical objects. In this paper, we extend the Wilson-Hamiltonian framework, recently implemented and benchmarked by us (\textit{J. Chem. Theory Comput.}, \textbf{21}, 9753 (2025) ), to a general three-dimensional framework suitable for computing the rovibrational spectra of diatomic molecules in strong uniform magnetic fields. The field-dependent electronic and nuclear Hamiltonians capture full non-perturbative coupling between particle motion and the field making the method applicable to all field strengths. The electric quadrupole transition moment integrals for rovibrational transitions in external static magnetic fields are formulated, implemented, and computed to yield spectra which respect the selection rules of the molecule-field system. The spectral changes with increasing field strength such as shifting, splitting, merging, appearance and disappearance of peaks are noted. Contributions from electrons and nuclei are studied individually, as well as in unison to reveal the underlying physics such as stiffening of the bond, emergence of a rotational barrier, field-induced coupling/decoupling of states, and symmetry-breaking in rotational and vibrational states. These results provide the first fully quantum mechanical computational results for the rovibrational signature of $^1\mathrm{H}_{2}$ in extreme magnetic field environments with accuracy suitable for experimental interpretation. The methodology developed herein has direct relevance for high-field spectroscopy and astrochemical modeling, both for providing computational data as well as for understanding the spectral impact of strong magnetic fields on electronic structure and nuclear motion in molecules.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27907 by Ashwani K Tiwari, Nikhil Yenugu, Sangita Sen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Potential energy curves (PECs) of 1H2 for magnetic field strengths B = 0 − 3 au, computed at the CCSD/Lu-aug-cc-pVTZ level with the molecular axis perpendicular to the field (θ = 90◦ ). (b) Bonding energy relative to dissociation, V − Vdiss, for the same field strengths. (c) Energy relative to the equilibrium minimum, V − Veq, highlighting the field-dependent modification of the molecular bond. 21 [PI… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: PES of 1H2 computed at the CCSD/Lu-aug-cc-pVTZ level under various magnetic field strengths at various orientations: (a) 0 au (b) 0.1 au (c) 0.5 au (d) 1 au (e) 1.5 au (f) 2 au (g) 2.5 au (h) 3 au 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: PES fitting parameters as a function of θ and B energy (De), and equilibrium bond length (Re) are shown. At B = 0, the PES is strictly isotropic with respect to molecular orientation, and Veq is independent of θ. It can be seen from Fig. 4a that for all magnetic-field strengths considered, the parallel configuration (θ = 0◦ ) is preferred over the perpendicular configuration (θ = 90◦ ). The dissociation re… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Angular dependence of the equilibrium energy shift ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Transition energies vs magnetic field for the Only Nucleus case: (a) 2D HO, (b) 3D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Transition energies vs magnetic field for the only electron case: (a) 2D HO, (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Transition energies vs magnetic field on both nuclei and electrons: (a) 2D HO, (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 2D Electronic Potential (Magnetic field acting on both nuclei and electrons) : [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: 2D Electronic Potential (Magnetic field acting on both nuclei and electrons) : [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: 3D Electronic Potential (Magnetic field acting on both nuclei and electrons) : [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Magnetic-field dependence of transition energies for the 3D electronic PES of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Magnetic-field dependence of oscillator strengths for the 3D electronic PES of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: 3D Electronic Potential (Magnetic field acting on both nuclei and electrons) : [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Magnetic-field dependence of transition energies at T = 1500K for the 3D elec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Magnetic-field dependence of oscillator strengths at T = 1500K for the 3D elec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Canonical ensemble spectra from classical MD simulations reproduced from Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Electronic Potential (Magnetic field acting on both nuclei and electrons) : Rovi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_17.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Durrive, Jean-Baptiste and Tashiro, Hiroyuki and Langer, Mathieu and Sugiyama, Naoshi , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2007 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2007 2017

  2. [2]

    Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars-Implications for gamma-ray bursts , author=. Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 392, no. 1, June 10, 1992, p. L9-L13. Research supported by NSERC. , volume=

    1992

  3. [3]

    Nature , year=

    Gold, Thomas , title=. Nature , year=. doi:10.1038/221025a0 , url=

    doi:10.1038/221025a0

  4. [4]

    and Sawabe, H

    Nakamura, D. and Sawabe, H. and Takeyama, S. , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.5003411 , url =

    doi:10.1063/1.5003411 2018

  5. [5]

    and Ikeda, A

    Nakamura, D. and Ikeda, A. and Sawabe, H. and Matsuda, Y. H. and Takeyama, S. , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.5044557 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5044557 2018

  6. [6]

    , year =

    Kemp, James and Swedlund, John and Landstreet, John and Angel, J. , year =. Discovery of Circularly Polarized Light from a White Dwarf , volume =. The Astrophysical Journal , doi =

  7. [7]

    Magnetic White Dwarfs , journal=

    Ferrario, Lilia and de Martino, Domitilla and G. Magnetic White Dwarfs , journal=. 2015 , month=. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0152-0 , url=

    doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0152-0 2015

  8. [8]

    2003 , eprint=

    Origin and evolution of neutron star magnetic fields , author=. 2003 , eprint=

    2003

  9. [9]

    Wickramasinghe, D. T. and Schmidt, Gary and Ferrario, Lilia and Vennes, S. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2002 , month =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05264.x , url =

    arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    Stationary components of He I in strong magnetic fields - a tool to identify magnetic DB white dwarfs , volume =

    Jordan, Stefan and Schmelcher, Peter and Becken, Wolfgang , year =. Stationary components of He I in strong magnetic fields - a tool to identify magnetic DB white dwarfs , volume =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , doi =

  11. [11]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Hollands, M A and Stopkowicz, S and Kitsaras, M-P and Hampe, F and Blaschke, S and Hermes, J J , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad143 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad143 2023

  12. [12]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Schreyer, Ethan and Owen, James E and Spake, Jessica J and Bahroloom, Zahra and Di Giampasquale, Simone , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3528 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3528 2023

  13. [13]

    Wickramasinghe, D. T. and Ferrario, Lilia , title =. 2000 , month =. doi:10.1086/316593 , url =

    work page doi:10.1086/316593 2000

  14. [14]

    and Jura, M

    Xu, S. and Jura, M. and Koester, D. and Klein, B. and Zuckerman, B. , title =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/L18 , url =

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/l18 2013

  15. [15]

    Bignami, G. F. and Caraveo, P. A. and Luca, A. De and Mereghetti, S. , title=. Nature , year=. doi:10.1038/nature01703 , url=

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01703

  16. [16]

    and Pavlov, G

    Sanwal, D. and Pavlov, G. G. and Zavlin, V. E. and Teter, M. A. , title =. 2002 , month =. doi:10.1086/342368 , url =

    work page doi:10.1086/342368 2002

  17. [17]

    Hollands, M. A. and Tremblay, P.-E. and G. An ultra-massive white dwarf with a mixed hydrogen--carbon atmosphere as a likely merger remnant , journal=. 2020 , month=. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1028-0 , url=

    doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1028-0 2020

  18. [18]

    Lange and E

    Kai K. Lange and E. I. Tellgren and M. R. Hoffmann and T. Helgaker , title =. Science , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  19. [20]

    Hameka , title =

    H.F. Hameka , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 1958 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/00268975800100261 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1080/00268975800100261 1958

  20. [21]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    Ditchfield, Robert , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1976 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.433526 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.433526 1976

  21. [22]

    Molecular Physics , volume =

    Robert Ditchfield , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 1974 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/00268977400100711 , URL =

    doi:10.1080/00268977400100711 1974

  22. [23]

    1976 , issn =

    GIAO studies of magnetic shielding in FHF- and HF , journal =. 1976 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(76)80119-4 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(76)80119-4 1976

  23. [24]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    Helgaker, Trygve and Jorgensen, Poul , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1991 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.460912 , url =

    doi:10.1063/1.460912 1991

  24. [25]

    , title=

    Peierls, R. , title=. Zeitschrift f. 1933 , month=. doi:10.1007/BF01342591 , url=

    doi:10.1007/bf01342591 1933

  25. [26]

    and Soncini, Alessandro and Helgaker, Trygve , title =

    Tellgren, Erik I. and Soncini, Alessandro and Helgaker, Trygve , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.2996525 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2996525 2008

  26. [27]

    Tellgren, E. I. and Teale, A. M. and Furness, J. W. and Lange, K. K. and Ekström, U. and Helgaker, T. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4861427 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4861427 2014

  27. [28]

    and Verbeke, Joachim and Tellgren, Erik I

    Furness, James W. and Verbeke, Joachim and Tellgren, Erik I. and Stopkowicz, Stella and Ekstr. Current Density Functional Theory Using Meta-Generalized Gradient Exchange-Correlation Functionals , journal =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  28. [29]

    Irons, Tom J. P. and David, Gr. Optimizing Molecular Geometries in Strong Magnetic Fields , journal =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  29. [30]

    Irons, Tom J. P. and Spence, Lucy and David, Gr. Analyzing Magnetically Induced Currents in Molecular Systems Using Current-Density-Functional Theory , journal =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  30. [31]

    and Teale, Andrew M

    Reimann, Sarah and Borgoo, Alex and Tellgren, Erik I. and Teale, Andrew M. and Helgaker, Trygve , title =. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  31. [32]

    and Reine, Simen S

    Tellgren, Erik I. and Reine, Simen S. and Helgaker, Trygve. Analytical GIAO and hybrid-basis integral derivatives: application to geometry optimization of molecules in strong magnetic fields. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012. doi:10.1039/C2CP40965H

    work page doi:10.1039/c2cp40965h 2012

  32. [33]

    and Helgaker, Trygve and Soncini, Alessandro

    Tellgren, Erik I. and Helgaker, Trygve and Soncini, Alessandro. Non-perturbative magnetic phenomena in closed-shell paramagnetic molecules. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009. doi:10.1039/B822262B

    work page doi:10.1039/b822262b 2009

  33. [34]

    and Helgaker, Trygve

    Austad, Jon and Borgoo, Alex and Tellgren, Erik I. and Helgaker, Trygve. Bonding in the helium dimer in strong magnetic fields: the role of spin and angular momentum. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020. doi:10.1039/D0CP03259J

    work page doi:10.1039/d0cp03259j 2020

  34. [35]

    and Tellgren, Erik I

    Stopkowicz, Stella and Gauss, Jürgen and Lange, Kai K. and Tellgren, Erik I. and Helgaker, Trygve , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4928056 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4928056 2015

  35. [36]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    Hampe, Florian and Stopkowicz, Stella , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4979624 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4979624 2017

  36. [37]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume =

    Hampe, Florian and Stopkowicz, Stella , title =. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  37. [38]

    Full triples contribution in coupled-cluster and equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for atoms and molecules in strong magnetic fields

    Hampe, Florian and Gross, Niklas and Stopkowicz, Stella. Full triples contribution in coupled-cluster and equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for atoms and molecules in strong magnetic fields. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020. doi:10.1039/D0CP04169F

    work page doi:10.1039/d0cp04169f 2020

  38. [39]

    and Tellgren, Erik I

    Sen, Sangita and Lange, Kai K. and Tellgren, Erik I. , title =. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  39. [40]

    and Hampe, Florian and Stopkowicz, Stella and Helgaker, Trygve and Klopper, Wim , title =

    Holzer, Christof and Teale, Andrew M. and Hampe, Florian and Stopkowicz, Stella and Helgaker, Trygve and Klopper, Wim , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.5093396 , url =

    doi:10.1063/1.5093396 2019

  40. [41]

    Frontiers in Chemistry , VOLUME=

    Holzer, Christof and Pausch, Ansgar and Klopper, Wim , TITLE=. Frontiers in Chemistry , VOLUME=. 2021 , URL=. doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.746162 , ISSN=

    arXiv 2021

  41. [42]

    and Helgaker, T

    Tellgren, E. and Helgaker, T. and Soncini, A. and Lange, K. K. and Teale, A. M. and Ekstr\"om, U. and Stopkowicz, S. and Austad, J. H. and Sen, S. and Peters, L. and Culpitt, T. , title =

  42. [43]

    Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=

    Excited states of molecules in strong uniform and nonuniform magnetic fields , author=. Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  43. [44]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=

    TURBOMOLE: Today and tomorrow , author=. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  44. [45]

    Balasubramani, SG and Chen, GP and Coriani, S and Diedenhofen, M and Frank, MS and Franzke, YJ and Furche, F and Grotjahn, R and Harding, ME and H. C. vanW. J. Chem. Phys , volume=

  45. [46]

    Chemical Physics Letters , volume=

    Electronic structure calculations on workstation computers: The program system turbomole , author=. Chemical Physics Letters , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  46. [47]

    A gauge-invariant LCAO method for NMR chemical shifts , author=

    Self-consistent perturbation theory of diamagnetism: I. A gauge-invariant LCAO method for NMR chemical shifts , author=. Molecular Physics , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

    1974

  47. [48]

    Rev.: Comput

    Wiley Interdiscip , author=. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci , volume=

  48. [49]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=

    Generalized Hartree--Fock with nonperturbative treatment of strong magnetic fields: Application to molecular spin phase transitions , author=. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  49. [50]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=

    An ab initio linear response method for computing magnetic circular dichroism spectra with nonperturbative treatment of magnetic field , author=. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  50. [51]

    U. P. Yerg\

    F. Hampe and S. Stopkowicz and Niklas Gross and M.P. Kitsaras and L. Grazioli and S. Blaschke and L. Monzel and \"U. P. Yerg\"un and C.M. R\"oper , year =

  51. [52]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    Kitsaras, Marios-Petros and Grazioli, Laura and Stopkowicz, Stella , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0189350 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0189350 2024

  52. [53]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=

    Fully relativistic self-consistent field under a magnetic field , author=. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  53. [54]

    2017 , url =

    Quest: A rapid development platform for quantum electronic structure techniques , author =. 2017 , url =

    2017

  54. [55]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    Coupled-cluster techniques for computational chemistry: The CFOUR program package , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  55. [56]

    and Solovyev, D

    Zalialiutdinov, T. and Solovyev, D. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0269984 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0269984 2025

  56. [57]

    2015 , issn =

    Non-Born–Oppenheimer calculations of the HD molecule in a strong magnetic field , journal =. 2015 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2015.09.051 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2015.09.051 2015

  57. [58]

    2017 , issn =

    Explicitly-correlated non-born-oppenheimer calculations of the HD molecule in a strong magnetic field , journal =. 2017 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2017.06.016 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2017.06.016 2017

  58. [59]

    2020 , issn =

    A quantum-mechanical non-Born–Oppenheimer model of a molecule in a strong magnetic field , journal =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2020.138041 , url =

    arXiv 2020

  59. [60]

    Culpitt, Tanner and Peters, Laurens D. M. and Tellgren, Erik I. and Helgaker, Trygve , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0139675 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0139675 2023

  60. [61]

    , title =

    Bhati, Mansi and Tao, Zhen and Bian, Xuezhi and Rawlinson, Jonathan and Littlejohn, Robert and Subotnik, Joseph E. , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  61. [62]

    and Irons, Tom J

    Pemberton, Miles J. and Irons, Tom J. P. and Helgaker, Trygve and Teale, Andrew M. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0092520 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0092520 2022

  62. [63]

    Approximate constant of motion for molecular ions in a magnetic field , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1989 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.40.3515 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.40.3515 1989

  63. [64]

    Electronic and nuclear motion and their couplings in the presence of a magnetic field , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1988 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.38.6066 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.38.6066 1988

  64. [65]

    International journal of quantum chemistry , volume=

    Molecules in strong magnetic fields: Some perspectives and general aspects , author=. International journal of quantum chemistry , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  65. [66]

    The geometric phase in molecular systems , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 1992 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.51 , url =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.51 1992

  66. [67]

    Alden , title=

    Yin, Li and Mead, C. Alden , title=. Theoretica chimica acta , year=. doi:10.1007/BF01113940 , url=

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01113940

  67. [68]

    , title =

    Yin, Li and Alden Mead, C. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1994 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.466806 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.466806 1994

  68. [69]

    1999 , issn =

    Classical Molecular Dynamics Simulation with the Velocity Verlet Algorithm at Strong External Magnetic Fields , journal =. 1999 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1999.6237 , url =

    arXiv 1999

  69. [70]

    Computer Experiments on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules , author =. Phys. Rev. , volume =. 1967 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.159.98 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.159.98 1967

  70. [71]

    Journal of Molecular Modeling , year=

    Khajeh, Kosar and Aminfar, Habib and Masuda, Yoshihiro and Mohammadpourfard, Mousa , title=. Journal of Molecular Modeling , year=. doi:10.1007/s00894-020-4349-0 , url=

    work page doi:10.1007/s00894-020-4349-0

  71. [72]

    and Marracino, P

    della Valle, E. and Marracino, P. and Setti, S. and Cadossi, R. and Liberti, M. and Apollonio, F. , booktitle=. Magnetic molecular dynamics simulations with Velocity Verlet algorithm , year=

  72. [73]

    Electron-corrected Lorentz forces in solids and molecules in a magnetic field , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.161101 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.161101 2007

  73. [74]

    Culpitt, Tanner and Peters, Laurens D. M. and Tellgren, Erik I. and Helgaker, Trygve , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0055388 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0055388 2021

  74. [75]

    Peters, Laurens D. M. and Culpitt, Tanner and Monzel, Laurenz and Tellgren, Erik I. and Helgaker, Trygve , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0056235 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0056235 2021

  75. [76]

    Laurens D. M. Peters and Erik I. Tellgren and Trygve Helgaker , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 2024 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/00268976.2023.2259008 , URL =

    arXiv 2024

  76. [77]

    and Culpitt, Tanner and Peters, Laurens D

    Tellgren, Erik I. and Culpitt, Tanner and Peters, Laurens D. M. and Helgaker, Trygve , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0139684 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0139684 2023

  77. [78]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume =

    Tang, Diandong and Liu, Aodong and Culpitt, Tanner and Hammes-Schiffer, Sharon and Li, Xiaosong , title =. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  78. [79]

    and Sen, Sangita , title =

    Yenugu, Nikhil and Tiwari, Ashwani K. and Sen, Sangita , title =. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  79. [80]

    Gauge-invariant grid discretization of the Schr\"odinger equation , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.7816 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.7816 1998

  80. [81]

    Confinement of quarks , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1974 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2445 1974

Showing first 80 references.