Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 44 references

Driven-dissipative bosonic lattices host emergent three-state Potts criticality, classical in 2D and quantum in 1D.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 07:50 UTC pith:BAUJS3UL

load-bearing objection A genuine first step toward Z3/Potts criticality in driven-dissipative lattices, but the evidence is a consistency check with assumed exponents and the 1D quantum claim is confounded — needs controlled runs before the claims hold. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08425 v3 pith:BAUJS3UL submitted 2026-07-09 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Quantum and Classical Potts Criticality in Driven-Dissipative Bosonic Lattices

Jacopo Tosca , Zejian Li , Cristiano Ciuti This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords driven-dissipative bosonic latticesPotts universality classZ3 symmetry breakingfinite-size scalingmultiphoton dissipationopen quantum systemsvariational multi-Gaussian ansatznonequilibrium steady state
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether a genuinely nonequilibrium system—a lattice of photon-lossy nonlinear resonators with three-photon driving—can display the same critical behavior as the three-state Potts model, a three-state cousin of the Ising model from equilibrium statistical mechanics. The authors argue that the steady state spontaneously breaks a Z3 symmetry and that the transition falls in the universality class of the 2D classical three-state Potts model when only single-photon losses are present, and in the 1D quantum three-state Potts class when three-photon losses are included. If right, this extends the known Z2/Ising correspondence to higher discrete symmetries and establishes multiphoton losses as the switch between classical and quantum criticality.

Core claim

For a lattice of Kerr-nonlinear cavities pumped by three-photon parametric driving, the nonequilibrium steady state breaks the Z3 symmetry of the Liouvillian. The authors show that the effective interaction between sites, derived in the strong-driving limit, is exactly the three-state Potts Hamiltonian, and they provide finite-size scaling collapses of the Z3 parity order parameter with the Potts exponents beta=1/9 and nu=5/6. The claim is that in two dimensions with single-photon losses the transition belongs to the 2D classical three-state Potts universality class, while in one dimension with three-photon losses it belongs to the 1D quantum three-state Potts class, with the baths' multipho

What carries the argument

The central objects are the Z3 parity operator (a three-valued discrete rotation of the photon-number phase) as order parameter, and the Variational Multi-Gaussian (VMG) ansatz, which represents the many-body Wigner function as a sum of rotating Gaussian components. The linking identity is the effective lattice energy: in the ordered phase the hopping term alone distinguishes configurations and reduces to a ferromagnetic cosine coupling that is exactly the three-state Potts interaction, so the universality class is fixed by the Liouvillian's exact Z3 symmetry rather than by microscopic details.

Load-bearing premise

The variational multi-Gaussian wavefunction with only 24–30 Gaussian components is accurate enough that the finite-size scaling collapses are real Potts criticality rather than artifacts of the ansatz.

What would settle it

Compute the same 2D transition with an independent method—tensor network, exact diagonalization, or stochastic wavefunction—for lattice sizes 4x4 through 8x8, and check whether the ⟨Z3⟩ curves still collapse with beta=1/9 and nu=5/6 at the same critical drive. If the collapse requires different exponents or breaks down as sizes grow, the Potts-universality claim is false.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The Z3 parity drop sharpens with lattice size and collapses onto one curve using beta=1/9 and nu=5/6, so the 2D transition is continuous and Potts-like.
  • Turning on three-photon losses in 1D yields the same exponents, signaling the 1D quantum Potts class, not the classical one.
  • The pattern suggests a general law: n-photon drive sets the Zn symmetry and universality class, while n-photon losses promote classical to quantum criticality.
  • Circuit-QED and photonic platforms that already realize tri-squeezed states become candidate experimental settings for these transitions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's quantum-classical distinction rests on dimension and loss channels; a natural extension is to test whether four-photon drives realize Ashkin-Teller criticality, as the authors conjecture.
  • The strong-driving derivation suggests the Potts identification may hold even outside the semiclassical limit because the exact Z3 symmetry of the Lindbladian, not microscopic parameters, controls universality—if so, the exponents should be robust to moderate changes in detuning and Kerr nonlinearity.
  • If the 1D quantum Potts universality is realized, a lattice with boundaries might exhibit parafermionic edge behavior, linking this steady-state transition to topological proposals—something the paper does not address.
  • A direct experimental signature: measuring ⟨Z3⟩ versus drive amplitude in a 3-photon-driven resonator array should show the predicted critical drift and shift exponents.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies a Bose-Hubbard lattice with three-photon parametric driving, whose Lindblad dynamics has an exact Z3 symmetry. In the strong-driving ordered phase, the authors derive an effective energy functional (Eq. (6)) equal to the three-state clock/Potts ferromagnet. They simulate the steady state with the Variational Multi-Gaussian (VMG) phase-space ansatz, benchmark it against exact single-mode dynamics, and perform finite-size scaling (FSS) on four system sizes per dimension. For 2D square lattices with single-photon losses only, they report a collapse with the 2D classical 3-state Potts exponents β=1/9, ν=5/6 and fitted Gc=0.661. For 1D chains with additional three-photon losses, they report a collapse with the same exponents (which also characterize the 1D quantum Potts transition via quantum-to-classical mapping) and fitted Gc=1.141. They conclude that driven-dissipative bosonic lattices realize classical and quantum Potts criticality and propose a general correspondence: n-photon drive fixes the Z_n symmetry, while n-photon losses promote classical to quantum criticality.

Significance. If established, this would be a substantial extension of the emergent-equilibrium-universality program from the Z2 Ising paradigm to the three-state Potts universality class. The VMG method is a nontrivial methodological step: stochastic phase-space approaches fail when three-photon losses are present, and the exact single-mode benchmark (Fig. 1) is a genuine validation of the ansatz in a strongly non-Gaussian regime. The proposed classical-to-quantum knob (presence of the n-photon loss channel) is elegant and experimentally relevant. However, as presented, the universality-class identification is a consistency check with fixed exponents, not a model-independent extraction; the 1D claim is not distinguishable from the 2D classical class by the collapse data; and no control simulation separates the change in dimension from the change in dissipation channel. The paper therefore currently establishes a plausible and interesting scenario rather than a definitive classification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Universality class; Eq. (9), Figs. 2 and 3] The FSS collapses use β=1/9 and ν=5/6 as fixed inputs, not as outputs. With only four lattice sizes (2D: 5×5–8×8; 1D: L=12–32), no collapse residuals, no error bars on ⟨Z3⟩ or Gc, and no correction-to-scaling analysis, Eq. (9) cannot discriminate the claimed Potts class from nearby universality classes or from a weakly first-order transition with finite-size rounding. Please extract β/ν and 1/ν from the data (or at least report a collapse-quality metric over a grid of exponents), include bootstrap confidence intervals on Gc, and test stability with correction-to-scaling terms. Without this, Figs. 2(b) and 3(b) demonstrate compatibility, not identification.
  2. [Universality class; Fig. 3(b), Table I] The 1D quantum 3-state Potts exponents coincide with the 2D classical 3-state Potts exponents through the standard quantum-to-classical correspondence. Therefore the collapse in Fig. 3(b) cannot certify quantum criticality; it is equally consistent with 2D classical Potts criticality. The comparison also changes dimension and dissipation channel simultaneously (2D with η3=0 versus 1D with η3=γ), so the mechanism 'three-photon losses promote quantum universality' summarized in Table I is not isolated. Please provide control data (e.g., 1D with η3=0 and 2D with η3>0) or use an intrinsically quantum diagnostic (entanglement structure, central charge, or dynamical exponent) that distinguishes the two interpretations.
  3. [Numerical method; Fig. 1, Fig. 2(a), Fig. 3(a)] The VMG accuracy is benchmarked only against exact single-mode dynamics. No many-body convergence check in NG is shown for the 5×5–8×8 or L=12–32 lattices used in the FSS. Since NG=24 and NG=30 are used in different settings, it is not evident that variational error is controlled at these sizes; size-dependent variational bias could be mistaken for genuine finite-size scaling. Please include convergence of ⟨Z3⟩ with NG for representative system sizes, or error bars derived from the variational uncertainty, before interpreting the collapse.
  4. [Model and Potts structure / End Matter; Eq. (6)] Equation (6) is derived in the strong-driving product-state coherent-state limit and is a valid effective classical Potts Hamiltonian there. Its use at the critical point rests on the assertion that the exact Z3 symmetry of the Lindbladian determines universality. That assertion is plausible but not demonstrated; Z3 symmetry alone does not fix the universality class, as different three-state models can have different critical behavior. The finite-size data are the only evidence and, as noted above, are currently insufficient. Please clarify what part of the Potts-class claim is derived and what part is numerical hypothesis-testing.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1] The caption labels panels (b) and (c), but the text refers to 'Figure 1(a) shows a snapshot...' with the VMG Wigner function; the panel lettering should be made consistent.
  2. [Figs. 2 and 3] The choices NG=24 (2D) and NG=30 (1D) are stated but not justified. Please state how the number of Gaussian components was chosen and how sensitive the order-parameter curves are to this choice.
  3. [Fig. 3(a)] The steady-state averaging procedure is described as 'a time window of 5γ^{-1} (500 time steps)' but the time step is not given. Please report the integration time step and the thermalization/relaxation criterion.
  4. [Table I] The column headers are terse. Define 'd' and clarify entries such as 'absent'/'present' (also, 'n-loss' meaning n-photon loss). A short caption explaining the correspondence would help.
  5. [Footnote 42] The footnote claims the collapse quality is comparable to Ref. [14] despite smaller sizes, but no quantitative metric is given. Please provide the measure used for this comparison.
  6. [General] There are accented-character artifacts in the author affiliation (e.g., 'Universit´ e Paris Cit´ e'). These are cosmetic but should be cleaned before final submission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Potts-class claim is tested by fixed-exponent collapses, not derived from them.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The effective Potts energy, Eq. (6), is derived by evaluating the Hamiltonian on coherent product states in the ordered phase (End Matter), not by assuming Potts criticality. The finite-size scaling analysis uses the standard scaling form Eq. (9) with Potts exponents β=1/9 and ν=5/6 taken from external references [23,40]; only the critical drive Gc is fitted. This is a consistency test of the computed order-parameter curves against a proposed universality class, not a construction in which the target exponents are extracted from the same data and then called a prediction. The 1D quantum Potts and 2D classical Potts exponents coincide, so the collapse alone cannot distinguish those interpretations; that is an identifiability/correctness concern, not circularity. The VMG method is cited from the authors' prior work [37], but it is an independently developed, benchmarked variational approach, and its use here is methodological rather than a vehicle for smuggling in the Potts conclusion. The single-mode benchmark (Fig. 1) validates the method but is not used as the Potts evidence. The acknowledged limitation in footnote [42] (smaller system sizes due to memory) is an accuracy limitation, not a circular step. No equation or parameter is defined in terms of the claim it is supposed to establish.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new entities are postulated. The central load-bearing assumptions are the accuracy of the VMG approximation for many-body steady states, the adequacy of finite-size scaling at very small system sizes, and the universality-based extension of the strong-driving Potts mapping. Two critical-drive values are fitted to get the collapses.

free parameters (2)
  • Critical drive Gc (2D) = 0.661
    Fitted to produce the finite-size scaling collapse in Fig. 2b; not predicted from the model.
  • Critical drive Gc (1D) = 1.141
    Fitted to produce the finite-size scaling collapse in Fig. 3b; not predicted from the model.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Lindblad master equation with local single- and three-photon loss channels is the correct description of the photonic/circuit-QED platform.
    Eqs. (2)-(3) define all dynamics; if a non-Markovian or different loss mechanism were relevant, the steady state and criticality would differ.
  • domain assumption The VMG ansatz with NG=24-30 Gaussian components accurately represents the many-body steady state at the system sizes simulated.
    Benchmarked against exact single-mode dynamics only (Fig. 1); no many-body convergence test is reported. All finite-size scaling data depend on this assumption.
  • domain assumption Finite-size scaling form Eq. (9) with the assumed Potts exponents holds with negligible corrections to scaling for L=5-8 (2D) and L=12-32 (1D).
    No correction-to-scaling terms, no exponent extraction, and no collapse-quality metric are provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The strong-driving Potts mapping Eq. (6) extends to the critical region by universality.
    Text after Eq. (6): 'This expectation extends well beyond the validity of the effective Hamiltonian, since universality is dictated by the exact Z3 symmetry...' This is stated, not derived.
  • standard math The 1D quantum 3-state Potts universality class has the same critical exponents (beta=1/9, nu=5/6) as the 2D classical 3-state Potts model.
    Standard quantum-to-classical correspondence cited in Refs. [23,38-40]; used to justify the collapse in Fig. 3b.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10297 in / 12755 out tokens · 118044 ms · 2026-08-02T07:50:10.585744+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of equilibrium universality from intrinsically nonequilibrium dynamics is a fundamental open problem. Bose-Hubbard lattices realized in photonic and circuit-QED platforms provide a versatile setting to engineer nonlinear interactions, dissipation, and multiphoton processes. Here we investigate a Bose-Hubbard lattice subject to three-photon parametric driving, whose nonequilibrium steady state spontaneously breaks a $\mathbb Z_3$ symmetry and realizes the criticality of the three-state Potts model, a three-state generalization of the Ising model. Using a variational phase-space approach with systematically controllable accuracy based on a Variational Multi-Gaussian ansatz, we perform finite-size scaling analyses in one and two spatial dimensions. We find that, in two-dimensional lattices with single-photon losses, the nonequilibrium steady-state transition belongs to the universality class of the 2D classical three-state Potts model. In contrast, in one-dimensional lattices with three-photon losses, the transition is governed by the one-dimensional quantum three-state Potts universality class. These results establish driven-dissipative bosonic lattices as a platform for emergent Potts criticality and identify multiphoton dissipation as a mechanism that promotes nonequilibrium critical behavior from classical to quantum universality classes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08425 by Cristiano Ciuti, Jacopo Tosca, Zejian Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Sketch of a photonic Kerr resonator with nonlinearity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Sketch of a photonic Kerr resonator with nonlinearity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Steady-state ⟨Zˆ3⟩ as a function of the real part of the three-photon drive Re G3 for 2D lattice sizes 5×5 to 8×8, computed with a total of NG = 24 Gaussian components. Here ⟨Zˆ3⟩ is the Z3 parity order parameter, which equals unity in the symmetric phase and vanishes as the three symmetry-broken sectors become equally populated. The increasingly sharp drop with system size signals a continuous Z3 symm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Steady-state of the order parameter ⟨Zˆ3⟩ as a function of the real part of the three-photon drive Re G3 for 1D chains of length L = 12, 16, 24, 32, computed with NG = 30 Gaussian components. The steady-state values are obtained by averaging the late-time dynamics over a time window of 5 γ −1 (500 time steps). (b) Finite-size scaling collapse using the critical exponents of the 1D quantum 3-state Potts… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Steady-state of the order parameter ⟨Zˆ3⟩ as a function of the real part of the three-photon drive Re G3 for 1D chains of length L = 12, 16, 24, 32, computed with NG = 30 Gaussian components. The steady-state values are obtained by averaging the late-time dynamics over a time window of 5 γ −1 (500 time steps). (b) Finite-size scaling collapse using the critical exponents of the 1D quantum 3-state Potts… view at source ↗

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter, Reviews of Modern Physics97, 025004 (2025)

    2025

  2. [2]

    Breuer and F

    H. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quan- tum Systems, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, UK, 2002) p. 648

    2002

  3. [3]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir` o, Many- body open quantum systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 99 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    A. A. Houck, H. E. T¨ ureci, and J. Koch, On-chip quan- tum simulation with superconducting circuits, Nature Physics8, 292 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    Carusotto, A

    I. Carusotto, A. A. Houck, A. J. Koll´ ar, P. Roushan, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, Photonic materials in cir- cuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature Physics16, 268 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    S. M. Girvin, Schr¨ odinger cat states in circuit QED, Cur- rent Trends in Atomic Physics107, 402 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Blais, S

    A. Blais, S. M. Girvin, and W. D. Oliver, Quantum infor- mation processing and quantum optics with circuit quan- tum electrodynamics, Nature Physics16, 247 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Raftery, D

    J. Raftery, D. Sadri, S. Schmidt, H. E. T¨ ureci, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipation-induced classical to quantum transition, Phys. Rev. X4, 031043 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase transi- tion in a one-dimensional circuit QED lattice, Phys. Rev. X7(2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Pierangeli, G

    D. Pierangeli, G. Marcucci, and C. Conti, Large-scale photonic Ising machine by spatial light modulation, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 213902 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Beaulieu, F

    G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, V. Savona, S. Fe- licetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Observation of first- and second-order dissipative phase transitions in a two-photon driven Kerr resonator, Nat. Commun.16, 1954 (2025)

    1954

  12. [12]

    J. A. Muniz, D. Barberena, R. J. Lewis-Swan, D. J. Young, J. R. K. Cline, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Exploring dynamical phase transitions with cold atoms in an optical cavity, Nature580, 602 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Lebreuilly, A

    J. Lebreuilly, A. Biella, F. Storme, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, C. Ciuti, and I. Carusotto, Stabilizing strongly correlated 6 photon fluids with non-markovian reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A96, 033828 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    R. Rota, F. Minganti, C. Ciuti, and V. Savona, Quan- tum critical regime in a quadratically driven nonlinear photonic lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 110405 (2019)

    2019

  15. [15]

    Vicentini, F

    F. Vicentini, F. Minganti, R. Rota, G. Orso, and C. Ciuti, Critical slowing down in driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattices, Phys. Rev. A97, 013853 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    Tosca, M

    J. Tosca, M. C. Strinati, C. Conti, and C. Ciuti, Emer- gent equilibrium in all-optical single quantum-trajectory Ising machines, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 230404 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Tosca, C

    J. Tosca, C. Ciuti, C. Conti, and M. C. Strinati, Ising selector machine by Kerr parametric oscillators (2026), arXiv:2604.12718 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Z. Li, F. Claude, T. Boulier, E. Giacobino, Q. Glorieux, A. Bramati, and C. Ciuti, Dissipative Phase Transition with Driving-Controlled Spatial Dimension and Diffu- sive Boundary Conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 093601 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Z. Li, A. Soret, and C. Ciuti, Dissipation-induced an- tiferromagneticlike frustration in coupled photonic res- onators, Phys. Rev. A103, 022616 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlastakis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge,et al., Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science (New York, N.Y.)347, 853 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    C. Wang, Y. Y. Gao, P. Reinhold, R. W. Heeres, N. Ofek, K. Chou, C. Axline, M. Reagor, J. Blumoff, K. M. Sliwa, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, A Schr¨ odinger cat living in two boxes, Science352, 1087 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Verstraelen, R

    W. Verstraelen, R. Rota, V. Savona, and M. Wouters, Gaussian trajectory approach to dissipative phase transi- tions: The case of quadratically driven photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    F. Y. Wu, The Potts model, Rev. Mod. Phys.54, 235 (1982)

    1982

  24. [24]

    R. J. Baxter, Potts model at the critical temperature, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.6, L445 (1973)

    1973

  25. [25]

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nonlocal (parafermion) currents in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory and self-dual critical points inz n- symmetric statistical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP62, 215 (1985)

    1985

  26. [26]

    Alicea and P

    J. Alicea and P. Fendley, Topological phases with parafermions: Theory and blueprints, Annu. Rev. Con- dens. Matter Phys.7, 119 (2016)

    2016

  27. [27]

    Bretz, Ordered helium films on highly uniform graphite—finite-size effects, critical parameters, and the three-state potts model, Phys

    M. Bretz, Ordered helium films on highly uniform graphite—finite-size effects, critical parameters, and the three-state potts model, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 501 (1977)

    1977

  28. [28]

    Gosner, B

    J. Gosner, B. Kubala, and J. Ankerhold, Relaxation dy- namics and dissipative phase transition in quantum os- cillators with period tripling, Phys. Rev. B101, 054501 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Minganti, V

    F. Minganti, V. Savona, and A. Biella, Dissipative phase transitions inn-photon driven quantum nonlinear res- onators, Quantum7, 1170 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Kruglikov, F

    L. Kruglikov, F. Ferrari, and V. Savona, Chaos and quantum regimes inn-photon-driven dissipative bosonic chains, Phys. Rev. A112, 052216 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Bruno, P

    A. Bruno, P. P. Potts, A. Grimm, and M. Brunelli, Quan- tum theory of a three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator (2026), arXiv:2605.21036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Svensson, A

    I.-M. Svensson, A. Bengtsson, P. Krantz, J. Bylander, V. Shumeiko, and P. Delsing, Period-tripling subhar- monic oscillations in a driven superconducting resonator, Phys. Rev. B96, 174503 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    C. W. S. Chang, C. Sab ´ ın, P. Forn-D ´ ıaz, F. Quijandr ´ ıa, A. M. Vadiraj, I. Nsanzineza, G. Johansson, and C. M. Wilson, Observation of three-photon spontaneous para- metric down-conversion in a superconducting parametric cavity, Phys. Rev. X10, 011011 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    P. D. Drummond and A. D. Hardman, Simulation of quantum effects in Raman-active waveguides, Europhys. Lett.21, 279 (1993)

    1993

  35. [35]

    Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Ann

    A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.)325, 1790–1852 (2010)

    2010

  36. [36]

    Deuar, A

    P. Deuar, A. Ferrier, M. Matuszewski, G. Orso, and M. H. Szyma´ nska, Fully quantum scalable description of driven-dissipative lattice models, PRX Quantum2, 010319 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Tosca, F

    J. Tosca, F. Carnazza, L. Giacomelli, and C. Ciuti, Effi- cient variational dynamics of open quantum bosonic sys- tems via automatic differentiation (2025), accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. X, arXiv:2507.14076 [quant- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Rapp and G

    ´A. Rapp and G. Zar´ and, Dynamical correlations and quantum phase transition in the quantum Potts model, Phys. Rev. B74, 014433 (2006)

    2006

  39. [39]

    ´A. Rapp, P. Schmitteckert, G. Tak´ acs, and G. Zar´ and, Asymptotic scattering and duality in the one-dimensional three-state quantum Potts model on a lattice, New J. Phys.15, 013058 (2013)

    2013

  40. [40]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1996)

    1996

  41. [41]

    M. E. Fisher and M. N. Barber, Scaling theory for finite- size effects in the critical region, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 1516 (1972)

    1972

  42. [42]

    The largest system size considered isL= 32, compared withL= 64 in Ref. [14], because automatic differentia- tion requires storing sixth-order derivatives generated by the three-photon-loss Lindbladian, leading to substan- tially higher memory requirements. Despite the smaller system sizes, the quality of the finite-size scaling collapse remains comparable...

  43. [43]

    Ashkin and E

    J. Ashkin and E. Teller, Statistics of two-dimensional lat- tices with four components, Phys. Rev.64, 178 (1943)

    1943

  44. [44]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Optics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994). End Matter Effective Potts energy in the ordered phase.— We de- rive the effective lattice energy of Eq. (6). In the strong driving ordered phase, each site occupies one of the three coherent states|α (kj )⟩=|α e i2πkj /3⟩, withk j ∈ {0,1,2}, and the many body state is the pr...

    1994