REVIEW 3 cited by
Lie Detector: Unified Backdoor Detection via Cross-Examination Framework
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Lie Detector: Unified Backdoor Detection via Cross-Examination Framework
read the original abstract
Institutions with limited data and computing resources often outsource model training to third-party providers in a semi-honest setting, assuming adherence to prescribed training protocols with pre-defined learning paradigm (e.g., supervised or semi-supervised learning). However, this practice can introduce severe security risks, as adversaries may poison the training data to embed backdoors into the resulting model. Existing detection approaches predominantly rely on statistical analyses, which often fail to maintain universally accurate detection accuracy across different learning paradigms. To address this challenge, we propose a unified backdoor detection framework in the semi-honest setting that exploits cross-examination of model inconsistencies between two independent service providers. Specifically, we integrate central kernel alignment to enable robust feature similarity measurements across different model architectures and learning paradigms, thereby facilitating precise recovery and identification of backdoor triggers. We further introduce backdoor fine-tuning sensitivity analysis to distinguish backdoor triggers from adversarial perturbations, substantially reducing false positives. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves superior detection performance, improving accuracy by 5.4%, 1.6%, and 11.9% over SoTA baselines across supervised, semi-supervised, and autoregressive learning tasks, respectively. Notably, it is the first to effectively detect backdoors in multimodal large language models, further highlighting its broad applicability and advancing secure deep learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
TimeGuard: Channel-wise Pool Training for Backdoor Defense in Time Series Forecasting
TimeGuard defends time series forecasting against backdoors via channel-wise pool training initialized by time-aware criteria and expanded with distance-regularized loss selection, improving poisoned MAE by 1.96x whil...
-
TimeGuard: Channel-wise Pool Training for Backdoor Defense in Time Series Forecasting
TimeGuard employs channel-wise pool training initialized with time-aware criteria and distance-regularized loss selection to defend time series forecasting against backdoor attacks, improving robustness by 1.96x while...
-
A Patch-based Cross-view Regularized Framework for Backdoor Defense in Multimodal Large Language Models
A patch-augmented cross-view regularization method reduces backdoor attack success rates in multimodal LLMs by enforcing output differences between original and perturbed views while using entropy constraints to prese...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.