The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2303.04048 · v3 · pith:BCH3HEQO · submitted 2023-03-07 · cs.CL · cs.AI

Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study

Reviewed by Pithpith:BCH3HEQOopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords chatgptevaluatormeta-evaluationmetricdatasetsevaluationhumanmetrics
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recently, the emergence of ChatGPT has attracted wide attention from the computational linguistics community. Many prior studies have shown that ChatGPT achieves remarkable performance on various NLP tasks in terms of automatic evaluation metrics. However, the ability of ChatGPT to serve as an evaluation metric is still underexplored. Considering assessing the quality of natural language generation (NLG) models is an arduous task and NLG metrics notoriously show their poor correlation with human judgments, we wonder whether ChatGPT is a good NLG evaluation metric. In this report, we provide a preliminary meta-evaluation on ChatGPT to show its reliability as an NLG metric. In detail, we regard ChatGPT as a human evaluator and give task-specific (e.g., summarization) and aspect-specific (e.g., relevance) instruction to prompt ChatGPT to evaluate the generated results of NLG models. We conduct experiments on five NLG meta-evaluation datasets (including summarization, story generation and data-to-text tasks). Experimental results show that compared with previous automatic metrics, ChatGPT achieves state-of-the-art or competitive correlation with human judgments in most cases. In addition, we find that the effectiveness of the ChatGPT evaluator might be influenced by the creation method of the meta-evaluation datasets. For the meta-evaluation datasets which are created greatly depending on the reference and thus are biased, the ChatGPT evaluator might lose its effectiveness. We hope our preliminary study could prompt the emergence of a general-purposed reliable NLG metric.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PEEM: Prompt Engineering Evaluation Metrics for Interpretable Joint Evaluation of Prompts and Responses

    cs.CL 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PEEM is a multi-criteria LLM-based evaluator for prompts and responses that aligns with standard accuracy while enabling zero-shot prompt optimization via feedback.

  2. MMP-Refer: Multimodal Path Retrieval-augmented LLMs For Explainable Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    MMP-Refer augments LLMs with multimodal retrieval paths and a trainable collaborative adapter to produce more accurate and explainable recommendations.

  3. SLoW: Select Low-frequency Words! Automatic Dictionary Selection for Translation on Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SLoW selects low-frequency word dictionaries to boost LLM translation quality and efficiency across 100 languages from FLORES.

  4. In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework

    cs.IR 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified framework and large-scale comparison of graph-based RAG methods on QA tasks yields new high-performing variants obtained by recombining existing components.

  5. Dictionary Insertion Prompting for Multilingual Reasoning on Multilingual Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DIP interleaves English word translations into non-English prompts to boost multilingual reasoning on synthetic benchmarks spanning 10-200 languages.

  6. From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization

    cs.CL 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GraphRAG improves comprehensiveness and diversity of answers to global questions over million-token document sets by constructing entity graphs and hierarchical community summaries before combining partial responses.

  7. GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts

    cs.AI 2023-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GPTFuzz is a black-box fuzzing framework that mutates seed jailbreak templates to automatically generate effective attacks, achieving over 90% success rates on models including ChatGPT and Llama-2.

  8. ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate

    cs.CL 2023-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    Multi-agent debate among LLMs yields more reliable text evaluations than single-agent prompting by simulating collaborative human judgment.

  9. G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment

    cs.CL 2023-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    G-Eval uses GPT-4 with chain-of-thought and form-filling to reach 0.514 Spearman correlation with humans on summarization, beating prior NLG metrics while noting a bias toward LLM outputs.

  10. A Pilot Study on Curator-Guided Multilingual Art Description for Blind and Low-Vision Audiences with Small Vision-Language Models

    cs.MM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Pilot evaluation of language-specific versus multilingual LoRA adapters on Qwen2.5-VL-3B for curator-guided BLV art descriptions in three languages.

  11. Supporting System Testing with a Multi-Agent LLM-based Framework for Knowledge Graph Extraction: A Case Study with Ethernet Switch Systems

    cs.SE 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    A multi-agent LLM-based framework extracts knowledge graphs from 50 real Ethernet switch manuals with 0.97-0.99 correctness to enable downstream test case specification generation.