Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Constructing and Machine Learning Calabi-Yau Five-folds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.15966 v2 pith:BEMHBR5G submitted 2023-10-24 hep-th cs.LGmath.AG

classification hep-thcs.LGmath.AG
keywords spacesveryaccuracycalabi-yaucohomologicaldatafindfive-folds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We construct all possible complete intersection Calabi-Yau five-folds in a product of four or less complex projective spaces, with up to four constraints. We obtain $27068$ spaces, which are not related by permutations of rows and columns of the configuration matrix, and determine the Euler number for all of them. Excluding the $3909$ product manifolds among those, we calculate the cohomological data for $12433$ cases, i.e. $53.7 \%$ of the non-product spaces, obtaining $2375$ different Hodge diamonds. The dataset containing all the above information is available at https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/z7ii5idt6qxu36e0b8azq/h?rlkey=0qfhx3tykytduobpld510gsfy&dl=0 . The distributions of the invariants are presented, and a comparison with the lower-dimensional analogues is discussed. Supervised machine learning is performed on the cohomological data, via classifier and regressor (both fully connected and convolutional) neural networks. We find that $h^{1,1}$ can be learnt very efficiently, with very high $R^2$ score and an accuracy of $96\%$, i.e. $96 \%$ of the predictions exactly match the correct values. For $h^{1,4},h^{2,3}, \eta$, we also find very high $R^2$ scores, but the accuracy is lower, due to the large ranges of possible values.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Machine Learning Free Quotients of CICYs

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Machine-learning classifiers, especially a multi-head attention model, correctly identify almost all free Z2, Z3, Z4, and Z2xZ2 quotients of CICYs on held-out manifolds, with only three missed Z2xZ2 cases.

  2. Machine Learning Toric Duality in Brane Tilings

    hep-th 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Neural networks classify Seiberg dual classes on Z_m x Z_n orbifolds with R^2=0.988 and predict toric multiplicities for Y^{6,0} with mean absolute error 0.021 under fixed Kasteleyn representative.

Pith tools