Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Supertranslations extend into the bulk of spacetime as shifts between null hypersurfaces, producing a curvature-dependent memory effect that can send light rays back from a black hole's photon sphere.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:25 UTC pith:BF53Z54Y

load-bearing objection A clean geometric definition of bulk supertranslations with one overreaching memory claim. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.20331 v3 pith:BF53Z54Y submitted 2025-12-23 hep-th gr-qc

Supertranslations in the bulk of spacetime

Pujian Mao This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords supertranslationBMS symmetrynull hypersurfacegravitational memory effectblack hole memoryNewman-Unti gaugecharacteristic flowSchwarzschild spacetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to prove that supertranslations—the infinite-dimensional symmetries first discovered at null infinity and black hole horizons—are not boundary phenomena but extend into the bulk of any Lorentzian spacetime. It defines a supertranslation purely geometrically: any function h(x^i) for which d(t+h) is a null vector selects a new family of null hypersurfaces, and the transition between families is the bulk supertranslation. The paper solves the resulting nonlinear first-order equation by characteristic flows, showing that every boundary supertranslation extends uniquely into the interior. In four-dimensional Schwarzschild the solution is an elliptic integral whose branch points are precisely the turning points of null geodesics; a gravitational wave with memory can therefore move a light ray from a hypersurface with no turning points to one where it turns around at the photon sphere and returns from the bulk. If correct, this gives asymptotic symmetry a direct, observable grip on light propagation deep inside curved spacetime.

Core claim

The central claim is Definition 2: in any coordinate system (t,x^i), a supertranslation is specified by a scalar h(x^i) such that d(t+h) is a null vector; equivalently, u=t+h labels a new family of null hypersurfaces. This makes supertranslations residual gauge transformations of the Newman-Unti construction, realized as transitions between null hypersurfaces, and the paper shows they are connected to boundary supertranslations by characteristic flows. Solving the null condition gives explicit bulk supertranslations in Minkowski spacetime and, in four-dimensional Schwarzschild, an elliptic-integral formula whose branch points coincide with turning points of null geodesics. Consequently, a gr

What carries the argument

The central object is the null hypersurface and the residual gauge transformation that selects a different family of them. In Newman-Unti coordinates the residual freedom is a scalar function f(r,x^a) with d(u+f) null; the coordinate-independent form is Definition 2, d(t+h) null. The null condition is a nonlinear first-order PDE, solved by the method of characteristic flows; the boundary value f0 at null infinity is the usual BMS supertranslation, and the characteristic flow uniquely extends it into the bulk. Light-ray operators built from light-ray integrals of the energy-momentum tensor on the null hypersurface are proposed as the algebra realizing the infinitesimal symmetries, and the bul

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands or falls on whether a passing gravitational wave actually transfers each light ray from its original null hypersurface to the new one labeled by the supertranslation—an identification the paper proposes rather than derives.

What would settle it

Compute, in black hole perturbation theory around Schwarzschild, the geodesic deviation of a null congruence after a memory burst: start with a ray on a null hypersurface with L=0 and check whether it acquires L≠0 and develops a real turning point at r=3M. If a characteristic evolution with a memory news function shows the ray never turning around, the proposed bulk memory effect is absent even though the geometric supertranslation construction stands.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Bulk supertranslations unify null-infinity and near-horizon symmetries: the same construction reproduces Λ-BMS supertranslations in an asymptotic expansion and near-horizon supertranslations in a horizon expansion.
  • The bulk supertranslation is the characteristic flow of a boundary supertranslation, so boundary and interior symmetries are connected by an explicit flow rather than being independent structures.
  • Gravitational-wave memory in the bulk is a transition of null geodesics from one null hypersurface to another; in this picture the transverse gradient L^2 of the supertranslation becomes the photon impact parameter squared.
  • In Schwarzschild, supertranslations can create turning points where none existed, so light rays can return from the bulk; this 'black hole memory' is computable within perturbation theory around the black hole.
  • The infinitesimal algebra is realized by light-ray operators on the null hypersurface, and the bulk supertranslation acts as a zero-mode operator in light-cone quantization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the returning-ray picture is correct, a memory burst near a black hole should be followed by delayed photons—an echo-like signal—beyond the standard displacement memory; this is a testable prediction not stated in the Letter.
  • Applying Definition 2 to Kerr (which the paper notes is possible) should yield frame-dragging corrections to the turning-point radius; computing it would extend the effect to rotating black holes.
  • The identification of L^2 with impact parameter suggests the effect changes a black hole shadow's size or brightness after a memory event, an observable connection to horizon-scale imaging.
  • Because the construction is coordinate-independent but relies on choosing a normalized timelike direction at infinity, one remaining question is how the bulk symmetry changes under boosts of that reference frame; the paper does not address this.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a coordinate-independent definition of supertranslations in the bulk of spacetime, realized as transitions between families of null hypersurfaces. After setting up Newman–Unti coordinates, the author defines a supertranslation by a scalar function h(x^i) such that d(t+h) is null, and solves the resulting first-order nonlinear PDE by the method of characteristics. Explicit solutions are given for four-dimensional Minkowski with a plane boundary (recovering the Compère–Long result [27]), Minkowski with sphere boundary in arbitrary dimensions, and four-dimensional Schwarzschild. In the Schwarzschild case, the solution involves elliptic-type integrals whose branch points are identified with turning points of null geodesics. The paper then proposes that gravitational-wave memory shifts null geodesics from one null hypersurface to another, leading to a curvature-dependent memory effect in which light rays can acquire turning points and return from the bulk.

Significance. If the construction is correct, it gives a clean, coordinate-independent way to extend boundary supertranslations into the interior, unifying null-infinity and horizon supertranslations and providing explicit bulk flows. The characteristic method is self-contained and has no fitted parameters; the Minkowski plane-boundary result correctly reproduces the known supertranslated metric of [27], and Eq. (18) does satisfy the null condition (17) when interpreted along characteristic coordinates. The main physical claim, however, is a proposed rather than derived mapping between this geometric transformation and a dynamical gravitational-wave memory process. The paper also makes an abstract-level claim about zero-mode operators in light-cone quantization that is not substantiated in the text. The geometric core is sound, but the memory prediction requires further dynamical input before it can be regarded as established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction; Schwarzschild solution, Eqs. (18)-(19) and Fig. 2] The paper's headline claim—that gravitational-wave memory moves null geodesics to the supertranslated hypersurface and that the constant L^2 in Eq. (18) becomes the photon's squared impact parameter after the burst—is asserted, not derived. The Introduction explicitly says 'we propose a bulk memory effect corresponding to the transition of null geodesics from one hypersurface to another,' and the returning-light prediction depends exactly on that identification. In standard BMS memory, a net supertranslation at null infinity is related to the GW burst by the Einstein equations; here no such dynamical calculation is given for the bulk. A concrete test would be to compute, within first-order perturbation theory around Schwarzschild, the late-time null geodesic congruence sourced by a memory-carrying radiation field and verify that it is the ar u=const hypersurface generated by Eq. (18), wi
  2. [Abstract; closing subsection of 'Four-dimensional Minkowski with plane boundary'] The abstract states that 'the bulk supertranslation acts as a zero-mode operator in the context of light-cone quantization,' but this claim is not derived or even defined anywhere in the paper. The only related passage is the closing remark, which says the algebra of residual gauge transformations 'strongly suggests' a realization in terms of light-ray operators, citing [12]. No light-cone quantization, no zero-mode operator, and no algebra computation appear. Either provide the derivation or remove the claim from the abstract.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Minkowski with sphere boundary; Schwarzschild solution] The explicit coordinate transformations are not given for the sphere-boundary Minkowski or Schwarzschild examples. Eq. (15) and Eq. (18) are expressed in characteristic variables ar x^a; to make the coordinate-independent claim concrete and to allow readers to check global regularity, the paper should provide (or at least outline) the inversion x^a(ar x^a,r) and the resulting ar u=u+f relation, as was done for the plane-boundary Minkowski case in Eq. (9).
  2. [Introduction; Conclusions] The paper claims the framework 'applies to generic spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions' and that near-horizon and Λ-BMS reductions follow, but no general proof or computation is shown. These assertions are plausible from the structure, but they should be flagged as remarks or supported by explicit derivations.
  3. [Eq. (13)] The characteristic equation for dp_a/ds is written with an index structure that is slightly ambiguous: it should be dp_a/ds = - (1/r^2) ∂_a γ_{cd} p^c p^d (with the r^{-2} factor), since p^2 = γ^{cd} p_c p_d. The subsequent conservation of L^2 also relies on the r-dependence of x^a(s); the derivation would be clearer if written out.
  4. [Schwarzschild section] The sentence 'Those branch points should correspond to points on the supertranslation horizon discovered in [28]' is vague. Either state the correspondence explicitly or remove the word 'should' and treat it as a conjecture.
  5. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract mentions 'zero-mode operator' and 'light-cone quantization' while the introduction mentions 'complete conservation laws'; neither is developed. These should be either substantiated or omitted to avoid overclaiming beyond the paper's content.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the bulk-supertranslation construction is a self-contained characteristic-flow PDE problem; the memory effect is explicitly a proposal, not a fitted or definitionally forced prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The bulk supertranslation is obtained by solving the null-condition PDE, Eq. (2), (11), and (17), with boundary data f0 fixed at infinity via the method of characteristics; no parameter is fitted to any target quantity and no prediction is renamed as an input. The Minkowski result (9) is checked against the external result [27], and the Schwarzschild integral (18) follows from the same first-order equation, with turning points (19) arising from the vanishing of a square root in the explicit solution—a mathematical consequence of the Schwarzschild metric, not of the ansatz. The only unforced element is the physical interpretation of the solution as a gravitational-wave memory effect: the Introduction explicitly says "we propose a bulk memory effect corresponding to the transition of null geodesics from one hypersurface to another," and the Schwarzschild discussion assumes that GW memory moves null generators onto the supertranslated hypersurface with L^2 acting as the photon impact parameter. That is an unproven physical assumption (a correctness or derivation gap), not a circular reduction: no step equates an output to an input by construction, and there is no load-bearing self-citation. The paper's Definition 2 is a definition; the nontrivial content is the PDE solution, its boundary recovery, and the explicit Schwarzschild turning-point structure, all of which are independently exhibited rather than assumed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on standard differential geometry (null foliations, eikonal theory), a domain assumption identifying residual gauge freedom with null scalars, and an ad-hoc physical assumption that memory corresponds to moving between null hypersurfaces. No numbers are fitted to data; M and f0 are physical inputs/boundary data, not free parameters. No new entities are invented.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Existence of a global foliation by null hypersurfaces (Newman–Unti gauge).
    The construction begins by assuming a family of null hypersurfaces u=const can be introduced; stated in the section 'The Newman-Unti coordinates', citing [39,40]. Caustics or global obstructions are not treated.
  • domain assumption Residual gauge transformations that preserve the null-foliation structure are exactly the scalars H with dH null (modulo rescaling).
    This identification in Definition 1/2 and Eq. (2) is the paper's central structural assumption; it equates supertranslations with eikonal solutions.
  • standard math At null infinity, the O(1) part of f reproduces the standard BMS supertranslation.
    Standard asymptotic analysis from [1-3]; used to connect bulk f to boundary f0 in the examples.
  • ad hoc to paper The method of characteristics with boundary data at r=infinity yields a global solution (minus branch chosen).
    The paper picks the outgoing branch and writes integrals from infinity; existence/uniqueness and possible caustics are not addressed; branch points appear specifically in the Schwarzschild example.
  • ad hoc to paper Gravitational-wave memory corresponds to a shift of null geodesics from one null hypersurface to another.
    Proposed in the Introduction ('we propose a bulk memory effect...') and used to interpret the Schwarzschild turning-point phenomenon; not derived from the equations of motion.
  • standard math The equatorial plane in Schwarzschild is totally geodesic, so the intersection of u=const with theta=pi/2 is a null geodesic.
    Footnote [94]; used for the simple memory example.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13117 in / 26338 out tokens · 250249 ms · 2026-08-03T14:25:24.743054+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Supertranslations are usually defined as asymptotic symmetries associated with spacetime boundaries, such as null infinity and black hole horizons. In this Letter, we show that supertranslations admit a natural, coordinate-independent extension into the bulk of spacetime, realized as transitions between families of null hypersurfaces. This construction applies to generic spacetimes admitting null boundaries with residual symmetries and unifies the realizations of supertranslations at null infinity and finite-distance null hypersurfaces such as black hole horizons. The bulk supertranslation is connected to boundary supertranslation by characteristic flows. The associated symmetry algebra at the linearized level can be realized by light-ray operators defined on the null hypersurface and the bulk supertranslation acts as a zero-mode operator in the context of light-cone quantization. Within this framework, the gravitational wave memory effect corresponds to a shift of null hypersurfaces in the bulk. As explicit examples, we compute bulk supertranslations in Minkowski spacetime and four-dimensional Schwarzschild spacetime, where we uncover a novel curvature-dependent memory effect with observable consequences for light propagation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.20331 by Pujian Mao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The black wavy lines represent gravitational waves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The black region represents the black hole. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravitational Memory Beyond Null Infinity through Finite-Distance Carrollian Screens

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Finite-distance null screens carry a Carrollian memory whose leading tracefree large-radius part reproduces the standard Bondi displacement memory in Robinson–Trautman spacetimes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 89 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269, 21 (1962)

    1962

  2. [2]

    R. K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity

  3. [3]

    Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational the- ory, Phys

    R. Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational the- ory, Phys. Rev.128, 2851 (1962)

    1962

  4. [4]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2018) arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2018) arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Strominger, On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering, JHEP07, 152 (2014), arXiv:1312.2229 [hep- th]

    A. Strominger, On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering, JHEP07, 152 (2014), arXiv:1312.2229 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger, BMS supertranslationsandWeinberg’ssoftgravitontheorem, JHEP05, 151 (2015), arXiv:1401.7026 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Strominger and A

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, Gravitational Mem- ory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems, JHEP 01, 086 (2016), arXiv:1411.5745 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Waves in asymptotically flat space-times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270, 103 (1962)

    1962

  9. [9]

    Bousso and M

    R. Bousso and M. Porrati, Observable Supertransla- tions,Phys.Rev.D96,086016(2017),arXiv:1706.09280 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Carlip, Black Hole Entropy from Bondi-Metzner- Sachs Symmetry at the Horizon, Phys

    S. Carlip, Black Hole Entropy from Bondi-Metzner- Sachs Symmetry at the Horizon, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 101301 (2018), arXiv:1702.04439 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Choi and R

    S. Choi and R. Akhoury, BMS Supertranslation Sym- metry Implies Faddeev-Kulish Amplitudes, JHEP02, 171 (2018), arXiv:1712.04551 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Sousa, G

    K. Sousa, G. Miláns del Bosch, and B. Reina, Super- translations: redundancies of horizon data, and global symmetries at null infinity, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 054002 (2018), arXiv:1707.02971 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Donnay, G

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, and F. Rosso, Quantum BMS transformations in conformally flat space-times and holography, JHEP12, 102 (2020), arXiv:2008.05483 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Córdova and S.-H

    C. Córdova and S.-H. Shao, Light-ray Operators and the BMS Algebra, Phys. Rev. D98, 125015 (2018), arXiv:1810.05706 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Fuentealba, M

    O. Fuentealba, M. Henneaux, S. Majumdar, J. Mat- ulich, and T. Neogi, Local supersymmetry and the square roots of Bondi-Metzner-Sachs supertranslations, Phys. Rev. D104, L121702 (2021), arXiv:2108.07825 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Chen, M.-T

    P.-N. Chen, M.-T. Wang, Y.-K. Wang, and S.- T. Yau, Supertranslation invariance of angular mo- mentum, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.25, 777 (2021), arXiv:2102.03235 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    O.Fuentealba, M.Henneaux, J.Matulich,andC.Troes- saert, Bondi-Metzner-Sachs Group in Five Spacetime Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 051103 (2022), arXiv:2111.09664 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Chakraborty, D

    S. Chakraborty, D. Ghosh, S. J. Hoque, A. Khairnar, and A. Virmani, Supertranslations at timelike infinity, JHEP02, 022 (2022), arXiv:2111.08907 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Javadinezhad and M

    R. Javadinezhad and M. Porrati, Supertranslation- Invariant Formula for the Angular Momentum Flux in Gravitational Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 011401 (2023), arXiv:2211.06538 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Veneziano and G

    G. Veneziano and G. A. Vilkovisky, Angular momentum loss in gravitational scattering, radiation reaction, and the Bondi gauge ambiguity, Phys. Lett. B834, 137419 (2022), arXiv:2201.11607 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    M.Henneaux,Corvino–Schoentheoremandsupertrans- lations at spatial infinity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, 2447007 (2024), arXiv:2306.12505 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Fuentealba, M

    O. Fuentealba, M. Henneaux, and C. Troessaert, Asymptotic Symmetry Algebra of Einstein Gravity and Lorentz Generators, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 111402 (2023), arXiv:2305.05436 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Elkhidir, D

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, and R. Roiban, Supertrans- lations from Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 151601 (2025), arXiv:2408.15961 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Javadinezhad and M

    R. Javadinezhad and M. Porrati, Three Puzzles with Covariance and Supertranslation Invariance of Angular Momentum Flux and Their Solutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 151604 (2024), arXiv:2312.02458 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    V.DeLuca, J.Khoury,andS.S.C.Wong,Gravitational memory and Ward identities in the local detector frame, Phys. Rev. D112, 024032 (2025), arXiv:2412.12273 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    V.DeLuca, J.Khoury,andS.S.C.Wong,Gravitational memoryandsofttheorems: Thelocalperspective,Phys. Rev. D112, L021502 (2025), arXiv:2412.01910 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    In [27], a radial shiftr= ¯r−∂ ζ∂¯ζf0 was introduced, which cor- responds to the integration constant indr ds = 1

    for a supertranslated Minkowski spacetime. In [27], a radial shiftr= ¯r−∂ ζ∂¯ζf0 was introduced, which cor- responds to the integration constant indr ds = 1. However, this shift does not affect the definition of the supertrans- lation. We now pinpoint the supertranslation effect from the new coordinates(¯u,¯r,ζ, ¯ζ). Importantly, this is not merely the in...

  28. [28]

    Henneaux, Wheeler-DeWitt Equation and Bondi- Metzner-Sachs (BMS) Symmetry, Phys

    M. Henneaux, Wheeler-DeWitt Equation and Bondi- Metzner-Sachs (BMS) Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 061501 (2025), arXiv:2506.02240 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Compère and J

    G. Compère and J. Long, Vacua of the gravitational field, JHEP07, 137 (2016), arXiv:1601.04958 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Compère and J

    G. Compère and J. Long, Classical static final state of collapse with supertranslation memory, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 195001 (2016), arXiv:1602.05197 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Compère, Bulk supertranslation memories: a con- cept reshaping the vacua and black holes of general relativity, Int

    G. Compère, Bulk supertranslation memories: a con- cept reshaping the vacua and black holes of general relativity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, 1644006 (2016), arXiv:1606.00377 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    However, those works mainly specify a bulk supertranslation from the asymptotic be- havior

    The supertranslation on particular exact solutions has been studied in [27–29]. However, those works mainly specify a bulk supertranslation from the asymptotic be- havior. The critical issue as a symmetry, what it pre- 7 serves in the bulk, is still unclear

  33. [33]

    Donnay, G

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. Gonzalez, and M. Pino, Supertranslations and Superrotations at the Black Hole Horizon, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 091101 (2016), arXiv:1511.08687 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Donnay, G

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. González, and M. Pino, Extended Symmetries at the Black Hole Horizon, JHEP 09, 100, arXiv:1607.05703 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Ashtekar and S

    A. Ashtekar and S. Speziale, Horizons and null infin- ity: A fugue in four voices, Phys. Rev. D109, L061501 (2024), arXiv:2401.15618 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Ashtekar and S

    A. Ashtekar and S. Speziale, Null infinity as a weakly isolated horizon, Phys. Rev. D110, 044048 (2024), arXiv:2402.17977 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Ashtekar and S

    A. Ashtekar and S. Speziale, Null infinity and horizons: A new approach to fluxes and charges, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044049 (2024), arXiv:2407.03254 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    S. W. Hawking, The Information Paradox for Black Holes (2015) arXiv:1509.01147 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry, and A. Strominger, Soft Hair on Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 231301 (2016), arXiv:1601.00921 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Bart, Gravitational memory in the bulk, JHEP05, 106 (2020), arXiv:1908.07505 [gr-qc]

    H. Bart, Gravitational memory in the bulk, JHEP05, 106 (2020), arXiv:1908.07505 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Newman and R

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, An Approach to gravi- tational radiation by a method of spin coefficients, J. Math. Phys.3, 566 (1962)

    1962

  42. [42]

    E. T. Newman and T. W. J. Unti, Behavior of Asymp- totically Flat Empty Spaces, J. Math. Phys.3, 891 (1962)

    1962

  43. [43]

    Penrose, Asymptotic properties of fields and space- times, Phys

    R. Penrose, Asymptotic properties of fields and space- times, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 66 (1963)

    1963

  44. [44]

    Geroch, Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, in Symposium on Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time (1977)

    R. Geroch, Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, in Symposium on Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time (1977)

    1977

  45. [45]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity(Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984)

    1984

  46. [46]

    Ashtekar, Geometry and physics of null infinity, Sur- veys Diff

    A. Ashtekar, Geometry and physics of null infinity, Sur- veys Diff. Geom.20, 99 (2015), arXiv:1409.1800 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Goncharov, L

    B. Goncharov, L. Donnay, and J. Harms, Inferring Fun- damental Spacetime Symmetries with Gravitational- Wave Memory: From LISA to the Einstein Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 241401 (2024), arXiv:2310.10718 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    In flat spacetime, light rays remain straight, so bulk memory (supertranslations) can distort their trajecto- ries but never generate turning points

  49. [49]

    Donnay, G

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. González, and A. Puhm, Black hole memory effect, Phys. Rev. D98, 124016 (2018), arXiv:1809.07266 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    A. A. Rahman and R. M. Wald, Black Hole Memory, Phys. Rev. D101, 124010 (2020), arXiv:1912.12806 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Elhashash and D

    A. Elhashash and D. A. Nichols, Waveform models for the gravitational-wave memory effect: Extreme mass- ratio limit and final memory offset, Phys. Rev. D111, 044052 (2025), arXiv:2407.19017 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Cunningham, C

    K. Cunningham, C. Kavanagh, A. Pound, D. Tres- tini, N. Warburton, and J. Neef, Gravitational mem- ory: newresultsfrompost-Newtonianandself-forcethe- ory,Class.Quant.Grav.42,135009(2025),[Addendum: Class.Quant.Grav.42, 199401(2025)],arXiv:2410.23950 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Winicour, Characteristic evolution and matching, Living Rev

    J. Winicour, Characteristic evolution and matching, Living Rev. Rel.4, 3 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0102085

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  54. [54]

    Barnich and P.-H

    G. Barnich and P.-H. Lambert, A Note on the Newman- Unti group and the BMS charge algebra in terms of Newman-Penrose coefficients, Adv. Math. Phys.2012, 197385 (2012), arXiv:1102.0589 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, Numerical solution of gravitational dynamics in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes,JHEP07,086(2014),arXiv:1309.1439[hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    Geiller and C

    M. Geiller and C. Zwikel, The partial Bondi gauge: Fur- ther enlarging the asymptotic structure of gravity, Sci- Post Phys.13, 108 (2022), arXiv:2205.11401 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Geiller and C

    M. Geiller and C. Zwikel, The partial Bondi gauge: Gauge fixings and asymptotic charges, SciPost Phys. 16, 076 (2024), arXiv:2401.09540 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    In the present work, we focus on transformations that induce physical transitions be- tween null hypersurfaces

    There are freedoms on the null hypersurface from re- parameterizing null geodesics and choosing the remain- ing two coordinatesx a. In the present work, we focus on transformations that induce physical transitions be- tween null hypersurfaces

  59. [59]

    V. P. Frolov, Null Surface Quantization and Quan- tum Field Theory in Asymptotically Flat Space-Time, Fortsch. Phys.26, 455 (1978)

    1978

  60. [60]

    Kravchuk and D

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Light-ray oper- ators in conformal field theory, JHEP11, 102 (2018), arXiv:1805.00098 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Finite BMS transforma- tions, JHEP03, 167 (2016), arXiv:1601.04090 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    E. E. Flanagan and D. A. Nichols, Fully nonlin- ear transformations of the Weyl-Bondi-Metzner-Sachs asymptotic symmetry group, JHEP03, 120 (2024), arXiv:2311.03130 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Symmetries of asymp- totically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infin- ity revisited, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 111103 (2010), arXiv:0909.2617 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    G.BarnichandC.Troessaert,AspectsoftheBMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP05, 062 (2010), arXiv:1001.1541 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  65. [65]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Supertranslations call for superrotations, PoSCNCFG2010, 010 (2010), arXiv:1102.4632 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, BMS charge algebra, JHEP12, 105 (2011), arXiv:1106.0213 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    Compère, A

    G. Compère, A. Fiorucci, and R. Ruzziconi, Super- boost transitions, refraction memory and super-Lorentz charge algebra, JHEP11, 200 (2018), [Erratum: JHEP 04, 172 (2020)], arXiv:1810.00377 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [68]

    Campiglia and A

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, New symmetries for the Gravitational S-matrix, JHEP04, 076 (2015), arXiv:1502.02318 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Campiglia and J

    M. Campiglia and J. Peraza, Generalized BMS charge algebra, Phys. Rev. D101, 104039 (2020), arXiv:2002.06691 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    É. É. Flanagan and D. A. Nichols, Conserved charges of the extended Bondi-Metzner-Sachs algebra, Phys. Rev. D95, 044002 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 069902 (2023)], arXiv:1510.03386 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Freidel, R

    L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti, and S. Speziale, The Weyl BMS group and Einstein’s equations, JHEP07, 170 (2021), arXiv:2104.05793 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Compère, A

    G. Compère, A. Fiorucci, and R. Ruzziconi, TheΛ- BMS4 group of dS4 and new boundary conditions for 8 AdS4, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 195017 (2019), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav.38, 229501(2021)],arXiv:1905.00971 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Compère, A

    G. Compère, A. Fiorucci, and R. Ruzziconi, The Λ-BMS4 charge algebra, JHEP10, 205 (2020), arXiv:2004.10769 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Afshar, S

    H. Afshar, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, A. Perez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, Soft Heisenberg hair on black holes in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 93, 101503 (2016), arXiv:1603.04824 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [75]

    Shi and J

    C. Shi and J. Mei, Extended Symmetries at Black Hole Horizons in Generic Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D95, 104053 (2017), arXiv:1611.09491 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    E. T. Akhmedov and M. Godazgar, Symmetries at the black hole horizon, Phys. Rev. D96, 104025 (2017), arXiv:1707.05517 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    Chandrasekaran, É

    V. Chandrasekaran, É. É. Flanagan, and K. Prabhu, Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries, JHEP11, 125 (2018), [Erratum: JHEP 07, 224 (2023)], arXiv:1807.11499 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    S. Haco, S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry, and A. Stro- minger, Black Hole Entropy and Soft Hair, JHEP12, 098 (2018), arXiv:1810.01847 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Grumiller, A

    D. Grumiller, A. Pérez, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Tron- coso, and C. Zwikel, Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 041601 (2020), arXiv:1908.09833 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Adami, V

    H. Adami, V. Hosseinzadeh, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Sliding surface charges on AdS3, Phys. Lett. B806, 135503 (2020), arXiv:2002.09962 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.