Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 70 references

MPO dualities preserve integrability by replacing the R-matrix with an extended R-matrix obeying a modified RLL relation.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 22:12 UTC pith:BHIG2GM4

load-bearing objection A solid, useful unification of MPO dualities in integrable models; the central claims hold up, though the general proof of the nilpotent decomposition leans on a one-line citation that a referee will want unpacked. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2602.17436 v2 pith:BHIG2GM4 submitted 2026-02-19 cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph

Matrix-product operator dualities in integrable lattice models

Yuan Miao , Andras Molnar , Nick G. Jones This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph MSC 81R1282B23
keywords matrix-product operatorsYang-Baxter equationmodified RLL relationintegrable spin chainsduality transformationsXXZ modelZ2 gauging dualitybaxterization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks what happens to the local integrable structure of a lattice model when it is transformed by a matrix-product operator (MPO) duality, such as a matrix-product unitary or a non-invertible gauging map. For MPOs with an exact MPO inverse, it claims that the usual Yang-Baxter R-matrix should be extended by a projector built from the MPO, and that this extended R-matrix satisfies a modified RLL (Yang-Baxter algebra) relation rather than the standard one. The modification is controlled by a nilpotent tensor that appears when the contraction of the MPO and its inverse is decomposed. This modified relation is enough to prove, locally, that the dual transfer matrices commute. The paper also shows that in the non-invertible case the circuit (baxterization) Yang-Baxter structure survives, and illustrates both claims on the XXZ chain with the cluster entangler and the standard Z2 gauging duality.

Core claim

The central claim is that integrability under MPO dualities is not lost but reorganised. If an integrable model is conjugated by an MPO that has an exact MPO inverse, the dual model still has commuting transfer matrices, but the local intertwiner is no longer the original R-matrix. Instead, one extends the R-matrix by tensoring it with the projector onto the dominant eigenvector of the MPO transfer matrix; this extended R-matrix obeys a modified RLL relation in which nilpotent tensors appear as obstruction terms. The same relation gives a local proof of commutativity of the dual transfer matrices, and it reduces to the standard RLL relation exactly when the obstruction vanishes, which for a

What carries the argument

The key object is the A-B transfer matrix decomposition: when MPO tensor A has inverse MPO tensor B, the contraction of one A with one B equals v_R v_L + N, where v_L and v_R are the dominant left and right fixed vectors and N is nilpotent with finite nilpotency length. This decomposition yields the pulling-through equation that lets the boundary vectors be moved past the MPO tensors. It is what turns a global conjugation by an MPO into a local algebraic statement: projecting the R-matrix onto v_L and v_R produces an extended R-matrix, and the nilpotent remainder N appears as the explicit obstruction in the modified RLL relation. For the non-invertible case, the matching instrument is the re

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assertion that the contraction of an MPO with its inverse decomposes into a product of two fixed vectors plus a nilpotent remainder; this is taken from a general normal-form theorem for matrix product operators, and the conditions under which that theorem applies are not checked for the specific MPOs treated here.

What would settle it

Take the cluster-entangler MPO on a finite chain and compute the contraction with its inverse as a matrix; if the part remaining after subtracting v_R v_L has an eigenvalue that fails to vanish as the chain grows, the nilpotent decomposition is false. Alternatively, substitute the XXZ Lax operator and the cluster-entangler tensors into the modified RLL relation at generic spectral parameters u and v: a discrepancy beyond the stated obstruction term would refute the relation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For every MPO duality with exact MPO inverse, the dual transfer matrices commute, and the commutativity can be derived from a local modified RLL relation rather than only from global equivalence.
  • The extended R-matrix constructed from the MPO satisfies a modified Yang-Baxter algebra; when the nilpotent obstruction vanishes the standard RLL relation is recovered, but for matrix-product unitaries this happens only for trivial on-site unitaries.
  • In the baxterization picture, MPO dualities preserve the circuit Yang-Baxter equation: the dual check-R-matrix remains a solution, so the dual model can be studied by baxterization.
  • Non-invertible dualities that gauge discrete symmetries map the XXZ chain to the zig-zag spin chain as a vertex-face correspondence, with commuting face-type transfer matrices and intertwined transfer matrices.
  • For MPOs with exact inverse, logarithmic derivatives of the transformed transfer matrix are local operators, and conjugation preserves locality of local operators up to a bounded widening of support.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The nilpotency length of N may be a natural invariant of an MPO duality, ranking dualities by how deeply the local integrable structure is modified; this invariant is not discussed explicitly in the paper.
  • The same extended-R-matrix construction should apply to any fundamental R-matrix, not just XXZ; testing it on R-matrices without a chromatic-algebra representation, such as the XYZ chain, would show whether the mechanism is universal.
  • The charge-pump connection suggests that SPT entanglers generically produce symmetry-charged nilpotent obstructions; one could search for a symmetry selection rule that forbids a standard RLL relation for any matrix-product unitary with nonzero SPT invariant.
  • For numerical tensor-network methods, the local modified RLL relation may allow truncating the dual transfer matrix while preserving approximate commutativity, giving a practical route to integrable boundary conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper studies how Yang–Baxter integrable structures transform under matrix-product-operator (MPO) dualities. The authors classify dualities into on-site invertible, invertible with exact MPO inverse, and non-invertible MPOs. For the second class, they argue that the usual local RLL relation must be extended: the transformed Lax operators satisfy a modified Yang–Baxter algebra with a canonical obstruction tensor N that is nilpotent, obtained from an A–B transfer-matrix decomposition (Eq. (82)). The central claim is that this modified RLL relation provides a local algebraic proof of transfer-matrix commutativity in the dual model. The paper illustrates the general results with two case studies on the XXZ chain: the cluster-entangler MPU and the Kramers–Wannier non-invertible MPO. It also proves several independent results for MPOs with exact MPO inverses, including locality preservation, locality of logarithmic derivatives, and a triviality condition for MPUs.

Significance. If the main claim is correct, the paper substantially generalizes previous work on MPU dualities [17] to the broader class of MPOs with exact MPO inverses, providing a unified local algebraic mechanism behind transfer-matrix commutativity after such dualities. The explicit treatment of the cluster entangler and the Kramers–Wannier duality, including the 8x8 matrix verification in Appendix B, is careful and instructive. The A–B decomposition results of Section 7.1 are of independent interest for tensor-network theory and may be useful in numerical and analytic applications. The paper is largely self-contained and clearly written, though the central technical decomposition relies on an external citation without a fully explicit verification of its hypotheses.

major comments (2)
  1. [§7.2, Appendix A.1; Eq. (82)–(84), (91)] The A–B transfer-matrix decomposition (82)–(84) is the load-bearing ingredient for the modified RLL relation (91) and the claimed exact local commutativity proof. The proof in Appendix A.1, however, consists of a one-sentence citation to Propositions 20 and 21 of Ref. [65], justified by the fact that the right-hand side I^⊗n is an injective MPS. The hypotheses of those propositions are not stated, and it is not verified that the mixed tensor B/A satisfies them. Exact nilpotency of N is essential: the pulling-through equations (86)–(87) and the exact algebraic vanishing of the obstruction terms in (91) require N^k = 0 for finite k. If N were merely sub-dominant (spectral radius < 1), Eq. (91) would hold only asymptotically and the claimed local algebraic proof would fail. The paper explicitly verifies the fixed-point form only for the cluster entangler (Eq. (46)), not for general non-unit
  2. [§7.2, Eq. (91); Appendix B] The derivation of the modified RLL relation for the general exact-inverse case is asserted by saying that Eq. (82) allows one to repeat the reasoning in Appendix B. However, Appendix B is written specifically for the cluster entangler using the explicit decomposition (46), with definite vectors |v0⟩, |v2⟩ and Pauli operators. For the general class, the index structure of v_L, v_R and N must be tracked carefully through the Lax operators to arrive at Eq. (91) with the correct placement of the obstruction. This is a nontrivial diagrammatic manipulation, and it is central to the paper's main claim. Please provide the general derivation, or at least a detailed diagrammatic derivation for a representative non-unitary exact-inverse MPO, rather than relying on an analogy to the MPU case.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§6, Eq. (75)–(78)] The proof of the KW transfer-matrix duality (75) is sketched via the log expansion and the statement 'it is straightforward to verify that D_KW Q_n = Q_n D_KW'. Since this is a central relation for the KW case, a few more details or a reference to a direct verification would be helpful.
  2. [Appendix A.1] The phrase 'injective MPS' is used somewhat loosely: the product MPO on the left-hand side of On(A)On(B)=I may have redundant bond dimension, and the identity MPS on the right is injective only after choosing a minimal representation. Clarify the precise notion of injectivity used in the context of Ref. [65].
  3. [§7.4] The statement that the dual model flows to the same c=1 CFT with radius r' = r/2 after orbifolding is asserted without a derivation; a reference to the relevant orbifold construction (beyond [68]) or a short argument would improve confidence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: modified RLL relation is derived from the MPO inverse decomposition and the standard RLL relation, not assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation (Section 7.2, Eq. (91)) starts from the standard RLL relation and the A-B transfer matrix decomposition (Eq. (82)), then derives the modified RLL relation by tensor manipulations; the modified relation is not assumed in advance and no parameter is fitted to a target result. The decomposition Eq. (82) is justified by applying Propositions 20 and 21 of Ref. [65] to the MPS equation O_n(A)O_n(B)=I; although Ref. [65] overlaps with one of the authors (A. Molnar), this citation is to a general, independently published MPS injectivity theorem and does not assume the modified RLL relation or the paper's conclusions. The cluster-entangler example is worked out explicitly in Appendix B from the fixed-point form Eq. (46), which is verified for that MPU, so this case does not reduce to a self-citation. The KW case (Section 6) uses known chromatic-algebra Baxterization and direct intertwining relations for the KW MPO; it does not rely on the modified RLL derivation. Possible concerns about unverified hypotheses in applying [65] are correctness risks, not circularity. Thus there is no circular step of the kind defined in the instructions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the anisotropic parameter µ and spectral parameter u are model parameters. The extended R-matrix and the nilpotent tensor N are constructions derived from the MPO, not new physical entities. The main load-bearing assumptions are the exact-inverse MPO condition and the external injectivity results from [65].

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Existence of exact MPO inverse: O_n(A) O_n(B) = I⊗n for finite bond dimension
    Defines the class of invertible dualities studied in §7.1; all the MPO lemmas and the modified RLL derivation in §7.2 depend on this assumption.
  • standard math A-B transfer matrix decomposition (82)-(84) follows from Propositions 20/21 of Ref. [65]
    Appendix A.1 invokes external results on injectivity of matrix product operators; the decomposition B/A = v_R v_L + N with nilpotent N is load-bearing for the invertible case.
  • domain assumption Non-invertible duality corresponds to gauging a discrete symmetry and preserves locality of symmetric operators
    Section 3.3 restricts the non-invertible case to discrete gauging; the locality of symmetric operators is needed for the dual Hamiltonian and ˇR-matrix to remain local (Eq. (31)).
  • standard math Chromatic algebra with 3-colouring relations (21) and its representations (42), (63)
    Used throughout §2.3 and §6 to construct ˇR-matrices that satisfy the circuit Yang-Baxter equation; the KW dual operators are shown to form another representation of this algebra.
  • standard math R-matrix is invertible except at isolated values, enabling the usual train argument
    Section 4 uses invertibility of R to prove commutativity of transfer matrices via the RLL relation (Eq. (39)-(40)).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22640 in / 11128 out tokens · 111554 ms · 2026-08-02T22:12:26.144104+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Matrix-product operators (MPOs) appear throughout the study of integrable lattice models, notably as the transfer matrices. They can also be used as transformations to construct dualities between such models, both invertible (including unitary) and non-invertible (including discrete gauging). We analyse how the local Yang--Baxter integrable structures are modified under such dualities. We see that the $\check{R}$-matrix, that appears in the baxterization approach to integrability, transforms in a simple manner. We further argue for a broad class of MPO dualities that the usual Yang--Baxter $R$-matrix should be extended. This extended $R$-matrix satisfies modified algebraic relations, including a modified Yang--Baxter algebra previously identified in the unitary case, that altogether give a local integrable structure underlying the commuting transfer matrices of the dual model. We illustrate these results with two case studies, analysing an invertible unitary MPO and a non-invertible MPO both applied to the canonical XXZ spin chain. The former is the cluster entangler, arising in the study of symmetry-protected topological phases, while the latter is the Kramers--Wannier duality. We show several results for MPOs with exact MPO inverses that are of independent interest.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.17436 by Andras Molnar, Nick G. Jones, Yuan Miao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A reference matrix-product operator (MPO). Each four-index tensor Mj , that may also depend on some parameters, has two physical indices (vertical lines) and two virtual indices (horizontal lines). For fixed virtual indices, Mi gives a linear transformation between physical Hilbert spaces Vi → V ′ i . These are referred to as ‘quantum space’(s) in some integrability literature. Fixing the physical indices … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ‘Scattering’ YBE for R-matrix. The labels 1, 2 and 3 stands for the three vector spaces in V ⊗ V ⊗ V . Arrows indicate the operators acting from right to left. 2. Review: key notions of integrability and Yang–Baxter equation In this section, we present the key notions of quantum integrability in terms of MPOs. The renowned Yang–Baxter equation (YBE) can be written naturally in this language. After introduc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ‘Circuit’ YBE for Rˇ-matrix. This is Eq. (3) where we specialize to the case where Rˇ acts on two neighbouring sites. This moreover represents Eq. (16) when we take the representation over a tensorized Hilbert space where Rˇ j 7→ Rˇ j,j+1. Here we label the tensor components from 0 to L, and the tensor component labeled by 0 has a special role (as all operators in the product act on it); the label 0 of M0(… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Baxter,Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics, Elsevier (2016)

    R.J. Baxter,Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics, Elsevier (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    Gaudin,The Bethe Wavefunction, Cambridge University Press (2014)

    M. Gaudin,The Bethe Wavefunction, Cambridge University Press (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Korepin, N

    V.E. Korepin, N. Bogoliubov and A. Izergin,Quantum inverse scattering method and correlation functions, vol. 3, Cambridge University Press (1997)

    1997

  4. [4]

    Jones,In and around the origin of quantum groups,math/0309199

    V.F.R. Jones,In and around the origin of quantum groups,math/0309199

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, Cambridge University Press, 2 ed

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, Cambridge University Press, 2 ed. (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    Alcaraz, M.N

    F.C. Alcaraz, M.N. Barber and M.T. Batchelor,Conformal invariance and the spectrum of the XXZ chain,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 771

    1987

  7. [7]

    Ginsparg,Applied Conformal Field Theory, inLes Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics: Fields, Strings, Critical Phenomena, 9, 1988 [hep-th/9108028]

    P.H. Ginsparg,Applied Conformal Field Theory, inLes Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics: Fields, Strings, Critical Phenomena, 9, 1988 [hep-th/9108028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  8. [8]

    Bethe,Zur Theorie der Metalle

    H.A. Bethe,Zur Theorie der Metalle. i. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette,Zeit. für Physik 71(1931) 205

    1931

  9. [9]

    Hulthén,Über das Austauschproblem eines Kristalles,Arkiv Mat

    L. Hulthén,Über das Austauschproblem eines Kristalles,Arkiv Mat. Astron. Fysik.26A(1938) 1

    1938

  10. [10]

    Jimbo and T

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa,Algebraic Analysis of Solvable Lattice Models, vol. 85 ofCBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA (1995), 10.1090/cbms/085

    work page doi:10.1090/cbms/085 1995

  11. [11]

    Katsura and I

    H. Katsura and I. Maruyama,Derivation of Matrix Product Ansatz for the Heisenberg Chain from Algebraic Bethe Ansatz,J. Phys. A43(2010) 175003 [0911.4215]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    Murg, V.E

    V. Murg, V.E. Korepin and F. Verstraete,Algebraic Bethe ansatz and tensor networks,Phys. Rev. B86(2012) 045125

    2012

  13. [13]

    Kramers and G.H

    H.A. Kramers and G.H. Wannier,Statistics of the Two-Dimensional Ferromagnet. Part I,Phys. Rev.60(1941) 252

    1941

  14. [14]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz and Z. Nussinov,Unified Approach to Quantum and Classical Dualities,Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(2010) 020402. MATRIX-PRODUCT OPERATOR DUALITIES IN INTEGRABLE LATTICE MODELS 26

    2010

  15. [15]

    Aasen, R.S.K

    D. Aasen, R.S.K. Mong and P. Fendley,Topological defects on the lattice: I. The Ising model,J. Phys. A49(2016) 354001

    2016

  16. [16]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley and R.S.K. Mong,Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies, 2008.08598

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  17. [17]

    Jones and N

    N.G. Jones and N. Linden,Integrable spin chains and the Clifford group,J. Math. Phys.63(2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Kogut,An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems,Rev

    J.B. Kogut,An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems,Rev. Mod. Phys.51(1979) 659

    1979

  19. [19]

    Borla, R

    U. Borla, R. Verresen, J. Shah and S. Moroz,Gauging the Kitaev chain,SciPost Physics10(2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 064 [2307.02534]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Seiberg, S

    N. Seiberg, S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 154 [2401.12281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Baxter,Eight vertex model in lattice statistics and one-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg chain

    R.J. Baxter,Eight vertex model in lattice statistics and one-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg chain. I. Eigenvectors of the transfer matrix and Hamiltonian,Annals Phys.76(1973) 48

    1973

  23. [23]

    Kojima, H

    T. Kojima, H. Konno and R. Weston,The Vertex-face correspondence and correlation functions of the fusion eight-vertex model. I. The General formalism,Nucl. Phys. B720(2005) 348 [math/0504433]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  24. [24]

    Ikhlef and R

    Y. Ikhlef and R. Weston,Conserved Currents in the Six-Vertex and Trigonometric Solid-On-Solid Models,J. Phys. A50(2017) 164003 [1612.03666]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath and R. Verresen,Pivot Hamiltonians as generators of symmetry and entanglement,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 012

    2023

  26. [26]

    Zhang,Topological invariants for symmetry-protected topological phase entanglers,Phys

    C. Zhang,Topological invariants for symmetry-protected topological phase entanglers,Phys. Rev. B107(2023) 235104

    2023

  27. [27]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topological order,Phys. Rev. B80(2009) 155131

    2009

  28. [28]

    Pollmann, A.M

    F. Pollmann, A.M. Turner, E. Berg and M. Oshikawa,Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B81(2010) 064439

    2010

  29. [29]

    Fidkowski and A

    L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev,Effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems,Phys. Rev. B81(2010) 134509

    2010

  30. [30]

    Turner, F

    A.M. Turner, F. Pollmann and E. Berg,Topological phases of one-dimensional fermions: An entanglement point of view,Phys. Rev. B83(2011) 075102

    2011

  31. [31]

    Schuch, D

    N. Schuch, D. Pérez-García and I. Cirac,Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,Phys. Rev. B84(2011) 165139

    2011

  32. [32]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems, Phys. Rev. B83(2011) 035107

    2011

  33. [33]

    Pollmann and A.M

    F. Pollmann and A.M. Turner,Detection of symmetry-protected topological phases in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B 86(2012) 125441

    2012

  34. [34]

    Senthil,Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases of Quantum Matter,Annu

    T. Senthil,Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases of Quantum Matter,Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6 (2015) 299

    2015

  35. [35]

    Kulish, N.Y

    P.P. Kulish, N.Y. Reshetikhin and E.K. Sklyanin,Yang-Baxter equation and representation theory: I,Lett. Math. Phys.5(1981) 393–403

    1981

  36. [36]

    Chari and A.N

    V. Chari and A.N. Pressley,A Guide to Quantum Groups, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York, NY (1994)

    1994

  37. [37]

    Jones,Baxterization,Int

    V. Jones,Baxterization,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B04(1990) 701

    1990

  38. [38]

    Temperley and E.H

    H.N.V. Temperley and E.H. Lieb,Relations between the ‘percolation’ and ‘colouring’ problem and other graph-theoretical problems associated with regular planar lattices: some exact results for the ‘percolation’ problem, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A322(1971) 251

    1971

  39. [39]

    Birman and H

    J.S. Birman and H. Wenzl,Braids, link polynomials and a new algebra,Trans. Am. Math. Soc.313(1989) 249–273

    1989

  40. [40]

    Murakami,The Kauffman polynomial of links and representation theory,Osaka J

    J. Murakami,The Kauffman polynomial of links and representation theory,Osaka J. Math.24(1987) 745

    1987

  41. [41]

    Pasquier and H

    V. Pasquier and H. Saleur,Common structures between finite systems and conformal field theories through quantum groups,Nucl. Phys. B330(1990) 523–556

    1990

  42. [42]

    Batchelor and M.N

    M.T. Batchelor and M.N. Barber,Spin-s quantum chains and Temperley–Lieb algebras,J. Phys. A23(1990) L15–L21

    1990

  43. [43]

    Levy,Algebraic structure of translation-invariant spin-1/2 XXZ and q-Potts quantum chains,Phys

    D. Levy,Algebraic structure of translation-invariant spin-1/2 XXZ and q-Potts quantum chains,Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(1991) 1971

    1991

  44. [44]

    Nichols,The Temperley–Lieb algebra and its generalizations in the Potts and XXZ models,J

    A. Nichols,The Temperley–Lieb algebra and its generalizations in the Potts and XXZ models,J. Stat. Mech.2006 (2006) P01003

    2006

  45. [45]

    Aufgebauer and A

    B. Aufgebauer and A. Klümper,Quantum spin chains of Temperley–Lieb type: periodic boundary conditions, spectral multiplicities and finite temperature,J. Stat. Mech.2010(2010) P05018

    2010

  46. [46]

    Alcaraz, M.N

    F.C. Alcaraz, M.N. Barber, M.T. Batchelor, R.J. Baxter and G.R.W. Quispel,Surface Exponents of the Quantum XXZ, Ashkin-Teller and Potts Models,J. Phys. A20(1987) 6397

    1987

  47. [47]

    Baxter,Eight vertex model in lattice statistics and one-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg chain

    R.J. Baxter,Eight vertex model in lattice statistics and one-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg chain. II. Equivalence to a generalized ice-type lattice model,Annals Phys.76(1973) 25

    1973

  48. [48]

    Fendley and V

    P. Fendley and V. Krushkal,Tutte chromatic identities from the Temperley–Lieb algebra,Geom. Topol.13(2009) 709

    2009

  49. [49]

    Fendley and V

    P. Fendley and V. Krushkal,Link invariants, the chromatic polynomial and the Potts model,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.14(2010) 507. MATRIX-PRODUCT OPERATOR DUALITIES IN INTEGRABLE LATTICE MODELS 27

    2010

  50. [50]

    Eck and P

    L. Eck and P. Fendley,From the XXZ chain to the integrable Rydberg-blockade ladder via non-invertible duality defects,SciPost Physics16(2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Rubio, A

    J.G. Rubio, A. Molnar and Y. Ogata,Classifying symmetric and symmetry-broken spin chain phases with anomalous group actions,2403.18573

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Ignacio Cirac, D

    J. Ignacio Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete,Matrix product unitaries: structure, symmetries, and topological invariants,J. Stat. Mech.2017(2017) 083105

    2017

  53. [53]

    Şahinoğlu, S.K

    M.B. Şahinoğlu, S.K. Shukla, F. Bi and X. Chen,Matrix product representation of locality preserving unitaries, Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 245122

    2018

  54. [54]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp and F. Verstraete,Dualities in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Models: Topological Sectors,PRX Quantum5(2024) 010338

    2024

  55. [55]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Moessner and F. Pollmann,One-dimensional symmetry protected topological phases and their transitions,Phys. Rev. B96(2017) 165124

    2017

  56. [56]

    Rey, O.M

    A. Rey, O.M. Aksoy, D.P. Arovas, C. Chamon and C. Mudry,Incommensurate gapless ferromagnetism connecting competing symmetry-enriched deconfined quantum phase transitions,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) L161110

    2025

  57. [57]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa,On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,JHEP03(2018) 189 [1704.02330]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, G. Ortiz and F. Verstraete,Dualities in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and Matrix Product Operator Intertwiners,PRX Quantum4(2023) 020357

    2023

  59. [59]

    Zadnik and M

    L. Zadnik and M. Fagotti,The Folded Spin-1/2 XXZ Model: I. Diagonalisation, Jamming, and Ground State Properties,SciPost Phys. Core4(2021) 010

    2021

  60. [60]

    Pozsgay, T

    B. Pozsgay, T. Gombor, A. Hutsalyuk, Y. Jiang, L. Pristyák and E. Vernier,Integrable spin chain with Hilbert space fragmentation and solvable real-time dynamics,Phys. Rev. E104(2021) 044106

    2021

  61. [61]

    Gombor and B

    T. Gombor and B. Pozsgay,Integrable spin chains and cellular automata with medium-range interaction,Phys. Rev. E104(2021) 054123

    2021

  62. [62]

    Stephen,Non-onsite symmetries and quantum teleportation in split-index matrix product states,Quantum9 (2025) 1738

    D.T. Stephen,Non-onsite symmetries and quantum teleportation in split-index matrix product states,Quantum9 (2025) 1738

    2025

  63. [63]

    Ilievski, M

    E. Ilievski, M. Medenjak and T. Prosen,Quasilocal Conserved Operators in the Isotropic Heisenberg Spin-1/2 Chain,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 120601

    2015

  64. [64]

    Ilievski, M

    E. Ilievski, M. Medenjak, T. Prosen and L. Zadnik,Quasilocal charges in integrable lattice systems,J. Stat. Mech. 2016(2016) 064008

    2016

  65. [65]

    Molnar, Y

    A. Molnar, Y. Ge, N. Schuch and J.I. Cirac,A generalization of the injectivity condition for projected entangled pair states,J. Math. Phys.59(2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    Jones, R

    N.G. Jones, R. Thorngren, R. Verresen and A. Prakash,Charge pumps, pivot Hamiltonians, and symmetry-protected topological phases,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) 165123

    2025

  67. [67]

    W. Cao, Y. Miao and M. Yamazaki,Global symmetries of quantum lattice models under non-invertible dualities, SciPost Phys. Core8(2025) 070 [2501.12514]

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond,JHEP07 (2024) 051 [2106.12577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Piroli, B

    L. Piroli, B. Bertini, J.I. Cirac and T. Prosen,Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits,Phys. Rev. B101 (2020)

    2020

  70. [70]

    Fendley, S

    P. Fendley, S. Gehrmann, E. Vernier and F. Verstraete,XYZ integrability the easy way,2511.04674

    arXiv