REVIEW 1 cited by
How changing physical constants and violation of local position invariance may occur?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Light scalar fields very naturally appear in modern cosmological models, affecting such parameters of Standard Model as electromagnetic fine structure constant $\alpha$, dimensionless ratios of electron or quark mass to the QCD scale, $m_{e,q}/\Lambda_{QCD}$. Cosmological variations of these scalar fields should occur because of drastic changes of matter composition in Universe: the latest such event is rather recent (redshift $z\sim 0.5$), from matter to dark energy domination. In a two-brane model (we use as a pedagogical example) these modifications are due to changing distance to "the second brane", a massive companion of "our brane". Back from extra dimensions, massive bodies (stars or galaxies) can also affect physical constants. They have large scalar charge $Q_d$ proportional to number of particles which produces a Coulomb-like scalar field $\phi=Q_d/r$. This leads to a variation of the fundamental constants proportional to the gravitational potential, e.g. $\delta \alpha/ \alpha = k_\alpha \delta (GM/ r c^2)$. We compare different manifestations of this effect. The strongest limits $k_\alpha +0.17 k_e= (-3.5\pm 6) * 10^{-7}$ are obtained from the measurements of dependence of atomic frequencies on the distance from Sun (the distance varies due to the ellipticity of the Earth's orbit).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Using the Th III Ion for a Nuclear Clock and Searches for New Physics
Predicted 10,000-fold electronic-bridge enhancement for exciting the 229Th nuclear clock transition in Th III, plus a 1.7-times lifetime reduction and strong new-physics sensitivity factors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.