Pith. sign in

REVIEW

AdvCat: Domain-Agnostic Robustness Assessment for Cybersecurity-Critical Applications with Categorical Inputs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.13989 v1 pith:BJM2BEQL submitted 2022-12-13 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords robustnessapplicationsassessmentadversarialcategoricalcybersecurity-criticaldomain-agnosticinputs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine Learning-as-a-Service systems (MLaaS) have been largely developed for cybersecurity-critical applications, such as detecting network intrusions and fake news campaigns. Despite effectiveness, their robustness against adversarial attacks is one of the key trust concerns for MLaaS deployment. We are thus motivated to assess the adversarial robustness of the Machine Learning models residing at the core of these security-critical applications with categorical inputs. Previous research efforts on accessing model robustness against manipulation of categorical inputs are specific to use cases and heavily depend on domain knowledge, or require white-box access to the target ML model. Such limitations prevent the robustness assessment from being as a domain-agnostic service provided to various real-world applications. We propose a provably optimal yet computationally highly efficient adversarial robustness assessment protocol for a wide band of ML-driven cybersecurity-critical applications. We demonstrate the use of the domain-agnostic robustness assessment method with substantial experimental study on fake news detection and intrusion detection problems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools