Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

External Reasoning: Towards Multi-Large-Language-Models Interchangeable Assistance with Human Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.12057 v2 pith:BK7NN4IK submitted 2023-07-05 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords externalllmsreasoninghumanknowledgeapproachassistancechatpdf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Memory is identified as a crucial human faculty that allows for the retention of visual and linguistic information within the hippocampus and neurons in the brain, which can subsequently be retrieved to address real-world challenges that arise through a lifetime of learning. The resolution of complex AI tasks through the application of acquired knowledge represents a stride toward the realization of artificial general intelligence. However, despite the prevalence of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 \cite{brown2020language, leiter2023chatgpt, zaitsu2023distinguishing, OpenAI2023GPT4TR} , which have displayed remarkable capabilities in language comprehension, generation, interaction, and reasoning, they are inhibited by constraints on context length that preclude the processing of extensive, continually evolving knowledge bases. This paper proposes that LLMs could be augmented through the selective integration of knowledge from external repositories, and in doing so, introduces a novel methodology for External Reasoning, exemplified by ChatPDF. Central to this approach is the establishment of a tiered policy for \textbf{External Reasoning based on Multiple LLM Interchange Assistance} in \cref{fig:overall}, where the level of support rendered is modulated across entry, intermediate, and advanced tiers based on the complexity of the query, with adjustments made in response to human feedback. A comprehensive evaluation of this methodology is conducted using multiple LLMs and the results indicate state-of-the-art performance in \cref{comparison} , surpassing existing solutions including ChatPDF.com. Moreover, the paper emphasizes that this approach is more efficient compared to the direct processing of full text by LLMs. The source code is publicly available at: \url{https://github.com/AkideLiu/ANLP}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A three-model, three-dataset LLM math evaluation using a multi-dimensional reasoning rubric, undermined by contradictory accuracy tables.

Pith tools