Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Distributed Mixture-of-Agents for Edge Inference with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.21200 v1 pith:BLAVNDB5 submitted 2024-12-30 cs.IT cs.CLcs.DCcs.LGcs.NImath.IT

classification cs.ITcs.CLcs.DCcs.LGcs.NImath.IT
keywords distributedllmspromptsdevicesuserdeviceedgemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mixture-of-Agents (MoA) has recently been proposed as a method to enhance performance of large language models (LLMs), enabling multiple individual LLMs to work together for collaborative inference. This collaborative approach results in improved responses to user prompts compared to relying on a single LLM. In this paper, we consider such an MoA architecture in a distributed setting, where LLMs operate on individual edge devices, each uniquely associated with a user and equipped with its own distributed computing power. These devices exchange information using decentralized gossip algorithms, allowing different device nodes to talk without the supervision of a centralized server. In the considered setup, different users have their own LLM models to address user prompts. Additionally, the devices gossip either their own user-specific prompts or augmented prompts to generate more refined answers to certain queries. User prompts are temporarily stored in the device queues when their corresponding LLMs are busy. Given the memory limitations of edge devices, it is crucial to ensure that the average queue sizes in the system remain bounded. In this paper, we address this by theoretically calculating the queuing stability conditions for the device queues under reasonable assumptions, which we validate experimentally as well. Further, we demonstrate through experiments, leveraging open-source LLMs for the implementation of distributed MoA, that certain MoA configurations produce higher-quality responses compared to others, as evaluated on AlpacaEval 2.0 benchmark. The implementation is available at: https://github.com/purbeshmitra/distributed_moa.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chained Recursive Language Models for Multi-Iteration Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Chained fresh-root model calls with plain-text artifacts improve reported long-context reasoning accuracy over a single-call baseline, but the evidence lacks error bars and compute-matched comparison.

  2. Balancing Information Accuracy and Response Timeliness in Networked LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For binary questions, combining m specialized LLMs with a Bayesian majority rule improves accuracy, and the paper derives the optimal m that trades accuracy against system delay.

  3. MOTIF: Modular Thinking via Reinforcement Fine-tuning in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-round modular thinking RL fine-tuning method improves a 3B model's pass@1 on MATH500 and AIME2024 over vanilla GRPO in one run, with sample-efficiency claims based on 15% of training questions.

  4. Toward Edge General Intelligence with Multiple-Large Language Model (Multi-LLM): Architecture, Trust, and Orchestration

    cs.NI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of multi-LLM systems in edge computing, covering architectures, enabling technologies, trust mechanisms, applications, and open datasets for edge general intelligence.

Pith tools