Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Benchmarks and Custom Package for Energy Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.07191 v2 pith:BM7PJQHD submitted 2023-07-14 cs.LG stat.ML

Benchmarks and Custom Package for Energy Forecasting

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords energyforecastingdataloadpowergridseriessubsequent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Energy (load, wind, photovoltaic) forecasting is significant in the power industry as it can provide a reference for subsequent tasks such as power grid dispatch, thus bringing huge economic benefits. However, there are many differences between energy forecasting and traditional time series forecasting. On the one hand, traditional time series mainly focus on capturing characteristics like trends and cycles. In contrast, the energy series is largely influenced by many external factors, such as meteorological and calendar variables. On the other hand, energy forecasting aims to minimize the cost of subsequent tasks such as power grid dispatch, rather than simply pursuing prediction accuracy. In addition, the scale of energy data can also significantly impact the predicted results. In this paper, we collected large-scale load datasets and released a new renewable energy dataset that contains both station-level and region-level renewable generation data with meteorological data. For load data, we also included load domain-specific feature engineering and provided a method to customize the loss function and link the forecasting error to requirements related to subsequent tasks (such as power grid dispatching costs), integrating it into our forecasting framework. Based on such a situation, we conducted extensive experiments with 21 forecasting methods in these energy datasets at different levels under 11 evaluation metrics, providing a comprehensive reference for researchers to compare different energy forecasting models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RMISC: A Large-scale Real-world Multivariate Corpus for Time Series Foundation Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A curated 142-billion-point real-world multivariate time series corpus improves zero-shot forecasting when combined with existing synthetic and univariate pretraining data across four foundation models.

  2. Zeus: Towards Tuning-Free Foundation Model for Time Series Analysis

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Zeus proposes a multi-scale Transformer with point-wise tokenization and Multi-Objective Temporal Masking to enable tuning-free performance on forecasting, interpolation, and other time series tasks.

  3. Human spatial dynamics for electricity demand forecasting: the case of France during the 2022 energy crisis

    stat.AP 2023-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Mobility indices derived from mobile network data improve state-of-the-art electricity demand forecasting models during the atypical 2022-2023 sobriety period in France.