Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Towards Improving Selective Prediction Ability of NLP Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.09371 v3 pith:BPROKP4I submitted 2020-08-21 cs.CL cs.LG

Towards Improving Selective Prediction Ability of NLP Systems

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords predictionselectiveabilityanswercalibratorinstancesmethodout-of-domain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

It's better to say "I can't answer" than to answer incorrectly. This selective prediction ability is crucial for NLP systems to be reliably deployed in real-world applications. Prior work has shown that existing selective prediction techniques fail to perform well, especially in the out-of-domain setting. In this work, we propose a method that improves probability estimates of models by calibrating them using prediction confidence and difficulty score of instances. Using these two signals, we first annotate held-out instances and then train a calibrator to predict the likelihood of correctness of the model's prediction. We instantiate our method with Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Duplicate Detection (DD) tasks and evaluate it in both In-Domain (IID) and Out-of-Domain (OOD) settings. In (IID, OOD) settings, we show that the representations learned by our calibrator result in an improvement of (15.81%, 5.64%) and (6.19%, 13.9%) over 'MaxProb' -- a selective prediction baseline -- on NLI and DD tasks respectively.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ECUAS$_n$: A family of metrics for principled evaluation of uncertainty-augmented systems

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces the ECUAS_n family of proper scoring rules for evaluating uncertainty-augmented systems, where n tunes the trade-off between prediction accuracy costs and uncertainty quality.

  2. ECUAS$_n$: A family of metrics for principled evaluation of uncertainty-augmented systems

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes ECUAS_n metrics as proper scoring rules for evaluating uncertainty-augmented systems, with n controlling cost trade-offs between predictions and uncertainties.

  3. ECUAS$_n$: A family of metrics for principled evaluation of uncertainty-augmented systems

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ECUAS_n is a parameterized family of proper scoring rules for jointly assessing prediction accuracy and uncertainty quality in automated decision systems.