pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16036 · v1 · pith:BQ2MHBUInew · submitted 2026-05-15 · ✦ hep-ph

The Monte Carlo Ecosystem in High-Energy Physics: A Primer

Melissa van Beekveld , Enrico Bothmann , Andy Buckley , Christian G\"utschow , Peter Skands , Ramon Winterhalder This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords Monte Carlo event generatorscollider physicsparton showershadronisation modelsmatrix element calculationsdetector simulationstatistical inference
0
0 comments X

The pith

Monte Carlo event generators serve as the central interface between theoretical calculations and experimental measurements in collider physics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This primer maps out the modular ecosystem of Monte Carlo event generators that turns theoretical inputs into simulated collider events. It covers the successive stages of matrix-element calculations, parton showers, hadronisation models, detector simulation, and statistical analysis. A sympathetic reader would value the overview because these tools are used throughout modern research, yet their full architecture can be hard to grasp for those entering the field. The paper also addresses the organisational and computational demands of large-scale simulations along with principles that support interoperability and reproducibility. It closes by considering how the changing computing landscape will shape future tool development.

Core claim

Monte Carlo event generators are the central interface between theoretical calculations and experimental measurements in collider physics. Over several decades a comprehensive and highly modular ecosystem has developed around them, encompassing matrix-element calculations, parton showers, hadronisation models, and integration with detector simulation, event-level analysis and statistical inference. The primer supplies a structured overview of their conceptual foundations, the challenges of large-scale simulations, and the principles that enable interoperability and reproducibility across theory and experiment.

What carries the argument

The Monte Carlo event generator simulation chain, which converts theoretical matrix elements into observable events through successive modules of parton showers, hadronisation, and detector response.

If this is right

  • Large-scale collider simulations become practical through the modular separation of theoretical and simulation stages.
  • Shared principles allow different tools to interoperate while preserving reproducibility between theory predictions and experimental data.
  • Awareness of computational and sustainability issues guides efficient use and future maintenance of the ecosystem.
  • Early-career researchers gain a clearer path into the workflow that underpins most collider analyses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Widespread use of the primer could shorten the time needed for new researchers to produce reliable simulation results.
  • The described foundations offer a natural base for testing whether machine-learning replacements for individual modules improve speed without loss of accuracy.
  • Similar structured guides could be written for simulation chains in adjacent areas such as neutrino or astroparticle experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The conceptual scope and technical structure of the Monte Carlo simulation chain remain stable enough that one structured primer can clarify the architecture and long-term trajectory without rapid obsolescence.

What would settle it

Publication of a major new generator framework or dominant algorithm that replaces the current modular stages of matrix elements, showers, and hadronisation would show whether the described ecosystem has shifted beyond the primer's account.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16036 by Andy Buckley, Christian G\"utschow, Enrico Bothmann, Melissa van Beekveld, Peter Skands, Ramon Winterhalder.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the most commonly used Monte Carlo tools and their roles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic ordering of perturbative coefficients d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: An event record for the Pythia 8 shower. The starting point is a hard process for the creation and decay of a Z boson in a pp collision with a centre-of￾mass energy of 13.6 TeV. mapping. Other than not violating momentum conservation and being infrared safe, such momentum mapping has many degrees of freedom in its formulation, leading to many different shower algorithms. Concerning the ordering of emission… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Colour labels for a Born dd¯ → Z event (left), a dd¯ → Z g (middle) and a d g¯ → Zd¯ event (right). The black arrows indicate the particle–anti-particle connec￾tions, whereas the curved, coloured arrows indicate the colour flow. which is unstable and decays into a pair of muons (who carry mother label 5, which is the Z boson). One sees that the px and py momenta of the muons add up to 0: the system starts … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A comparison of the MC@NLO and POWHEG (labelled “PWG”) matching [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of the different contributions for different jet multiplicities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Unless otherwise stated, we use the term [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Snapshots at different times (t0 , t1 , . . ., t5 ) of a string configuration corresponding to an e +e − → qgq¯ event. Fewer hadrons will be produced in the angular region between the q and q¯ jets than between the quark and gluon jet pairs. Right: a real 3-jet event recorded by the JADE experiment [195,196,198]. For ultra-relativistic partons (with E ≫ m as is typical in high-energy collider context… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Illustration of string formation and breaking in the fragmentation of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Illustration of ambiguity in defining the confining colour singlets for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Average charged-particle pT versus charged multiplicity Nch in Tevatron minimum-bias proton-antiproton collisions at p s = 1960 GeV, as measured by the CDF experiment [256], compared to default MC models and to Pythia without CR. (From mcplots.cern.ch [257].) σˆ q1 q¯2 q3 q¯4 −→ σˆ q1 q¯2 q3 q¯4 or σˆ q1 q¯2 q3 q¯4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Illustration of ambiguity in defining the confining colour singlets for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Monte Carlo event generators are the central interface between theoretical calculations and experimental measurements in collider physics. Over several decades, a comprehensive and highly modular ecosystem of tools has developed around them, encompassing matrix-element calculations, parton showers, hadronisation models, and their integration with detector simulation, event-level analysis and statistical inference. While these tools are ubiquitous in modern research, the conceptual scope and technical structure of the full simulation chain can be challenging to navigate, particularly for researchers entering the field. In this primer, we provide a structured and up-to-date overview of the high-energy physics Monte Carlo ecosystem, focusing primarily on event-generator methodologies and their role within the broader collider workflow. We discuss the conceptual foundations of modern generators, the computational and organisational challenges of large-scale simulations, and the principles that enable interoperability and reproducibility across theory and experiment. We also examine the evolving computing landscape and sustainability considerations that will shape the future development of these tools. Aimed primarily at early-stage doctoral researchers while serving as a reference for the broader community, this article seeks to clarify architecture, methodology, and long-term trajectory of Monte Carlo event generation in collider physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a primer on the Monte Carlo event generator ecosystem in high-energy physics. It positions these generators as the central modular interface between theoretical calculations (matrix elements, parton showers, hadronisation) and experimental measurements (detector simulation, event analysis, statistical inference). The text provides a structured overview of conceptual foundations, computational and organisational challenges in large-scale simulations, interoperability and reproducibility principles, and evolving computing and sustainability considerations, aimed primarily at early-stage doctoral researchers.

Significance. If the overview is accurate and current, the primer fills a genuine pedagogical gap by clarifying the architecture of a complex, long-developed ecosystem without advancing new derivations or predictions. Its expository approach, drawing on established literature, supports better navigation for newcomers and could improve reproducibility across theory-experiment workflows. The emphasis on modularity and future sustainability is a constructive contribution to community training resources.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and concluding sections] The central claim that a single structured primer can usefully clarify the full simulation chain without rapid obsolescence (as stated in the abstract) would benefit from an explicit discussion of update mechanisms or version-specific caveats, since the field evolves with new generators and computing paradigms.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Conceptual foundations] Notation for generator components (e.g., ME, PS, hadronisation) should be introduced consistently with a short glossary or table to aid readers new to the terminology.
  2. [Interoperability and reproducibility] References to specific interoperability standards or common data formats (e.g., HepMC, LHE) would strengthen the discussion of reproducibility principles.
  3. [Throughout] Figure captions could more explicitly link visual elements to the modular workflow described in the text for improved clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for the constructive recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and concluding sections] The central claim that a single structured primer can usefully clarify the full simulation chain without rapid obsolescence (as stated in the abstract) would benefit from an explicit discussion of update mechanisms or version-specific caveats, since the field evolves with new generators and computing paradigms.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of maintenance and versioning would strengthen the manuscript. While the primer focuses on stable conceptual foundations, architectural principles, and long-term trajectories rather than transient implementation details, we will add a concise paragraph in the concluding section. This will outline community-driven update practices, the role of versioned repositories and documentation, and the value of consulting current tool releases for specific applications. The addition will be limited in scope to preserve the primer's pedagogical emphasis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this expository primer

full rationale

This paper is a descriptive primer and overview of the Monte Carlo event generator ecosystem in collider physics. It summarizes established components (matrix elements, parton showers, hadronisation, detector simulation) and interoperability principles without presenting any novel derivations, predictions, equations, or quantitative results. The central claim is expository rather than deductive, drawing on community literature for context but advancing no load-bearing technical assumption or fitted input that could reduce to self-reference by construction. As a reference for early-stage researchers, the text is self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper summarizing established practices; it introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities of its own.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 1088 out tokens · 66621 ms · 2026-05-20T16:29:51.883273+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · 126 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Dokshitzer, Yuri L

    Azimov, Yakov I. and Dokshitzer, Yuri L. and Khoze, Valery A. and Troian, S. I. The String Effect and QCD Coherence. Phys. Lett. B. 1985. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90709-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90709-9 1985

  2. [2]

    and Ostrolenk, Kiran

    Cabouat, Baptiste and Gaunt, Jonathan R. and Ostrolenk, Kiran. A Monte-Carlo Simulation of Double Parton Scattering. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)061. arXiv:1906.04669

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2019)061 2019

  3. [3]

    The role of multi-parton interactions in doubly-heavy hadron production

    Egede, Ulrik and Hadavizadeh, Tom and Singla, Minni and Skands, Peter and Vesterinen, Mika. The role of multi-parton interactions in doubly-heavy hadron production. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2022. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10710-5. arXiv:2205.15681

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10710-5 2022

  4. [4]

    and others

    Alexopoulos, T. and others. Multiplicity dependence of transverse momentum spectra of centrally produced hadrons in anti-p p collisions at 0.3-TeV, 0.54-TeV, 0.9-TeV, and 1.8-TeV center-of-mass energy. Phys. Lett. B. 1994. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90578-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90578-9 1994

  5. [5]

    and others

    Breakstone, A. and others. Multiplicity Dependence of the Average Transverse Momentum and of the Particle Source Size in p p Interactions at s =62 GeV , 44 GeV and 31 GeV. Z. Phys. C. 1987. doi:10.1007/BF01552538

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01552538 1987

  6. [6]

    and others

    Alexopoulos, T. and others. Multiplicity Dependence of the Transverse Momentum Spectrum for Centrally Produced Hadrons in Anti-proton -- Proton Collisions at s =1 .8 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1622

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.60.1622 1988

  7. [7]

    Multiplicity dependence of the average transverse momentum in pp, p-Pb, and Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC

    Abelev, Betty Bezverkhny and others. Multiplicity dependence of the average transverse momentum in pp, p-Pb, and Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.054. arXiv:1307.1094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.054 2013

  8. [8]

    Multiplicity dependence of light-flavor hadron production in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Multiplicity dependence of light-flavor hadron production in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV. Phys. Rev. C. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.024906. arXiv:1807.11321

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.024906 2019

  9. [9]

    and others

    Bartel, W. and others. Experimental Study of Jets in electron - Positron Annihilation. Phys. Lett. B. 1981. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90505-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90505-0 1981

  10. [10]

    and others

    Bartel, W. and others. Particle Distribution in Three Jet Events Produced by e+ e- Annihilation. Z. Phys. C. 1983. doi:10.1007/BF01648774

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01648774 1983

  11. [11]

    Tuning Monte Carlo Generators: The Perugia Tunes

    Skands, Peter Zeiler. Tuning Monte Carlo Generators: The Perugia Tunes. Phys. Rev. D. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074018. arXiv:1005.3457

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.074018 2010

  12. [12]

    Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune

    Skands, Peter and Carrazza, Stefano and Rojo, Juan. Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2014. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y. arXiv:1404.5630

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y 2013

  13. [13]

    Kerbizi, A. and L. Quark spin effects in e+e- annihilation: A Monte Carlo event generator study. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074029. arXiv:2407.07706

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.074029 2024

  14. [14]

    Extending StringSpinner to handle vector-meson spin

    Kerbizi, Albi and L. Extending StringSpinner to handle vector-meson spin. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108886. arXiv:2305.05058

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108886 2023

  15. [15]

    StringSpinner - adding spin to the PYTHIA string fragmentation

    Kerbizi, Albi and L. StringSpinner - adding spin to the PYTHIA string fragmentation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108234. arXiv:2105.09730

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108234 2022

  16. [16]

    and Banerjee, Sw

    Antropov, S. and Banerjee, Sw. and Was, Z. and Zaremba, J. TAUOLA update for decay channels with e^+e^- pairs in the final state. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108592. arXiv:1912.11376

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108592 2023

  17. [17]

    TAUOLA of tau lepton decays-- framework for hadronic currens, matrix elements and anomalous decays

    Chrzaszcz, M. and Przedzinski, T. and Was, Z. and Zaremba, J. TAUOLA of lepton decays framework for hadronic currents, matrix elements and anomalous decays. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.017. arXiv:1609.04617

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.017 2018

  18. [18]

    and Was, Zbigniew

    Jadach, Stanislaw and Kuhn, Johann H. and Was, Zbigniew. TAUOLA: A Library of Monte Carlo programs to simulate decays of polarized tau leptons. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1990. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90038-M

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90038-m 1990

  19. [19]

    EvtGen recent developments and prospects

    Abudin \'e n, Fernando and Back, John and Kreps, Michal and Latham, Thomas. EvtGen recent developments and prospects. EPJ Web Conf. 2024. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429503012

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429503012 2024

  20. [20]

    Update of the EvtGen decay models and branching ratios, together with mass tables for heavy flavour hadrons decay

    Curcio, F. Update of the EvtGen decay models and branching ratios, together with mass tables for heavy flavour hadrons decay. Nuovo Cim. C. 2022. doi:10.1393/ncc/i2022-22100-2

    work page doi:10.1393/ncc/i2022-22100-2 2022

  21. [21]

    Lange, D. J. The EvtGen particle decay simulation package. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2001. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00089-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(01)00089-4 2001

  22. [22]

    How to Trust Learned Loop Amplitudes

    Bahl, Henning and Braun, Jens and Heinrich, Gudrun and Plehn, Tilman and Revelli, Rebecca. How to Trust Learned Loop Amplitudes. 2026. arXiv:2601.00950

    work page arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Scaling laws for amplitude surrogates

    Bahl, Henning and Bres \'o -Pla, Victor and Butter, Anja and Ramirez, Joaqu \' n Iturriza. Scaling laws for amplitude surrogates. 2026. arXiv:2601.13308

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    and Lippmann, Peter and Pitz, Sebastian and Plehn, Tilman and Qu, Huilin and Spinner, Jonas

    Favaro, Luigi and Gerhartz, Gerrit and Hamprecht, Fred A. and Lippmann, Peter and Pitz, Sebastian and Plehn, Tilman and Qu, Huilin and Spinner, Jonas. Lorentz-Equivariance without Limitations. 2025. arXiv:2508.14898

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    i-flow: High-dimensional Integration and Sampling with Normalizing Flows

    Gao, Christina and Isaacson, Joshua and Krause, Claudius. i-flow: High-dimensional Integration and Sampling with Normalizing Flows. Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 2020. doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abab62. arXiv:2001.05486

    work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abab62 2020

  26. [26]

    otz, Niklas , title =

    Deutschmann, Nicolas and G\"otz, Niklas , title = ". JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)083. arXiv:2401.09069

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)083 2024

  27. [27]

    MadNIS at NLO

    De Crescenzo, Giovanni and Villadamigo, Javier Mari \ n o and Elmer, Nina and Heimel, Theo and Plehn, Tilman and Winterhalder, Ramon and Zaro, Marco. MadNIS at NLO. 2026. arXiv:2603.22407

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Gribov, V. N. and Lipatov, L. N. Deep inelastic ep scattering in perturbation theory. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 1972

    work page 1972

  29. [29]

    Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language

    Altarelli, Guido and Parisi, G. Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language. Nucl. Phys. B. 1977. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4 1977

  30. [30]

    Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics

    Dokshitzer, Yuri L. Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics. Sov. Phys. JETP. 1977

    work page 1977

  31. [31]

    FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?

    Shtabovenko, Vladyslav and Mertig, Rolf and Orellana, Frederik. FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109357. arXiv:2312.14089

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109357 2025

  32. [32]

    and Bohm, M

    Mertig, R. and Bohm, M. and Denner, Ansgar. FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1991. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90130-D

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90130-d 1991

  33. [33]

    Automatized One-Loop Calculations in 4 and D dimensions

    Hahn, T. and Perez-Victoria, M. Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1999. doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00173-8. arXiv:hep-ph/9807565

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(98)00173-8 1999

  34. [34]

    Generating Feynman Diagrams and Amplitudes with FeynArts 3

    Hahn, Thomas. Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2001. doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(01)00290-9. arXiv:hep-ph/0012260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(01)00290-9 2001

  35. [35]

    Feynman graph generation and propagator mixing, I

    Nogueira, P. Feynman graph generation and propagator mixing, I. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108103

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108103 2021

  36. [36]

    Automatic Feynman Graph Generation

    Nogueira, Paulo. Automatic Feynman Graph Generation. J. Comput. Phys. 1993. doi:10.1006/jcph.1993.1074

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.1993.1074 1993

  37. [37]

    Data-parallel leading-order event generation in MadGraph5 \_ aMC@NLO

    Hageb. Data-parallel leading-order event generation in MadGraph5 \_ aMC@NLO. 2025. arXiv:2507.21039

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    MadSpace – Event Generation for the Era of GPUs and ML,

    Heimel, Theo and Mattelaer, Olivier and Winterhalder, Ramon. MadSpace -- Event Generation for the Era of GPUs and ML. 2026. arXiv:2602.06895

    work page arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Next-to-leading order calculation of four-jet observables in electron-positron annihilation

    Nagy, Zoltan and Trocsanyi, Zoltan. Next-to-leading order calculation of four jet observables in electron positron annihilation. Phys. Rev. D. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.099902. arXiv:hep-ph/9806317

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.099902 1999

  40. [40]

    $W$-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD

    Boughezal, Radja and Focke, Christfried and Liu, Xiaohui and Petriello, Frank. W -boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.062002. arXiv:1504.02131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.062002 2015

  41. [41]

    Precision Phenomenology with MCFM

    Campbell, John and Neumann, Tobias. Precision Phenomenology with MCFM. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)034. arXiv:1909.09117

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)034 2019

  42. [42]

    An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC

    Catani, Stefano and Grazzini, Massimiliano. An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.222002. arXiv:hep-ph/0703012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.222002 2007

  43. [43]

    A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO

    Czakon, M. A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO. Phys. Lett. B. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.08.036. arXiv:1005.0274

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.08.036 2010

  44. [44]

    Antenna Subtraction at NNLO

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, A. and Gehrmann, T. and Glover, E. W. Nigel. Antenna subtraction at NNLO. JHEP. 2005. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/09/056. arXiv:hep-ph/0505111

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/09/056 2005

  45. [45]

    Vector boson pair production at the LHC

    Campbell, John M. and Ellis, R. Keith and Williams, Ciaran. Vector Boson Pair Production at the LHC. JHEP. 2011. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)018. arXiv:1105.0020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2011)018 2011

  46. [46]

    A Multi-Threaded Version of MCFM

    Campbell, John M. and Ellis, R. Keith and Giele, Walter T. A Multi-Threaded Version of MCFM. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2015. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3461-2. arXiv:1503.06182

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3461-2 2015

  47. [47]

    NNLOJET: a parton-level event generator for jet cross sections at NNLO QCD accuracy

    Huss, Alexander and others. NNLOJET: A parton-level event generator for jet cross sections at NNLO QCD accuracy. SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2026. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.69. arXiv:2503.22804

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.69 2026

  48. [48]

    and Ostrolenk, K

    Mattelaer, O. and Ostrolenk, K. Speeding up MadGraph5 \_ aMC@NLO. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2021. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09204-7. arXiv:2102.00773

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09204-7 2021

  49. [49]

    MadEvent: Automatic Event Generation with MadGraph

    Maltoni, Fabio and Stelzer, Tim. MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph. JHEP. 2003. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/02/027. arXiv:hep-ph/0208156

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/02/027 2003

  50. [50]

    Introduction to Monte Carlo methods

    Weinzierl, Stefan. Introduction to Monte Carlo methods. 2000. arXiv:hep-ph/0006269

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  51. [51]

    Weight optimization in multichannel Monte Carlo

    Kleiss, Ronald and Pittau, Roberto. Weight optimization in multichannel Monte Carlo. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1994. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(94)90043-4. arXiv:hep-ph/9405257

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0010-4655(94)90043-4 1994

  52. [52]

    Automatic Generation of Tree Level Helicity Amplitudes

    Stelzer, T. and Long, W. F. Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1994. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(94)90084-1. arXiv:hep-ph/9401258

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0010-4655(94)90084-1 1994

  53. [53]

    and Watanabe, I

    Murayama, H. and Watanabe, I. and Hagiwara, Kaoru. HELAS: HELicity amplitude subroutines for Feynman diagram evaluations. 1992

    work page 1992

  54. [54]

    and Dormans, J

    Abreu, S. and Dormans, J. and Febres Cordero, F. and Ita, H. and Kraus, M. and Page, B. and Pascual, E. and Ruf, M. S. and Sotnikov, V. Caravel: A C++ framework for the computation of multi-loop amplitudes with numerical unitarity. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108069. arXiv:2009.11957

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108069 2021

  55. [55]

    Smirnov, A. V. and Shapurov, N. D. and Vysotsky, L. I. FIESTA5: Numerical high-performance Feynman integral evaluation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108386. arXiv:2110.11660

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108386 2022

  56. [56]

    and Jones, S

    Heinrich, G. and Jones, S. P. and Kerner, M. and Magerya, V. and Olsson, A. and Schlenk, J. Numerical scattering amplitudes with pySecDec. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108956. arXiv:2305.19768

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108956 2024

  57. [57]

    Numerical evaluation of multi-loop integrals for arbitrary kinematics with SecDec 2.0

    Borowka, Sophia and Carter, Jonathon and Heinrich, Gudrun. Numerical Evaluation of Multi-Loop Integrals for Arbitrary Kinematics with SecDec 2.0. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.020. arXiv:1204.4152

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.020 2013

  58. [58]

    Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

    Cascioli, Fabio and Maierhofer, Philipp and Pozzorini, Stefano. Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.111601. arXiv:1111.5206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.111601 2012

  59. [59]

    Lange, J

    Lange, Fabian and Usovitsch, Johann and Wu, Zihao. Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection. 2025. arXiv:2505.20197

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods

    Klappert, Jonas and Lange, Fabian and Maierh. Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108024. arXiv:2008.06494

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108024 2021

  61. [61]

    Non-perturbative QCD Effects and the Top Mass at the Tevatron

    Skands, Peter Z. and Wicke, Daniel. Non-perturbative QCD effects and the top mass at the Tevatron. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2007. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0352-1. arXiv:hep-ph/0703081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0352-1 2007

  62. [62]

    Effects of color reconnection on $t\bar{t}$ final states at the LHC

    Argyropoulos, Spyros and Sj. Effects of color reconnection on t t final states at the LHC. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)043. arXiv:1407.6653

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2014)043 2014

  63. [63]

    Summations by parton showers of large logarithms in electron-positron annihilation

    Nagy, Zolt \'a n and Soper, Davison E. Summations by parton showers of large logarithms in electron-positron annihilation. 2020. arXiv:2011.04777

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    and Holguin, Jack and Pl

    Forshaw, Jeffrey R. and Holguin, Jack and Pl. Building a consistent parton shower. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)014. arXiv:2003.06400

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)014 2020

  65. [65]

    and Soto-Ontoso, Alba and Soyez, Gregory and Verheyen, Rob

    van Beekveld, Melissa and Ferrario Ravasio, Silvia and Hamilton, Keith and Salam, Gavin P. and Soto-Ontoso, Alba and Soyez, Gregory and Verheyen, Rob. PanScales showers for hadron collisions: all-order validation. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2022)020. arXiv:2207.09467

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)020 2022

  66. [66]

    and Soto-Ontoso, Alba and Soyez, Gregory and Verheyen, Rob

    van Beekveld, Melissa and Ferrario Ravasio, Silvia and Salam, Gavin P. and Soto-Ontoso, Alba and Soyez, Gregory and Verheyen, Rob. PanScales parton showers for hadron collisions: formulation and fixed-order studies. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2022)019. arXiv:2205.02237

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)019 2022

  67. [67]

    A new approach to color-coherent parton evolution

    Herren, Florian and H. A new approach to color-coherent parton evolution. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)091. arXiv:2208.06057

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)091 2023

  68. [68]

    and Scyboz, Ludovic and Soyez, Gregory

    Ferrario Ravasio, Silvia and Hamilton, Keith and Karlberg, Alexander and Salam, Gavin P. and Scyboz, Ludovic and Soyez, Gregory. Parton Showering with Higher Logarithmic Accuracy for Soft Emissions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.161906. arXiv:2307.11142

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.161906 2023

  69. [69]

    A partitioned dipole-antenna shower with improved transverse recoil

    Preuss, Christian T. A partitioned dipole-antenna shower with improved transverse recoil. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)161. arXiv:2403.19452

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)161 2024

  70. [70]

    alaric parton shower for hadron colliders

    H. alaric parton shower for hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.094032. arXiv:2404.14360

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.094032 2025

  71. [71]

    New Standard for the Logarithmic Accuracy of Parton Showers

    van Beekveld, Melissa and others. New Standard for the Logarithmic Accuracy of Parton Showers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.011901. arXiv:2406.02661

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.011901 2025

  72. [72]

    and Hamilton, Keith and Monni, Pier Francesco and Salam, Gavin P

    Dasgupta, Mrinal and Dreyer, Fr \'e d \'e ric A. and Hamilton, Keith and Monni, Pier Francesco and Salam, Gavin P. and Soyez, Gregory. Parton showers beyond leading logarithmic accuracy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.052002. arXiv:2002.11114

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.052002 2020

  73. [73]

    and Hamilton, Keith and Monni, Pier Francesco and Salam, Gavin P

    Dasgupta, Mrinal and Dreyer, Fr \'e d \'e ric A. and Hamilton, Keith and Monni, Pier Francesco and Salam, Gavin P. Logarithmic accuracy of parton showers: a fixed-order study. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)033. arXiv:1805.09327

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)033 2018

  74. [74]

    LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for the reduction of the multiloop integrals

    Lee, Roman N. LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/523/1/012059. arXiv:1310.1145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1742-6596/523/1/012059 2014

  75. [75]

    Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction

    von Manteuffel, A. and Studerus, C. Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction. 2012. arXiv:1201.4330

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  76. [76]

    Smirnov, A. V. and Chukharev, F. S. FIRE6: Feynman Integral REduction with modular arithmetic. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106877. arXiv:1901.07808

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106877 2020

  77. [77]

    Vegas Revisited: Adaptive Monte Carlo Integration Beyond Factorization

    Ohl, Thorsten. Vegas revisited: Adaptive Monte Carlo integration beyond factorization. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1999. doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(99)00209-X. arXiv:hep-ph/9806432

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(99)00209-x 1999

  78. [78]

    WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC

    Kilian, Wolfgang and Ohl, Thorsten and Reuter, Jurgen. WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2011. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1742-y. arXiv:0708.4233

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1742-y 2011

  79. [79]

    O'Mega: An Optimizing Matrix Element Generator

    Moretti, Mauro and Ohl, Thorsten and Reuter, Jurgen. O'Mega: An Optimizing matrix element generator. 2001. arXiv:hep-ph/0102195

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  80. [80]

    CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model

    Belyaev, Alexander and Christensen, Neil D. and Pukhov, Alexander. CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.01.014. arXiv:1207.6082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.01.014 2013

Showing first 80 references.