Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.10148 v4 pith:BQ4XRC6R submitted 2024-10-14 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords optimizationpreferencerewardalphamodeladaptivealignmentmargin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values and intentions is crucial for their utility, honesty, and safety. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a popular approach to achieve this alignment, but it faces challenges in computational efficiency and training stability. Recent methods like Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO) have proposed offline alternatives to RLHF, simplifying the process by reparameterizing the reward function. However, DPO depends on a potentially suboptimal reference model, and SimPO's assumption of a fixed target reward margin may lead to suboptimal decisions in diverse data settings. In this work, we propose $\alpha$-DPO, an adaptive preference optimization algorithm designed to address these limitations by introducing a dynamic reward margin. Specifically, $\alpha$-DPO employs an adaptive preference distribution, balancing the policy model and the reference model to achieve personalized reward margins. We provide theoretical guarantees for $\alpha$-DPO, demonstrating its effectiveness as a surrogate optimization objective and its ability to balance alignment and diversity through KL divergence control. Empirical evaluations on AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard show that $\alpha$-DPO consistently outperforms DPO and SimPO across various model settings, establishing it as a robust approach for fine-tuning LLMs. Our method achieves significant improvements in win rates, highlighting its potential as a powerful tool for LLM alignment. The code is available at https://github.com/junkangwu/alpha-DPO

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Margin RLHF via Preference over Preferences

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adaptive margins for DPO inferred from preference-over-preference comparisons improve alignment quality, with random sampling of comparisons working best overall.

  2. MPO: Multilingual Safety Alignment via Reward Gap Optimization

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MPO reduces jailbreak success in multilingual LLMs by regressing target-language reward gaps onto the English reward gap, outperforming DPO and related methods while preserving utility.

  3. Margin Adaptive DPO: Leveraging Reward Model for Granular Control in Preference Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MADPO replaces DPO's fixed temperature with an instance-level weight derived from a trained reward model, amplifying low-margin preference pairs and dampening high-margin pairs.

Pith tools