REVIEW 1 cited by
Is Temporal Difference Learning Optimal? An Instance-Dependent Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Is Temporal Difference Learning Optimal? An Instance-Dependent Analysis
read the original abstract
We address the problem of policy evaluation in discounted Markov decision processes, and provide instance-dependent guarantees on the $\ell_\infty$-error under a generative model. We establish both asymptotic and non-asymptotic versions of local minimax lower bounds for policy evaluation, thereby providing an instance-dependent baseline by which to compare algorithms. Theory-inspired simulations show that the widely-used temporal difference (TD) algorithm is strictly suboptimal when evaluated in a non-asymptotic setting, even when combined with Polyak-Ruppert iterate averaging. We remedy this issue by introducing and analyzing variance-reduced forms of stochastic approximation, showing that they achieve non-asymptotic, instance-dependent optimality up to logarithmic factors.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Corruption-Tolerant Asynchronous Q-Learning with Near-Optimal Rates
A novel robust asynchronous Q-learning algorithm achieves finite-time convergence rates that match clean-data bounds up to an additive term proportional to the corruption fraction, with a matching information-theoreti...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.