pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.06995 · v2 · pith:BX7THGIFnew · submitted 2026-01-28 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.CV· cs.IT· cs.MA· math.IT

When Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Meets Wireless Communications: A Survey

Konstantinos Gounis , Sotiris A. Tegos , Dimitrios Tyrovolas , Panagiotis D. Diamantoulakis , George K. Karagiannidis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 12:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.CVcs.ITcs.MAmath.IT
keywords SLAMvisual SLAMwireless communicationsRF localizationscale ambiguityvisual odometry5Gintegrated sensing and communication
0
0 comments X

The pith

Wireless signals resolve scale ambiguity in monocular visual SLAM while visual odometry improves 5G positioning accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey maps the connections between simultaneous localization and mapping and wireless communications with a focus on visual SLAM methods. It shows that radio frequency data can act as a proxy to correct the scale ambiguity that arises in monocular camera setups. In the other direction, the visual odometry at the heart of SLAM can supply more accurate positioning information to wireless systems operating in 5G and later standards. The work reviews signal propagation models, channel geometry, landmark detection from images, Bayesian estimation filters, and motion control strategies that support these links. It notes that complete joint communication and SLAM systems are still early in development and will need further theoretical and practical work to reach higher semantic capabilities.

Core claim

The authors establish that monocular V-SLAM would benefit from RF relevant information as the latter can serve as a proxy for the scale ambiguity resolution, while wireless communications in the context of 5G and beyond can potentially benefit from visual odometry that is central in SLAM. The survey supplies an overview of wireless signal propagation, geometric channel modeling, RF-based localization and sensing, image processing for landmark detection, and proactive path prediction for optimal wireless channels. It examines estimation and control methods including Bayesian filters, feature-based pose estimation, perception-aware motion control, and spatial signal processing via vector field

What carries the argument

Bidirectional integration in which RF localization supplies scale information to visual SLAM and visual odometry supplies positioning data to wireless networks.

If this is right

  • Monocular V-SLAM systems gain a practical proxy for resolving scale ambiguity through incorporation of RF measurements.
  • Wireless systems in 5G and beyond gain improved positioning accuracy by leveraging visual odometry outputs from SLAM.
  • Estimation tools such as Bayesian filters and feature-based pose estimation become usable across both visual and radio domains.
  • Perception-aware motion control combined with vector-field signal processing enables joint optimization of robot paths and channel quality.
  • Fully integrated joint communication and SLAM solutions will require additional theoretical and practical work to support semantic perception and higher-level localization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Robots in GPS-denied spaces could maintain consistent maps by treating RF signals as an additional measurement source alongside camera images.
  • Network operators could use SLAM-derived environment maps to adapt beam directions and resource allocation dynamically in dense deployments.
  • Extensions that add LiDAR or radar alongside cameras and RF would likely produce more robust multi-modal localization than any single modality alone.
  • Field trials that quantify end-to-end latency and accuracy gains would clarify whether the surveyed integrations translate into deployable systems.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's overview of bidirectional benefits and future directions rests on the assumption that the selected literature accurately captures the current state of both fields and that the described integrations are practically feasible without major unaddressed technical barriers.

What would settle it

A controlled indoor or urban experiment that measures whether adding RF range or angle data to a monocular V-SLAM pipeline reduces scale drift below the level achieved by camera-only methods, or conversely shows whether visual odometry inputs measurably raise localization precision in a 5G multi-antenna testbed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.06995 by Dimitrios Tyrovolas, George K. Karagiannidis, Konstantinos Gounis, Panagiotis D. Diamantoulakis, Sotiris A. Tegos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An illustration of the architecture of a networked autonomous system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The dynamics of an autonomous car using Newton-Euler equations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Multi-dimensional channel estimation, channel parameter clustering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Vector Field SLAM: The bilinear interpolation function of the expected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Area graph localization (AGloc) pipeline based on [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: EZMAP: a high-accuracy, low-cost floor plan construction system that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of P²-SLAM incorporating wheel odometry, two-way bearings and a pose refinement via graph SLAM, based on [127]. 64 beam scanning for a given BS-UE orientation pair. By combining multiple RSRP matrices from different BS-UE orientations, an RSRP image can be constructed with extended angular coverage, effectively representing the received signal in the beam space. This enables the transformation… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper surveys the state-of-the-art in the nexus of SLAM and Wireless Communications, attributing the bidirectional impact of each with a focus on visual SLAM (V-SLAM) integration. We provide an overview of key concepts related to wireless signal propagation, geometric channel modeling, and radio frequency (RF)-based localization and sensing. In addition to this, we show image processing techniques that can detect landmarks, proactively predicting optimal paths for wireless channels. Several dimensions are considered, including the prerequisites, techniques, background, and future directions and challenges of the intersection between SLAM and wireless communications. We analyze estimation and control approaches such as Bayesian filters, feature-based pose estimation, perception-aware motion control, spatial methods for signal processing such as vector fields, and key technological aspects. We expose techniques and items towards enabling a highly effective retrieval of the autonomous robot state. Among other interesting findings, we observe that monocular V-SLAM would benefit from RF relevant information, as the latter can serve as a proxy for the scale ambiguity resolution. Conversely, we find that wireless communications in the context of 5G and beyond can potentially benefit from visual odometry that is central in SLAM. Moreover, we examine other sources besides the camera for SLAM and describe the twofold relation with wireless communications. Finally, integrated solutions performing joint communications and SLAM appear to be in their infancy: theoretical and practical advancements are required to add higher-level localization and semantic perception capabilities to RF and multi-antenna technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This survey examines the nexus between Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), with emphasis on visual SLAM (V-SLAM), and wireless communications. It reviews wireless signal propagation, geometric channel modeling, RF-based localization and sensing, image processing for landmark detection and path prediction, Bayesian filters, feature-based pose estimation, perception-aware control, vector-field spatial methods, and other sensing modalities. The paper identifies bidirectional synergies—monocular V-SLAM can use RF data to resolve scale ambiguity while 5G-and-beyond communications can leverage visual odometry—and concludes that joint communications-and-SLAM solutions remain in their infancy, requiring further theoretical and practical work.

Significance. If the reviewed literature is representative and the identified integration pathways are feasible, the survey could serve as a useful interdisciplinary reference that highlights concrete opportunities for improving robot state estimation through RF-visual fusion and for enhancing wireless systems via SLAM-derived geometric awareness. Explicit credit is due for framing the problem in terms of both prerequisites and future challenges rather than isolated techniques.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and concluding discussion of integrated solutions] Abstract and final paragraph on integrated solutions: the central claim that 'integrated solutions performing joint communications and SLAM appear to be in their infancy' and that 'theoretical and practical advancements are required' is load-bearing for the bidirectional-benefit narrative. The manuscript lists high-level challenges but does not analyze or cite specific failure modes such as timestamp alignment between camera frames and RF measurements, multipath propagation effects within geometric channel models during SLAM updates, or the computational cost of joint Bayesian filtering; without this quantification the feasibility assumption underlying the mutual-benefit observations remains untested.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / structure overview] The abstract introduces several dimensions (prerequisites, techniques, background, future directions) but the manuscript would benefit from an explicit early section or table that maps these dimensions to the subsequent subsections for improved navigation.
  2. [Throughout] Acronyms such as V-SLAM, RF, and SLAM are used throughout; a single consolidated acronym table or consistent first-use expansion would reduce reader effort.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our survey. We address the major comment below and have made revisions to strengthen the discussion of integrated solutions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and concluding discussion of integrated solutions] Abstract and final paragraph on integrated solutions: the central claim that 'integrated solutions performing joint communications and SLAM appear to be in their infancy' and that 'theoretical and practical advancements are required' is load-bearing for the bidirectional-benefit narrative. The manuscript lists high-level challenges but does not analyze or cite specific failure modes such as timestamp alignment between camera frames and RF measurements, multipath propagation effects within geometric channel models during SLAM updates, or the computational cost of joint Bayesian filtering; without this quantification the feasibility assumption underlying the mutual-benefit observations remains untested.

    Authors: We agree that expanding on specific failure modes would better substantiate the claim. As a survey, the assertion that joint communications-and-SLAM solutions remain in their infancy rests on the limited body of literature that performs true joint optimization or fusion, rather than separate or loosely coupled approaches; this scarcity is documented across the reviewed works on RF sensing, V-SLAM, and 5G positioning. The high-level challenges enumerated in the manuscript already point to open issues in synchronization, channel modeling, and estimation complexity. In the revised version we will augment the abstract and concluding section with explicit references to related sensor-fusion literature that quantifies timestamp misalignment effects, multipath-induced biases in geometric models, and the added computational burden of joint Bayesian updates, thereby providing concrete support for the need for further theoretical and practical work without altering the survey's scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Survey paper with no internal derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

This is a literature survey that summarizes external works on SLAM-wireless intersections without original equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or ansatzes. Bidirectional benefit claims (e.g., RF as scale proxy for monocular V-SLAM) are presented as observations drawn from reviewed literature rather than derived internally. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or renamings reduce any central claim to the paper's own inputs by construction. The paper is self-contained as an overview against external benchmarks, with all technical details and feasibility discussions attributed to cited sources.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey paper, no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors; all content draws from cited prior work in robotics and communications.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5835 in / 1004 out tokens · 35322 ms · 2026-05-22T12:20:16.391022+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 153 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Part i,

    H. F. Durrant-Whyte and T. Bailey, “Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Part i,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99– 110, Jun. 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    RGBD-SLAM Based on Object Detection with Two-Stream YOLOv4- MobileNetv3 in Autonomous Driving,

    G. Li, H. Fan, G. Jiang, D. Jiang, Y. Liu, B. Tao, and J. Yun, “RGBD-SLAM Based on Object Detection with Two-Stream YOLOv4- MobileNetv3 in Autonomous Driving,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 2847–2857, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    ORB-SLAM: A versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system,

    R. Mur-Artal, J. M. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tard ´os, “ORB-SLAM: A versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1147–1163, Oct. 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Split Learning in Computer Vision for Semantic Segmentation Delay Minimization,

    N. G. Evgenidis, N. A. Mitsiou, S. A. Tegos, P. D. Diamantoulakis, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Split Learning in Computer Vision for Semantic Segmentation Delay Minimization,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    LIFT-SLAM: A deep learning feature-based monocular visual SLAM method,

    H. M. S. Bruno and E. L. Colombini, “LIFT-SLAM: A deep learning feature-based monocular visual SLAM method,”Neurocomputing, vol. 455, pp. 97–110, Sep. 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Estimating Optical Flow: A comprehensive review of the state of the art,

    A. Alfarano, L. Maiano, L. Papa, and I. Amerini, “Estimating Optical Flow: A comprehensive review of the state of the art,”Comput. Vis. Image Underst., vol. 249, p. 104160, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of optical flow estimation with deep net- works,

    E. Ilg, N. Mayer, T. Saikia, M. Keuper, A. Dosovitskiy, and T. Brox, “FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of optical flow estimation with deep net- works,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2017, pp. 2462–2470

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Real-Time Dynamic SLAM Algorithm Based on Deep Learning,

    P. Su, S. Luo, and X. Huang, “Real-Time Dynamic SLAM Algorithm Based on Deep Learning,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 87 754–87 766, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [10]

    ISAC Prototype System for Multi-Domain Cooperative Communication Networks,

    J. Yanget al., “ISAC Prototype System for Multi-Domain Cooperative Communication Networks,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 108–112, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [11]

    General Simultane- ous Localization and Mapping Scheme for mmWave Communication Systems,

    T. Du, J. Yang, C.-K. Wen, S. Xia, and S. Jin, “General Simultane- ous Localization and Mapping Scheme for mmWave Communication Systems,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 22 521–22 536, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [12]

    rWiFiSLAM: Effective WiFi ranging-based SLAM system in ambient environments,

    B. Wei, M. Gao, F. Li, C. Luo, S. Wang, and J. Zhang, “rWiFiSLAM: Effective WiFi ranging-based SLAM system in ambient environments,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 5362–5369, Jun. 2024. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, X XXXX 21

    work page 2024

  12. [13]

    A Review of Millimeter-Wave Device-Based Local- ization and Device-Free Sensing Technologies and Applications,

    A. Shastriet al., “A Review of Millimeter-Wave Device-Based Local- ization and Device-Free Sensing Technologies and Applications,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1708–1749, May 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [14]

    Millimeter Wave Communications for Future Mobile Networks (Guest Editorial)—Part I,

    M. Xiaoet al., “Millimeter Wave Communications for Future Mobile Networks (Guest Editorial)—Part I,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1425–1431, Jul. 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [15]

    A Tutorial on Environment-Aware Communications via Channel Knowledge Map for 6G,

    Y. Zenget al., “A Tutorial on Environment-Aware Communications via Channel Knowledge Map for 6G,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1478–1519, Feb. 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [16]

    6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, architec- ture, and key technologies,

    Z. Zhanget al., “6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, architec- ture, and key technologies,”IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 28–41, Sep. 2019

    work page 2019

  16. [17]

    IEEE 802.11ay-based mmwave WLANs: Design challenges and solutions,

    P. Zhouet al., “IEEE 802.11ay-based mmwave WLANs: Design challenges and solutions,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1654–1681, Mar. 2018

    work page 2018

  17. [18]

    Ubiquitous Localization (UbiLoc): A survey and taxonomy on device-free localization for smart world,

    R. C. Shitet al., “Ubiquitous Localization (UbiLoc): A survey and taxonomy on device-free localization for smart world,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3532–3564, May 2019

    work page 2019

  18. [19]

    A Tutorial on 5G Positioning,

    L. Italiano, B. Camajori Tedeschini, M. Brambilla, H. Huang, M. Nicoli, and H. Wymeersch, “A Tutorial on 5G Positioning,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1488–1535, Jun. 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [20]

    A Comprehensive Overview on UWB Radar: Applications, standards, signal processing techniques, datasets, radio chips, trends and future research directions,

    M. Cheraghiniaet al., “A Comprehensive Overview on UWB Radar: Applications, standards, signal processing techniques, datasets, radio chips, trends and future research directions,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2283–2324, Aug. 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [21]

    A Review of Computational Intelligence Techniques in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks,

    N. Primeau, R. Falcon, R. Abielmona, and E. M. Petriu, “A Review of Computational Intelligence Techniques in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2822– 2854, Dec. 2018

    work page 2018

  21. [22]

    Game Theory for Multi-Access Edge Computing: Survey, use cases, and future trends,

    J. Moura and D. Hutchison, “Game Theory for Multi-Access Edge Computing: Survey, use cases, and future trends,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 260–288, Mar. 2019

    work page 2019

  22. [23]

    A Survey of mmWave Radar- Based Sensing in Autonomous Vehicles, Smart Homes and Industry,

    H. Kong, C. Huang, J. Yu, and X. Shen, “A Survey of mmWave Radar- Based Sensing in Autonomous Vehicles, Smart Homes and Industry,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 463–508, Feb. 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [24]

    A Survey on Fundamental Limits of Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    A. Liuet al., “A Survey on Fundamental Limits of Integrated Sensing and Communication,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 994–1034, Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [25]

    Radio Detection and Ranging,

    Bell Laboratories Record, “Radio Detection and Ranging,”Nature, vol. 152, pp. 391–392, 1943

    work page 1943

  25. [26]

    Wiener,Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series

    N. Wiener,Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1949

    work page 1949

  26. [27]

    Navstar Global Positioning System,

    H. R. Heuerman and W. J. Serms, “Navstar Global Positioning System,” J. Surv. Eng., vol. 109, pp. 73–80, 1983

    work page 1983

  27. [28]

    Survey of Cellular Mobile Radio Localization Methods: From 1G to 5G,

    J. A. del Peral-Rosado, R. Raulefs, J. A. L ´opez-Salcedo, and G. Seco- Granados, “Survey of Cellular Mobile Radio Localization Methods: From 1G to 5G,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1124–1148, 2018, second Quarter

    work page 2018

  28. [29]

    RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system,

    P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan, “RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system,” inProc. IEEE INFOCOM 2000, vol. 2, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2000, pp. 775–784

    work page 2000

  29. [30]

    From RSSI to CSI: Indoor localization via channel response,

    Z. Yang, Z. Zhou, and Y. Liu, “From RSSI to CSI: Indoor localization via channel response,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 1–32, 2013

    work page 2013

  30. [31]

    Improving Indoor Local- ization Using Mobile UWB Sensor and Deep Neural Networks,

    L. Nosrati, M. S. Fazel, and M. Ghavami, “Improving Indoor Local- ization Using Mobile UWB Sensor and Deep Neural Networks,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 20 420–20 431, 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [32]

    Network-Based Wireless Location: Challenges faced in developing techniques for accurate wireless location informa- tion,

    A. H. Sayedet al., “Network-Based Wireless Location: Challenges faced in developing techniques for accurate wireless location informa- tion,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 24–40, 2005

    work page 2005

  32. [33]

    Indoor Geolocation Science and Technology,

    K. Pahlavan, X. Li, and J. M ¨akel¨a, “Indoor Geolocation Science and Technology,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 112–118, 2002

    work page 2002

  33. [34]

    Enhanced Channel Estimation with Atomic Norm Minimization and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces in mmWave MIMO Systems,

    S. Ganapathy and K. Muthusamy, “Enhanced Channel Estimation with Atomic Norm Minimization and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces in mmWave MIMO Systems,”Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 38, no. 2, p. e5973, 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [35]

    Localization-Based OFDM Framework for RIS-Aided Systems,

    F. Saggese, K. Kansanen, and P. Popovski, “Localization-Based OFDM Framework for RIS-Aided Systems,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2023, pp. 1956–1961

    work page 2023

  35. [36]

    Localization in Dynamic Indoor MIMO-OFDM Wireless Systems Using Domain Adaptation,

    R. Ismayilov, R. L. Cavalcante, and S. Stanczak, “Localization in Dynamic Indoor MIMO-OFDM Wireless Systems Using Domain Adaptation,” arXiv:2408.13017, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [37]

    On the Representation and Estimation of Spatial Uncertainty,

    R. Smith and P. Cheeseman, “On the Representation and Estimation of Spatial Uncertainty,”Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 56–68, 1986

    work page 1986

  37. [38]

    Simultaneous Map Building and Localization for an Autonomous Mobile Robot,

    J. J. Leonard and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Simultaneous Map Building and Localization for an Autonomous Mobile Robot,” inProc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Workshop Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), 1991, pp. 1442–1447

    work page 1991

  38. [39]

    Simultaneous Localiza- tion and Mapping: A survey of current trends in autonomous driving,

    G. Bresson, Z. Alsayed, L. Yu, and S. Glaser, “Simultaneous Localiza- tion and Mapping: A survey of current trends in autonomous driving,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 194–220, Sep. 2017

    work page 2017

  39. [40]

    Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping (SLAM): Part ii,

    T. Bailey and H. F. Durrant-Whyte, “Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping (SLAM): Part ii,”Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 108–117, Sep. 2006

    work page 2006

  40. [41]

    Thrun, W

    S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox,Probabilistic Robotics. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  41. [42]

    Improved Techniques for Grid Mapping with Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters,

    G. Grisetti, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard, “Improved Techniques for Grid Mapping with Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 34–46, 2007

    work page 2007

  42. [43]

    Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the robust-perception age,

    C. Cadena, L. Carlone, H. Carrillo, Y. Latif, D. Scaramuzza, J. Neira, I. Reid, and J. J. Leonard, “Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the robust-perception age,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1309–1332, Dec. 2016

    work page 2016

  43. [44]

    MonoSLAM: Real-time single camera SLAM,

    A. J. Davison, I. D. Reid, N. D. Molton, and O. Stasse, “MonoSLAM: Real-time single camera SLAM,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1052–1067, 2007

    work page 2007

  44. [45]

    Keyframe-Based Visual–Inertial Odometry Using Nonlinear Opti- mization,

    S. Leutenegger, S. Lynen, M. Bosse, R. Siegwart, and P. T. Furgale, “Keyframe-Based Visual–Inertial Odometry Using Nonlinear Opti- mization,”Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 314–334, Mar. 2015

    work page 2015

  45. [46]

    BASL-AD SLAM: A robust deep- learning feature-based visual SLAM system with adaptive motion model,

    J. Han, R. Dong, and J. Kan, “BASL-AD SLAM: A robust deep- learning feature-based visual SLAM system with adaptive motion model,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 11 794– 11 804, Sep. 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [47]

    DeepSLAM: A robust monocular SLAM system with unsupervised deep learning,

    R. Li, S. Wang, and D. Gu, “DeepSLAM: A robust monocular SLAM system with unsupervised deep learning,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 3577–3587, Apr. 2021

    work page 2021

  47. [48]

    A Real- Time, Robust, and Versatile Visual-SLAM Framework Based on Deep Learning Networks,

    X. Zhang, H. Dong, H. Zhang, X. Zhu, S. Li, and B. Deng, “A Real- Time, Robust, and Versatile Visual-SLAM Framework Based on Deep Learning Networks,”IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 74, pp. 1–13, 2025

    work page 2025

  48. [49]

    When Wireless Communications Meet Computer Vision in Beyond 5G,

    T. Nishio, Y. Koda, J. Park, M. Bennis, and K. Doppler, “When Wireless Communications Meet Computer Vision in Beyond 5G,”IEEE Commun. Standards Mag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 76–83, Jun. 2021

    work page 2021

  49. [51]

    Integrated Sensing and Communication in 6G: A prototype of high-resolution THz sensing on portable device,

    O. Liet al., “Integrated Sensing and Communication in 6G: A prototype of high-resolution THz sensing on portable device,” inProc. Joint Eur. Conf. Netw. Commun. & 6G Summit (EuCNC/6G Summit), Porto, Portugal, 2021, pp. 544–549

    work page 2021

  50. [52]

    Real-Time Outdoor Localization Using Radio Maps: A deep learning approach,

    C ¸ . Yapar, R. Levie, G. Kutyniok, and G. Caire, “Real-Time Outdoor Localization Using Radio Maps: A deep learning approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 9703–9717, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  51. [53]

    Networked Control Systems: A survey of trends and techniques,

    X.-M. Zhang, Q.-L. Han, X. Ge, D. Ding, L. Ding, D. Yue, and C. Peng, “Networked Control Systems: A survey of trends and techniques,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020

    work page 2020

  52. [54]

    ACHORD: Communication-aware multi-robot coordination with in- termittent connectivity,

    M. Saboia, L. Clark, V. Thangavelu, J. A. Edlund, K. Otsu, G. J. Correa, V. S. Varadharajan, A. Santamaria-Navarro, T. Touma, A. Bouman, H. Melikyan, T. Pailevanian, S.-K. Kim, A. Archanian, T. S. Va- quero, G. Beltrame, N. Napp, G. Pessin, and A.-A. Agha-Mohammadi, “ACHORD: Communication-aware multi-robot coordination with in- termittent connectivity,”IE...

    work page 2022

  53. [55]

    A Survey on Cooperative Perception in an Automotive Context,

    T. A. de Sousa, A. M. Pascoal, and D. F. Wolf, “A Survey on Cooperative Perception in an Automotive Context,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 14 110–14 132, Sep. 2022

    work page 2022

  54. [56]

    Kimera-Multi: Robust, distributed, dense metric-semantic SLAM for multi-robot systems,

    Y. Tian, Y. Chang, F. Herrera Arias, C. Nieto-Granda, J. P. How, and L. Carlone, “Kimera-Multi: Robust, distributed, dense metric-semantic SLAM for multi-robot systems,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2022–2038, 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [57]

    DOOR-SLAM: Distributed, online, and outlier-resilient SLAM for robotic teams,

    P.-Y. Lajoie, B. Ramtoula, Y. Chang, L. Carlone, and G. Beltrame, “DOOR-SLAM: Distributed, online, and outlier-resilient SLAM for robotic teams,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1656–1663, 2020

    work page 2020

  56. [58]

    The Many Facets of Information in Networked Estimation and Control,

    M. Franceschetti, M. J. Khojasteh, and M. Z. Win, “The Many Facets of Information in Networked Estimation and Control,”Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 6, pp. 233–259, 2023

    work page 2023

  57. [59]

    5G Networks Enabling Cooperative Autonomous Vehicle Localization: A survey,

    B. Zhou, Z. Liu, and H. Su, “5G Networks Enabling Cooperative Autonomous Vehicle Localization: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 7715–7731, Nov. 2024. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, X XXXX 22

    work page 2024

  58. [60]

    Research on Visual SLAM Technology of Autonomous Mobile Robot,

    D. Zhang and S. Su, “Research on Visual SLAM Technology of Autonomous Mobile Robot,”J. Zhengzhou Univ., Nat. Sci., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021

    work page 2021

  59. [61]

    Dynamic Visual SLAM and MEC Technologies for B5G: A comprehensive review,

    J. Peng, Y. Hou, H. Xu, and T. Li, “Dynamic Visual SLAM and MEC Technologies for B5G: A comprehensive review,”EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw., vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 98, 2022

    work page 2022

  60. [62]

    ORB visual and WiFi online RSSI fusion SLAM,

    Y.-H. Lu, C.-C. Huang, and C.-F. Chou, “ORB visual and WiFi online RSSI fusion SLAM,”WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl., vol. 21, pp. 398– 408, 2024

    work page 2024

  61. [63]

    SLAM visual localization and location recognition technology based on 6G network,

    C. Zhang, Y. Yang, and G. Li, “SLAM visual localization and location recognition technology based on 6G network,”Wireless Pers. Commun., pp. 1–17, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  62. [64]

    Ultra Wide-Band Localization and SLAM: A comparative study for mobile robot navigation,

    M. J. Segura, F. A. Auat Cheein, J. M. Toibero, V. Mut, and R. Carelli, “Ultra Wide-Band Localization and SLAM: A comparative study for mobile robot navigation,”Sensors, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2035–2055, Feb. 2011

    work page 2035

  63. [65]

    Localization of Mobile Robots Based on Depth Camera,

    Z. Yin, H. Wen, W. Nie, and M. Zhou, “Localization of Mobile Robots Based on Depth Camera,”Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 16, p. 4016, Aug. 2023

    work page 2023

  64. [66]

    Indoor Localization of UA V Using Monocular Vision,

    W. Nie, H. Wen, L. Xie, X. Yang, and M. Zhou, “Indoor Localization of UA V Using Monocular Vision,”J. Electron. Inf. Technol., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 906–914, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  65. [67]

    A Real-Time and Robust Monocular Visual-Inertial SLAM System Based on Point and Line Features for Mobile Robots of Smart Cities Toward 6G,

    Z. Kuang, W. Wei, Y. Yan, J. Li, G. Lu, Y. Peng, and W. Shang, “A Real-Time and Robust Monocular Visual-Inertial SLAM System Based on Point and Line Features for Mobile Robots of Smart Cities Toward 6G,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Sep. 2022

    work page 1950

  66. [68]

    Multi-View Data Capture for Dynamic Object Reconstruction Using Handheld Augmented Real- ity Mobiles,

    M. Bortolon, L. Bazzanella, and F. Poiesi, “Multi-View Data Capture for Dynamic Object Reconstruction Using Handheld Augmented Real- ity Mobiles,”J. Real-Time Image Process., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 345–355, Apr. 2021

    work page 2021

  67. [69]

    PointRend: Image segmentation as rendering,

    A. Kirillov, Y. Wu, K. He, and R. Girshick, “PointRend: Image segmentation as rendering,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2020

    work page 2020

  68. [70]

    A Multi-User Collaborative AR System for Industrial Training and Maintenance Tasks,

    J. Wang, Y. Zhuang, and X. Chen, “A Multi-User Collaborative AR System for Industrial Training and Maintenance Tasks,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 5, p. 1927, Mar. 2022

    work page 1927

  69. [71]

    Building Technology Platform Aimed to Develop Service Robot with Embedded Personality and Enhanced Communication with Social Environment,

    A. Rodi ´c, M. Jovanovi ´c, I. Stevanovi ´c, B. Karan, and V. Potkonjak, “Building Technology Platform Aimed to Develop Service Robot with Embedded Personality and Enhanced Communication with Social Environment,”Digit. Commun. Netw., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 112–124, May 2015

    work page 2015

  70. [72]

    Advancements in the Field of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle,

    A. Sahoo, S. K. Dwivedy, and P. S. Robi, “Advancements in the Field of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle,”Ocean Eng., vol. 181, pp. 145– 160, Jun. 2019

    work page 2019

  71. [73]

    A Study on Turning Motion Con- trol of a 3-Joint Fish Robot Using Sliding Mode-Based Controllers,

    T. Q. Vo, H. S. Kim, and B. R. Lee, “A Study on Turning Motion Con- trol of a 3-Joint Fish Robot Using Sliding Mode-Based Controllers,” inProc. Int. Conf. Control, Autom. Syst. (ICCAS), Gyeonggi-do, South Korea, 2010, pp. 1556–1561

    work page 2010

  72. [74]

    Vision-Based Control for Fast 3-D Reconstruction with an Aerial Robot,

    E. Cristofalo, E. Montijano, and M. Schwager, “Vision-Based Control for Fast 3-D Reconstruction with an Aerial Robot,”IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1189–1202, Jul. 2020

    work page 2020

  73. [75]

    5G networks enabling cooperative autonomous vehicle localization: A survey,

    B. Zhou, Z. Liu, and H. Su, “5G networks enabling cooperative autonomous vehicle localization: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 15 291–15 313, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  74. [76]

    A Survey on Approximate Edge AI for Energy-Efficient Au- tonomous Driving Services,

    D. Katare, D. Perino, J. Nurmi, M. Warnier, M. Janssen, and A. Y. Ding, “A Survey on Approximate Edge AI for Energy-Efficient Au- tonomous Driving Services,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2714–2754, Oct. 2023

    work page 2023

  75. [77]

    Multi-Robot Object SLAM Using Distributed Variational Inference,

    H. Cao, S. Shreedharan, and N. Atanasov, “Multi-Robot Object SLAM Using Distributed Variational Inference,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 8722–8729, 2024

    work page 2024

  76. [78]

    Deeper Understanding of the Homography Decomposition for Vision-Based Control,

    E. Malis and M. Vargas, “Deeper Understanding of the Homography Decomposition for Vision-Based Control,” INRIA, Research Report RR-6303, 2007

    work page 2007

  77. [79]

    Data Fusion for Multipath-Based SLAM: Combining information from multiple propagation paths,

    E. Leitinger, A. Venus, B. Teague, and F. Meyer, “Data Fusion for Multipath-Based SLAM: Combining information from multiple propagation paths,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 71, pp. 4011– 4026, 2023

    work page 2023

  78. [80]

    Swarm-SLAM: Sparse decentralized collaborative simultaneous localization and mapping framework for multi-robot systems,

    P.-Y. Lajoie and G. Beltrame, “Swarm-SLAM: Sparse decentralized collaborative simultaneous localization and mapping framework for multi-robot systems,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 6958–6965, 2023

    work page 2023

  79. [81]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liu, Y. Cui, C. Masouros, J. A. Zhang, D. W. K. Ng, W. Gerstacker, and A. Nallanathan, “Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022

    work page 2022

  80. [82]

    Intelligent Integrated Sensing and Com- munication: A survey,

    J. Zhang, H. Zhanget al., “Intelligent Integrated Sensing and Com- munication: A survey,”Sci. China Inf. Sci., vol. 68, no. 3, p. 131301, 2025

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.