REVIEW 4 cited by
Sliding Windows Are Not the End: Exploring Full Ranking with Long-Context Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Sliding Windows Are Not the End: Exploring Full Ranking with Long-Context Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exciting performance in listwise passage ranking. Due to the limited input length, existing methods often adopt the sliding window strategy. Such a strategy, though effective, is inefficient as it involves repetitive and serialized processing, which usually re-evaluates relevant passages multiple times. As a result, it incurs redundant API costs, which are proportional to the number of inference tokens. The development of long-context LLMs enables the full ranking of all passages within a single inference, avoiding redundant API costs. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study of long-context LLMs for ranking tasks in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Surprisingly, our experiments reveal that full ranking with long-context LLMs can deliver superior performance in the supervised fine-tuning setting with a huge efficiency improvement. Furthermore, we identify two limitations of fine-tuning the full ranking model based on existing methods: (1) sliding window strategy fails to produce a full ranking list as a training label, and (2) the language modeling loss cannot emphasize top-ranked passage IDs in the label. To alleviate these issues, we propose a new complete listwise label construction approach and a novel importance-aware learning objective for full ranking. Experiments show the superior performance of our method over baselines. Our codes are available at \url{https://github.com/8421BCD/fullrank}.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
ResRank: Unifying Retrieval and Listwise Reranking via End-to-End Joint Training with Residual Passage Compression
ResRank unifies retrieval and listwise reranking by compressing passages to one token each, using residual connections and cosine-similarity scoring, achieving competitive effectiveness on TREC DL and BEIR benchmarks ...
-
LRanker: LLM Ranker for Massive Candidates
LRanker combines K-means candidate aggregation with graph-partitioned ensemble of query embeddings to improve LLM ranking accuracy and scalability on massive candidate pools, reporting 3-30% gains on RBench tasks up t...
-
Dynamic Ranked List Truncation for Reranking Pipelines via LLM-generated Reference-Documents
LLM-generated reference documents enable dynamic ranked list truncation and adaptive batching for listwise reranking, outperforming prior RLT methods and accelerating processing by up to 66% on TREC benchmarks.
-
Dynamic Ranked List Truncation for Reranking Pipelines via LLM-generated Reference-Documents
LLM-generated reference documents serve as relevance pivots for dynamic ranked-list truncation and adaptive/parallel listwise reranking, reportedly beating prior RLT methods and cutting LLM reranking cost by up to 66%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.