Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Lies, Damned Lies, and Distributional Language Statistics: Persuasion and Deception with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.17128 v1 pith:BZD3CVTS submitted 2024-12-22 cs.CL cs.CYcs.HC

classification cs.CLcs.CYcs.HC
keywords languagepersuasivebecomecapabilitiesdeceptionincludinglargelies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate content that is as persuasive as human-written text and appear capable of selectively producing deceptive outputs. These capabilities raise concerns about potential misuse and unintended consequences as these systems become more widely deployed. This review synthesizes recent empirical work examining LLMs' capacity and proclivity for persuasion and deception, analyzes theoretical risks that could arise from these capabilities, and evaluates proposed mitigations. While current persuasive effects are relatively small, various mechanisms could increase their impact, including fine-tuning, multimodality, and social factors. We outline key open questions for future research, including how persuasive AI systems might become, whether truth enjoys an inherent advantage over falsehoods, and how effective different mitigation strategies may be in practice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Large language models can effectively convince people to believe conspiracies

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In three experiments, GPT-4o instructed to argue for a conspiracy raised believers' confidence about as much as it lowered it when arguing against; a truth-constraining prompt and a corrective debrief largely undid the harm.

  2. Thinking beyond the anthropomorphic paradigm benefits LLM research

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Anthropomorphic language and assumptions are common and growing in LLM research, and the authors propose a framework for moving beyond them while keeping what is useful.

  3. Mind What You Ask For: Emotional and Rational Faces of Persuasion by Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Emotional prompts make LLMs produce more cognitively complex language than rational prompts, and models systematically differ in their use of Cialdini influence principles across prompt types.

Pith tools