Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 60 references

This paper predicts that a chemically active droplet will spontaneously start moving when its reaction kinetics remember the past for longer than the reaction turnover time, and that such droplets will align into flocks or traveling labyrin

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:03 UTC pith:BZQORLNP

load-bearing objection Reaction memory is a genuinely nice mechanism, and the numerics show the effect clearly, but the onset threshold is taken from a bulk stability analysis that does not apply to the simulated droplet regime; the paper needs a droplet-level analysis. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14451 v1 pith:BZQORLNP submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-phq-bio.BM

Memory-Driven Self-Propulsion and Flocking of Chemically Active Droplets

Samuel Kovach , Trevor GrandPre This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft physics.bio-phq-bio.BM
keywords active phase separationbiomolecular condensatesnon-Markovian kineticsmemory effectsself-propelled dropletsflockingHopf instabilityreaction-diffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Biomolecular condensates are shaped by reactions, and this paper argues that reaction kinetics that remember the past provide a generic route to motion. The central claim is that when a droplet's reaction memory time becomes comparable to the reaction turnover time, the stationary droplet loses stability and spontaneously acquires a polar, self-propelled state. In the paper's minimal two-component model this appears as a Hopf instability of the uniform state, and in multidroplet simulations the same memory wakes that push a droplet forward also align neighbouring droplets, producing polar flocks and, at higher density, traveling labyrinths. The authors present reaction memory as a new control parameter of active phase separation, linking condensate remodeling to autonomous motion and collective organization — and they explicitly leave open whether biological reactions realize the effect.

Core claim

The paper establishes that delayed reaction feedback destabilizes stationary droplets. Linearizing the homogeneous state of a Cahn-Hilliard model with an exponential memory kernel gives a quadratic dispersion relation with an extra root; when γ < α (memory time longer than reaction time) the threshold D(k)=γ is a Hopf bifurcation with frequency √(γ(α−γ)), and numerical phase diagrams match this boundary, marking a self-propelled band at Γ1/γ ∼ 1. Propulsion itself comes from the lag of the auxiliary memory field m: for a droplet moving at velocity V, φ−m ≃ −γ⁻¹ V·∇m forms a dipolar wake that is positive at the leading edge and negative behind, breaking fore-aft symmetry and reinforcing the m

What carries the argument

The central object is the exponentially weighted memory field m, defined by ∂t m = γ(φ − m), which encodes the history of the concentration with relaxation time 1/γ. It enters the Cahn-Hilliard reaction-diffusion equation as a nonlocal reaction term, and its relaxation mode is the second root of the quadratic dispersion relation obtained by linearizing around the homogeneous state. That extra root is what converts the usual stationary size-control instability into a Hopf oscillation when γ < α, and the mismatch φ−m ≃ −γ⁻¹ V·∇m is the propulsion dipole that moves the droplet and couples neighbouring droplets through persistent wakes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the Hopf threshold computed by linearising the uniform, well-mixed state also sets the onset of motion for a finite, phase-separated droplet; the paper does not carry out a stability analysis of the stationary droplet profile itself.

What would settle it

Search for the growing dipole (odd parity) mode of the linearised dynamics around a stationary circular droplet in the same model: if no such mode becomes unstable as 1/γ crosses the predicted boundary, or if its threshold differs from γ = α by more than finite-size corrections, the identification of bulk Hopf onset with droplet self-propulsion is wrong. A numerical check would be to slowly ramp 1/γ across the boundary and observe whether the onset is discontinuous or hysteretic.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Reaction memory joins reaction rate as a control parameter of active phase separation: varying 1/γ alone drives a stationary droplet through oscillation, self-propulsion, division, and dissolution.
  • The onset of self-propulsion is set by the bulk reaction kinetics (γ = α) and is independent of interfacial stiffness; stiffness only sets the magnitude of the speed.
  • Droplet speed is nonmonotonic in memory time, peaking when memory time matches the droplet relaxation time, so systems can be tuned for fastest motion.
  • In multi-droplet systems, the memory wake of one droplet reorients its neighbours, producing a polar flock at low density and a travelling labyrinth at high density.
  • Because the mechanism requires only a delayed reaction field, it should operate beyond the specific exponential-kernel model; adding hydrodynamics or richer kernels may shift thresholds but not the qualitative picture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not explore kernels beyond the exponential one, but the mechanism is a generic consequence of a lagging field; richer kernels will likely shift the exact phase boundaries while keeping the qualitative route to motility.
  • A testable extension: in a reconstituted condensate with an enzyme that cycles between sticky and non-sticky states, changing the enzyme's catalytic rate relative to its residence time should reproduce the predicted dome-shaped speed curve, peaking when the residence time matches the reaction time.
  • The wake-mediated alignment is a chemical analogue of trailing vortices; it suggests that condensates inside cells could coordinate motion without direct contact, as long as they exchange reactive material through a shared, slowly relaxing field.
  • The paper leaves open whether phosphorylation cycles or hidden biochemical states realize this memory in vivo; if they do, reaction memory becomes a knob for controlling organelle transport.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Cahn–Hilliard reaction–diffusion theory for phase-separating condensates with temporally nonlocal (memory-dependent) reaction kinetics. Using exponential memory kernels, the authors linearize the homogeneous steady state and derive a dispersion relation that exhibits a Hopf instability when the memory relaxation rate γ falls below the reaction rate α. Numerical simulations show that single droplets deform and self-propel above a memory threshold, while multi-droplet systems form polar flocks and, at higher density, traveling labyrinths. The central claim is that reaction memory is a generic control parameter for autonomous motility and collective motion in active condensates.

Significance. If substantiated, the mechanism is original and significant: it identifies non-Markovian reaction kinetics as a route to self-propulsion and flocking in condensates, distinct from Marangoni, phoretic, or nonreciprocal mechanisms. The linear calculation for the homogeneous state is transparent and the simulations demonstrate a rich phenomenology. However, the quantitative link between the bulk Hopf instability and the finite-droplet shape instability is not established, and several simulation parameters are unspecified. The paper is publishable in principle, but the central threshold claim requires substantial additional support.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eqs. (7)–(11) and Fig. 2] The Hopf condition γ<α is derived for a single Fourier mode of the uniform state. For a spatially extended system, the bulk onset would be γ_c = max_k D(k) when max_k D(k)<α, and D(k)=2κΛk^2(k_c^2−k^2) gives max_k D(k)=Λ f''(φ0)^2/(8κ), which depends on κ. If max_k D(k)>α, the uniform state is already unstable for all γ and no finite threshold exists. Figure 2 reports a κ-independent onset near 1/γ≈2 and attributes it to α, but this does not follow from the presented bulk dispersion unless the relevant droplet shape mode has a κ-independent growth rate. No linear stability analysis of the stationary droplet profile is provided, so the statement that measured thresholds agree quantitatively with linear theory is unsupported. I request a droplet-level stability calculation (e.g., radial eigenvalue problem or numerical continuation) or a clear reduction showing why the shape-mode growth rat
  2. [Appendix I A and Eq. (2)] The model contains an unspecified mobility function M(φ). The linear expression Λ=M(φ0)kBT/v appears in Eq. (7), but the functional form of M(φ) used in the simulations is never stated, and no values are given for Λ, kBT/v, or the Flory–Huggins parameters beyond χ and φ0. Without these, Figs. 1–3 cannot be reproduced and the claimed quantitative agreement with linear theory cannot be checked. Please provide the complete parameter set and the form of M(φ) for each figure.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5)] The normalization sentence says 'with Γ_BA and Γ_AB normalized,' but the subscripts are reversed relative to Eq. (1). Please make the notation consistent.
  2. [Eqs. (3) and (12)] Eq. (3) integrates from 0 to t, while Eq. (12) uses a kernel from −∞. Please state how the initial transient is handled and how the memory field is initialized.
  3. [Phase-diagram discussion, Fig. 1(a)] The text says 'Γ1/γ guide lines closely track the α/γ=1 onset,' but since α=1.25Γ1, the predicted threshold is Γ1/γ=0.8, not 1. Please correct the description or the guide-line values.
  4. [After Eq. (13)] The expression m≈φ+γ^{-1}V·∇m is written without derivation. Since ∂_t m = −V·∇m for a steadily moving droplet, the sign should be clarified; the subsequent statement 'positive on the leading edge' depends on the orientation convention.
  5. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains a garbled phrase 'border=phase; white = , red dashed = m'. Please rewrite the caption to clearly define the colored borders, the white region, and the red dashed contour.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the memory-kernel model and its linear-stability derivation are self-contained; self-citations are peripheral and the central prediction is not equivalent to an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the independently stated model (Eqs. 2–4) with a chosen exponential memory kernel that defines an auxiliary field via dm/dt = γ(φ−m). Linearizing around the uniform state (Eq. 7) and solving the self-consistent dispersion relation (Eqs. 9–11) gives the Hopf threshold γ<α mathematically, with no fitted constants. The numerics (Figs. 1–3) are separate tests of the same model: observed states, speeds, and polar order are measured variables, not imposed inputs. The propulsion relation φ−m ≈ −γ^{-1}V·∇m follows from the steady moving form of the auxiliary field equation, and the wake-alignment mechanism is a post hoc interpretation of simulation data, not an input. Citations to prior work in the dispersion and steady droplet-size relations ([21],[22]) are external, not self-citations; GrandPre self-citations ([1],[18],[39],[48]) appear only in background lists and do no load-bearing work. A legitimate concern is that the onset is derived from the homogeneous-state stability analysis, while the simulated propulsion is an instability of a finite droplet; the paper does not prove that the bulk Hopf condition applies to the droplet shape mode, and the κ-independence of the numerical onset in Fig. 2 is not reconciled with the κ-dependence of D_max in the bulk dispersion. But this is a derivation/completeness gap, not circularity: the claimed prediction is not by construction equal to any input, and the paper's own caveat (adding hydrodynamics or richer kernels may shift thresholds) explicitly leaves room for correction. No self-definitional, fitted-input, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming pattern is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model has no fitted parameters: the control parameters (χ, κ, Γ1, Γ2, γ, φ0) are explicitly stated and scanned. The only hidden input is the mobility M(φ), which is never defined. The main auxiliary object, the memory field m, is a mathematical reformulation of the exponential kernel, not a new physical entity.

free parameters (1)
  • Mobility function M(φ)
    Eq. (2) uses a concentration-dependent mobility but the paper never specifies its functional form or parameters used in the simulations. The linear theory only needs M(φ0), but the nonlinear results (speed, phase boundaries) depend on this undefined function, making it an unstated free input.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Two-state linear reaction model (A↔B with rates linear in φ)
    Eqs. (1)-(3) assume one phase-separating species A and one non-phase-separating B with a reaction term linear in φ. Real signaling cascades are nonlinear and multi-state; the paper notes a nonlinear functional R[φ] could replace it but does not study it.
  • ad hoc to paper Exponential memory kernel Γ̂_i(τ)=γ e^{-γτ}
    The phase diagram and linear theory use a single exponential kernel, reducing memory to one field m (∂_t m=γ(φ-m)). The Hopf criterion γ<α is specific to this single-pole kernel; generality across kernel shapes is asserted but not demonstrated. Location: Eq. (5) and text after Eq. (6).
  • domain assumption Flory-Huggins free energy with χ=2.5 is representative
    The free energy f(φ)=φ ln φ+(1-φ)ln(1-φ)+χφ(1-φ) is chosen. The authors state the results do not depend deeply on the free-energy type, but no test of another free energy is provided. Location: Eq. (4).
  • domain assumption Temporal memory is local in space
    The reaction kernel in Eq. (3) acts on the concentration history at the same point r; any spatial nonlocality arising from diffusing intermediate chemical states is neglected. This is a modeling choice that could affect wake-mediated alignment.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9723 in / 20536 out tokens · 190925 ms · 2026-08-02T02:03:12.001418+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Memory-Driven Self-Propulsion and Flocking of Chemically Active Droplets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BZQORLNP

@misc{pith2026260714451,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Memory-Driven Self-Propulsion and Flocking of Chemically Active Droplets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BZQORLNP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14451}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Biomolecular condensates are continually remodeled by biochemical reactions that can exhibit non-Markovian, history-dependent dynamics. We develop a theory of active phase separation with non-Markovian reactions and show that delayed reaction feedback destabilizes stationary droplets: when the memory time becomes comparable to the reaction turnover time, condensates deform and spontaneously acquire a polar, self-propelled state. In multidroplet systems, persistent memory wakes mediate alignment, producing polar flocks and, at higher concentrations, traveling labyrinths. These results establish reaction memory as a control parameter of active phase separation, linking condensate remodeling, autonomous motility, and collective organization, and suggest a possible route to flocking-like behavior within cells.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14451 by Samuel Kovach, Trevor GrandPre.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Phase behavior of memory-driven active condensates. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Tunable propulsion speed of a memory-driven active [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Collective motion of memory-driven active condensates with increasing density. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Aierken, S

    D. Aierken, S. Aland, S. Bo, S. Boeynaems, D. Cai, S. Carra, L. B. Case, H. S. Chan, J. R. Espinosa, T. K. GrandPre,et al., Roadmap for condensates in cell biol- ogy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03677 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Patel, L

    A. Patel, L. Malinovska, S. Saha, J. Wang, S. Alberti, Y. Krishnan, and A. A. Hyman, Atp as a biological hy- drotrope, Science356, 753 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    E. Dine, A. A. Gil, G. Uribe, C. P. Brangwynne, and J. E. Toettcher, Protein phase separation provides long- term memory of transient spatial stimuli, Cell systems6, 6 655 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    S. He, L. M. Lemma, A. Martinez-Calvo, G. He, J. H. Hennacy, L. Wang, S. L. Ergun, A. K. Rai, C. Wang, L. Bunday,et al., Kinase key1 controls pyrenoid conden- sate size throughout the cell cycle by disrupting phase separation interactions, Nature cell biology , 1 (2026)

    2026

  5. [5]

    Sastre, A

    J. Sastre, A. Thatte, A. M. Bergmann, M. Stasi, M. Tena- Solsona, C. A. Weber, and J. Boekhoven, Size control and oscillations of active droplets in synthetic cells, Nature Communications16, 2003 (2025)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Ashraf, P

    S. Ashraf, P. Kumar, P. Dwivedi, F. Blanc, D. Pillai, and R. Mangal, Emergence of order in chemically ac- tive droplets: Temporal dynamics and collective behav- ior, Langmuir42, 226 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    B. V. Hokmabad, R. Dey, M. Jalaal, D. Mohanty, M. Al- mukambetova, K. A. Baldwin, D. Lohse, and C. C. Maass, Emergence of bimodal motility in active droplets, Physical review X11, 011043 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Dwivedi, S

    P. Dwivedi, S. Ashraf, P. Kumar, D. Pillai, and R. Man- gal, Chemical interactions in active droplets, The Journal of Chemical Physics163(2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    I. B. Smokers, B. S. Visser, A. D. Slootbeek, W. T. Huck, and E. Spruijt, How droplets can accelerate reactions— coacervate protocells as catalytic microcompartments, Accounts of chemical research57, 1885 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    W. Yu, Y. Zhou, L. Yang, X. Yan, S. N. Smukowski, Y. Ma, J. Fan, Y. A. Goo, A. A. Hyman, and Y. Dai, Origins of the intrinsic redox activity of biomolecular condensates, Journal of the American Chemical Society (2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    Y. Dai, C. F. Chamberlayne, M. S. Messina, C. J. Chang, R. N. Zare, L. You, and A. Chilkoti, Interface of biomolecular condensates modulates redox reactions, Chem9, 1594 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    M. Papp, F. Stoffel, M. Gil-Garcia, L. Faltova, and P. Arosio, Biomolecular condensates as regulators of en- zymatic reactions, Nature Chemical Engineering2, 394 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Stoffel, M

    F. Stoffel, M. Papp, M. Gil-Garcia, A. K¨ uffner, A. I. Ben ´ ıtez-Mateos, R. Jacquat, N. Galvanetto, L. Faltova, and P. Arosio, Enhancement of enzymatic activity by biomolecular condensates through ph buffering, Nature Communications16, 6368 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    L. B. Case and C. M. Waterman, Integration of actin dynamics and cell adhesion by a three-dimensional, mechanosensitive molecular clutch, Nature cell biology 17, 955 (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    Sawada, M

    Y. Sawada, M. Tamada, B. J. Dubin-Thaler, O. Cher- niavskaya, R. Sakai, S. Tanaka, and M. P. Sheetz, Force sensing by mechanical extension of the src family kinase substrate p130cas, Cell127, 1015 (2006)

    2006

  16. [16]

    Swaminathan, R

    V. Swaminathan, R. Fischer, and C. M. Waterman, The fak–arp2/3 interaction promotes leading edge advance and haptosensing by coupling nascent adhesions to lamel- lipodia actin, Molecular biology of the cell27, 1085 (2016)

    2016

  17. [17]

    L. B. Case, M. De Pasquale, L. Henry, and M. K. Rosen, Synergistic phase separation of two pathways promotes integrin clustering and nascent adhesion formation, Elife 11, e72588 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Ghosal, N

    A. Ghosal, N. E. Lea, L. B. Case, and T. GrandPre, Prin- ciples of client enrichment in multicomponent biomolecu- lar condensates, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11450 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Y.-L. Hu, S. Lu, K. W. Szeto, J. Sun, Y. Wang, J. C. Lasheras, and S. Chien, Fak and paxillin dynamics at focal adhesions in the protrusions of migrating cells, Sci- entific reports4, 6024 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    Y. M. Wani and J. A. Joseph, Non-equilibrium model- ing of directed flux through biomolecular condensates, bioRxiv , 2026 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    S. C. Glotzer, E. A. Di Marzio, and M. Muthukumar, Reaction-controlled morphology of phase-separating mix- tures, Physical review letters74, 2034 (1995)

    2034

  22. [22]

    Zwicker, A

    D. Zwicker, A. A. Hyman, and F. J¨ ulicher, Suppression of ostwald ripening in active emulsions, Physical Review E92, 012317 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    J. D. Wurtz and C. F. Lee, Stress granule formation via atp depletion-triggered phase separation, New Journal of Physics20, 045008 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    Zwicker, O

    D. Zwicker, O. W. Paulin, and C. Ter Burg, Physics of droplet regulation in biological cells, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 116601 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    J. D. Wurtz and C. F. Lee, Chemical-reaction-controlled phase separated drops: formation, size selection, and coarsening, Physical review letters120, 078102 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    Sorkin and N

    B. Sorkin and N. S. Wingreen, Accelerated ostwald ripen- ing by chemical activity, Journal of the American Chem- ical Society147, 44673 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Brauns, H

    F. Brauns, H. Weyer, J. Halatek, J. Yoon, and E. Frey, Wavelength selection by interrupted coarsen- ing in reaction-diffusion systems, Physical Review Letters 126, 104101 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Seyboldt and F

    R. Seyboldt and F. J¨ ulicher, Role of hydrodynamic flows in chemically driven droplet division, New journal of physics20, 105010 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    Bauermann, G

    J. Bauermann, G. Bartolucci, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Theory of reversed ripening in active phase separating systems, Physical Review Letters135, 148201 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Zippo, D

    E. Zippo, D. Dormann, T. Speck, and L. S. Stelzl, Molec- ular simulations of enzymatic phosphorylation of disor- dered proteins and their condensates, Nature Communi- cations16, 4649 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    S. Laha, J. Bauermann, F. J¨ ulicher, T. C. Michaels, and C. A. Weber, Chemical reactions regulated by phase-separated condensates, Physical Review Research 6, 043092 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    M. S. Heltberg, L. H. Kristensen, M. H. Jensen, and D. Zwicker, Oscillating concentrations suppress conden- sate coarsening, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.16614 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Prathyusha, S

    K. Prathyusha, S. Saha, and R. Golestanian, Anomalous fluctuations in a droplet of chemically active colloids or enzymes, Physical Review Letters133, 058401 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    I. S. Haugerud, H. D. Vuijk, J. Boekhoven, and C. A. Weber, Excitability and oscillations of active droplets, Physical Review Letters136, 218401 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    Tjhung, C

    E. Tjhung, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Cluster phases and bubbly phase separation in active fluids: Reversal of the ostwald process, Physical Review X8, 031080 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Fries, J

    J. Fries, J. Diaz, M. Jardat, I. Pagonabarraga, P. Il- lien, and V. Dahirel, Active droplets controlled by en- zymatic reactions, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 22(2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    S. Saha, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Scalar active mixtures: The nonreciprocal cahn-hilliard model, Physical Review X10, 041009 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Brauns and M

    F. Brauns and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciprocal pattern formation of conserved fields, Physical Review X14, 7 021014 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Martis, D

    S. Martis, D. J. Schwab, and T. GrandPre, Trait-space patterning is dictated by the tempo and mode of muta- tion, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122, e2425607122 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Bauermann, G

    J. Bauermann, G. Bartolucci, J. Boekhoven, F. J¨ ulicher, and C. A. Weber, Critical transition between intensive and extensive active droplets, Physical Review X15, 041027 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Demarchi, A

    L. Demarchi, A. Goychuk, I. Maryshev, and E. Frey, Enzyme-enriched condensates show self-propulsion, po- sitioning, and coexistence, Physical Review Letters130, 128401 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    H. H. Schede, P. Natarajan, A. K. Chakraborty, and K. Shrinivas, A model for organization and regulation of nuclear condensates by gene activity, Nature Commu- nications14, 4152 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Z. You, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciproc- ity as a generic route to traveling states, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 19767 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Sorkin and N

    B. Sorkin and N. S. Wingreen, Propelling catalytic structures using active phase separation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.27965 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Saha and R

    S. Saha and R. Golestanian, Effervescence in a binary mixture with nonlinear non-reciprocal interactions, Na- ture Communications16, 7310 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Qiang, C

    Y. Qiang, C. Luo, and D. Zwicker, Self-propulsion via nontransitive phase coexistence in chemically active mix- tures, Physical Review Letters135, 268301 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Gajendragad and S

    V. Gajendragad and S. Saha, Memory as activity: pat- tern formation in a conserved scalar field, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.17444 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    G. Teza, A. L. Stella, and T. GrandPre, Coarse-graining via lumping: Exact calculations and fundamental limita- tions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.11974 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Van der Meer, B

    J. Van der Meer, B. Ertel, and U. Seifert, Thermody- namic inference in partially accessible markov networks: A unifying perspective from transition-based waiting time distributions, Physical Review X12, 031025 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    K. Blom, K. Song, E. Vouga, A. Godec, and D. E. Makarov, Milestoning estimators of dissipation in sys- tems observed at a coarse resolution, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2318333121 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    O. A. Igoshin, A. B. Kolomeisky, and D. E. Makarov, Coarse-graining chemical networks by trimming to pre- serve energy dissipation, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry Letters16, 1229 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Zhang and T

    J. Zhang and T. Zhou, Markovian approaches to model- ing intracellular reaction processes with molecular mem- ory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 23542 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    H. S. Chung, Transition path times measured by single- molecule spectroscopy, Journal of molecular biology430, 409 (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    Zwicker, R

    D. Zwicker, R. Seyboldt, C. A. Weber, A. A. Hyman, and F. J¨ ulicher, Growth and division of active droplets provides a model for protocells, Nature Physics13, 408 (2017)

    2017

  55. [55]

    C. C. Maass, C. Kr¨ uger, S. Herminghaus, and C. Bahr, Swimming droplets, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics7, 171 (2016)

    2016

  56. [56]

    Michelin, Self-propulsion of chemically active droplets, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics55, 77 (2023)

    S. Michelin, Self-propulsion of chemically active droplets, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics55, 77 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Z. Izri, M. N. van der Linden, S. Michelin, and O. Dau- chot, Self-propulsion of pure water droplets by sponta- neous marangoni-stress-driven motion, Physical Review Letters113, 248302 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    Savitzky and M

    A. Savitzky and M. J. Golay, Smoothing and differentia- tion of data by simplified least squares procedures, Ana- lytical Chemistry36, 1627 (1964)

    1964

  59. [59]

    K. J. Burns, G. M. Vasil, J. S. Oishi, D. Lecoanet, and B. P. Brown, Dedalus: A flexible framework for numerical simulations with spectral methods, Physical Review Re- search2, 023068 (2020), arXiv:1905.10388 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Wang and S

    D. Wang and S. J. Ruuth, Variable step-size implicit- explicit linear multistep methods for time-dependent partial differential equations, Journal of Computational Mathematics26, 838 (2008)

    2008