REVIEW 1 cited by
Symbolic Regression in Materials Science
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Symbolic Regression in Materials Science
read the original abstract
We showcase the potential of symbolic regression as an analytic method for use in materials research. First, we briefly describe the current state-of-the-art method, genetic programming-based symbolic regression (GPSR), and recent advances in symbolic regression techniques. Next, we discuss industrial applications of symbolic regression and its potential applications in materials science. We then present two GPSR use-cases: formulating a transformation kinetics law and showing the learning scheme discovers the well-known Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) form, and learning the Landau free energy functional form for the displacive tilt transition in perovskite LaNiO$_3$. Finally, we propose that symbolic regression techniques should be considered by materials scientists as an alternative to other machine-learning-based regression models for learning from data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the definition and importance of interpretability in scientific machine learning
Interpretability in SciML requires mechanistic understanding rather than sparsity, and prior knowledge is often essential for interpretable scientific discovery.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.