Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A driven holographic Weyl semimetal reaches a stable time-periodic steady state, destabilizes into superharmonic and chaotic response beyond a critical drive curve, and in a magnetic field pumps charge at rate rho = q^2 b_eff B/(2 pi^2).

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 20:50 UTC pith:CCA7ZXLD

load-bearing objection Chiral pumping match is solid and the NESS construction is plausible; the stability phase diagram is the main new claim and it is under-supported by the text as written. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2602.22016 v1 pith:CCA7ZXLD submitted 2026-02-25 hep-th cond-mat.str-el

Nonequilibrium steady states in driven holographic Weyl semi-metals

Matteo Baggioli , Sebastian Grieninger , James Stokes This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.str-el
keywords holographic Weyl semimetalnonequilibrium steady stateFloquet exponentschiral pumping effectcircularly polarized driveanomalous transportsuperharmonic responsedriven open quantum systems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that a strongly coupled Weyl semimetal, modeled holographically, can be driven by a circularly polarized electric field into a time-periodic nonequilibrium steady state instead of heating without bound. It constructs that state explicitly and shows, from the spectrum of Floquet exponents, that it is linearly stable over a wide region of drive amplitude and frequency. Beyond a critical curve in (P, omega_D) the dominant exponent moves into the unstable half-plane, the axial current develops superharmonic oscillations while the vector current stays locked to the drive, and sufficiently strong driving produces chaotic time evolution. Adding a magnetic field yields the chiral pumping relation rho = q^2 b_eff B/(2 pi^2) at leading order in B, matching free Dirac theory and receiving a bulk contribution to the effective chiral shift. The reason to care: this is a controlled, fully nonlinear check that Floquet Weyl semimetal physics and chiral pumping survive in a strongly coupled open quantum system, with a concrete stability phase diagram.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes three related results. First, in the probe-limit holographic model, a rotating boundary electric field drives the system into a time-periodic nonequilibrium steady state described by phi = phi(z), A3 = A3(z), V± = g±(z) e^{±i omega_D t}. Second, linearized perturbations around this state are governed by Floquet exponents; for weak driving the dominant exponent has Im(omega) < 0 and the state is stable, while beyond a critical curve in (P, omega_D) it crosses into the upper half-plane, producing a superharmonic axial response (oscillations at higher integer multiples of the drive frequency) even though the vector current remains commensurate with the dr

What carries the argument

The central object is the bottom-up holographic model of a Weyl semimetal: a five-dimensional anti-de Sitter black brane with two U(1) gauge fields (vector V and axial A), a Chern-Simons coupling alpha, and a scalar charged under the axial symmetry, treated in the probe limit so the black-hole horizon acts as a fixed-temperature dissipative sink. The NESS is captured by the time-periodic ansatz phi = phi(z), A3 = A3(z), V± = g±(z) e^{±i omega_D t} for a boundary source S1 = P cos(omega_D t), S2 = P sin(omega_D t). Stability is governed by Floquet exponents — the complex frequencies omega of linearized perturbations e^{-i omega t} delta-phi(z), e^{-i omega t} delta-A3(z), e^{-i omega t} delta

Load-bearing premise

The whole stability phase diagram depends on the perturbation ansatz (4.7)-(4.9), where fluctuations are e^{-i omega t} times z-profiles and the Floquet sidebands omega + n omega_D are absent; if those sidebands matter, the critical curve in Fig. 2 could move.

What would settle it

Compute the full Floquet spectrum for the same time-periodic background including all harmonics omega + n omega_D. If the dominant exponent crosses into the upper half-plane at a materially different point in (P, omega_D) than the single-harmonic result, the stability boundary is wrong. On the experimental side, driving a Weyl semimetal with circularly polarized light and finding the superharmonic axial response or chaos at drive strengths well below the predicted curve would also falsify the model's stability prediction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A strongly coupled Weyl semimetal can support a stable Floquet NESS, not just in the free-Dirac limit: energy injected by the drive is balanced by horizon dissipation.
  • The phase diagram in (P, omega_D) makes a concrete prediction: as drive strength or frequency crosses the critical curve, the axial response gains superharmonic components while the vector response remains commensurate with the drive.
  • At sufficiently strong drive the fully nonlinear evolution becomes chaotic, indicating that the horizon does not prevent nonlinear instabilities even when it prevents indefinite heating.
  • The chiral pumping coefficient is exactly the free-Dirac value q^2 b_eff/(2 pi^2) at leading order in B, so the anomaly-protected charge response is unchanged by strong coupling, although b_eff now contains a bulk contribution.
  • The axial current is not proportional to the pumped charge in the holographic result, so the regulator-dependent part of the axial response is not protected and cannot be predicted from the anomaly alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The stability boundary is computed from a single-harmonic perturbation ansatz that omits Floquet sidebands; a full treatment retaining omega + n omega_D could shift the critical curve, so Fig. 2 should be read as provisional.
  • The chaotic regime is obtained in the probe limit with a fixed background. If metric backreaction were included, the horizon temperature would change and could quench or delay the chaos, so the chaotic region may not survive in the fully backreacted theory.
  • A concrete experimental analogue would be to drive a Dirac/Weyl semimetal with circularly polarized light and look for the threshold where a superharmonic or chaotic axial current appears; matching the predicted curve would support the strong-coupling picture.
  • The form of b_eff suggests the pumped charge density can be used as an in situ probe of the drive-induced chiral shift; deviations from the q^2/(2 pi^2) slope would signal additional material or bulk corrections beyond this model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs and analyzes a time-periodic nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) for a holographic Weyl semimetal driven by a circularly polarized electric field, in the probe limit of the Landsteiner–Liu model. The NESS is obtained from the ansatz (4.6), with static scalar and axial components and rotating vector components at ±ω_D. Its linearized stability is analyzed via Floquet exponents; the authors report a stable region in (P,ω_D) space, an instability across a critical curve, superharmonic axial response, and apparently chaotic behaviour in the nonlinear evolution. In a magnetic field, they compute the anomaly-induced vector charge density and axial current, showing that at leading order in B the charge density matches the free-Dirac chiral pumping formula ρ = q^2 b_eff B/(2π^2), with an explicit holographic expression for b_eff that includes a bulk contribution. Appendices provide free-fermion and first-quantized derivations of the CPE, holographic renormalization, and the boundary value problem formulation.

Significance. The chiral-pumping part is the cleanest contribution: Eq. (4.18) is derived from the holographic equations without fitting to the target result, and it ties the NESS response to the Dirac-theory formula with an explicit bulk correction. The free-fermion appendix and the lowest-Landau-level counting in Appendix A.2 provide a self-contained field-theoretic cross-check. The stability phase diagram, if valid, would be a genuinely non-perturbative result: it avoids the high-frequency expansion of Ref. [12] and exhibits a parametric instability in a strongly coupled holographic NESS. However, the Floquet computation is not currently documented. The manuscript is generally careful to separate derivation from observation, and model parameters are set by hand rather than fitted; comparisons to Ref. [12] are external benchmarks, not inputs.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.7)–(4.9) and Fig. 2] The stability computation is not reproducible as presented. The text states that "discrete time-translation invariance implies that the periodic time dependence factors out", but for a T-periodic background Floquet solutions are e^{-iωt} times a T-periodic function, generically containing all sidebands ω+nω_D. The ansatz (4.7)–(4.9) truncates to a single harmonic per field (two shifted lab-frame frequencies in the δV± sector), and no linearized fluctuation equations, harmonic projection, or numerical method for the Floquet spectrum is supplied. Such a single-frequency ansatz can be exact if the O(2) symmetry of the (V1,V2) sector allows a co-rotating frame in which the background becomes static; the paper should state that transformation explicitly and write the fluctuation equations in that frame. Without this, the critical curve in Fig. 2 and the superharmonic-instability narrative are
  2. [§4.1, stability analysis sector] The analysis does not state whether only spatially homogeneous, zero-momentum perturbations are considered, or whether momentum-carrying modes are included. Since the background and sources are homogeneous in ⃗x, modes can be classified by momentum, and the dominant Floquet exponent could in principle be at nonzero ⃗k. A phase diagram claiming to describe stability of the NESS should either show that the critical mode is at ⃗k=0 or extend the computation to nonzero momentum; at minimum, the sector treated must be specified. This is load-bearing for the interpretation of Fig. 2.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2] The right panel plots Im(ω_max) versus ω_D for P = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, but the curves are not distinguished by markers, and the beige region in the left panel is not accompanied by a quantitative definition (presumably Im(ω_max)>0). Please add a legend and define the contour extraction.
  2. [§4.1, last paragraph] The phrase "the oscillations average out to give an effectively nonzero Weyl distance" is not defined. Presumably this refers to a cycle average of A3(z=1) or of ⟨J_A^3⟩; please define the quantity and avoid introducing a new term without explanation.
  3. [Abstract and §5] The abstract says "chaotic time evolution emerges", while §4.1 says the time evolution "appears to be chaotic" and §5 says "apparently chaotic regime". No quantitative diagnostic (e.g., Lyapunov exponent, power-spectrum broadening, sensitivity to initial conditions) is provided. Please either supply such evidence or soften the abstract claim to match the actual numerical support.
  4. [Eq. (4.17) and §4.2] The integration by parts leading to the definition of b_eff is not shown. One line of algebra would help the reader verify that the bulk contribution ∫ dz z^2 (A3^(0))' is not an artifact of a sign or boundary term.
  5. [Figs. 3 and 4] Figure 4 uses green dots to mark the nodes of the vector source S1, but Figure 3 does not; the purpose of the green dots is not explained in the text. Also, the correspondence between each panel and the points in Fig. 2 is not quantified (no (P,ω_D) values are listed in the captions).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

One definitional step makes the chiral-pumping match to free-Dirac theory tautological (beff is defined as the coefficient extracted from the computed ρ); central NESS/stability claims are independent, though the Floquet spectrum method is omitted.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 4.2, Eqs. (4.17)–(4.18)]
    "Next, we recall that the Chern-Simons anomaly coefficient α is related to the charge in the Dirac theory by 8α = q2/2π2 [13]. Thus, identifying the effective chiral shift with beff = A(0)3(1) − ∫01 dz z2 (A(0)3)′(z), then we obtain, at leading order in the magnetic field, ρ = q2beffB/2π2, in agreement with [12, Eq. (15)]."

    Equation (4.17) has already computed ρ = 8αB [A3^(0)(1) − ∫₀¹ dz z² (A3^(0))′(z)] + O(B²). With the standard dictionary 8α = q²/2π² [13], this is identically ρ = (q²/2π²) B × I, where I is the bracketed combination. The paper then defines beff := I and reports ρ = q² beff B/(2π²) 'in agreement with [12, Eq. (15)]'. The agreement is therefore by construction: the effective chiral shift is defined to be the coefficient that reproduces the free-Dirac formula, so the match carries no independent content. What remains non-tautological is that I ≠ 0 (the drive generates a chiral shift) and that ρ is O(B) at µ = 0; the specific functional form and coefficient of the match are a renaming of the computed quantity, not an independent prediction.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain. The NESS is constructed by substituting the stated ansatz (4.6) into the bulk equations (4.1)–(4.4) with UV data (M, b, S1 = P cos ωDt, S2 = P sin ωDt) fixed by hand; the outputs (φ, a, v1, v2, ρ) are computed, not fitted, so Fig. 1 and the background are independent results. The stability analysis uses replacements (4.7)–(4.9) to linearize the same equations; the critical curve in Fig. 2 is a computed output with no fitted parameter renamed as prediction. The one genuine definitional reduction is in §4.2: ρ is computed as 8αB times the bracket I = A3^(0)(1) − ∫ z²(A3^(0))′ dz, and beff is then defined as I so that (4.18) reproduces [12, Eq. (15)] identically; the 'agreement' is by construction (self-definitional), though the existence and linear-in-B character of the pumped density are real results. Separately, per the reviewing rule I flag a missing-support issue that is not circularity: the Floquet claim rests on the single-harmonic ansatz (4.7)–(4.9) with the stated justification 'discrete time-translation invariance implies that the periodic time dependence factors out', which is not the general Floquet form (sidebands ω + nωD are omitted), and no fluctuation equations, harmonic projection, or numerical spectral method is supplied. This is a correctness/reproducibility risk and should be verified, but it does not make the result an input by construction. Self-citations (e.g., [17], [27]–[29], [45]–[47]) are contextual background and carry no load-bearing premise; the model and the 8α = q²/2π² dictionary come from external, independently checkable sources [12, 13]. Net: one mild definitional step in a supporting claim; the central NESS/stability derivations are self-contained, so the score is 3 rather than 6+.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; model inputs (M, α, q5, b, ω_D, P, B, µ) are set by hand, and the leading-order CPE coefficient follows analytically from the equations. The main assumptions are the probe limit, the model's anomaly identification, the NESS ansatz, and the single-harmonic Floquet ansatz.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Probe limit: the bulk metric is fixed to Schwarzschild-AdS5 and does not backreact to the gauge fields or scalar.
    Used in the action (3.1)-(3.3) and throughout; the horizon absorbs energy at fixed temperature. Acknowledged in §5 as questionable deep in the unstable/chaotic regime.
  • domain assumption The bottom-up U(1)_V × U(1)_A Chern-Simons model of Ref. [13] correctly encodes the Weyl-semimetal anomaly structure and the identification of the horizon value A3(1) with the effective chiral shift.
    Invoked in §3.2 and §4.2 to map holographic current data to the Dirac-theory prediction (4.18).
  • ad hoc to paper The NESS ansatz (4.6) — static ϕ and A3, vector fields at ±ω_D — is the relevant time-periodic attractor for the driven problem.
    Imposed to construct steady-state solutions; the IBVP provides numerical support in the stable region but no general proof that all solutions converge to this ansatz.
  • ad hoc to paper Linearized stability is described by the single-frequency ansatz (4.7)-(4.9) with the periodic background dependence factored out.
    This is the premise behind the Floquet-exponent phase diagram (Fig. 2); the required sideband structure and fluctuation equations are not shown.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17179 in / 20696 out tokens · 182716 ms · 2026-08-02T20:50:16.695912+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Three-dimensional Weyl materials provide a controlled setting for exploring Floquet dynamics in open quantum systems, including nonequilibrium steady states (NESS). Motivated by the desire for a strongly-coupled description, we employ holography to analyze the formation and stability of a NESS in a Weyl semi-metal induced by an external circularly polarized electric field. A time-periodic steady-state solution is constructed and its stability is determined from the spectrum of out-of-equilibrium quasinormal modes (Floquet exponents). A stable region in the drive parameter space is identified; beyond a critical curve, the Floquet exponents enter the upper half of the complex plane, leading to a superharmonic response. At sufficiently strong driving, chaotic time evolution emerges in the fully nonlinear initial-boundary value problem. The anomaly-induced response of the NESS to an external magnetic field is also computed, and the resulting behavior is related to the previously proposed chiral pumping effect.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Chiral Plasma under Strong Magnetic Fields: A Holographic Analysis of Transport Phenomena

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Holographic U(1)V x U(1)A Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory in Schwarzschild-AdS5 yields thirteen momentum- and B-field-dependent transport coefficient functions for chiral plasma currents, applied to negative magnetoresist...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 35 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Sato and T.N

    M. Sato and T.N. Ikeda,Floquet theory and applications in open quantum and classical systems,Journal of the Physical Society of Japan94(2025) 111007

    2025

  2. [2]

    Armitage, E.J

    N.P. Armitage, E.J. Mele and A. Vishwanath,Weyl and dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 015001

    2018

  3. [3]

    Nielsen and M

    H. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya,The adler-bell-jackiw anomaly and weyl fermions in a crystal, Physics Letters B130(1983) 389

    1983

  4. [4]

    R. Wang, B. Wang, R. Shen, L. Sheng and D.Y. Xing,Floquet Weyl semimetal induced by off-resonant light,EPL (Europhysics Letters)105(2014) 17004 [1308.4266]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Zhang, T.T

    X.-X. Zhang, T.T. Ong and N. Nagaosa,Theory of photoinduced floquet weyl semimetal phases,Physical Review B94(2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    H¨ ubener, M.A

    H. H¨ ubener, M.A. Sentef, U. de Giovannini, A.F. Kemper and A. Rubio,Creating stable Floquet-Weyl semimetals by laser-driving of 3D Dirac materials,Nature Communications8 (2017) 13940 [1604.03399]. – 20 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Bucciantini, S

    L. Bucciantini, S. Roy, S. Kitamura and T. Oka,Emergent weyl nodes and fermi arcs in a floquet weyl semimetal,Phys. Rev. B96(2017) 041126

    2017

  8. [8]

    Hartnoll, A

    S.A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev,Holographic quantum matter,1612.07324

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Zaanen, Y.-W

    J. Zaanen, Y.-W. Sun, Y. Liu and K. Schalm,Holographic Duality in Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press (2015), 10.1017/CBO9781139942492

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139942492 2015

  10. [10]

    Baggioli,Applied Holography: A Practical Mini-Course, other thesis, Madrid, IFT, 2019, 10.1007/978-3-030-35184-7, [1908.02667]

    M. Baggioli,Applied Holography: A Practical Mini-Course, other thesis, Madrid, IFT, 2019, 10.1007/978-3-030-35184-7, [1908.02667]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Natsuume,AdS/CFT Duality User Guide, vol

    M. Natsuume,AdS/CFT Duality User Guide, vol. 903 (2015), 10.1007/978-4-431-55441-7, [1409.3575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Ebihara, K

    S. Ebihara, K. Fukushima and T. Oka,Chiral pumping effect induced by rotating electric fields,Physical Review B93(2016) 155107

    2016

  13. [13]

    Landsteiner and Y

    K. Landsteiner and Y. Liu,The holographic weyl semi-metal,Physics Letters B753(2016) 453

    2016

  14. [14]

    Hashimoto, S

    K. Hashimoto, S. Kinoshita, K. Murata and T. Oka,Holographic floquet states i: a strongly coupled weyl semimetal,Journal of High Energy Physics2017(2017) 1

    2017

  15. [15]

    Kinoshita, K

    S. Kinoshita, K. Murata and T. Oka,Holographic floquet states ii: Floquet condensation of vector mesons in nonequilibrium phase diagram,Journal of High Energy Physics2018 (2018) 1

    2018

  16. [16]

    Fadafan, A

    K.B. Fadafan, A. O’Bannon, R. Rodgers and M. Russell,A weyl semimetal from ads/cft with flavour,Journal of High Energy Physics2021(2021) 1

    2021

  17. [17]

    Y. Ahn, M. Baggioli, Y. Liu and X.-M. Wu,Chiral magnetic waves in strongly coupled Weyl semimetals,JHEP03(2024) 124 [2401.07772]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Rai and K

    N. Rai and K. Landsteiner,Hydrodynamic modes of holographic Weyl semimetals,Phys. Lett. B860(2025) 139212 [2408.06192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Copetti, J

    C. Copetti, J. Fern´ andez-Pend´ as and K. Landsteiner,Axial Hall effect and universality of holographic Weyl semi-metals,JHEP02(2017) 138 [1611.08125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Landsteiner, Y

    K. Landsteiner, Y. Liu and Y.-W. Sun,Odd viscosity in the quantum critical region of a holographic Weyl semimetal,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 081604 [1604.01346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    X. Ji, Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun and Y.-L. Zhang,A Weyl-Z 2 semimetal from holography,JHEP12 (2021) 066 [2109.05993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Landsteiner, Y

    K. Landsteiner, Y. Liu and Y.-W. Sun,Negative magnetoresistivity in chiral fluids and holography,JHEP03(2015) 127 [1410.6399]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    Copetti and K

    C. Copetti and K. Landsteiner,Anomalous Hall viscosity at the Weyl-semimetal–insulator transition,Phys. Rev. B99(2019) 195146 [1901.11403]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Liu and Y.-W

    Y. Liu and Y.-W. Sun,Topological invariants for holographic semimetals,JHEP10(2018) 189 [1809.00513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Liu and J

    Y. Liu and J. Zhao,Weyl semimetal/insulator transition from holography,JHEP12(2018) 124 [1809.08601]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Ammon, M

    M. Ammon, M. Baggioli, A. Jim´ enez-Alba and S. Moeckel,A smeared quantum phase transition in disordered holography,JHEP04(2018) 068 [1802.08650]. – 21 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Baggioli and D

    M. Baggioli and D. Giataganas,Detecting topological quantum phase transitions via the c-function,Physical Review D103(2021) 026009

    2021

  28. [28]

    Baggioli, B

    M. Baggioli, B. Padhi, P.W. Phillips and C. Setty,Conjecture on the butterfly velocity across a quantum phase transition,Journal of High Energy Physics2018(2018) 1

    2018

  29. [29]

    Baggioli, Y

    M. Baggioli, Y. Liu and X.-M. Wu,Entanglement entropy as an order parameter for strongly coupled nodal line semimetals,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(2023) 221

    2023

  30. [30]

    Chang, A

    H.-C. Chang, A. Karch and A. Yarom,An ansatz for one dimensional steady state configurations,J. Stat. Mech.1406(2014) P06018 [1311.2590]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Amado and A

    I. Amado and A. Yarom,Black brane steady states,JHEP10(2015) 015 [1501.01627]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Sonner and B

    J. Sonner and B. Withers,Universal spatial structure of nonequilibrium steady states,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 161603 [1705.01950]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Ecker, J

    C. Ecker, J. Erdmenger and W. van der Schee,Non-equilibrium steady state formation in 3+1 dimensions,SciPost Phys.11(2021) 047 [2103.10435]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Bachas, Z

    C. Bachas, Z. Chen and V. Papadopoulos,Steady states of holographic interfaces,JHEP11 (2021) 095 [2107.00965]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Kundu and S

    A. Kundu and S. Kundu,Steady-state Physics, Effective Temperature Dynamics in Holography,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 046004 [1307.6607]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Brattan, M

    D.K. Brattan, M. Matsumoto, M. Baggioli and A. Amoretti,Relaxed hydrodynamic theory of electrically driven non-equilibrium steady states,Phys. Rev. Res.6(2024) 043097 [2404.05568]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Landsteiner,Notes on anomaly induced transport,arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.04413 (2016)

    K. Landsteiner,Notes on anomaly induced transport,arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.04413 (2016)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    event by event p and cp violation

    D.E. Kharzeev, L.D. McLerran and H.J. Warringa,The effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions:“event by event p and cp violation”,Nuclear Physics A803(2008) 227

    2008

  39. [39]

    Fukushima, D.E

    K. Fukushima, D.E. Kharzeev and H.J. Warringa,Chiral magnetic effect,Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology78(2008) 074033

    2008

  40. [40]

    Rangamani, M

    M. Rangamani, M. Rozali and A. Wong,Driven Holographic CFTs,JHEP04(2015) 093 [1502.05726]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Biasi, P

    A. Biasi, P. Carracedo, J. Mas, D. Musso and A. Serantes,Floquet Scalar Dynamics in Global AdS,JHEP04(2018) 137 [1712.07637]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Gaschler, A

    M. Gaschler, A. Sch¨ afer and S. Waeber,Anomalous resonance in Weyl semimetals: A holographic study of non-linear effects,2511.10754

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Ammon, S

    M. Ammon, S. Grieninger, A. Jimenez-Alba, R.P. Macedo and L. Melgar,Holographic quenches and anomalous transport,JHEP09(2016) 131 [1607.06817]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Haack, D

    M. Haack, D. Sarkar and A. Yarom,Probing anomalous driving,JHEP04(2019) 034 [1812.08210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Ghosh, S

    J.K. Ghosh, S. Grieninger, K. Landsteiner and S. Morales-Tejera,Is the chiral magnetic effect fast enough?,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 046009 [2105.05855]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Grieninger and D.E

    S. Grieninger and D.E. Kharzeev,Spacetime dynamics of chiral magnetic currents in a hot non-Abelian plasma,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 126004 [2308.14825]. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Grieninger and S

    S. Grieninger and S. Morales-Tejera,Real-time dynamics of axial charge and chiral magnetic current in a non-Abelian expanding plasma,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 126010 [2308.14829]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Meiring, I

    B. Meiring, I. Shyovitz, S. Waeber and A. Yarom,Multiply charged magnetic black branes, JHEP06(2024) 196 [2312.02802]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Waeber and A

    S. Waeber and A. Yarom,Long lived quasi normal modes,2411.18039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Cortijo, D

    A. Cortijo, D. Kharzeev, K. Landsteiner and M.A.H. Vozmediano,Strain induced Chiral Magnetic Effect in Weyl semimetals,Phys. Rev. B94(2016) 241405 [1607.03491]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Andrade,Holographic lattices and numerical techniques,arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00548 (2017)

    T. Andrade,Holographic lattices and numerical techniques,arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00548 (2017) . – 23 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017