Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Fully back-reacted nonlinear effects shift the decay rate of long-lived current oscillations only by a correction of order the squared amplitude times the linearized rate, so the lifetime of these states can grow arbitrarily large at suffic

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:20 UTC pith:OT7GIBSN

load-bearing objection Solid first fully back-reacted numerics, but the 'arbitrarily long-lived' extrapolation is under-supported and the paper is honest about it. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.10754 v2 pith:OT7GIBSN submitted 2025-11-13 hep-th cond-mat.mtrl-scigr-qc

Anomalous resonance in Weyl semimetals: A holographic study of non-linear effects

Maximilian Gaschler , Andreas Sch\"afer , Sebastian Waeber This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.mtrl-scigr-qc
keywords Weyl semimetalsholographyanomalous resonancequasi-normal modesChern-Simons couplingback-reactiontime crystalscurrent oscillations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the anomalously long-lived current oscillations predicted by linearized holographic calculations in Weyl-semimetal-like theories survive once the full nonlinear Einstein-Maxwell-Chern-Simons-dilaton equations are solved with back-reaction. It finds that they do: the exact decay rate stays very close to the linearized quasi-normal-mode decay rate evaluated at the late-time geometry, with the difference scaling as the squared oscillation amplitude times that same rate rather than as the squared amplitude times the magnetic-field scale. Because the linearized rate vanishes as the final temperature goes to zero and the Chern-Simons coupling grows, the lifetime of these time-translation-symmetry-breaking states can be made arbitrarily large. This matters because it turns a linearized curiosity into a potentially observable signature in real Weyl semimetals.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that γ = γ_lin + ε²γ^(2) + O(ε⁴), where γ is the exact, fully back-reacted decay rate of the anomalous current oscillations, γ_lin is the imaginary part of the lowest quasi-normal-mode frequency of the late-time magnetic black brane, and ε is the amplitude of the current oscillations. The computed nonlinear correction γ^(2) is not of order √B or Λ, as a naive estimate from the quadratic sourcing of metric fluctuations would suggest, but of order γ_lin itself. Consequently the exact decay rate approaches zero when the temperature after the quench is small and the Chern-Simons coupling is large, making the current oscillations an approximate but arbitrarily long-li

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the lowest quasi-normal mode of the magnetically charged black brane at late times: its real part sets the oscillation frequency and its imaginary part γ_lin sets the linearized decay rate. The paper's key quantitative finding is the scaling γ = γ_lin + O(ε²γ_lin), which shows that the nonlinear correction generated by metric fluctuations sourced quadratically by the gauge fields is suppressed by the same anomalous mechanism that makes γ_lin small, instead of being set by the magnetic-field scale √B. The Chern-Simons term is what suppresses the imaginary part of this mode in the low-temperature, large-coupling limit.

Load-bearing premise

That the numerically inaccessible regime—final temperatures below about 0.5Λ and Chern-Simons couplings above about 3—behaves like the accessible regime, where the exact decay rate stays within a relative difference of order the squared current amplitude from the linearized rate.

What would settle it

Stabilizing the numerical evolution at T≲0.5Λ and λ≳3 and finding that the relative difference (γ_lin−γ)/γ_lin grows parametrically larger than ε², or that the exact decay rate stops decreasing with temperature, would falsify the extrapolation. Experimentally, observing that the resonance lifetime in a Weyl semimetal shortens rather than lengthens as the final electron temperature is lowered would contradict the paper's central suggestion.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Linearized quasi-normal-mode calculations remain quantitatively reliable for the decay rate of the current even at sizable oscillation amplitudes, so the cheaper linearized computations can be used to predict lifetimes.
  • The lifetime of anomalous resonance states is controlled by the temperature after the quench and by the Chern-Simons coupling; lowering the final temperature and raising the coupling makes the state effectively a stable time crystal.
  • In experimental realizations in Weyl semimetals, the current oscillations excited by a short electric pulse should persist for times much longer than the magnetic-field scale even after full nonlinear and back-reaction effects are included.
  • Because the back-reaction of the pulse on the temperature becomes negligible for large Chern-Simons coupling, the final temperature increase can be minimized by working at large coupling, giving a practical route to long-lived oscillations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same scaling argument should extend to neighboring setups, such as magnetically charged branes with more gauge fields or higher charges; if so, the near-linear decay behavior is a general feature of anomalous holographic systems rather than a property of this specific model.
  • A testable extension is that the resonance lifetime in a Weyl semimetal should show a clear floor set by the final electron temperature, so measuring the lifetime as a function of quench energy should reveal a universal low-temperature trend.
  • The approximate time-translation symmetry presumably comes with an almost massless pseudo-Goldstone mode whose frequency scales with the small decay rate; this mode could appear as a very narrow spectral peak and would be a sharp experimental fingerprint of the near-time-crystal behavior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies fully back-reacted, time-dependent solutions of five-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-Chern-Simons-dilaton theory with a magnetic background, dual to a strongly coupled CFT with a U(1) 't Hooft anomaly. Starting from hairy or uncharged magnetic black branes, the authors apply an electric pulse and follow the boundary current. They compare the exact, fully back-reacted decay rate of the late-time current oscillations with the decay rate obtained from linearized quasi-normal modes around the late-time geometry. The main numerical finding is that the exact decay rate is very close to the linearized decay rate, with the difference scaling roughly as (current amplitude)^2 times the linearized decay rate, rather than as (current amplitude)^2 times an O(√B) or O(Λ) scale. Based on this, the authors argue that in the limit of small final temperature and large Chern-Simons coupling the decay rate can be made arbitrarily small, so that the system realizes an approximate holographic time crystal that might be relevant to Weyl semimetals.

Significance. If the central scaling, γ ≈ γ_lin + O(ε² γ_lin), holds uniformly as γ_lin → 0, the result is significant: it would show that fully non-linear, back-reacted effects do not destroy the anomalously long-lived current oscillations predicted by linearized analyses, and it would give a concrete holographic mechanism for approximate continuous time-crystal behavior. A strength of the paper is that the exact decay rate is obtained by an independent full evolution of the coupled PDEs and only benchmarked against linearized QNM decay rates; this is a comparison, not an input, so the argument is not circular. The model and numerical scheme are described in detail, and the authors are unusually candid about the numerical instability regime. However, the advertised conclusion about arbitrarily small decay rates reaches beyond the computed parameter range, and the quantitative evidence for the key scaling is thin: no convergence tests, error bars, or code/data release are provided. The paper is therefore better read as numerical evidence for a plausible conjecture than as a demonstration of the asymptotic claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4 and Eq. (3.9)] The headline claim that the life-time can be made arbitrarily large for T_final→0 and large λ rests on the relation γ ≈ γ_lin + O(ε² γ_lin) in Eq. (3.9). All shown runs have γ_lin ≳ 10⁻³ and T_final ≳ 0.5Λ (scalar case) or T ≈ 1.4√B (λ=1.5, Fig. 3); the regime where γ_lin is exponentially small is exactly the regime stated to be numerically unstable in Sec. 4. The authors do not provide an analytic derivation of why the nonlinear correction γ⁽²⁾ is proportional to γ_lin rather than O(√B) or O(Λ), which would dominate as γ_lin→0. The λ→∞ probe-limit argument addresses large λ, but not fixed-λ, T→0 behavior. Please either supply an argument (e.g., showing that the metric response inherits the 2γ_lin decay of the source) or explicitly restrict the claim to the computed parameter range and present the arbitrary-lifetime statement as a conjecture.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Fig. 5] The quantitative evidence for Eq. (3.9) is not fully reported. For the λ=1.5 run, the text states that at t√B=300 the current amplitude is J ≈ 0.85 B^{3/2}, so J²/B³ ≈ 0.72; this is not a small expansion parameter. If the relative difference (γ_lin−γ)/γ_lin is 'of the same order' as J²/B³, then the exact and linearized rates differ by an O(1) factor, which must be reconciled with the claim that the linearized result 'well approximates' the exact one. If instead the relative difference is small, the phrase 'same order' is misleading. No numerical values, error bars, or convergence checks are given for Fig. 5, and the 10⁻⁷ differences in Fig. 2 are below any reported numerical error. Please provide the actual fitted values, fit intervals, and a resolution/convergence study.
  3. [Sec. 3 and App. A] The parameter coverage is very narrow: scalar-free runs for λ=1.5 and 2.5, and one scalar run with λ=3 (Fig. 1). The numerical method is described in detail, but no code or data are released, and no grid parameters, time step, or constraint residuals are given. For a paper whose central quantitative statement concerns the smallness of a nonlinear correction, the absence of reproducibility data is a significant obstacle. A table of runs with grid sizes, horizon position, and constraint residuals, or a public repository, would be needed before the numerical claims can be fully assessed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.14)] The notation J²_x has an upper flavor index, which is easily confused with a squared current. A short parenthetical reminder after Eq. (2.14) would help.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption is truncated and missing a sentence: 'As can be seen there, the relative difference in decay rates is of the same order Here λ=1.5...' Also, 'in units of the magnetic field B' should specify the dimensionless combination, e.g., J²/B³.
  3. [App. A, Eq. (A.10)] In the last line of Eq. (A.10), 'a(1,2)(1,0)(t,u)' appears to be a typo; please check the intended index structure.
  4. [Secs. 3.1–3.2] The distinction between γ_qnm(t), which is computed for the geometry at time t (Eq. 3.8), and γ_lin = lim_{t→∞} γ_qnm, used in Fig. 5, is important but easy to miss. A one-sentence clarification when γ_lin is introduced would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central comparison is an independent numerical benchmark, and the extrapolation to arbitrarily long lifetimes is an explicitly acknowledged limitation, not a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claim is the near-equality between the fully back-reacted decay rate γ and the linearized quasi-normal-mode decay rate γ_lin computed about the late-time equilibrium geometry (Eq. 3.9, Figs. 2, 3, 5). These are two independent computations: γ is extracted by fitting the boundary current obtained from a numerical evolution of the full Einstein-Maxwell-Chern-Simons-dilaton equations (Sec. 3 and Appendix A), while γ_lin is obtained by solving linearized QNM equations about the late-time geometry. Nothing in the QNM calculation uses the fitted γ as an input, and γ_qnm is not defined in terms of the exact current fit; the close agreement is an observed result, not an identity. The paper also openly flags that the extrapolation to arbitrarily small decay rates is not established in the inaccessible regime: 'there is a limit where our numerical evolution becomes unstable, 3≲λ, T≲0.5Λ. It might be that in the, thus far, numerically inaccessible regime ... the relative difference between the exact and linearized decay rates increases again.' That is a limitation of the evidence base, not a circular step. The self-citations ([15,16]) supply the linearized zero-temperature expectation and are used as motivation/input; the new back-reacted computation does not reduce to them, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore no step in the derivation is equivalent to its inputs by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameter was fitted to data; the runs are numerical experiments in a fixed holographic model. The listed free parameters are hand-chosen model/numerical inputs on which the quantitative claim depends. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are postulated. The 'approximate time crystal' is an interpretation of existing degrees of freedom, not an invented entity.

free parameters (4)
  • Chern-Simons coupling λ = 1.5, 2.5, 3
    Chosen by hand; the central claim requires sufficiently large λ, and the λ→∞ probe-limit argument is used to explain the result.
  • Scalar potential parameter σ = 1
    Set to 1 to make the potential bounded; the paper claims qualitative independence from scalar matter content, but all explicit runs use this value.
  • Electric pulse amplitude Ê0 = 0.028Λ in Sec. 3.1; varied in Sec. 3.2
    Determines the injected energy and thus the final temperature T_final, which controls the decay-rate suppression.
  • Initial temperature T_i = 0.549Λ in Sec. 3.1; T≈1.4√B in Sec. 3.2
    Sets the low-temperature regime; the central claim concerns small final temperature, and the accessible T range is limited.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT duality maps Einstein-Maxwell-Chern-Simons-dilaton theory to a CFT with U(1)^3 't Hooft anomaly
    Section 2; foundational assumption of the holographic model and the interpretation of bulk solutions as field-theory states.
  • domain assumption The action (2.1) with λ=1/4 is the STU supergravity truncation, and general λ is a consistent deformation
    Section 2; used to define the theory whose dynamics are computed.
  • domain assumption Large-N semi-classical gravity permits approximate time crystals despite no-go theorems
    Introduction and Ref. [19]; needed to justify the physical interpretation of long-lived oscillations as approximate time crystals.
  • domain assumption The characteristic numerical scheme with fixed radial shift l is convergent and stable in the studied regime
    Appendix A; no convergence tests are provided, and stability is explicitly lost for λ≳3, T≲0.5Λ.
  • domain assumption Late-time geometry can be treated as stationary for quasi-normal-mode extraction
    Section 3; QNM frequencies are computed around the late-time equilibrium, assuming the residual time dependence is negligible.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14336 in / 9940 out tokens · 86536 ms · 2026-08-03T22:20:17.342498+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider hairy, magnetic black brane solutions to Einstein-Maxwell-Chern-Simons-dilaton theory with full back-reaction of the scalar and gauge fields and compute the time evolution with time dependent sources. The dual field theory's 't Hooft anomaly leads to long-lived current oscillations in the low temperature limit long after the electric pulse which created these modes has been switched off. We find that, generally, non-linear effects increase the decay rates of long-lived modes by a temperature dependent amount. Nonetheless, our results suggest that the life-time of time-translation symmetry breaking states can be made arbitrarily large if the temperature after the quench is sufficiently small. Experimentally this might be realizable in Weyl semimetals.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonequilibrium steady states in driven holographic Weyl semi-metals

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    A driven holographic Weyl semimetal supports a stable nonequilibrium steady state, becomes superharmonic and then chaotic at stronger driving, and exhibits strong-coupling chiral pumping in a magnetic field.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 29 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena, The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Bhattacharyya, V

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani, Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP02(2008) 045 [0712.2456]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Erdmenger, M

    J. Erdmenger, M. Haack, M. Kaminski and A. Yarom, Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes, JHEP01(2009) 055 [0809.2488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Banerjee, J

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam and P. Surowka, Hydrodynamics from charged black branes, JHEP01(2011) 094 [0809.2596]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Landsteiner, E

    K. Landsteiner, E. Megias and F. Pena-Benitez, Gravitational Anomaly and Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 021601 [1103.5006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    D. T. Son and P. Surowka, Hydrodynamics with Triangle Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 191601 [0906.5044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam and A. Yarom, Thermodynamics, gravitational anomalies and cones, JHEP02(2013) 088 [1207.5824]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Golkar and D

    S. Golkar and D. T. Son, (Non)-renormalization of the chiral vortical effect coefficient, JHEP 02(2015) 169 [1207.5806]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam and A. Yarom, Anomaly inflow and thermal equilibrium, JHEP 05(2014) 134 [1310.7024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam and A. Yarom, Chern-Simons terms from thermal circles and anomalies, JHEP05(2014) 110 [1311.2935]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S. A. Voloshin and G. Wang, Chiral magnetic and vortical effects in high-energy nuclear collisions—A status report, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.88(2016) 1 [1511.04050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev and H. J. Warringa, The Chiral Magnetic Effect, Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 074033 [0808.3382]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    Ammon, M

    M. Ammon, M. Kaminski, R. Koirala, J. Leiber and J. Wu, Quasinormal modes of charged magnetic black branes & chiral magnetic transport, JHEP 04(2017) 067 [1701.05565]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Haack, D

    M. Haack, D. Sarkar and A. Yarom, Probing anomalous driving, JHEP04(2019) 034 [1812.08210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Waeber and A

    S. Waeber and A. Yarom, Long lived quasi normal modes,2411.18039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Meiring, I

    B. Meiring, I. Shyovitz, S. Waeber and A. Yarom, Multiply charged magnetic black branes, JHEP06(2024) 196 [2312.02802]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Ammon, S

    M. Ammon, S. Grieninger, J. Hernandez, M. Kaminski, R. Koirala, J. Leiber et al., Chiral hydrodynamics in strong external magnetic fields, JHEP04(2021) 078 [2012.09183]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 160401 [1202.2539]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Absence of Quantum Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 251603 [1410.2143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Choi et al., Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature543(2017) 221

    S. Choi et al., Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature543(2017) 221

    2017

  21. [21]

    Zhang et al., Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature543(2017) 217

    J. Zhang et al., Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature543(2017) 217

    2017

  22. [22]

    N. . Yao, A. . Potter, I. D. Potirniche and A. Vishwanath, Discrete Time Crystals: Rigidity, Criticality, and Realizations, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 030401

    2017

  23. [23]

    D. V. Else, C. Monroe, C. Nayak and N. Y. Yao, Discrete time crystals, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11(2020) 467–499

    2020

  24. [24]

    Keßler, J

    H. Keßler, J. G. Cosme, M. Hemmerling, L. Mathey and A. Hemmerich, Emergent limit cycles and time crystal dynamics in an atom-cavity system, Phys. Rev. A99(2019) 053605

    2019

  25. [25]

    G. He, B. Ye, R. Gong, C. Yao, Z. Liu, K. W. Murch et al., Experimental realization of discrete time quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. X15(2025) 011055

    2025

  26. [26]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich and H. Keßler, Observation of a continuous time crystal, Science377(2022) abo3382 [2202.06980]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Liu et al., Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in Floquet-driven Rydberg atoms, Nature Commun.15(2024) 9730 [2402.13657]

    B. Liu et al., Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in Floquet-driven Rydberg atoms, Nature Commun.15(2024) 9730 [2402.13657]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. G. Cosme, J. Skulte, M. A. Moreno Armijos, L. Mathey, A. Hemmerich et al., Observation of a phase transition from a continuous to a discrete time crystal, Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) 080502 [2402.12378]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Frey and S

    P. Frey and S. Rachel, Realization of a discrete time crystal on 57 qubits of a quantum computer, Sci. Adv.8 (2022) abm7652 [2105.06632]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Waeber, A

    S. Waeber, A. Sch¨ afer, A. Vuorinen and L. G. Yaffe, Finite coupling corrections to holographic predictions for hot QCD, JHEP11(2015) 087 [1509.02983]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Waeber and A

    S. Waeber and A. Sch¨ afer, Studying a charged quark gluon plasma via holography and higher derivative corrections, JHEP07(2018) 069 [1804.01912]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Waeber, Quasinormal modes of magnetic black branes at finite ’t Hooft coupling, JHEP 08(2019) 006 [1811.04040]

    S. Waeber, Quasinormal modes of magnetic black branes at finite ’t Hooft coupling, JHEP 08(2019) 006 [1811.04040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    X. Wang, Q. Han, Z. Bai, H. Fan and Y. Zhang, Strongly Coupled Continuous Time Crystal, 2507.15295

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Greilich, N

    A. Greilich, N. E. Kopteva, A. N. Kamenskii, P. S. Sokolov, V. L. Korenev and M. Bayer, Robust continuous time crystal in an electron–nuclear spin system, Nature Phys.20(2024) 631 [2303.15989]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Zhai and T.-L

    H. Zhai and T.-L. Ho, Superfluid-insulator transition of strongly interacting fermi gases in optical lattices, Physical Review Letters99(2007)

    2007

  36. [36]

    Jiang, R

    Y. Jiang, R. Qi, Z.-Y. Shi and H. Zhai, Vortex lattices in the bose-fermi superfluid mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 080403

    2017

  37. [37]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415(2002) 39–44

    2002

  38. [38]

    Huang, L

    X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang et al., Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance in 3d weyl semimetal taas, Physical Review X5(2015) 031023

    2015

  39. [39]

    Zhang, S.-Y

    C.-L. Zhang, S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, Z. Yuan, Z. Lin, B. Tong et al., Signatures of the adler–bell–jackiw chiral anomaly in a weyl fermion semimetal, Nature communications7 (2016) 1

    2016

  40. [40]

    Arnold, C

    F. Arnold, C. Shekhar, S.-C. Wu, Y. Sun, R. D. Dos Reis, N. Kumar et al., Negative magnetoresistance without well-defined chirality in the weyl semimetal tap, Nature communications7(2016) 11615

    2016

  41. [41]

    Gooth, A

    J. Gooth, A. C. Niemann, T. Meng, A. G. Grushin, K. Landsteiner, B. Gotsmann et al., Experimental signatures of the mixed axial–gravitational anomaly in the weyl semimetal nbp, Nature547(2017) 324

    2017

  42. [42]

    P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, Numerical solution of gravitational dynamics in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes, JHEP07(2014) 086 [1309.1439]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014