Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Enhancing Tool Retrieval with Iterative Feedback from Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17465 v2 pith:CCNJW2UV submitted 2024-06-25 cs.CL cs.AI

Enhancing Tool Retrieval with Iterative Feedback from Large Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords toolretrievalmodelstoolsfeedbacklanguagelargemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Tool learning aims to enhance and expand large language models' (LLMs) capabilities with external tools, which has gained significant attention recently. Current methods have shown that LLMs can effectively handle a certain amount of tools through in-context learning or fine-tuning. However, in real-world scenarios, the number of tools is typically extensive and irregularly updated, emphasizing the necessity for a dedicated tool retrieval component. Tool retrieval is nontrivial due to the following challenges: 1) complex user instructions and tool descriptions; 2) misalignment between tool retrieval and tool usage models. To address the above issues, we propose to enhance tool retrieval with iterative feedback from the large language model. Specifically, we prompt the tool usage model, i.e., the LLM, to provide feedback for the tool retriever model in multi-round, which could progressively improve the tool retriever's understanding of instructions and tools and reduce the gap between the two standalone components. We build a unified and comprehensive benchmark to evaluate tool retrieval models. The extensive experiments indicate that our proposed approach achieves advanced performance in both in-domain evaluation and out-of-domain evaluation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ToolOmni: Enabling Open-World Tool Use via Agentic learning with Proactive Retrieval and Grounded Execution

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ToolOmni combines supervised fine-tuning on a cold-start multi-turn dataset with Decoupled Multi-Objective GRPO to enable proactive retrieval and grounded execution, yielding +10.8% higher end-to-end tool-use success ...

  2. From Intent to Execution: Composing Agentic Workflows with Agent Recommendation

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A framework automates multi-agent system creation via LLM planning and two-stage agent recommendation, claiming higher recall than prior methods.