Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 64 references

Adiabatic vacua from linear complex structures

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that finite-order adiabatic vacua of any quadratic time-dependent Hamiltonian can be built from a linear recursion on phase-space complex structures, generalizing WKB and Lewis-Riesenfeld invariants to d coupled bosonic…

desk verdict Genuine multimode generalization of adiabatic vacua with a real but fixable ambiguity in the remainder. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19164 v1 pith:CGD2LW5O submitted 2025-04-27 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph

Eugenio Bianchi , Yusuf Ghelem , Lucas Hackl This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-thquant-ph
keywords adiabaticvacuumlinearcomplexstructurequadratictime-dependentHamiltonianWKBapproximationLewis-RiesenfeldinvariantGaussianstatesparticleproductionsubtraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that for any quadratic time-dependent Hamiltonian with d coupled bosonic degrees of freedom, the adiabatic vacuum and adiabatic number operator of a given order can be constructed directly from a linear complex structure, a phase-space matrix that squares to minus one and encodes a Gaussian state. The construction is a recursion that produces, order by order, a complex structure J0 and a displacement vector z0 from time derivatives of the Hamiltonian alone. Because the equations are linear and first order in time, it avoids the nonlinear WKB equation needed for a single oscillator. The authors prove the recursion has a unique solution at each order, show it reproduces WKB and Lewis-Riesenfeld results when those apply, and exhibit examples in cosmology, driven oscillators, and a charged particle in a time-dependent magnetic field.

What carries the argument

The central object is the linear complex structure J, a 2d×2d real matrix with $J^{2}$=-1 that, together with the symplectic form Ω, defines a positive metric G=-JΩ and a Gaussian vacuum via the number operator N_{J,z}=12(ξ-z)·$Ω^{{-1}}$·(J-i1)·(ξ-z). The mechanism is the slow-time reparametrization t→(t-t0)/λ+t0: analyticity in λ of the invariant number operator turns the dynamical equations λ Jdot=[K,J] and λ zdot=Kz+F into the order-by-order recursion (38)-(43). Because the equations are linear and first order in time, the recursion only needs derivatives of K and F and a single matrix anti-commutator inversion at each step; no nonlinear equation of Ermakov type must be solved.

What would settle it

Compute the adiabatic vacuum of order 2 for the oscillator with time-dependent frequency using each of the two remainder choices described in the paper and evaluate the expectation value of an order-3 number operator; if the answers differ at order $ε^{3}$, then order-(n+1) predictions are not determined by the recursion alone. A more direct test is to search for a smooth frequency profile where the quadratic remainder equation has no solution with the required smallness, which would break Definition 1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

With a time-dependent quadratic Hamiltonian written as H(t)=12ξ·h(t)·ξ+f(t)·ξ+c(t), any Gaussian state is fixed by a pair (J,z) with $J^{2}$=-1. The central claim is that imposing invariance of the associated number operator under the reparametrized dynamics, order by order in a slow-time parameter λ, reduces to linear algebraic equations (38)-(43) for the Taylor coefficients J_n and ζ_n. Proposition 1 states these equations have a unique solution at every order whenever K=Ωh and F=Ωf are sufficiently differentiable; the zeroth-order terms are J0=|$K^{{-1}}$|K and ζ0=-$K^{{-1}}$F, and the higher orders are built by inverting an anti-commutator. The adiabatic initial conditions at a reference time are then the truncated sums (51)-(52), with a remainder R(n) that enforces $J0^{2}$=-1 exactly. The resulting number operator and its ground state are the paper's finite-order adiabatic number operator and adiabatic vacuum.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that a remainder term R(n) always exists that restores the exact condition $J0^{2}$=-1 while being of order n+1; the paper shows one way to choose it in a single example but does not prove existence or give a canonical choice for all Hamiltonians.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any Hamiltonian in the class, the adiabatic vacuum of order n can be computed by an explicit linear recursion, so the method applies to coupled multi-mode systems where WKB on individual Fourier modes fails.
  • When restricted to a single oscillator with time-dependent frequency, the resulting state agrees with the WKB adiabatic vacuum up to order n+1 (Proposition 2), tying the new method to the established literature.
  • The same construction defines adiabatic subtraction for the energy: the renormalized Hamiltonian (156) has exactly zero expectation value in the adiabatic vacuum of the same order, matching the order n≥4 needed in curved-spacetime renormalization.
  • For special frequency profiles the expansion self-truncates and produces exact adiabatic states of infinite order; examples include de Sitter's Bunch-Davies vacuum and an oscillator with ω(t)=ω0/(1-t/2τ)^2.
  • In general the adiabatic vacuum of infinite order does not evolve into itself under exact unitary evolution; the tanh-frequency example shows residual particle production even at infinite order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The freedom in the remainder R(n) deserves to be treated as a completion rule: Example 3 and Figure 5 show two different remainder choices give different particle-number curves, so any prediction at order n+1 depends on a choice the recursion alone does not fix.
  • If combined with optimal-truncation ideas, the complex-structure formulation could turn single-mode results on superadiabatic particle number and Stokes phenomena into a multi-mode algorithm; the paper mentions this as future work but does not carry it out.
  • Because the construction is phrased entirely in phase space, it should transfer to fermionic quadratic Hamiltonians through the same Kähler-structure language; the paper notes this possibility.
  • For quantum fields, the formalism may provide a route to define adiabatic vacua directly from the background's real-time history rather than through mode-by-mode WKB, potentially simplifying renormalization in inhomogeneous spacetimes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a construction of adiabatic vacua for finite-dimensional systems with time-dependent quadratic Hamiltonians, using linear complex structures on phase space. Starting from the invariant equation for a Gaussian number operator, the authors expand the complex structure J(t) and the displacement z(t) in formal power series in a slow-time parameter λ and derive a first-order linear recursion, Eqs. (38)-(43), for the coefficients J_n and ζ_n. Truncating at order n and adding a remainder R(n) that enforces J0^2 = -1 defines the adiabatic initial condition (J0, z0), from which the adiabatic number operator and Gaussian vacuum are defined. The paper compares the construction to the WKB method for a single oscillator, proving equivalence up to order n+1 (Proposition 2), and tests the formalism on several examples: a driven oscillator, an Airy frequency profile, a tanh profile with exact Bogoliubov coefficients, a charged particle in a time-dependent magnetic field, and cosmological scalar perturbations. In de Sitter space the series is claimed to self-truncate at order 2 and to reproduce the Bunch-Davies vacuum.

Significance. If the construction is made fully precise, the recursion is a valuable contribution: it generalizes WKB and Lewis-Riesenfeld invariants to d coupled bosonic modes through linear first-order equations, and it is accompanied by explicit checks against exact solutions (Airy, de Sitter, tanh Bogoliubov). The proof of Proposition 1 is careful, and the comparison with WKB in Proposition 2 is explicit and informative. The main limitation is that Definition 1 leaves the remainder R(n) unspecified, so the finite-order adiabatic complex structure, and hence the finite-order adiabatic vacuum, is not uniquely determined by the recursion as it stands; this does not invalidate the recursion itself but does affect the paper's central claim of a well-defined unique finite-order state.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.D, Definition 1 (Eq. 51); Example 3 (Eqs. 79-80); Fig. 5] The recursion (38)-(43) determines the coefficients J_n and ζ_n uniquely, but Definition 1 adds a remainder R(n) that is not determined by the recursion. The paper acknowledges the non-uniqueness ('The solution is not unique', Eq. 79-80) and Figure 5 shows two admissible choices of R(2) giving different particle-number predictions at the same order n=2. Since J0 is used in Definition 2 and Definition 3 to define the adiabatic number operator and the adiabatic vacuum, the finite-order state is underdetermined. The manuscript should either give a canonical prescription for R(n) (for example, a symplectic or polar projection of the truncated sum onto the manifold of complex structures) or prove that all admissible remainders produce the same physical predictions at order n.
  2. [Sec. II.D, Definition 1 (Eq. 51); Sec. VI] The assertion R(n) = O(epsilon^{n+1}) is made without proof. While the recursion enforces J^2 = -1 order by order, the existence of an exact complex structure within O(epsilon^{n+1}) of the truncated sum S = sum_{m=0}^{n} J_m(t0) is a nontrivial statement, especially for d > 1. The explicit check in Example 3 covers only a quadratic ansatz in d = 1. This gap is load-bearing because the claimed smallness of the remainder is what justifies ignoring the ambiguity in the truncation. Please add a general existence argument, or state precisely the smoothness and positivity conditions under which such a remainder exists.
  3. [Sec. VI (Discussion)] The Discussion states that the construction yields 'a well-defined framework with a unique solution.' This statement overstates Proposition 1, which proves uniqueness only for the formal coefficients J_n and ζ_n, not for the adiabatic initial condition J0 of Definition 1, because of the non-unique remainder. The manuscript should either qualify this claim or supply the missing canonical remainder prescription so that the uniqueness claim becomes accurate.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Example 3 (after Eq. 77)] 'reminder' should be 'remainder'.
  2. [Abstract and Section I] The typos 'appoach' and 'spatimes' should be corrected to 'approach' and 'spacetimes'.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The caption should state explicitly that the black curve uses the WKB-based remainder and the orange curve uses the ansatz of Eq. (79).
  4. [Section V.B (Eq. 164)] The notation W0 is used both for the order-zero WKB frequency and for the infinite-order sum in Eq. (164); please use distinct notation, for example W_infty.
  5. [Proof of Proposition 1 (Eq. 48)] The proof would be easier to follow if it showed explicitly that the solution of Eq. (48) indeed satisfies both Eqs. (41) and (42); currently the reversibility of the derivation is implicit.
  6. [Example 7 (Eq. 150)] The claim that the adiabatic series self-truncates at order n=2 in de Sitter space is stated but not demonstrated; a short argument, for example showing J_n = 0 for n >= 3, would strengthen the example.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One definitional equivalence in the abstract; the recursive construction itself is self-contained and externally benchmarked, so no substantive circularity.

  1. self definitional [Abstract; Sec. II.D, Definitions 1–3 (Eqs. 51–54)]
    "We show that the adiabatic number operator and the adiabatic vacuum of finite order can be expressed in terms of the adiabatic complex structure of the same order. ... Definition 2. Given the time-dependent Hamiltonian (9) and a reference time t0, the adiabatic number operator ˆN0 of order ¯n is defined by ... where J0 and z0 are defined above in (51), (52)."

    The claimed result is stipulated rather than derived: Definition 2 defines the adiabatic number operator directly as the quadratic form built from J0 and z0, and Definition 3 defines the adiabatic vacuum as its ground state. Hence the abstract's statement that the number operator and vacuum 'can be expressed in terms of' the complex structure is true by construction (Eq. 53 is Eq. 20 with J0 taken from Eq. 51), not by a separate argument. The genuine content — the recursion (38)–(43) determining Jn and ζn from K and F — is independent of this definitional equivalence.

full rationale

The derivation chain is otherwise self-contained: the invariant condition (28)–(29) and the λ-power-series ansatz (31)–(32) lead directly to the algebraic recursion (38)–(43), which Proposition 1 solves by linear algebra without fitted parameters or imported uniqueness. External checks are genuine benchmarks: the de Sitter power spectrum (Example 7) matches Bunch–Davies, the Airy asymptotics in Sec. V.B are compared with the exact solution, and Proposition 2 shows the d=1 limit agrees with WKB initial conditions. Citations to [17] and [32] supply the Gaussian/complex-structure formalism but are not load-bearing for the recursion; no self-citation is used to forbid alternatives or to supply the uniqueness of the Jn recursion. The main caveats are not circularity: Definition 1's remainder R(¯n) is non-unique (the paper says 'The solution is not unique'), so the 'unique solution' in the Discussion overstates Proposition 1, and Figure 5 shows physical predictions can depend on the remainder choice. That is a completeness/correctness gap, not an input–output tautology. Accordingly, the only circular element is the definitional framing of the abstract's equivalence claim, which warrants a low score rather than a charge of substantive circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the only free choice is the remainder R(bar n) in the definition of the truncated complex structure. The main axioms are positive-definiteness of the Hamiltonian and the lambda-analyticity selection principle, with the remainder existence and order asserted rather than proven.

free parameters (1)
  • Remainder R(bar n) = not unique; e.g., r2 in Eq. (80) or WKB-based choice in Figure 5
    Enforces J0^2=-1 in Definition 1; the paper leaves it unspecified, so the finite-order adiabatic vacuum depends on this hand-chosen matrix at order n+1.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption h(t) is positive definite and K(t)=Omega h(t) is invertible at the reference time and in a neighborhood
    Needed for J0 = |K^{-1}| K in Proposition 1 and for the existence of a normalizable instantaneous vacuum; acknowledged in Section II A.
  • ad hoc to paper The formal power series in lambda (Eq. 31) selects the adiabatic initial conditions via analyticity in lambda
    The paper requires analyticity in lambda (Section II C), but the Airy example (Section V B) shows the series is only asymptotic, so this selection principle is an assumption, not a theorem.
  • ad hoc to paper The remainder R(bar n) exists with R(bar n)=O(epsilon^(bar n+1)) and can enforce J0^2=-1
    Asserted in Definition 1 and Example 3; no proof or constructive prescription is supplied, and Figure 5 shows scheme dependence.
  • standard math Standard symplectic geometry and Williamson's theorem
    Used for the properties of K and J0 in Proposition 1; these are standard results from linear symplectic algebra.
  • standard math Gaussian state machinery from Hackl and Bianchi [17]
    Number operator (20), correlations (25), and Wick's theorem are imported from established prior literature on Gaussian states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Adiabatic vacua from linear complex structures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CGD2LW5O

@misc{pith2026250419164,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Adiabatic vacua from linear complex structures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CGD2LW5O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19164}
}
read the original abstract

Adiabatic vacua play a central role in quantum fields in cosmological spacetimes, where they serve as distinguished initial conditions and as reference states for the renormalization of observables. In this paper we introduce new methods based on linear complex structures which provide a powerful tool for determining adiabatic vacua. The new methods generalize both the standard WKB appoach and the Lewis-Riesenfeld invariants, and allow us to study the problem of many coupled bosonic degrees of freedom with general quadratic time-dependent Hamiltonian. We show that the adiabatic number operator and the adiabatic vacuum of finite order can be expressed in terms of the adiabatic complex structure of the same order. We compare our results to standard techniques which apply only to a single degree of freedom, and comment on its applicability to problems in quantum fields in cosmological spacetimes, many-body systems and quantum thermodynamics, where the Hamiltonian is time dependent with slowly-changing parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19164 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. We show the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. We show the time-dependent frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. We show for a given 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. We show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. We consider the energy difference between adiabatic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We note that, at the order ¯n, the complex structure J0 and the vector z0 depend on the first ¯n time-derivatives of the functions hab(t) and fa(t) appearing in the Hamiltonian (9)

    (56) where J0 and z0 are defined in (51), (52). We note that, at the order ¯n, the complex structure J0 and the vector z0 depend on the first ¯n time-derivatives of the functions hab(t) and fa(t) appearing in the Hamiltonian (9). In particular at the zero order, ¯n = 0, they depend only on hab(t0) and fa(t0) evaluated at the instant t0 and not on their ti...

    work page

  2. [2]

    thermodynamic limit

    (62) = + 1 8∥J0−J 0∥2 g + 1 2∥z0−ζ0∥2 g, (63) where the Hilbert-Schmidt norm of a matrix ∥L∥2 g = Tr(LL†) is defined in terms of the metric g via the ad- joint L† =GL⊺g. This formula implies that each of the two distances is required to be small, ∥J0−J 0∥g≪ 1, ∥z0−ζ0∥g≪ 1. (64) These conditions are imposed to the truncation at each order ¯n. If the series...

    work page

  3. [3]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum fields in curved space (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-time (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

    S. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-time (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    L. E. Parker and D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity (Cam- bridge University Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. Davies, Quantum field theory in de sitter space: renormalization by point-splitting, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 360, 117 (1978)

    work page 1978

  7. [7]

    V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Branden- berger, Theory of cosmological perturbations, Physics re- ports 215, 203 (1992)

    work page 1992

  8. [8]

    Bianchi and M

    E. Bianchi and M. Gamonal, Primordial power spectrum 20 at N3LO in effective theories of inflation, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104032 (2024), arXiv:2405.03157 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Parker and S

    L. Parker and S. Fulling, Adiabatic regularization of the energy-momentum tensor of a quantized field in homoge- neous spaces, Physical Review D 9, 341 (1974)

    1974

  2. [10]

    Birrell, The application of adiabatic regularization to calculations of cosmological interest, Proc

    N. Birrell, The application of adiabatic regularization to calculations of cosmological interest, Proc. R. Soc. B 361 (1978)

    1978

  3. [11]

    Agullo, W

    I. Agullo, W. Nelson, and A. Ashtekar, Preferred in- stantaneous vacuum for linear scalar fields in cosmo- logical space-times, Phys. Rev. D 91, 064051 (2015), arXiv:1412.3524 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Parker, Particle creation in expanding universes, Phys

    L. Parker, Particle creation in expanding universes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 562 (1968)

    1968

  5. [13]

    Parker, Quantized fields and particle creation in ex- panding universes

    L. Parker, Quantized fields and particle creation in ex- panding universes. 1., Phys. Rev. 183, 1057 (1969)

    1969

  6. [14]

    Parker, Particle creation and particle number in an expanding universe, J

    L. Parker, Particle creation and particle number in an expanding universe, J. Phys. A 45, 374023 (2012), arXiv:1205.5616 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Messiah, Quantum Mechanics , Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, 2014)

    A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics , Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, 2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers I: Asymptotic meth- ods and perturbation theory (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    White, Asymptotic Analysis of Differential Equations (Imperial College Press, 2010)

    R. White, Asymptotic Analysis of Differential Equations (Imperial College Press, 2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Winitzki, Cosmological particle production and the precision of the WKB approximation, Phys

    S. Winitzki, Cosmological particle production and the precision of the WKB approximation, Phys. Rev. D 72, 104011 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0510001

    2005 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Hackl and E

    L. Hackl and E. Bianchi, Bosonic and fermionic Gaussian states from K¨ ahler structures, SciPost Phys. Core4, 025 (2021), arXiv:2010.15518 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    H. R. Lewis and W. Riesenfeld, An exact quantum the- ory of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator and of a charged particle in a time-dependent electromagnetic field, Journal of mathematical physics 10, 1458 (1969)

    1969

  13. [21]

    L. H. Ford, Cosmological particle production: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84, 10.1088/1361-6633/ac1b23 (2021), arXiv:2112.02444 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gemmer, M

    J. Gemmer, M. Michel, and G. Mahler, Quantum Ther- modynamics: Emergence of Thermodynamic Behavior Within Composite Quantum Systems (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Albash and D

    T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018), arXiv:1611.04471 [quant-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Ashtekar and A

    A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, Quantum Fields in Curved Space-Times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 346, 375 (1975)

    1975

  17. [25]

    Ashtekar and A

    A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon-Ashtekar, A geometrical ap- proach to external potential problems in quantum field theory, Gen. Rel. Grav. 12, 205 (1980)

    1980

  18. [26]

    R. M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space- Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics (University of Chicago Press, 1995)

    1995

  19. [27]

    Derezi´ nski and C

    J. Derezi´ nski and C. G´ erard, Mathematics of Quan- tization and Quantum Fields , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, 1966) sec

    M. Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, 1966) sec. 3.1

    1966

  21. [29]

    Gu´ ery-Odelin, A

    D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Tor- rontegui, S. Mart´ ınez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Short- cuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applica- tions, Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 045001 (2019), arXiv:1904.08448 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. V. Berry, Uniform asymptotic smoothing of stokes’s discontinuities, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 422, 7 (1989)

    1989

  23. [31]

    Dabrowski and G

    R. Dabrowski and G. V. Dunne, Superadiabatic particle number in Schwinger and de Sitter particle production, Phys. Rev. D 90, 025021 (2014), arXiv:1405.0302 [hep- th]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Dabrowski and G

    R. Dabrowski and G. V. Dunne, Time dependence of adi- abatic particle number, Phys. Rev. D 94, 065005 (2016), arXiv:1606.00902 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    de Gosson, Symplectic Geometry and Quantum Me- chanics (Springer, 2006)

    M. de Gosson, Symplectic Geometry and Quantum Me- chanics (Springer, 2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    L. F. Hackl, Aspects of Gaussian states entanglement, squeezing and complexity (The Pennsylvania State Uni- versity, 2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Williamson, On the algebraic problem concerning the normal forms of linear dynamical systems, American Journal of Mathematics 58, 141 (1936)

    J. Williamson, On the algebraic problem concerning the normal forms of linear dynamical systems, American Journal of Mathematics 58, 141 (1936)

    1936

  28. [36]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Me- chanics, Quantum physics, quantum information and quantum computation (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    E. P. Wigner, Events, Laws of Nature, and Invariance Principles, in International School of Subnuclear Physics: How Far We Are from the Gauge Forces , Vol. 21 (1985) pp. 699–711

    1985

  30. [38]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. Chibisov, Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular universe, ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu33, 549 (1981)

    1981

  31. [39]

    Sasaki, Large scale quantum fluctuations in the in- flationary universe, Progress of Theoretical Physics 76, 1036 (1986)

    M. Sasaki, Large scale quantum fluctuations in the in- flationary universe, Progress of Theoretical Physics 76, 1036 (1986)

    1986

  32. [40]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. H¨ anggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 771 (2011), arXiv:1012.2268 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2011 arXiv

  33. [41]

    L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman, Restrictions on negative energy density in flat space-time, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2082 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9607003

    1997 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Bernard and A

    C. Bernard and A. Duncan, Regularization and renor- malization of quantum field theory in curved space-time, Annals of Physics 107, 201 (1977)

    1977

  35. [43]

    Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Agullo and A

    I. Agullo and A. Ashtekar, Unitarity and ultraviolet reg- ularity in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124010 (2015), arXiv:1503.03407 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Much and R

    A. Much and R. Oeckl, Complex Structures for Klein- Gordon Theory on Globally Hyperbolic Spacetimes, (2018), arXiv:1812.00926 [math-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Cortez, G

    J. Cortez, G. A. M. Marug´ an, and J. Velhinho, Quantum Linear Scalar Fields with Time Dependent Potentials: Overview and Applications to Cosmology, Mathematics 8, 115 (2020), arXiv:1912.04203 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ashtekar and B

    A. Ashtekar and B. Gupt, Initial conditions for cosmo- logical perturbations, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 035004 (2017), arXiv:1610.09424 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    W. J. Handley, A. N. Lasenby, and M. P. Hobson, Novel quantum initial conditions for inflation, Phys. Rev. D94, 024041 (2016), arXiv:1607.04148 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    M. J. Fahn, K. Giesel, and M. Kobler, Dynamical Proper- 21 ties of the Mukhanov-Sasaki Hamiltonian in the context of adiabatic vacua and the Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant, Universe 5, 170 (2019), arXiv:1812.11122 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Elizaga Navascu´ es, G

    B. Elizaga Navascu´ es, G. A. M. Marug´ an, and S. Prado, Non-oscillating power spectra in Loop Quan- tum Cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 035001 (2020), arXiv:2005.10194 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Mart´ ın-Benito, R

    M. Mart´ ın-Benito, R. B. Neves, and J. Olmedo, States of Low Energy in bouncing inflationary scenarios in Loop Quantum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123524 (2021), arXiv:2104.03035 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bianchi and M

    E. Bianchi and M. Gamonal, Squeezed vacua and primor- dial features in effective theories of inflation at N2LO, (2024), arXiv:2410.11812 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Negro and S

    A. Negro and S. P. Patil, An ´Etude on the regularization and renormalization of divergences in primordial observ- ables, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 47, 179 (2024), arXiv:2402.10008 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, Cosmological gravita- tional particle production and its implications for cos- mological relics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 045005 (2024), arXiv:2312.09042 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Animali, P

    C. Animali, P. Conzinu, and G. Marozzi, On adiabatic renormalization with a physically motivated infrared cut- off, JCAP 05 (05), 026, arXiv:2201.05602 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Ferreiro, S

    A. Ferreiro, S. Monin, and F. Torrenti, Physical scale adi- abatic regularization in cosmological spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 045015 (2024), arXiv:2311.08986 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, and N. Yokomizo, Entanglement entropy of squeezed vacua on a lattice, Phys. Rev. D 92, 085045 (2015), arXiv:1507.01567 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, and N. Yokomizo, Linear growth of the entanglement entropy and the Kolmogorov-Sinai rate, JHEP 03, 025, arXiv:1709.00427 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Bianchi, J

    E. Bianchi, J. Guglielmon, L. Hackl, and N. Yokomizo, Loop expansion and the bosonic representation of loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 94, 086009 (2016), arXiv:1609.02219 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, A short review of loop quantum gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84, 042001 (2021), arXiv:2104.04394 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Vidmar, L

    L. Vidmar, L. Hackl, E. Bianchi, and M. Rigol, Entan- glement Entropy of Eigenstates of Quadratic Fermionic Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 020601 (2017), arXiv:1703.02979 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2017 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Vidmar, L

    L. Vidmar, L. Hackl, E. Bianchi, and M. Rigol, Vol- ume Law and Quantum Criticality in the Entangle- ment Entropy of Excited Eigenstates of the Quan- tum Ising Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 220602 (2018), arXiv:1808.08963 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2018 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Bianchi and C

    E. Bianchi and C. Rovelli, Why all these prejudices against a constant?, (2010), arXiv:1002.3966 [astro- ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bianchi, C

    E. Bianchi, C. Rovelli, and R. Kolb, Is dark energy really a mystery?, Nature 466, 321 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.