Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLM-TOPLA: Efficient LLM Ensemble by Maximising Diversity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03953 v1 pith:CGQY6QH3 submitted 2024-10-04 cs.CL cs.LG

LLM-TOPLA: Efficient LLM Ensemble by Maximising Diversity

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords ensemblellm-toplallmscomponentbenchmarksbest-performingdiversitydiversity-optimized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Combining large language models during training or at inference time has shown substantial performance gain over component LLMs. This paper presents LLM-TOPLA, a diversity-optimized LLM ensemble method with three unique properties: (i) We introduce the focal diversity metric to capture the diversity-performance correlation among component LLMs of an ensemble. (ii) We develop a diversity-optimized ensemble pruning algorithm to select the top-k sub-ensembles from a pool of $N$ base LLMs. Our pruning method recommends top-performing LLM subensembles of size $S$, often much smaller than $N$. (iii) We generate new output for each prompt query by utilizing a learn-to-ensemble approach, which learns to detect and resolve the output inconsistency among all component LLMs of an ensemble. Extensive evaluation on four different benchmarks shows good performance gain over the best LLM ensemble methods: (i) In constrained solution set problems, LLM-TOPLA outperforms the best-performing ensemble (Mixtral) by 2.2\% in accuracy on MMLU and the best-performing LLM ensemble (MoreAgent) on GSM8k by 2.1\%. (ii) In generative tasks, LLM-TOPLA outperforms the top-2 performers (Llama70b/Mixtral) on SearchQA by $3.9\mathrm{x}$ in F1, and on XSum by more than $38$ in ROUGE-1. Our code and dataset, which contains outputs of 8 modern LLMs on 4 benchmarks is available at https://github.com/git-disl/llm-topla

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are Diversity Metrics Measuring Diversity? A Capability-Controlled Audit of Majority-Vote Gain in LLM Ensembles

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Diversity metrics used to select LLM ensembles are largely capability proxies; after control, only a modest pairwise co-failure association with majority-vote gain remains.

  2. Opti-Q: A Constraint-Based Optimization Framework for Multi-LLM Question Planning

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    Per-question database-style plan search over multi-LLM DAGs improves QA quality under budgets by ~58% (MMLU-Pro) and ~41% (SimpleQA) versus reimplemented baselines.