Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

LAMD: Context-driven Android Malware Detection and Classification with LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13055 v2 pith:CIBRSBJ4 submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords androidllmsmalwarecodedetectionlamdapplicationsreasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid growth of mobile applications has escalated Android malware threats. Although there are numerous detection methods, they often struggle with evolving attacks, dataset biases, and limited explainability. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative with their zero-shot inference and reasoning capabilities. However, applying LLMs to Android malware detection presents two key challenges: (1)the extensive support code in Android applications, often spanning thousands of classes, exceeds LLMs' context limits and obscures malicious behavior within benign functionality; (2)the structural complexity and interdependencies of Android applications surpass LLMs' sequence-based reasoning, fragmenting code analysis and hindering malicious intent inference. To address these challenges, we propose LAMD, a practical context-driven framework to enable LLM-based Android malware detection. LAMD integrates key context extraction to isolate security-critical code regions and construct program structures, then applies tier-wise code reasoning to analyze application behavior progressively, from low-level instructions to high-level semantics, providing final prediction and explanation. A well-designed factual consistency verification mechanism is equipped to mitigate LLM hallucinations from the first tier. Evaluation in real-world settings demonstrates LAMD's effectiveness over conventional detectors, establishing a feasible basis for LLM-driven malware analysis in dynamic threat landscapes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking LLM-Assisted Blue Teaming via Standardized Threat Hunting

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Standardized modular threat-hunting workflows (CyberTeam) improve LLM performance on blue team tasks compared to open-ended ICL, CoT, and ToT prompting across 30 tasks and 452k samples.

  2. MalLoc: Toward Fine-grained Android Malicious Payload Localization via LLMs

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MalLoc uses a two-phase LLM pipeline to localize malicious Smali methods and generate role explanations, with promising but very small-scale evidence.

  3. Empirical Evaluation of Concept Drift in ML-Based Android Malware Detection

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Concept drift consistently lowers Android malware detection accuracy across nine machine learning and deep learning algorithms and two large language models, on two datasets.

  4. TraceRAG: A LLM-Based Framework for Explainable Android Malware Detection and Behavior Analysis

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM-based RAG framework that retrieves method-level Java code snippets to explain and detect malicious behavior in Android apps.

Pith tools