Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Attention-based Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Recurrent Networks for Traffic Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.12973 v1 pith:CJ7QSL4R submitted 2023-02-25 cs.LG cs.AI

Attention-based Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Recurrent Networks for Traffic Forecasting

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords graphspatial-temporalconvolutionalrecurrenttemporaltrafficdependenciesattention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Traffic forecasting is one of the most fundamental problems in transportation science and artificial intelligence. The key challenge is to effectively model complex spatial-temporal dependencies and correlations in modern traffic data. Existing methods, however, cannot accurately model both long-term and short-term temporal correlations simultaneously, limiting their expressive power on complex spatial-temporal patterns. In this paper, we propose a novel spatial-temporal neural network framework: Attention-based Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Recurrent Network (ASTGCRN), which consists of a graph convolutional recurrent module (GCRN) and a global attention module. In particular, GCRN integrates gated recurrent units and adaptive graph convolutional networks for dynamically learning graph structures and capturing spatial dependencies and local temporal relationships. To effectively extract global temporal dependencies, we design a temporal attention layer and implement it as three independent modules based on multi-head self-attention, transformer, and informer respectively. Extensive experiments on five real traffic datasets have demonstrated the excellent predictive performance of all our three models with all their average MAE, RMSE and MAPE across the test datasets lower than the baseline methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.