Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

HelpSteer3: Human-Annotated Feedback and Edit Data to Empower Inference-Time Scaling in Open-Ended General-Domain Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04378 v2 pith:CJOCXM56 submitted 2025-03-06 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords feedbackscalinginference-timemodelsarenaeditmodelopen-ended
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Inference-Time Scaling has been critical to the success of recent models such as OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1. However, many techniques used to train models for inference-time scaling require tasks to have answers that can be verified, limiting their application to domains such as math, coding and logical reasoning. We take inspiration from how humans make first attempts, ask for detailed feedback from others and make improvements based on such feedback across a wide spectrum of open-ended endeavors. To this end, we collect HelpSteer3 data to train dedicated Feedback and Edit Models that are capable of performing inference-time scaling for open-ended general-domain tasks. In our setup, one model generates an initial response, which are given feedback by a second model, that are then used by a third model to edit the response. We show that performance on Arena Hard, a benchmark strongly predictive of Chatbot Arena Elo can be boosted by scaling the number of initial response drafts, effective feedback and edited responses. When scaled optimally, our setup based on 70B models from the Llama 3 family can reach SoTA performance on Arena Hard at 92.7 as of 5 Mar 2025, surpassing OpenAI o1-preview-2024-09-12 with 90.4 and DeepSeek R1 with 92.3.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Polyglot Teachers: Evaluating Language Models for Multilingual Synthetic Data Generation

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gemma 3 27B and Aya Expanse 32B are the strongest multilingual synthetic-data teachers; model scale does not predict effectiveness while prompt diversity, length and response fluency do.

  2. Chasing Moving Targets with Online Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for Safer Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Online self-play between attacker and defender roles of a single LLM improves safety robustness and attack diversity across Llama and Qwen models.

  3. Think-RM: Enabling Long-Horizon Reasoning in Generative Reward Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A generative reward model trained with long chain-of-thought and rule-based RL outperforms standard and vertically scaled reward baselines on RM-Bench and RewardBench.

Pith tools