Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 74 references

Multipolar Dark Matter Freeze-out in an Early Matter-Dominated Universe

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Early matter domination dilutes multipole dark matter, reopening parameter space that standard cosmology excludes.

desk verdict Solid incremental paper: entropy dilution reopens windows for three of four multipole operators under early matter domination, with clean analytics and honest flags on the approximations. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07956 v1 pith:CKBSRRTX submitted 2026-07-08 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Debajit Bose , Prolay Chanda , Suvam Maharana , Poulami Mondal This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords multipoledarkmatterearlydominationentropydilutionfreeze-outanapolemagneticdipoleelectricchargeradius
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Thermal dark matter's relic abundance depends on both its interactions and the early Universe's expansion history. This paper studies fermionic dark matter that couples to the Standard Model only through higher-dimensional electromagnetic operators—magnetic dipole, electric dipole, anapole, and charge-radius moments—and freezes out during an early matter-dominated epoch driven by a long-lived heavy field. Entropy injection from that field's later decay dilutes the dark-matter density, so a weaker coupling still yields the observed abundance. The resulting mass–coupling contours are compared with those of ordinary radiation-dominated freeze-out and with present direct-detection and solar-neutrino limits. The dilution reopens sizable regions, especially for the anapole interaction, that are ruled out under standard cosmology, showing that the pre-BBN thermal history can qualitatively change the experimental viability of multipole dark matter.

What carries the argument

Analytic matter-dominated freeze-out formulae (relic density and freeze-out temperature) that incorporate the entropy-dilution factor ζ arising from the sudden decay of a heavy field ϕ; these replace the standard radiation-dominated expressions and map each multipole operator onto a lower required coupling.

What would settle it

A complete numerical solution of the coupled Boltzmann equations that includes continuous ϕ decay during freeze-out, for the same multipole operators and the same reheating temperatures, would show whether the lower-coupling contours remain viable once entropy injection is treated continuously.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Entropy dilution from an early matter-dominated era substantially lowers the multipole couplings needed to match the observed dark-matter relic density, thereby restoring viability to regions of magnetic-dipole, anapole and charge-radius parameter space that are excluded by direct detection and IceCube solar-neutrino bounds when freeze-out is assumed to occur in a radiation-dominated Universe.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes freeze-out finishes while the Universe is still purely matter-dominated and entropy is conserved, before the heavy field begins to decay; if that hierarchy fails, the analytic formulae no longer apply.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies thermal freeze-out of fermionic dark matter that couples to the photon through dimension-5 and dimension-6 electromagnetic multipole operators (magnetic dipole, electric dipole, anapole, charge radius) in an early matter-dominated cosmology driven by a long-lived heavy field φ. Analytic solutions of the Boltzmann equation (App. A) yield the freeze-out abundance and the subsequent entropy-dilution factor ζ that relates it to the observed relic density (Eqs. 17–19). The required couplings are mapped in the (m_χ, g/Λ) or (m_χ, g/Λ^{2}) planes for several reheating temperatures and compared with radiation-dominated freeze-out and with current direct-detection and IceCube solar-neutrino limits. The central claim is that entropy dilution substantially lowers the interaction strength needed for Ωh^{2} = 0.12, reopening regions that are excluded under standard radiation domination, most notably for the anapole operator at low T_RH.

Significance. If the result holds, it shows that the pre-BBN expansion history is an essential ingredient in the phenomenology of electromagnetic multipole dark matter: regions that appear ruled out by direct detection and solar neutrinos under radiation domination become viable once entropy injection is taken into account. The work supplies explicit analytic formulae for the matter-dominated yield, carefully derived non-relativistic annihilation cross sections (App. B), and a transparent set of consistency conditions (Sec. II D) that mark where the pure-MD treatment is self-consistent. These ingredients make the qualitative conclusion falsifiable and useful for future model-building and experimental reinterpretation.

major comments (2)
  1. The analytic relic-density formulae (Eqs. 17–19) and the solid-black segments of the contours rest on the pure-MD, entropy-conserving, sudden-decay hierarchy T_f ≫ T_Γ, T_RH (Sec. II C, App. C). While the paper correctly greys out the T_f < T_Γ segments and states that a coupled evolution is then required, the quantitative size of the reopened windows for T_RH = 0.1 GeV and 10 GeV is still quoted from those formulae. A short numerical check (or an explicit statement of the residual uncertainty) for at least one benchmark point near the edge of the solid-black region would strengthen that the dilution factor remains accurate enough to support the claim that previously excluded parameter space is reopened.
  2. The analysis is restricted to m_χ < m_W to avoid the spurious high-energy growth of the W^{+}W^{-} channels (Sec. III B). This is a legitimate EFT cut, but it leaves the phenomenologically interesting multi-hundred-GeV to TeV window unexplored. Because the paper already flags the need for a full gauge-invariant basis including Z and Higgs operators, a brief estimate of how the relic contours would shift once those channels are restored (or an explicit deferral with a quantitative caveat) would clarify the scope of the “reopened” regions advertised in the abstract and Sec. IV.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and Sec. IV: the phrase “confront it with current constraints” should be “confront them” (subject–verb agreement).
  2. Figs. 1 and 2: the solid-black versus grey distinction for T_f ≳ T_Γ is explained only in the caption; a short sentence in the main text of Sec. IV would help readers who look first at the figures.
  3. Table I (NR structures): the charge-radius entry lists the operator as χ̄ γ^μ γ^{5} χ J_μ, which appears to be a typographical mix-up with the anapole; the correct CR structure is the vector current without γ^{5}.
  4. Eq. (16) for g_eff^{1/2}: the approximation used later in App. A (g_eff^{1/2} ≃ (3/4) g_igstar^{1/2} (1−r)^{-½} x^{-½} x_igstar^{1/2}) is stated only after the fact; a forward reference would improve readability.
  5. Note Added: the arXiv number of the concurrent work is given as 2607.01390; a quick consistency check of the citation would avoid a possible typographical error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: relic contours are computed from free cosmological parameters and external Ωh², then compared to independent experimental bounds.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that entropy dilution from early matter domination lowers the multipole couplings needed for Ωχh² = 0.12, reopening regions excluded under radiation-dominated freeze-out. The derivation chain is: (i) free parameters T⋆, r, TRH define the modified Hubble and dilution factor ζ (Eqs. 1–9, 7); (ii) multipole operators yield ⟨σv⟩ expansions (Sec. III A, App. B) that are standard EFT results; (iii) the Boltzmann equation is solved analytically under the pure-MD, sudden-decay assumptions (App. A, Eqs. 17–19) to obtain the coupling that matches the external Planck benchmark Ωh² = 0.12; (iv) the resulting contours are overlaid on external direct-detection and IceCube limits. None of these steps is self-definitional, a fitted input re-used as a prediction, or a uniqueness claim imported from the authors' prior work. Self-citations supply cross-sections or earlier multipole phenomenology but are not load-bearing for the dilution effect itself. The sudden-decay hierarchy is an explicit assumption whose breakdown is marked (gray contour segments) rather than hidden. The result is therefore a genuine parameter-space comparison, not a circular construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Boltzmann cosmology plus four free cosmological parameters that control the amount of entropy dilution, together with the assumption that a single multipole operator dominates and that freeze-out occurs before significant ϕ decay. No new particles beyond the conventional long-lived heavy field ϕ are invented; the multipole operators themselves are taken from the existing EFT literature.

free parameters (4)
  • T_⋆ = 10^5 GeV
    Temperature at which the heavy field ϕ becomes matter-like; fixed by hand to 10^5 GeV for all numerical contours.
  • r = 0.99
    Radiation energy-density fraction at T_⋆; fixed to 0.99.
  • T_RH = 0.1, 10, 10^3 GeV
    Reheating temperature after ϕ decay; scanned over three discrete values (0.1, 10, 10^3 GeV) that set the entropy-dilution factor ζ.
  • g/Λ or g/Λ²
    Effective multipole coupling strength solved for so that Ωh² = 0.12; the free parameter that is mapped against experimental bounds.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Universe undergoes an early matter-dominated era driven by a long-lived heavy field ϕ that later decays and injects entropy before BBN.
    Sec. II; standard non-standard-cosmology premise taken from Hamdan–Unwin and related works.
  • domain assumption Sudden-decay approximation: entropy is conserved until ϕ decays instantaneously at T_Γ ≈ T_RH.
    Sec. II C and App. C; used to obtain the closed-form dilution factor ζ and the analytic yield formulae.
  • ad hoc to paper Only one multipole operator is present at a time; all other coefficients are set to zero.
    Sec. III A and IV; simplifies the scan but is not required by any UV completion.
  • domain assumption EFT description restricted to m_χ < m_W so that photon-only operators remain gauge-invariant and free of spurious energy growth.
    Sec. III B; authors explicitly acknowledge that a full SU(2)×U(1) operator basis is needed above the electroweak scale.
  • standard math Standard thermal freeze-out Boltzmann equation with NR velocity expansion of ⟨σv⟩.
    Eqs. 11–19 and App. A; textbook treatment adapted to matter-dominated Hubble expansion.
invented entities (1)
  • long-lived heavy field ϕ
    purpose: Drives the early matter-dominated era and supplies the entropy injection that dilutes the DM abundance.
    Standard ingredient of non-standard cosmologies; no new quantum numbers or interactions beyond those already assumed in the literature are introduced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multipolar Dark Matter Freeze-out in an Early Matter-Dominated Universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CKBSRRTX

@misc{pith2026260707956,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multipolar Dark Matter Freeze-out in an Early Matter-Dominated Universe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CKBSRRTX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07956}
}
read the original abstract

The relic abundance of thermal dark matter depends not only on its particle interactions but also on the expansion history of the early Universe. We study the freeze-out of fermionic dark matter interacting with the Standard Model through higher-dimensional electromagnetic operators in an early matter-dominated cosmology. In particular, we consider magnetic dipole, electric dipole, anapole, and charge-radius interactions, and compute the couplings required to reproduce the observed dark matter relic abundance in the presence of entropy injection from the decay of a long-lived heavy field. The resulting parameter space is compared with that obtained in the standard radiation-dominated freeze-out scenario and confront it with current constraints from direct-detection experiments and solar neutrino observations. We find that the entropy dilution associated with an early matter-dominated epoch significantly reduces the interaction strength required to obtain the observed relic abundance, thereby rendering viable regions of parameter space that are excluded in the conventional cosmological history. Our results demonstrate that the cosmological history prior to Big Bang nucleosynthesis can have an important impact on the phenomenology and experimental viability of electromagnetic multipole dark matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07956 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Dimension-six operators: relic density contours in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    X n δχ(δχ + 2)λnx−n−2 f g1/2 eff # Yχ,eq(xf). (A12) Substituting for the equilibrium abundanceY χ,eq from Eq. (12) and using 1− 3 2xf ≈1, we obtain xf = ln b

    Calculation for the freeze-out temperature At freeze-out the DM relic abundance stop tracking the equilibrium abundance, hence, ∆χ(xf)≃Y χ,eq(xf) =δ χYχ,eq(xf), (A9) whereδ χ is a order of unity factor. Neglectingd∆ χ/dxnear freeze-out, from Eq. (A2) we may write dYχ dx f ≈ − X n λn δχ(δχ + 2)x −n−2 f g1/2 eff (xf)Y 2 χ,eq(xf). (A10) Also, dYχ,eq dx =Y χ,...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe

    R. Allahverdiet al., The First Three Seconds: a Re- view of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Uni- verse, Open J. Astrophys.4, astro.2006.16182 (2021), arXiv:2006.16182 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    Kamionkowski and M

    M. Kamionkowski and M. S. Turner, Thermal Relics: Do We Know Their Abundances?, Phys. Rev. D42, 3310 (1990)

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    G. F. Giudice, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, Largest tem- perature of the radiation era and its cosmological im- plications, Phys. Rev. D64, 023508 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0005123

    work page arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    Wino Cold Dark Matter from Anomaly-Mediated SUSY Breaking

    T. Moroi and L. Randall, Wino cold dark matter from anomaly mediated SUSY breaking, Nucl. Phys. B570, 455 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9906527

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    D. H. Lyth, Dilution of cosmological densities by sax- ino decay, Phys. Rev. D48, 4523 (1993), arXiv:hep- ph/9306293

    work page arXiv 1993

  7. [7]

    The effect of a late decaying scalar on the neutralino relic density

    G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko, and C. E. Ya- guna, The Effect of a late decaying scalar on the neu- tralino relic density, Phys. Rev. D74, 083514 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0605016

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    G. B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo, Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any su- persymmetric model, Phys. Rev. D74, 023510 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602230

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    B. S. Acharya, G. Kane, S. Watson, and P. Kumar, A Non-thermal WIMP Miracle, Phys. Rev. D80, 083529 (2009), arXiv:0908.2430 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 arXiv

  2. [10]

    G. L. Kane, P. Kumar, B. D. Nelson, and B. Zheng, Dark matter production mechanisms with a nonthermal cosmological history: A classification, Phys. Rev. D93, 063527 (2016), arXiv:1502.05406 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Davoudiasl, D

    H. Davoudiasl, D. Hooper, and S. D. McDermott, Inflat- able Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 031303 (2016), arXiv:1507.08660 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Randall, J

    L. Randall, J. Scholtz, and J. Unwin, Flooded Dark Mat- ter and S Level Rise, JHEP03, 011, arXiv:1509.08477 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    R. T. Co, F. D’Eramo, L. J. Hall, and D. Pappadop- ulo, Freeze-In Dark Matter with Displaced Signatures at Colliders, JCAP12, 024, arXiv:1506.07532 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    J. A. Dror, E. Kuflik, and W. H. Ng, Codecaying Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 211801 (2016), arXiv:1607.03110 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Banerjee and D

    A. Banerjee and D. Chowdhury, Fingerprints of freeze-in dark matter in an early matter-dominated era, SciPost Phys.13, 022 (2022), arXiv:2204.03670 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe, Vol. 69 (Taylor and Francis, 2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Hamdan and J

    S. Hamdan and J. Unwin, Dark Matter Freeze-out Dur- ing Matter Domination, Mod. Phys. Lett. A33, 1850181 (2018), arXiv:1710.03758 [hep-ph]

    2018

  10. [18]

    Chanda, S

    P. Chanda, S. Hamdan, and J. Unwin, RevivingZand Higgs Mediated Dark Matter Models in Matter Domi- nated Freeze-out, JCAP01, 034, arXiv:1911.02616 [hep- ph]

    1911

  11. [19]

    Chanda and J

    P. Chanda and J. Unwin, Decoupling of asymmetric dark matter during an early matter dominated era, JCAP06, 032, arXiv:2102.02313 [hep-ph]

  12. [20]

    Steigman and M

    G. Steigman and M. S. Turner, Cosmological Constraints on the Properties of Weakly Interacting Massive Parti- cles, Nucl. Phys. B253, 375 (1985)

    1985

  13. [21]

    Jungman, M

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Super- symmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept.267, 195 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9506380

    1996 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    2005 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Steigman, B

    G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Rev. D86, 023506 (2012), arXiv:1204.3622 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Arcadi, M

    G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mam- brini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 203 (2018), arXiv:1703.07364 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    W. L. Xu, C. Dvorkin, and A. Chael, Probing sub- GeV Dark Matter-Baryon Scattering with Cosmolog- ical Observables, Phys. Rev. D97, 103530 (2018), arXiv:1802.06788 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Dvorkin, T

    C. Dvorkin, T. Lin, and K. Schutz, Making dark matter out of light: freeze-in from plasma effects, Phys. Rev. D 99, 115009 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 119901 (2022)], arXiv:1902.08623 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and S. D. McDermott, Super- nova 1987A Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Sectors, Mil- licharged Particles, the QCD Axion, and an Axion-like Particle, JHEP09, 051, arXiv:1803.00993 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Caputo, L

    A. Caputo, L. Sberna, M. Frias, D. Blas, P. Pani, L. Shao, and W. Yan, Constraints on millicharged dark matter and axionlike particles from timing of radio waves, Phys. Rev. D100, 063515 (2019), arXiv:1902.02695 [astro- ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    E. Iles, S. Heeba, and K. Schutz, Dark Matter Di- rect Detection Experiments Are Sensitive to the Mil- licharged Background, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 121002 (2025), arXiv:2407.21096 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    I. B. Zel’dovich, Electromagnetic Interaction with Parity Violation, Sov. Phys. JETP6, 1184 (1958)

    1958

  23. [31]

    Pospelov and T

    M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, Direct and indirect lim- its on the electromagnetic form-factors of WIMPs, Phys. Lett. B480, 181 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0003010

    2000 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Sigurdson, M

    K. Sigurdson, M. Doran, A. Kurylov, R. R. Caldwell, and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-matter electric and mag- netic dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D70, 083501 (2004), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 73, 089903 (2006)], arXiv:astro- ph/0406355

    2004

  25. [33]

    Masso, S

    E. Masso, S. Mohanty, and S. Rao, Dipolar Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D80, 036009 (2009), arXiv:0906.1979 [hep- ph]

    2009 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Barger, W.-Y

    V. Barger, W.-Y. Keung, and D. Marfatia, Electro- magnetic properties of dark matter: Dipole moments and charge form factor, Phys. Lett. B696, 74 (2011), arXiv:1007.4345 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    C. M. Ho and R. J. Scherrer, Anapole Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B722, 341 (2013), arXiv:1211.0503 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    B. J. Kavanagh, P. Panci, and R. Ziegler, Faint Light from Dark Matter: Classifying and Constraining Dark Matter-Photon Effective Operators, JHEP04, 089, arXiv:1810.00033 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Hambye and X.-J

    T. Hambye and X.-J. Xu, Dark matter electromag- 16 netic dipoles: the WIMP expectation, JHEP11, 156, arXiv:2106.01403 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Ibarra, M

    A. Ibarra, M. Reichard, and R. Nagai, Anapole mo- ment of Majorana fermions and implications for direct detection of neutralino dark matter, JHEP01, 086, arXiv:2207.01014 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    E. E. Radescu, On the Electromagnetic Properties of Ma- jorana Fermions, Phys. Rev. D32, 1266 (1985)

    1985

  32. [40]

    Banks, J.-F

    T. Banks, J.-F. Fortin, and S. Thomas, Direct Detec- tion of Dark Matter Electromagnetic Dipole Moments, (2010), arXiv:1007.5515 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Del Nobile, G

    E. Del Nobile, G. B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, and J.-H. Huh, Direct detection of Light Anapole and Magnetic Dipole DM, JCAP06, 002, arXiv:1401.4508 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    D. Bose, D. Chowdhury, P. Mondal, and T. S. Ray, Trou- bles mounting for multipolar dark matter, JHEP06, 014, arXiv:2312.05131 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Ibarra, M

    A. Ibarra, M. Reichard, and G. Tomar, Probing dark matter electromagnetic properties in direct detection ex- periments, JCAP02, 072, arXiv:2408.15760 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Kumar, B

    J. Kumar, B. Mondal, G. Muralidhara, and N. Raj, Di- rect detection of electromagnetically interacting ultra- heavy dark matter, (2025), arXiv:2509.24938 [hep-ph]

    2025

  37. [45]

    Geytenbeek, S

    B. Geytenbeek, S. Rao, P. Scott, A. Serenelli, A. C. Vin- cent, M. White, and A. G. Williams, Effect of electro- magnetic dipole dark matter on energy transport in the solar interior, JCAP03, 029, arXiv:1610.06737 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Lambiase, S

    G. Lambiase, S. Mohanty, A. Nautiyal, and S. Rao, Constraints on electromagnetic form factors of sub- GeV dark matter from the cosmic microwave back- ground anisotropy, Phys. Rev. D104, 023519 (2021), arXiv:2102.04840 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fortin and T

    J.-F. Fortin and T. M. P. Tait, Collider Constraints on Dipole-Interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D85, 063506 (2012), arXiv:1103.3289 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    X. Chu, J. Pradler, and L. Semmelrock, Light dark states with electromagnetic form factors, Phys. Rev. D99, 015040 (2019), arXiv:1811.04095 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    R. J. Scherrer and M. S. Turner, Decaying particles do not “heat up” the Universe, Phys. Rev. D31, 681 (1985)

    1985

  42. [50]

    Spokoiny, Deflationary universe scenario, Phys

    B. Spokoiny, Deflationary universe scenario, Phys. Lett. B315, 40 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9306008

    1993 arXiv

  43. [51]

    M. L. Graesser, I. M. Shoemaker, and L. Vec- chi, Asymmetric WIMP dark matter, JHEP10, 110, arXiv:1103.2771 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    R. J. Scherrer and M. S. Turner, On the Relic, Cos- mic Abundance of Stable Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, Phys. Rev. D33, 1585 (1986), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 34, 3263 (1986)]

    1986

  45. [53]

    Del Nobile, The Theory of Direct Dark Matter De- tection: A Guide to Computations 10.1007/978-3-030- 95228-0 (2021), arXiv:2104.12785 [hep-ph]

    E. Del Nobile, The Theory of Direct Dark Matter De- tection: A Guide to Computations 10.1007/978-3-030- 95228-0 (2021), arXiv:2104.12785 [hep-ph]

    2021 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    Y. Gao, C. M. Ho, and R. J. Scherrer, Anapole Dark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D89, 045006 (2014), arXiv:1311.5630 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Arina, A

    C. Arina, A. Cheek, K. Mimasu, and L. Pagani, Light and Darkness: consistently coupling dark matter to photons via effective operators, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 223 (2021), arXiv:2005.12789 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    S. Y. Choi, J. Jeong, D. W. Kang, and S. Shin, Hunting for hypercharge anapole dark matter in all spin scenarios, Phys. Rev. D109, 096001 (2024), arXiv:2401.02855 [hep- ph]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    PandaX Collaboration, Limits on the luminance of dark matter from xenon recoil data, Nature618, 47 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Liang, Y

    J.-H. Liang, Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma, and H.-L. Wang, A systematic investigation on dark matter-electron scattering in effective field theories, JHEP07, 279, arXiv:2406.10912 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Garani and S

    R. Garani and S. Palomares-Ruiz, Dark matter in the Sun: scattering off electrons vs nucleons, JCAP05, 007, arXiv:1702.02768 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Busoni, A

    G. Busoni, A. De Simone, P. Scott, and A. C. Vin- cent, Evaporation and scattering of momentum- and velocity-dependent dark matter in the Sun, JCAP10, 037, arXiv:1703.07784 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bose and S

    D. Bose and S. Sarkar, Impact of galactic distributions in celestial capture of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D107, 063010 (2023), arXiv:2211.16982 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Vinyoles, A

    N. Vinyoles, A. M. Serenelli, F. L. Villante, S. Basu, J. Bergstr¨ om, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, C. Pe˜ na-Garay, and N. Song, A new Generation of Standard Solar Models, Astrophys. J.835, 202 (2017), arXiv:1611.09867 [astro-ph.SR]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [63]

    R. H. Helm, Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei, Phys. Rev. 104, 1466 (1956)

    1956

  56. [64]

    Liang, Y.-L

    Z.-L. Liang, Y.-L. Tang, and Z.-Q. Yang, The leptophilic dark matter in the Sun: the minimum testable mass, JCAP10, 035, arXiv:1802.01005 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Garani and S

    R. Garani and S. Palomares-Ruiz, Evaporation of dark matter from celestial bodies, JCAP05(05), 042, arXiv:2104.12757 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Q. Liu, J. Lazar, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, and A. Kheirandish, χaroν: a tool for neutrino flux generation from WIMPs, JCAP10, 043, arXiv:2007.15010 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  59. [67]

    C. A. Arg¨ uelles, J. Salvado, and C. N. Weaver, nuSQuIDS: A toolbox for neutrino propagation, Comput. Phys. Commun.277, 108346 (2022), arXiv:2112.13804 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    T. N. Maity, A. K. Saha, S. Mondal, and R. Laha, Neutrinos from the Sun can discover dark matter- electron scattering, Phys. Rev. D112, 023025 (2025), arXiv:2308.12336 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Search for annihilating dark matter in the Sun with 3 years of IceCube data, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 146 (2017), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 79, 214 (2019)], arXiv:1612.05949 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Search for GeV-scale dark matter annihilation in the Sun with IceCube DeepCore, Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Search for GeV-scale dark matter annihilation in the Sun with IceCube DeepCore, Phys. Rev. D105, 062004 (2022), arXiv:2111.09970 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  63. [71]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Anand, A

    N. Anand, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and W. C. Haxton, Weakly interacting massive particle-nucleus elastic scattering re- sponse, Phys. Rev. C89, 065501 (2014), arXiv:1308.6288 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  65. [73]

    J. C. Criado, A. Djouadi, M. Perez-Victoria, and J. San- tiago, A complete effective field theory for dark matter, JHEP07, 081, arXiv:2104.14443 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  66. [74]

    Jahedi, Neutron stars as thermometers for reheating induced dipole dark matter, (2026), arXiv:2607.01390 [hep-ph]

    S. Jahedi, Neutron stars as thermometers for reheating induced dipole dark matter, (2026), arXiv:2607.01390 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.