REVIEW 3 cited by
LAMBench: A Benchmark for Large Atomistic Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LAMBench: A Benchmark for Large Atomistic Models
read the original abstract
Large Atomistic Models (LAMs) have undergone remarkable progress recently, emerging as universal or fundamental representations of the potential energy surface defined by the first-principles calculations of atomistic systems. However, our understanding of the extent to which these models achieve true universality, as well as their comparative performance across different models, remains limited. This gap is largely due to the lack of comprehensive benchmarks capable of evaluating the effectiveness of LAMs as approximations to the universal potential energy surface. In this study, we introduce LAMBench, a benchmarking system designed to evaluate LAMs in terms of their generalizability, adaptability, and applicability. These attributes are crucial for deploying LAMs as ready-to-use tools across a diverse array of scientific discovery contexts. We benchmark ten state-of-the-art LAMs released prior to August 1, 2025, using LAMBench. Our findings reveal a significant gap between the current LAMs and the ideal universal potential energy surface. They also highlight the need for incorporating cross-domain training data, supporting multi-fidelity modeling, and ensuring the models' conservativeness and differentiability. As a dynamic and extensible platform, LAMBench is intended to continuously evolve, thereby facilitating the development of robust and generalizable LAMs capable of significantly advancing scientific research. The LAMBench code is open-sourced at https://github.com/deepmodeling/lambench, and an interactive leaderboard is available at https://www.aissquare.com/openlam?tab=Benchmark.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
AI-Driven Expansion and Application of the Alexandria Database
A combined generative model, ML potential, and graph neural network pipeline expands the Alexandria database by 1.3 million DFT-validated compounds with 99% success near the convex hull and releases training data for ...
-
VASP Plugins: Linking the Vienna ab-initio Simulation Package with Python
A C++/pybind11 shared-memory plugin layer exposes VASP SCF and ionic data as NumPy arrays so Python can modify structure, forces, local potential, and occupancies in place.
-
Comparing the latent features of universal machine-learning interatomic potentials
Different uMLIPs encode chemical space in distinct ways, with high cross-model feature reconstruction errors, and fine-tuning preserves strong pre-training bias in the latent features.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.