Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 194 references

Vision-Language Models for Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey claims that vision-language models can be efficiently moved from cloud data centers to edge devices through a coordinated cycle of compression, distributed training, and privacy-preserving deployment, and it sets out to map…

desk verdict A structurally useful survey undone by citation errors, circular self-citation, and a copied passage; reject in current form. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07855 v2 pith:CMX4TGQT submitted 2025-02-11 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

Ahmed Sharshar , Latif U. Khan , Waseem Ullah , Mohsen Guizani This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords vision-languagemodelsedgecomputingmodelcompressionquantizationknowledgedistillationfederatedlearningefficientfine-tuningprivacy-preservinginference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey sets out to organise the fast-moving field of vision-language models (VLMs) for edge networks into one coherent picture. Its central claim is that deploying VLMs on resource-constrained devices is not a single trick but a full cycle: compressing the model, choosing where each computation runs, training across distributed edge devices, fine-tuning cheaply, and securing the pipeline against privacy and security threats. The authors argue that no existing survey covers this complete cloud-to-edge cycle with attention to security and privacy, and they aim to fill that gap with a structured overview of techniques, models, applications, and open challenges. A careful reader would care because the practical value of multimodal AI in phones, cameras, drones, and medical devices depends on exactly this kind of efficiency playbook.

What carries the argument

The central organising object is the 'comprehensive cycle for extending VLMs from the cloud to the edge', presented as a six-step design process in Figure 6. Each step is a distinct category of methods: (1) data selection and pre-processing, (2) model choice across edge and cloud, (3) distributed implementation using federated learning with parent-child model partitioning, (4) post-processing and evaluation, (5) deployment and continuous learning, plus (0) the compression layer of pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation that runs through the whole cycle. The survey also uses a three-part architecture distinction from the VLM literature (single-stream vs dual-stream encoders, plus fusion mechanisms) and a task taxonomy in Figure 8 (image-text, video-text, and vision-as-VL tasks). These frameworks carry the survey's argument because they turn scattered techniques into a checklist.

What would settle it

The 'comprehensive' claim would be falsified by finding an established edge-VLM method or a widely used lightweight VLM that the taxonomy omits; more concretely, a reader can check Table II and find that the identifier 2405.09215 is claimed for both Xmodel-VLM and ScreenAI, which means the survey's citation layer fails a basic consistency test.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is taxonomic: it identifies the load-bearing methods that make edge VLMs viable and arranges them into a deployable pipeline. The survey distinguishes general lightweight VLMs from edge-specific VLMs, presents the six-step design process of data selection, model choice, distributed implementation, post-processing and evaluation, and continuous learning, and catalogues eight open problem areas including compressed lightweight VLMs, context-aware models, cross-modality adaptation, security, privacy, and communication-efficient architectures. It also compiles a catalogue of concrete models (MobileVLM V2, EfficientVLM, MiniVLM, EdgeVL, Moondream2, and others) and applications in healthcare, environmental monitoring, autonomous driving, and surveillance. The paper's contribution is the claim that these pieces fit together into a single comprehensive cycle that researchers and engineers can follow.

Load-bearing premise

The whole survey rests on the assumption that the roughly two hundred works it cites are accurately described, correctly attributed, and representative of the field; the duplicate arXiv identifier in its own Table II shows that this assumption is not safe.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Practitioners get a structured checklist for taking a VLM to the edge: compress first, then decide edge vs cloud placement, then distribute training, then evaluate and deploy with continuous learning.
  • Security and privacy are treated as first-class steps in the deployment cycle, not afterthoughts: differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, secure aggregation, and federated prompt learning are mapped to specific stages.
  • The survey's taxonomy implies that general lightweight VLMs are not automatically edge-ready; edge-specific constraints such as energy budgets and on-device inference matter.
  • The eight open challenges named by the survey, such as context-aware VLMs and communication-efficient distributed inference, mark the concrete gaps where future contributions are needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the survey does not reproduce evaluation setups for the models it cites, its specific numbers (for instance accuracy gains or model sizes) should be verified against the primary sources before being used in design decisions.
  • The survey's own Table II assigns the same arXiv identifier (2405.09215) to two different models, Xmodel-VLM and ScreenAI; that suggests the citation layer is not fully reliable and the map should be re-checked against primary literature.
  • A natural extension would be a quantitative comparison benchmark that measures latency, memory, and energy of the surveyed compression methods on identical edge hardware; the survey itself provides no such head-to-head numbers.
  • The privacy discussion points toward a testable design: a federated prompt-learning plus homomorphic-encryption combination for edge VLMs could be evaluated for accuracy loss and communication cost; the survey lists the ingredients but does not run that experiment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript surveys vision-language models (VLMs) for edge networks, covering fundamentals, lightweight model designs, efficient fine-tuning methods, edge deployment challenges, applications, and open problems. It positions itself as a comprehensive treatment of the full cycle from cloud-based VLMs to edge deployment, and it provides a taxonomy together with comparison tables of existing surveys and lightweight VLM models.

Significance. If the survey's claims are trustworthy, the paper would be a useful entry point to a rapidly growing area, especially because of its organization around edge deployment (compression, federated learning, security and privacy) and its comparison of existing surveys. The paper is not a technical contribution with proofs or reproducible artifacts, but it does offer a structured taxonomy and broad literature coverage. However, the value of a survey is entirely dependent on the accuracy and provenance of its citations, and it is in this respect that the manuscript currently falls short.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table II and References [52], [53], [54], [59]] Duplicate arXiv identifiers are assigned to different models: [53] (Xmodel-VLM) and [59] (ScreenAI) both list arXiv:2405.09215, and [52] (LightVLP) and [54] (EM-VLM4AD) both list arXiv:2403.19838. Since an arXiv ID uniquely identifies one paper, at least two of these entries are necessarily wrong, and the reader cannot determine which technique belongs to which model. This directly undermines the survey's promise of accurate representation of prior work and must be corrected for every entry in Table II.
  2. [Section IV.A, Bilingual Medical Mixture LLM paragraph] The paragraph describing BiMediX is written in the first person ('We developed a semi-automated English-to-Arabic translation pipeline...') and closely matches the abstract of reference [136] without quotation or explicit attribution. This is not an original synthesis by the survey authors; it is an apparent verbatim reuse of the primary paper's wording. The passage must be rewritten as a third-person description with appropriate citation, or the manuscript cannot be considered a reliable secondary source.
  3. [Section V.B, discussion of dynamic inference and model scaling] The discussion of dynamic inference and model scaling cites reference [168], which is the survey itself, as the sole support for several claims (e.g., the problems of limited computational resources and unpredictable latency, and the mitigation via modular architectures and resource-aware scheduling). Using one's own survey to support one's own recommendations is circular and provides no external evidence. These claims need to be supported by actual prior work, and the self-citation should be removed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Reference [7]] The reference points to a 'consensus.app' URL with a 'utm_source=chatgpt' tracking parameter; this is not a proper scholarly citation and should be replaced with the arXiv identifier of the underlying paper (arXiv:2309.16739).
  2. [Section II.C] There are numerous typographical and formatting errors, including 'comparision' in the opening sentence and inconsistent spacing around model names (e.g., 'RA VEN', 'ALLaV A').
  3. [Figure 1] The figure contains several misspellings: 'Survelliance', 'Heatlhcare', and 'Sem-supervised learning' instead of 'Semi-supervised learning'; these should be corrected.
  4. [Reference [54]] The author attribution for EM-VLM4AD is given as 'Z. Wu et al.' in reference [54], but the same paper is correctly attributed to Gopalkrishnan, Greer, and Trivedi in reference [175]; the metadata should be reconciled.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

One load-bearing self-citation in Section V.B; the survey's central synthesis otherwise rests on external sources, though citation-integrity errors weaken its comprehensiveness claim.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section V.B, 'Problems in Model Optimization for Edge Networks' (Open Challenges)]
    "Dynamic inference, which adjusts model complexity at runtime based on available resources, faces critical issues, including limited computational resources and unpredictable latency, adversely impacting real-time performance [168]. These can be mitigated through modular architectures that selectively activate model components depending on resource availability and by employing resource-aware scheduling algorithms for effective real-time adjustments [168]."

    Reference [168] in the bibliography is this paper itself: 'A. Sharshar, L. U. Khan, W. Ullah, and M. Guizani, Vision-language models for edge networks: A comprehensive survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07855, 2025.' The paper's own open-challenge section therefore cites the same document as the authority for the claimed problems of dynamic inference and model scaling and for the proposed mitigations (modular architectures, resource-aware scheduling, federated learning). There is no external, independently verifiable source for these load-bearing statements; the support chain reduces to the survey asserting its own conclusions.

full rationale

This is a survey paper with no mathematical derivation chain or quantitative predictions, so the circularity analysis focuses on the self-support structure of its claims. The only clear circular step is in Section V.B, where the open-challenge discussion of dynamic inference and model scaling is cited to reference [168], which is the present arXiv paper itself (same authors and title). That makes the paper's recommended mitigations self-referential: the survey is its own source for the very claims it uses to define open problems. This is not a minor or ornamental citation; it is the sole support for the dynamic-inference problem statement and mitigation. However, the paper's central claim of being a comprehensive survey does not reduce to this self-citation. Most sections, including fundamentals, compression, federated learning, applications, security, and privacy, are supported by a broad set of external references, and the organization and comparison tables are independent editorial content. I therefore score 4 rather than 6-8. The manuscript also contains serious citation-integrity problems that are not circularity but affect trustworthiness: Table II and the reference list assign arXiv:2403.19838 to both LightVLP [52] and EM-VLM4AD [54], and arXiv:2405.09215 to both Xmodel-VLM [53] and ScreenAI [59]; one arXiv ID cannot identify two different papers, so the model comparison in Table II cannot be reliably traced. In addition, Section IV.A's 'Bilingual Medical Mixture LLM' passage is written in the first person ('We developed a semi-automated English-to-Arabic translation pipeline...') and closely matches the abstract of BiMediX [136] without quotation or attribution, so part of the survey text is not demonstrably the authors' own synthesis. These failures undermine the advertised comprehensiveness and verifiability, but they are not reduction-by-construction circularity; they are weighed here as aggravating evidence about the reliability of the reference base.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters or new entities. Its central premises are the accuracy and representativeness of its cited literature, both of which are internally undermined.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Cited references accurately support the statements made in the survey.
    The entire survey relies on the trustworthiness of its citations. Internal evidence shows duplicate arXiv IDs and misattributions, violating this assumption.
  • domain assumption The survey's taxonomy and paper selection are representative of the field.
    No search strategy or inclusion criteria are given, so the claimed comprehensiveness is unsupported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vision-Language Models for Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CMX4TGQT

@misc{pith2026250207855,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vision-Language Models for Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CMX4TGQT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07855}
}
read the original abstract

Vision Large Language Models (VLMs) combine visual understanding with natural language processing, enabling tasks like image captioning, visual question answering, and video analysis. While VLMs show impressive capabilities across domains such as autonomous vehicles, smart surveillance, and healthcare, their deployment on resource-constrained edge devices remains challenging due to processing power, memory, and energy limitations. This survey explores recent advancements in optimizing VLMs for edge environments, focusing on model compression techniques, including pruning, quantization, knowledge distillation, and specialized hardware solutions that enhance efficiency. We provide a detailed discussion of efficient training and fine-tuning methods, edge deployment challenges, and privacy considerations. Additionally, we discuss the diverse applications of lightweight VLMs across healthcare, environmental monitoring, and autonomous systems, illustrating their growing impact. By highlighting key design strategies, current challenges, and offering recommendations for future directions, this survey aims to inspire further research into the practical deployment of VLMs, ultimately making advanced AI accessible in resource-limited settings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07855 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of integrating Vision-Language Models (VLMs) into edge networks. The diagram highlights IoT applications (e.g., healthcare, autonomous driving, smart homes, surveillance, gaming, education, fitness tracking, Industry 4.0, sports) that benefit from VLMs to address traditional Machine Learning (ML) challenges such as limited training data and semantic reasoning. It outlines key ML techniques (transfer learnin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The architecture of Vision-Language Pre-trained (VLP) models typically includes three key components: Visual Embedding (VE), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The APoLLo framework provides a unified approach to multi-modal adapter and prompt learning for Vision-Language Pretraining [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The MobileVLM architecture. Inputs include visual data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The challenge of adapting large vision-language models to edge devices across different visual modalities. In this example, a resource￾constrained cleaning robot equipped with RGB and depth cameras is used. The robot generates RGB-depth image pairs without scene labels…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Design Process of Distributed Edge VLMs. processed locally and which are sent to the cloud, often using heuristics or lightweight models [96], [97]. Data Compression further reduces bandwidth for edge￾cloud transmission using methods like quantization, di￾mensionality …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: An Overview of Compression Schemes for VLMs. strengths. Ref. [110] showed that such combinations reduce size effectively without compromising accuracy. • Adaptive and Dynamic Compression: Adaptive methods like dynamic quantization adjust precision based on data complex…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of representative tasks from three categories of Vision-Language (VL) problems, image-text tasks, vision tasks as VL, and video-text tasks [135]. high transfer performance in zero-shot classification tasks, making it effective for rapid deployment in envir…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

194 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [59]

    Screenai: A vision-language model for ui and infographics understanding,

    G. AI, “Screenai: A vision-language model for ui and infographics understanding,”arXiv, 2024, arXiv:2405.09215

    arXiv 2024

  2. [168]

    Vision- language models for edge networks: A comprehensive survey,

    A. Sharshar, L. U. Khan, W. Ullah, and M. Guizani, “Vision- language models for edge networks: A comprehensive survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07855, 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/html/2502.07855v1

    arXiv 2025

  3. [136]

    Bimedix: Bilingual medical mixture of experts llm,

    S. Pieri, S. S. Mullappilly, F. S. Khan, R. M. Anwer, S. Khan, T. Baldwin, and H. Cholakkal, “Bimedix: Bilingual medical mixture of experts llm,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402. 13253

    2024

  4. [2]

    Oscar: Object-semantics aligned pre-training for vision-language tasks,

    X. Li, X. Yin, C. Li, X. Hu, P. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, L. Dong, F. Wei, Y . Choiet al., “Oscar: Object-semantics aligned pre-training for vision-language tasks,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2020, pp. 121–137

    2020

  5. [3]

    Vilt: Vision-and-language transformer without convolution or region supervision,

    W. Kim, B. Son, and I. Kim, “Vilt: Vision-and-language transformer without convolution or region supervision,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 5583–5594

    2021

  6. [4]

    Edge intelligence empowered vehicular metaverse: Key design aspects and future directions,

    L. U. Khan, A. Elhagry, M. Guizani, and A. El Saddik, “Edge intelligence empowered vehicular metaverse: Key design aspects and future directions,”IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 120–126, 2024

    2024

  7. [5]

    Edge ai: On-demand accelerating deep neural network inference via edge computing,

    H. Li, K. Li, Z. Yang, Y . Guo, W. Yu, and W. Dai, “Edge ai: On-demand accelerating deep neural network inference via edge computing,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 144–156, 2019

    2019

  8. [6]

    Lite trans- former with long-short range attention,

    F. Wu, A. Fan, A. Baevski, Y . Dauphin, and M. Auli, “Lite trans- former with long-short range attention,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2020

    2020

Show all 194 references
  1. [8]

    Efficientvlm: Fast and accurate vision-language models via knowledge distillation and modal-adaptive pruning,

    T. Wang, W. Zhou, Y . Zeng, and X. Zhang, “Efficientvlm: Fast and accurate vision-language models via knowledge distillation and modal-adaptive pruning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07795, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07795

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Quantization and training of neural networks for effi- cient integer-arithmetic-only inference,

    B. Jacob, S. Kligys, B. Chen, M. Zhu, M. Tang, A. Howard, B. Steiner, and J. Rolfe, “Quantization and training of neural networks for effi- cient integer-arithmetic-only inference,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 2704–2713

    2018

  3. [12]

    Efficient processing of deep neural networks: A tutorial and survey,

    V . Sze, Y .-H. Chen, T.-J. Yang, and J. S. Emer, “Efficient processing of deep neural networks: A tutorial and survey,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 2295–2329, 2017

    2017

  4. [13]

    Edge tpu: State-of-the-art ai at the edge,

    V . J. Reddi, N. Jeffries, K. Panchapakesan, R. Jain, P. Pabla, R. Mehta, P. Narkhede, and D. Kanter, “Edge tpu: State-of-the-art ai at the edge,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04268, 2020

    2005 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Deep learning for autonomous driving: Techniques and applications,

    C. Chen, Q. Chen, L. Jin, and G. Hua, “Deep learning for autonomous driving: Techniques and applications,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 291–306, 2019

    2019

  6. [15]

    Real-time human activity recognition with miniaturized wearable sensors using deep learning,

    Z. Wang, B. Yang, C. Xie, D. Xie, and K. Liu, “Real-time human activity recognition with miniaturized wearable sensors using deep learning,”Sensors, vol. 20, no. 12, p. 3456, 2020

    2020

  7. [16]

    Efficientnetv2: Smaller models and faster training,

    M. Tan and Q. V . Le, “Efficientnetv2: Smaller models and faster training,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.00298, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Can deep learning revolutionize mobile sensing?

    N. D. Lane, S. Bhattacharya, A. Mathur, P. Georgiev, C. Forlivesi, F. Kawsar, S. Mirri, F. Antonelli, and R. Tesoriero, “Can deep learning revolutionize mobile sensing?”Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 117– 122, 2015

    2015

  9. [18]

    In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit,

    N. P. Jouppi, C. Young, N. Patil, D. Patterson, G. Agrawal, R. Bajwa, S. Bates, S. Bhatia, N. Boden, A. Borcherset al., “In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit,”Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp. 1–12, 2017

    2017

  10. [19]

    Language mod- els are few-shot learners,

    T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askellet al., “Language mod- els are few-shot learners,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020

    1901

  11. [20]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clarket al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,”Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8748–8763, 2021

    2021

  12. [21]

    Internet of things (iot) for next-generation smart systems: A review of current challenges, future trends and prospects for emerging 5g-iot scenarios,

    A. Zanella and N. Bui, “Internet of things (iot) for next-generation smart systems: A review of current challenges, future trends and prospects for emerging 5g-iot scenarios,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, p. 8972389, 2020

    2020

  13. [22]

    Hardware acceleration for machine learning inference on edge devices: A review,

    J. Zhang, L. De Glossi, S. Eilers, and S. Kohlbrecher, “Hardware acceleration for machine learning inference on edge devices: A review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 82 554–82 566, 2020

    2020

  14. [23]

    Cloud and edge computing for deep learning applications,

    L. Chen, K. Wang, X. Tian, T. Su, and W. Li, “Cloud and edge computing for deep learning applications,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1719–1734, 2021

    2021

  15. [24]

    Mnasnet: Platform-aware neural architecture search for mobile,

    M. Tan, B. Chen, R. Pang, V . Vasudevan, M. Sandler, A. Howard, and Q. V . Le, “Mnasnet: Platform-aware neural architecture search for mobile,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019, pp. 2820–2828

    2019

  16. [25]

    Slimmable neural networks,

    J. Yu and T. Huang, “Slimmable neural networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08928, 2019

    2019 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, . Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 5998– 6008

    2017

  18. [27]

    Transformer-based model for text classification and question answering,

    T. Chen, Z. Zhang, S. Zhang, Q. Xu, and Y . Ma, “Transformer-based model for text classification and question answering,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 160 543–160 552, 2020

    2020

  19. [28]

    Squeeze-and-excitation networks,

    J. Hu, L. Shen, and G. Sun, “Squeeze-and-excitation networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 7132–7141

    2018

  20. [29]

    Searching for mobilenetv3,

    A. Howard, M. Sandler, G. Chu, L.-C. Chen, B. Chen, M. Tan, W. Wang, Y . Zhu, R. Pang, V . Vasudevanet al., “Searching for mobilenetv3,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 1314–1324

    2019

  21. [30]

    Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks,

    A. Esteva, B. Kuprel, R. A. Novoa, J. Ko, S. M. Swetter, H. M. Blau, and S. Thrun, “Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks,”Nature, vol. 542, pp. 115–118, 2017

    2017

  22. [31]

    High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence,

    E. J. Topol, “High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence,”Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2019

    2019

  23. [32]

    Faster r-cnn: Towards real- time object detection with region proposal networks,

    S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun, “Faster r-cnn: Towards real- time object detection with region proposal networks,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015, pp. 91–99

    2015

  24. [33]

    Ssd: Single shot multibox detector,

    W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.-Y . Fu, and A. C. Berg, “Ssd: Single shot multibox detector,”Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 21–37, 2016

    2016

  25. [34]

    A survey of vision- language pre-trained models,

    Y . Du, Z. Liu, J. Li, and W. X. Zhao, “A survey of vision- language pre-trained models,” inProceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-22, L. D. Raedt, Ed. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organiza...

    2022 doi

  26. [35]

    Vision-language intelligence: Tasks, representation learning, and large models,

    F. Li, H. Zhang, Y .-F. Zhang, S. Liu, J. Guo, L. M. Ni, P. Zhang, and L. Zhang, “Vision-language intelligence: Tasks, representation learning, and large models,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01922

    2022 arXiv

  27. [36]

    A survey of efficient fine-tuning methods for vision-language models prompt and adapter,

    J. Xing, J. Liu, J. Wang, L. Sun, X. Chen, X. Gu, and Y . Wang, “A survey of efficient fine-tuning methods for vision-language models prompt and adapter,”Computers & Graphics, vol. 119, p. 103885, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0...

    2024

  28. [37]

    Exploring the frontier of vision-language models: A survey of current methodologies and future directions,

    A. Ghosh, A. Acharya, S. Saha, V . Jain, and A. Chadha, “Exploring the frontier of vision-language models: A survey of current methodologies and future directions,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07214

    2024

  29. [38]

    Vision-language models for vision tasks: A survey,

    J. Zhang, J. Huang, S. Jin, and S. Lu, “Vision-language models for vision tasks: A survey,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 5625–5644, 2024

    2024

  30. [39]

    A survey on multimodal large language models for autonomous driving,

    C. Cui, Y . Ma, X. Cao, W. Ye, Y . Zhou, K. Liang, J. Chen, J. Lu, Z. Yang, K.-D. Liao, T. Gao, E. Li, K. Tang, Z. Cao, T. Zhou, A. Liu, X. Yan, S. Mei, J. Cao, Z. Wang, and C. Zheng, “A survey on multimodal large language models for autonomous driving,” pp. 958–979, 2024

    2024

  31. [40]

    A survey on multimodal large language models,

    S. Yin, C. Fu, S. Zhao, K. Li, X. Sun, T. Xu, and E. Chen, “A survey on multimodal large language models,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13549

    2024 arXiv

  32. [42]

    Artificial intelligence market by offering, technology, end-user industry and geography - global forecast to 2026,

    MarketsandMarkets, “Artificial intelligence market by offering, technology, end-user industry and geography - global forecast to 2026,” 2021, accessed: 2024-07-16. [On- line]. Available: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/ artificial-intelligence-market-74851580.html

    2026

  33. [43]

    Design choices for vision language models in 2024,

    T. Gigant, “Design choices for vision language models in 2024,” Hugging Face, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://huggingface.co/blog/ vision-language-models

    2024

  34. [44]

    Edge ai hardware market by device type, processor type, end user, and application: Global opportunity analysis and industry forecast, 20182025,

    Allied Market Research, “Edge ai hardware market by device type, processor type, end user, and application: Global opportunity analysis and industry forecast, 20182025,” 2020, accessed: 2024- 07-16. [Online]. Available: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/ edge-ai-hardware-market

    2020

  35. [45]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  36. [46]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,

    A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gellyet al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020

    2010 arXiv

  37. [47]

    Visual- bert: A simple and performant baseline for vision and language,

    L. H. Li, M. Yatskar, D. Yin, C.-J. Hsieh, and K.-W. Chang, “Visual- bert: A simple and performant baseline for vision and language,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.03557, 2019

    1908 arXiv

  38. [48]

    Vl-bert: Pre-training of generic visual-linguistic representations,

    W. Su, X. Zhu, Y . Cao, B. Li, L. Lu, F. Wei, and J. Dai, “Vl-bert: Pre-training of generic visual-linguistic representations,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08530, 2019

    1908 arXiv

  39. [49]

    Vilt: Vision-and-language trans- former without convolution or region supervision,

    W. Kim, B. Son, and I. Kim, “Vilt: Vision-and-language trans- former without convolution or region supervision,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.03334, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  40. [50]

    Mobilevlm v2: Faster and stronger baseline for vision language model,

    J. Liuet al., “Mobilevlm v2: Faster and stronger baseline for vision language model,”arXiv, 2024, arXiv:2402.03766

    2024 arXiv

  41. [51]

    Unified-io: A unified model for vision, language, and multi-modal tasks,

    J. Lu, C. Clark, R. Zellers, R. Mottaghi, and A. Kembhavi, “Unified-io: A unified model for vision, language, and multi-modal tasks,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08916

    2022 arXiv

  42. [55]

    Vitamin: Designing scalable vision models in the vision-language era,

    J. Chen, Q. Yu, X. Shen, A. Yuille, and L.-C. Chen, “Vitamin: Designing scalable vision models in the vision-language era,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2024, pp. 12 954–12 966

    2024

  43. [56]

    Driving with language: Introducing wayves multimodal driving model lingo-2,

    W. AI, “Driving with language: Introducing wayves multimodal driving model lingo-2,”Wayve, 2024, available: https://wayve.ai/blog/lingo-2

    2024

  44. [57]

    Instructblip: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning,

    W. Dai, J. Li, D. Liet al., “Instructblip: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning,”OpenReview, 2024, available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=vvoWPYqZJA

    2024

  45. [58]

    Raven: Multitask retrieval augmented vision-language learning,

    R. Kumaret al., “Raven: Multitask retrieval augmented vision-language learning,”arXiv, 2024, arXiv:2406.19150

    2024 arXiv

  46. [60]

    Allava: Harnessing gpt4v-synthesized data for lite vision-language models,

    G. H. Chen, S. Chen, R. Zhang, J. Chen, X. Wu, Z. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Li, X. Wan, and B. Wang, “Allava: Harnessing gpt4v-synthesized data for lite vision-language models,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11684

    2024 arXiv

  47. [62]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, K. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clarket al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00020, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  48. [63]

    Vilbert: Pretraining task- agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks,

    J. Lu, D. Batra, D. Parikh, and S. Lee, “Vilbert: Pretraining task- agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.02265, 2019

    1908 arXiv

  49. [64]

    Lxmert: Learning cross-modality encoder representations from transformers,

    H. Tan and M. Bansal, “Lxmert: Learning cross-modality encoder representations from transformers,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07490, 2019

    1908 arXiv

  50. [65]

    Apollo: Unified adapter and prompt learning for vision language models,

    S. Chowdhury, S. Nag, and D. Manocha, “Apollo: Unified adapter and prompt learning for vision language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07356, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  51. [67]

    Conditional prompt learning for vision-language models,

    ——, “Conditional prompt learning for vision-language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01134, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  52. [68]

    The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning,

    B. Lester, R. Al-Rfou, and N. Constant, “The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08691, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  53. [69]

    P- tuning v2: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning universally across scales and tasks,

    X. Liu, Y . Zheng, Z. Du, M. Ding, Y . Qian, Z. Yang, and J. Tang, “P- tuning v2: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning universally across scales and tasks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07602, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  54. [70]

    Denseclip: Language-guided dense prediction with context-aware prompting,

    Y . Rao, W. Zhao, G. Chen, Y . Tang, Z. Zhu, G. Huang, and H. Li, “Denseclip: Language-guided dense prediction with context-aware prompting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01518, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  55. [71]

    Proda: Prompt distribution learning for efficient and effective fine-tuning of pre-trained models,

    R. Wang, R. He, B. Xu, J. Lin, H. Shi, W. Liu, Z. Zeng, J. Ma, and Y . Chen, “Proda: Prompt distribution learning for efficient and effective fine-tuning of pre-trained models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12434, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  56. [72]

    Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp,

    N. Houlsby, A. Giurgiu, S. Jastrzebski, B. Morrone, Q. de Laroussilhe, A. Gesmundo, M. Attariyan, and S. Gelly, “Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00751, 2019

    1902 arXiv

  57. [73]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,

    E. Hu, Y . Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y . Li, L. Wang, and W. Chen, “Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  58. [74]

    Adapterfusion: Non-destructive task composition for transfer learn- ing,

    J. Pfeiffer, A. Rckl, A. Kamath, K. Cho, I. Gurevych, and S. Ruder, “Adapterfusion: Non-destructive task composition for transfer learn- ing,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00247, 2021

    2005 arXiv

  59. [75]

    Vl-adapter: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for vision-and-language tasks,

    W. Sung, J. Cho, and M. Bansal, “Vl-adapter: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for vision-and-language tasks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01558, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  60. [76]

    Clip-adapter: Better vision-language models with feature adapters,

    P. Gao, S. Geng, R. Zhang, T. Ma, R. Fang, Y . Zhang, H. Li, Y . Xu, X. Zhu, and J. Dai, “Clip-adapter: Better vision-language models with feature adapters,”International Journal of Computer Vision, 2021

    2021

  61. [77]

    Self-adapting large visual-language models to edge devices across visual modalities,

    K. Cai, Z. Duan, G. Liu, C. Fleming, and C. X. Lu, “Self-adapting large visual-language models to edge devices across visual modalities,”

  62. [78]

    Resource optimized network virtualization empowered metaverse for wireless networks,

    L. U. Khan, M. Guizani, C.-D. Wang, and D. Wu, “Resource optimized network virtualization empowered metaverse for wireless networks,” in ICC 2024-IEEE International Conference on Communications. IEEE, 2024, pp. 4251–4256

    2024

  63. [79]

    Survey on intelligence edge computing in 6g: characteristics, challenges, potential use cases, and market drivers,

    A. Al-Ansi, A. Al-Ansi, A. Muthanna, I. Elgendy, and A. Kouch- eryavy, “Survey on intelligence edge computing in 6g: characteristics, challenges, potential use cases, and market drivers,”Future Internet, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 118, 2021

    2021

  64. [80]

    Authentication in mobile cloud computing: a survey,

    M. Alizadeh, S. Abolfazli, M. Zamani, S. Baaaharun, and K. Sakurai, “Authentication in mobile cloud computing: a survey,”Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 61, pp. 59–80, 2016

    2016

  65. [81]

    Karthikeyan and M

    P. Karthikeyan and M. Thangavel,Applications of security, mobile, analytic and cloud (SMAC) technologies for effective information processing and management. Springer, 2019

    2019

  66. [82]

    Edge cloud computing technologies for internet of things: a primer,

    T. Shiyun, “Edge cloud computing technologies for internet of things: a primer,”IEEE Access, 2021

    2021

  67. [83]

    Sdn enhanced multi-access edge computing (mec) for e2e mobility and qos management,

    S. Shah, M. Gregory, S. Li, and R. Fontes, “Sdn enhanced multi-access edge computing (mec) for e2e mobility and qos management,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 77 459–77 469, 2020

    2020

  68. [84]

    Edge computing security: state of the art and challenges,

    Y . Xiao, Y . Jia, C. Liu, X. Cheng, J. Yu, and W. Lv, “Edge computing security: state of the art and challenges,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1608–1631, 2019

    2019

  69. [85]

    Efficient prompting for llm-based generative internet of things,

    B. Xiao, B. Kantarci, J. Kang, D. Niyato, and M. Guizani, “Efficient prompting for llm-based generative internet of things,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10382, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2406.10382

    2024 arXiv

  70. [86]

    Llmind: Orchestrating ai and iot with llm for complex task execution,

    H. Cui, Y . Du, Q. Yang, Y . Shao, and S. C. Liew, “Llmind: Orchestrating ai and iot with llm for complex task execution,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09007, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2312.09007

    2024 arXiv

  71. [87]

    Self-adapting large visual-language models to edge devices across visual modalities,

    K. Cai, Z. Duan, G. Liu, C. Fleming, and C. X. Lu, “Self-adapting large visual-language models to edge devices across visual modalities,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04908, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  72. [88]

    Minivlm: A smaller and faster vision-language model,

    J. Wang, X. Hu, P. Zhang, X. Li, L. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Gao, and Z. Liu, “Minivlm: A smaller and faster vision-language model,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.06946, 2020

    2012 arXiv

  73. [89]

    Lightvlp: A lightweight vision-language pre-training via gated interactive masked autoencoders,

    Y . Xu, L. Wang, J. Chen, J. Wang, P. Zhang, and Z. Liu, “Lightvlp: A lightweight vision-language pre-training via gated interactive masked autoencoders,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023

    2023

  74. [90]

    Tiny vlms bring ai text plus image vision to the edge,

    Anonymous, “Tiny vlms bring ai text plus image vision to the edge,” TechHQ, 2024, https://techhq.com

    2024

  75. [91]

    Vila: On pre-training for visual language models,

    J. Lin, H. Yin, W. Ping, Y . Lu, P. Molchanov, A. Tao, H. Mao, J. Kautz, M. Shoeybi, and S. Han, “Vila: On pre-training for visual language models,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07533

    2024 arXiv

  76. [92]

    Edge-llm: Enabling efficient large language model adaptation on edge devices,

    Z. Yu, Z. Wang, Y . Li, H. You, R. Gao, X. Zhou, S. R. Bommu, Y . K. Zhao, and Y . C. Lin, “Edge-llm: Enabling efficient large language model adaptation on edge devices,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15758, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  77. [93]

    Patch slimming for efficient vision transformers,

    Y . Tang, K. Han, Y . Wang, C. Xu, J. Guo, C. Xu, and D. Tao, “Patch slimming for efficient vision transformers,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02852

    2022 arXiv

  78. [94]

    Data selection for efficient model update in federated learning,

    L. Shi and V . Radu, “Data selection for efficient model update in federated learning,”arXiv preprint, vol. arXiv:2111.03512, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03512

    2021 arXiv

  79. [95]

    A systematic literature review on the use of federated learning and bioinspired computing,

    R. M. de Souza, A. Holm, M. Biczyk, and L. N. de Castro, “A systematic literature review on the use of federated learning and bioinspired computing,”Electronics, vol. 13, no. 16, p. 3157, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/13/16/3157

    2024

  80. [96]

    Enhancing edge-assisted federated learning with asynchronous aggregation and cluster pairing,

    X. Sha, W. Sun, X. Liu, Y . Luo, and C. Luo, “Enhancing edge-assisted federated learning with asynchronous aggregation and cluster pairing,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2135, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/13/11/2135

    2024

  81. [97]

    A multi-dimensional reverse auction mechanism for volatile federated learning in the mobile edge computing systems,

    Y . Hong, Z. Zheng, and Z. Wang, “A multi-dimensional reverse auction mechanism for volatile federated learning in the mobile edge computing systems,”Electronics, vol. 13, no. 16, p. 3154, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/13/16/3154

    2024

  82. [98]

    Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications,

    A. G. Howard, M. Zhu, B. Chen, D. Kalenichenko, W. Wang, T. Weyand, M. Andreetto, and H. Adam, “Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications,” arXiv preprint, vol. arXiv:1704.04861, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861

    2017 arXiv

  83. [99]

    Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks,

    M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, and L.-C. Chen, “Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018, pp. 4510–4520. [Online]. Avail- able: https://openaccess.thecvf...

    2018

  84. [100]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770–778. [Online]. Available: https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content cvpr 2016/ html/He Deep Re...

    2016

  85. [101]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), 2019, pp. 4171–41...

    2019

  86. [102]

    Quantization and training of neural networks for efficient integer-arithmetic-only inference,

    B. Jacob, S. Kligys, B. Chen, M. Zhu, M. Tang, A. Howard, H. Adam, and D. Kalenichenko, “Quantization and training of neural networks for efficient integer-arithmetic-only inference,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018,...

    2018

  87. [103]

    Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding,

    S. Han, H. Mao, and W. J. Dally, “Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00149

    2016 arXiv

  88. [104]

    Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,

    G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean, “Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,”arXiv preprint, vol. arXiv:1503.02531, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02531

    2015 arXiv

  89. [105]

    Neural architecture search: A survey,

    T. Elsken, J. H. Metzen, and F. Hutter, “Neural architecture search: A survey,”Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 20, no. 55, pp. 1–21, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume20/ 18-598/18-598.pdf

    2019

  90. [106]

    Large batch training of convolutional networks,

    Y . You, I. Gitman, and B. Ginsburg, “Large batch training of convolutional networks,”arXiv preprint, vol. arXiv:1708.03888, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03888

    2017 arXiv

  91. [107]

    Expanding the reach of federated learning by reducing client resource requirements,

    S. Caldas, J. Konen, H. B. McMahan, and A. Talwalkar, “Expanding the reach of federated learning by reducing client resource requirements,”arXiv preprint, vol. arXiv:1812.07210, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07210

    2018 arXiv

  92. [108]

    Comprehensive survey of model compression and speed up for vision transformers,

    F. Chen, Z. Luo, L. Zhou, X. Pan, and Y . Jiang, “Comprehensive survey of model compression and speed up for vision transformers,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10407, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  93. [109]

    Structured pruning learns compact and accurate models,

    M. Xia, Z. Zhong, and D. Chen, “Structured pruning learns compact and accurate models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.00408, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  94. [110]

    Combining compressions for multiplicative size scaling on natural language tasks,

    R. Movva, J. Lei, S. Longpre, A. Gupta, and C. DuBois, “Combining compressions for multiplicative size scaling on natural language tasks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.09684, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  95. [111]

    Dq-bart: Efficient sequence-to-sequence model via joint distillation and quantization,

    Z. Li, Z. Wang, M. Tan, R. Nallapati, P. Bhatia, A. Arnold, B. Xiang, and D. Roth, “Dq-bart: Efficient sequence-to-sequence model via joint distillation and quantization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11239, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  96. [112]

    Advances and open problems in federated learning,

    P. Kairouz, H. B. McMahan, B. Avent, A. Bellet, M. Bennis, A. N. Bhagojiet al., “Advances and open problems in federated learning,” arXiv preprint, vol. arXiv:1912.04977, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04977

    1912 arXiv

  97. [113]

    Federated machine learning: Concept and applications,

    Q. Yang, Y . Liu, T. Chen, and Y . Tong, “Federated machine learning: Concept and applications,”ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3298981

    2019 doi

  98. [114]

    Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,

    H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” inProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 2017, pp. 1273–1282. [Online]...

    2017

  99. [115]

    Robust and communication- efficient federated learning from non-iid data,

    F. Sattler, K.-R. Mller, and W. Samek, “Robust and communication- efficient federated learning from non-iid data,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 3400– 3413, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 8889996

    2019

  100. [116]

    Federated multi-task learning,

    V . Smith, C.-K. Chiang, M. Sanjabi, and A. Talwalkar, “Federated multi-task learning,” inProceedings of the 31st International Confer- ence on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 4427–4437. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/ 2017...

    2017

  101. [117]

    Bayesian nonparametric federated learning of neural networks,

    M. Yurochkin, M. Agarwal, S. Ghosh, K. Greenewald, N. Hoang, and Y . Khazaeni, “Bayesian nonparametric federated learning of neural networks,” inProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2019, pp. 7252–7261. [Online]. Available: https://proce...

    2019

  102. [118]

    Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence,

    J. Konen, H. B. McMahan, F. X. Yu, P. Richtrik, A. T. Suresh, and D. Bacon, “Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence,”arXiv preprint, vol. arXiv:1610.02527, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02527

    2016 arXiv

  103. [119]

    Ldp-fl: Practical private aggregation in federated learning with local differential privacy,

    S. Truex, L. Liu, M. E. Gursoy, L. Yu, and W. Wei, “Ldp-fl: Practical private aggregation in federated learning with local differential privacy,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.13129, 2020

    2005 arXiv

  104. [120]

    Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning,

    K. Bonawitzet al., “Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning,” inProceedings of the ACM on International Con- ference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2017

    2017

  105. [121]

    Openfhe: Open-source fully homomorphic encryption library,

    O. D. Team, “Openfhe: Open-source fully homomorphic encryption library,” https://github.com/openfheorg/openfhe-development, 2022

    2022

  106. [122]

    Towards edge- based federated learning: A systematic survey,

    X. Yao, Z. Wang, Y . Zhang, and Y . Zhang, “Towards edge- based federated learning: A systematic survey,”IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1751–1771, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9685161

    2022

  107. [123]

    Edge-based continual learning: Achieving privacy-preserving, fast, and accurate model adaptation,

    Z. Wang, X. Yao, Y . Zhang, and Y . Zhang, “Edge-based continual learning: Achieving privacy-preserving, fast, and accurate model adaptation,”IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 247–253, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9490544

    2021

  108. [124]

    Federated meta-learning: Concept and applications,

    T. Li, A. K. Sahu, A. Talwalkar, and V . Smith, “Federated meta-learning: Concept and applications,” inProceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021, pp. 10 132–10 142. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips...

    2021

  109. [125]

    Federated evaluation: A unified framework for privacy-preserving model evaluation,

    J. Xu, S. Zhou, and S. Zhao, “Federated evaluation: A unified framework for privacy-preserving model evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1457–1469, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9336284

    2022

  110. [126]

    Federated hyperparameter tuning with bayesian optimization,

    H. Zhang, X. Liu, Z. Jiang, and J. Ren, “Federated hyperparameter tuning with bayesian optimization,”IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 5234–5245, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9340104

    2021

  111. [127]

    Continuous federated learning with dynamic client participation,

    J. Liu, X. Chen, H. Zhao, and Z. Wang, “Continuous federated learning with dynamic client participation,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 312–325, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9565234

    2024

  112. [128]

    Sparse federated learning: Reducing communication overhead for edge computing,

    H. Zhang, Y . Liu, and J. Ren, “Sparse federated learning: Reducing communication overhead for edge computing,”IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 478–490, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9618745

    2024

  113. [129]

    Orchestrated edge deployment for federated learning in heterogeneous environments,

    X. Wang, J. Xu, and X. Chen, “Orchestrated edge deployment for federated learning in heterogeneous environments,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 112–126, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9654782

    2024

  114. [130]

    Adaptive federated learning in resource-constrained environments,

    T. Chen, Q. Yang, and Y . Liu, “Adaptive federated learning in resource-constrained environments,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2789–2801, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9687123

    2024

  115. [131]

    Kubefl: A kubernetes-based federated learning framework for scalable edge computing,

    J. Xu, W. Li, and H. Wang, “Kubefl: A kubernetes-based federated learning framework for scalable edge computing,”Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 167, pp. 12–22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0743731523000024

    2023

  116. [132]

    Federated continual learning: Advances and challenges,

    X. Yao, Y . Zhang, and Z. Wang, “Federated continual learning: Advances and challenges,”IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 324–335, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9647563

    2024

  117. [133]

    Reinforcement learning in federated learning systems: A survey,

    X. Zhu, J. Ren, and H. Zhang, “Reinforcement learning in federated learning systems: A survey,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 1123– 1145, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 9658793

    2024

  118. [134]

    A joint communication and learning framework for hierarchical split federated learning,

    L. U. Khan, M. Guizani, A. Al-Fuqaha, C. S. Hong, D. Niyato, and Z. Han, “A joint communication and learning framework for hierarchical split federated learning,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023

    2023

  119. [135]

    Vision-language pre-training: Basics, recent advances, and future trends,

    Z. Gan, L. Li, C. Li, L. Wang, Z. Liu, and J. Gao, “Vision-language pre-training: Basics, recent advances, and future trends,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09263

    2022 arXiv

  120. [137]

    Vilmedic: a framework for research at the intersection of vision and language in medical ai,

    J.-B. Delbrouck, K. K. Saab, and M. Varma, “Vilmedic: a framework for research at the intersection of vision and language in medical ai,”Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 23–34, 2022

    2022

  121. [138]

    Medblip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training from 3d medical images and texts,

    Q. Chen, X. Hu, Z. Wang, and Y . Hong, “Medblip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training from 3d medical images and texts,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2305.10799, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  122. [139]

    Lightweight transfer learning models for ultrasound-guided classifica- tion of covid-19 patients,

    M. E. Karar, O. Reyad, M. Abd-elnaby, A. AbdelAty, and M. Shouman, “Lightweight transfer learning models for ultrasound-guided classifica- tion of covid-19 patients,”Computers, Materials & Continua, 2021

    2021

  123. [140]

    Customizing general- purpose foundation models for medical report generation,

    B. Yang, A. Raza, Y . Zou, and T. Zhang, “Customizing general- purpose foundation models for medical report generation,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2306.05642, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  124. [141]

    Geollava: Efficient fine-tuned vision-language models for temporal change detection in remote sensing,

    H. Elgendy, A. Sharshar, A. Aboeitta, Y . Ashraf, and M. Guizani, “Geollava: Efficient fine-tuned vision-language models for temporal change detection in remote sensing,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19552

    2025 arXiv

  125. [142]

    Satin: A multi-task metadataset for classifying satellite imagery using vision-language models,

    J. Roberts, K. Han, and S. Albanie, “Satin: A multi-task metadataset for classifying satellite imagery using vision-language models,”ArXiv, 2023

    2023

  126. [143]

    Aerialvln: Vision-and-language navigation for uavs,

    S. Liu, H. Zhang, Y . Qi, P. Wang, Y . Zhang, and Q. Wu, “Aerialvln: Vision-and-language navigation for uavs,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2308.06735, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  127. [144]

    Changeclip: Remote sensing change detection with multimodal vision-language representation learning,

    S. Dong, L. Wang, B. Du, and X. Meng, “Changeclip: Remote sensing change detection with multimodal vision-language representation learning,”ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 208, pp. 53–69, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www. sciencedirect.com/scienc...

    2024

  128. [145]

    Bi-modal transformer-based approach for visual question answering in remote sensing imagery,

    Y . Bazi, M. M. A. Rahhal, M. L. Mekhalfi, M. Zuair, and F. Melgani, “Bi-modal transformer-based approach for visual question answering in remote sensing imagery,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–11, 2022

    2022

  129. [146]

    Vision language models in autonomous driving and intelligent transportation systems,

    X. Zhou, M. Liu, B. L. agar, E. Yurtsever, and A. C. Knoll, “Vision language models in autonomous driving and intelligent transportation systems,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2310.14414, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  130. [147]

    Language prompt for autonomous driving,

    D. Wu, W. Han, T. Wang, Y .-H. Liu, X. Zhang, and J. Shen, “Language prompt for autonomous driving,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2309.04379, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  131. [148]

    Detecting and learning city intersection traffic contexts for autonomous vehicles,

    J. Gao, D. Wang, C.-P. Lin, C. Luo, Y . Ruan, and M. Yuan, “Detecting and learning city intersection traffic contexts for autonomous vehicles,” Journal of Smart Cities and Society, 2022

    2022

  132. [149]

    Crisscross- global vision transformers model for very high resolution aerial image semantic segmentation,

    G. Deng, Z. Wu, M. Xu, C. Wang, Z. Wang, and Z. Lu, “Crisscross- global vision transformers model for very high resolution aerial image semantic segmentation,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1–19, 2023

    2023

  133. [150]

    Tracking urban heartbeat and policy compliance through vision and language- based sensing,

    T. Chowdhury, Q. Ding, I. Mandel, W. Ju, and J. Ortiz, “Tracking urban heartbeat and policy compliance through vision and language- based sensing,”Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, 2021

    2021

  134. [151]

    Vision-language models in remote sensing: Current progress and future trends,

    C. Wen, Y . Hu, X. Li, Z. Yuan, and X. X. Zhu, “Vision-language models in remote sensing: Current progress and future trends,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2305.05726, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  135. [152]

    Vision-language models as success detectors,

    Y . Du, K. Konyushkova, M. Denil, A. Raju, J. Landon, F. Hill, N. de Freitas, and S. Cabi, “Vision-language models as success detectors,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2303.07280, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  136. [153]

    Improving vision-and-language navigation by generating future-view image semantics,

    J. Li and M. Bansal, “Improving vision-and-language navigation by generating future-view image semantics,”2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 10 803– 10 812, 2023

    2023

  137. [154]

    Tiny vlms bring ai text plus image vision to the edge,

    TechHQ, “Tiny vlms bring ai text plus image vision to the edge,” https://techhq.com/tiny-vlm-trends-2024, 2024

    2024

  138. [155]

    Self-adapting large visual-language models to edge devices across visual modalities,

    K. Cai, Z. Duan, G. Liu, C. Fleming, and C. X. Lu, “Self-adapting large visual-language models to edge devices across visual modalities,” ECCV 2024, 2024

    2024

  139. [156]

    Moondream2: A tiny vision-language model for edge devices,

    K. Vikhyat, “Moondream2: A tiny vision-language model for edge devices,” https://github.com/vikhyatk/moondream2, 2024

    2024

  140. [157]

    A survey on the integration and optimization of large language models in edge computing envi- ronments,

    S. Bhardwaj, P. Singh, and M. K. Pandit, “A survey on the integration and optimization of large language models in edge computing envi- ronments,” in2024 16th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE), 2024, pp. 168–172

    2024

  141. [158]

    Visual language intelligence and edge ai 2.0,

    Y . J. Lu, H. D. Yin, J. Lin, D. Franklin, H. Tang, S. Yang, C. Su, and S. Han, “Visual language intelligence and edge ai 2.0,”NVIDIA Technical Blog, 2024

    2024

  142. [159]

    Mobile edge intelligence for large language models: A contemporary survey,

    G. Qu, Q. Chen, W. Wei, Z. Lin, X. Chen, and K. Huang, “Mobile edge intelligence for large language models: A contemporary survey,” TechRxiv, 2024

    2024

  143. [160]

    Pushing large language models to the 6g edge: Vision, challenges, and oppor- tunities,

    Z. Lin, G. Qu, Q. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Chen, and K. Huang, “Pushing large language models to the 6g edge: Vision, challenges, and oppor- tunities,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16739, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  144. [161]

    Generative inference of large language models in edge computing: An energy efficient approach,

    X. Yuan, H. Li, K. Ota, and M. Dong, “Generative inference of large language models in edge computing: An energy efficient approach,” in 2024 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), 2024, pp. 244–249

    2024

  145. [162]

    Mobile edge intelligence for large language models: A contemporary survey,

    G. Qu, Q. Chen, W. Wei, Z. Lin, X. Chen, and K. Huang, “Mobile edge intelligence for large language models: A contemporary survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18921, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  146. [163]

    Towards edge general intelligence via large language models: Opportunities and challenges,

    H. Chen, W. Deng, S. Yang, J. Xu, Z. Jiang, E. C. H. Ngai, J. Liu, and X. Liu, “Towards edge general intelligence via large language models: Opportunities and challenges,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18125

    2024 arXiv

  147. [164]

    Vision transformer models for mobile/edge devices: A survey,

    S. I. Lee, K. Koo, J. H. Lee, G. Lee, S. Jeong, S. Oh, and H. Kim, “Vision transformer models for mobile/edge devices: A survey,”Mul- timedia Systems, 2024

    2024

  148. [165]

    Dime-fm: Distilling multimodal and efficient foundation models,

    X. Sun, P. Zhang, P. Zhang, H. Shah, K. Saenko, and X. Xia, “Dime-fm: Distilling multimodal and efficient foundation models,”

  149. [166]

    Edgevl: Self-adapting large visual-language models to edge devices,

    Ramdrop, “Edgevl: Self-adapting large visual-language models to edge devices,” https://github.com/ramdrop/edgevl, 2024

    2024

  150. [167]

    Adapting vision-language models for edge devices,

    S. Science, “Adapting vision-language models for edge devices,” https: //simplescience.ai/vlm-edge-adaptation, 2024

    2024

  151. [169]

    Efficient multimodal large language models: A survey,

    Y . Jin, J. Liet al., “Efficient multimodal large language models: A survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10739, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/html/2405.10739v1

    2024

  152. [171]

    Mixture of experts made personalized: Federated prompt learn- ing for vision-language models,

    ——, “Mixture of experts made personalized: Federated prompt learn- ing for vision-language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10114, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  153. [172]

    Flora: Enhancing vision- language models with parameter-efficient federated learning,

    D. P. Nguyen, J. P. Munoz, and A. Jannesari, “Flora: Enhancing vision- language models with parameter-efficient federated learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15182, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  154. [173]

    Federated learning from vision- language foundation models,

    B. Pan, W. Huang, and Y . Shi, “Federated learning from vision- language foundation models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19610, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  155. [174]

    To- wards multi-modal transformers in federated learning,

    G. Sun, M. Mendieta, A. Dutta, X. Li, and C. Chen, “To- wards multi-modal transformers in federated learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12467, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  156. [175]

    Multi-frame, lightweight & efficient vision-language models for question answering in autonomous driving,

    A. Gopalkrishnan, R. Greer, and M. Trivedi, “Multi-frame, lightweight & efficient vision-language models for question answering in autonomous driving,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2403.19838

    2024 arXiv

  157. [176]

    Litevila: A lightweight vision- language model for scene understanding in autonomous driving,

    Y . Cheng, M.-H. Chen, and S.-H. Lai, “Litevila: A lightweight vision- language model for scene understanding in autonomous driving,” ECCV 2024 Workshop W-CODA, 2024

    2024

  158. [177]

    Semantic scene understanding with large language models on unmanned aerial vehicles,

    J. de Curt, I. de Zarz, and C. Calafate, “Semantic scene understanding with large language models on unmanned aerial vehicles,”Drones, vol. 7, p. 114, 02 2023

    2023

  159. [178]

    Edge-assisted object segmentation using multimodal feature fusion,

    Y . Liu, X. Wanget al., “Edge-assisted object segmentation using multimodal feature fusion,”ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3612922

    2023 doi

  160. [179]

    Dynafuse: Dynamic fusion for resource efficient multi-modal machine learning inference,

    H. Alikhani, A. Kanduriet al., “Dynafuse: Dynamic fusion for resource efficient multi-modal machine learning inference,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15333, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/374181098 DynaFuse Dynamic Fusion for Resource Efficien...

    2023 arXiv

  161. [180]

    Few-shot learning with multimodal fusion for efficient cloudedge collaborative mmwave beam selection,

    Y . Zhang, J. Li, Q. Wanget al., “Few-shot learning with multimodal fusion for efficient cloudedge collaborative mmwave beam selection,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 804, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/4/804

    2025

  162. [181]

    Unraveling cross-modality knowledge conflicts in large vision-language models,

    T. Zhuet al., “Unraveling cross-modality knowledge conflicts in large vision-language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03659, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  163. [182]

    Visual prompt multi-modal tracking,

    Y . Cheng, M.-H. Chen, and S.-H. Lai, “Visual prompt multi-modal tracking,” inProceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024

    2024

  164. [183]

    Cross-modality fusion for depth prediction via rgb and thermal data,

    S. Tianet al., “Cross-modality fusion for depth prediction via rgb and thermal data,”IEEE Xplore, 2023

    2023

  165. [184]

    Beyond gradients: Exploiting adversarial priors in model inversion attacks,

    D. Usynin, D. Rueckert, and G. Kaissis, “Beyond gradients: Exploiting adversarial priors in model inversion attacks,”ArXiv, 2022

    2022

  166. [185]

    Boosting model inversion attacks with adversarial examples,

    S. Zhou, T. Zhu, D. Ye, X. Yu, and W. Zhou, “Boosting model inversion attacks with adversarial examples,”ArXiv, 2023

    2023

  167. [186]

    Towards adversarial attack on vision- language pre-training models,

    J. Zhang, Q. Yi, and J. Sang, “Towards adversarial attack on vision- language pre-training models,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM Inter- national Conference on Multimedia, 2022

    2022

  168. [187]

    Defending against model inversion attack by adversarial examples,

    J. Wen, S. Yiu, and L. Hui, “Defending against model inversion attack by adversarial examples,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR), 2021, pp. 551–556

    2021

  169. [188]

    A formal model for secure multiparty computation,

    A. Rathore, M. Blanton, M. Gaboardi, and L. Ziarek, “A formal model for secure multiparty computation,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00308

    2023 arXiv

  170. [189]

    Set-level guidance attack: Boosting adversarial transferability of vision-language pre-training models,

    D. Lu, Z. Wang, T. Wang, W. Guan, H. Gao, and F. Zheng, “Set-level guidance attack: Boosting adversarial transferability of vision-language pre-training models,”ArXiv, 2023

    2023

  171. [190]

    Privacy-preserving federated learning using homomorphic encryption,

    J. Park and H.-K. Lim, “Privacy-preserving federated learning using homomorphic encryption,”Applied Sciences, 2022

    2022

  172. [191]

    Privacy-preserving federated learning using homomorphic en- cryption,

    ——, “Privacy-preserving federated learning using homomorphic en- cryption,”Applied Sciences, vol. 12, p. 734, 2022

    2022

  173. [192]

    Privacy preserving machine learning with homomorphic encryption and federated learning,

    H. Fang and Q. Qian, “Privacy preserving machine learning with homomorphic encryption and federated learning,”Future Internet, vol. 13, p. 94, 2021

    2021

  174. [193]

    Privacy enhanced federated learning via privacy masks and additive homomorphic encryption,

    C. Shen and W. Zhang, “Privacy enhanced federated learning via privacy masks and additive homomorphic encryption,” in2023 Inter- national Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA), 2023, pp. 471–478

    2023

  175. [194]

    Secure federated learning with a homomorphic encryption model,

    N. Hussien, S. A. Salman, and M. Aljanabi, “Secure federated learning with a homomorphic encryption model,”International Journal Papier Advance and Scientific Review, 2023

    2023

  176. [195]

    Privacy-preserving federated learning using homomorphic encryption with different encryption keys,

    J. Park, N. Y . Yu, and H. Lim, “Privacy-preserving federated learning using homomorphic encryption with different encryption keys,” in2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 2022, pp. 1869–1871

    2022

  177. [196]

    Privacypreserving federated learning based on multikey homomorphic encryption,

    J. Ma, S.-A. Naas, S. Sigg, and X. Lyu, “Privacypreserving federated learning based on multikey homomorphic encryption,”International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 37, pp. 5880–5901, 2021

    2021

  178. [197]

    A homomorphic signcryption-based privacy preserving federated learning framework for iots,

    W. Du, M. Li, Y . Han, X. A. Wang, and Z. Wei, “A homomorphic signcryption-based privacy preserving federated learning framework for iots,”Security and Communication Networks, 2022

    2022

  179. [198]

    Com- bining homomorphic encryption and differential privacy in federated learning,

    A. G. Sbert, M. Checri, O. Stan, R. Sirdey, and C. Gouy-Pailler, “Com- bining homomorphic encryption and differential privacy in federated learning,” in2023 20th Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), 2023, pp. 1–7

    2023

  180. [199]

    Memory optimization at edge for distributed convolution neural network,

    S. Naveen and M. R. Kounte, “Memory optimization at edge for distributed convolution neural network,”Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2022

    2022

  181. [200]

    Declarative data serving: The future of machine learning inference on the edge,

    T. Shaowang, N. Jain, D. Matthews, and S. Krishnan, “Declarative data serving: The future of machine learning inference on the edge,”Proc. VLDB Endow., vol. 14, pp. 2555–2562, 2021

    2021

  182. [201]

    Energy-efficient task adaptation for nlp edge inference leveraging heterogeneous memory architectures,

    Z. Fu, A. Avaliani, and M. Donato, “Energy-efficient task adaptation for nlp edge inference leveraging heterogeneous memory architectures,” ArXiv, 2023

    2023

  183. [202]

    Pipeline parallelism for inference on heterogeneous edge computing,

    Y . Hu, C. Imes, X. Zhao, S. Kundu, P. Beerel, S. Crago, and J. Walters, “Pipeline parallelism for inference on heterogeneous edge computing,” ArXiv, 2021

    2021

  184. [203]

    Devit: Decomposing vision transformers for collaborative inference in edge devices,

    G. Xu, Z. Hao, Y . Luo, H. Hu, J. An, and S. Mao, “Devit: Decomposing vision transformers for collaborative inference in edge devices,”ArXiv, 2023

    2023

  185. [204]

    Search-time efficient device constraints-aware neural architecture search,

    O. Dutta, T. Kanvar, and S. Agarwal, “Search-time efficient device constraints-aware neural architecture search,”ArXiv, 2023. Ahmed Sharsharis currently pursuing a PhD in Computer Vision at Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (MBZUAI) in Abu Dhabi, UAE. He ...

    2023

  186. [2023]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18232

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18232

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.