REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning from Pseudo-Randomness With an Artificial Neural Network - Does God Play Pseudo-Dice?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Learning from Pseudo-Randomness With an Artificial Neural Network - Does God Play Pseudo-Dice?
read the original abstract
Inspired by the fact that the neural network, as the mainstream for machine learning, has brought successes in many application areas, here we propose to use this approach for decoding hidden correlation among pseudo-random data and predicting events accordingly. With a simple neural network structure and a typical training procedure, we demonstrate the learning and prediction power of the neural network in extremely random environment. Finally, we postulate that the high sensitivity and efficiency of the neural network may allow to critically test if there could be any fundamental difference between quantum randomness and pseudo randomness, which is equivalent to the question: Does God play dice?
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Pseudorandom Streams within Diffusion Models Act as Learnable Inputs That Affect Generation Quality
A diffusion model's training loss and output quality depend measurably on which pseudorandom orbit supplies its randomness, even after marginal-statistics control.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.