pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15553 · v2 · pith:CQZWR56Tnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 💻 cs.NI · cs.AI· cs.ET

Operator-Controlled 6G: From Connectivity Infrastructure to Guaranteed Digital Services

David Soldani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI cs.AIcs.ET
keywords 6G networksoperator controlOpen RANcloud-native architectureguaranteed digital servicesControl CompactGuarantee EconomyRakuten Mobile
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rakuten Mobile's cloud-native Open RAN deployment shows operator-controlled 6G can deliver guaranteed digital services.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that five generations of vendor-led networks have left operators without ownership or control, and that 6G must reverse this by placing operator control, customer outcomes, business models, and operations ahead of technology choices. It introduces the 6G Control Compact to classify network components into own, federate, and consume layers based on strategic value, along with the Guarantee Economy to price services according to five tiers of enforceable outcomes. Operational results from Rakuten Mobile, which achieved full-year EBITDA profitability through a fully cloud-native and Open RAN architecture, serve as the grounding evidence. A three-phase roadmap from 2025 to 2032 and stakeholder calls to action aim to turn these ideas into commitments aligned with existing standards. If the central claim holds, 6G shifts from connectivity infrastructure to a platform for monetizable, operator-enforced digital services.

Core claim

The central claim is that Rakuten Mobile's national-scale, fully cloud-native, fully Open RAN deployment, which reached full-year EBITDA profitability in FY2025, demonstrates the feasibility of operator-controlled 6G. This feasibility rests on reordering priorities to Control First, Customer First, Business First, Operations First, and Technology Last. The 6G Control Compact supplies a three-layer ownership taxonomy that allocates architectural sovereignty according to strategic value, while the Guarantee Economy supplies a five-tier outcome-priced commercial model that converts operator control into enforceable service-level objectives.

What carries the argument

The 6G Control Compact, a three-layer ownership taxonomy of own, federate, and consume that allocates control over network elements according to their strategic value to the operator.

Load-bearing premise

The operational and financial results from Rakuten Mobile's single national-scale deployment can be transferred to operator-controlled 6G architectures in other markets and regulatory environments.

What would settle it

A second large operator in a different regulatory market adopting similar cloud-native Open RAN principles but failing to achieve comparable profitability or full architectural control by 2028 would undermine the claim of general feasibility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15553 by David Soldani.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Five-axis priority reordering; Technology Last is a sequencing principle, not a downgrade [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Operator revenue potential rises as vendor control falls; Phase 3 reverses two decades of disaggregation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Operator sovereignty is allocated by layer: control plane is owned, ecosystems are federated, hardware [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Six families map to ITU-R IMT-2030 usage scenarios; Sovereign Trust is a cross-cutting governance dimension. Sovereign Trust addresses the growing recognition – accelerated by geopolitical disruption, supply-chain scrutiny, and high-profile cyberattacks on critical national infrastructure – that connectivity infrastructure must be trustworthy by design, not by assertion. The migration to post-quantum crypt… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Primary = headline outcome; Secondary = supporting outcome; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The three engines reinforce each other; cumulative ARPU uplift accrues only when all three are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Five tiers anchor outcome-priced commercial models. The five-tier anchor outcome-priced commercial models are depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Six layers of open, eBPF-instrumented, Kubernetes-orchestrated infrastructure replace proprietary middleware. As NGMN articulates [23], "by mapping cloud-native maturity stages to AI readiness, operators can systematically plan their transition toward autonomous, intelligent network management" – a roadmap that requires simultaneous investment in cloud-native infrastructure, MLOps tooling, and the organiza… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Four-stage Intent → Observe → Decide → Act loop; Network Digital Twin validates actions before they are executed in the live network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Cloud-native disaggregation extended to the full stack; AI substrate on top, transport at the bottom, three-tier intelligence between. The first structural characteristic is the convergence of RAN and AI compute on shared, cloud￾native infrastructure. In the AI-RAN architecture defined by the AI-RAN Alliance [11], the RAN functions – DU, CU, and RU – are co-hosted with AI inference workloads on the same a… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Convergence of RAN and AI workloads on one accelerated cloud [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: From AI-augmented blocks to fully learned end-to-end transmit-receive chains over a decade-long standards trajectory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Three-tier intelligence: Non-RT RIC (s–min) · Near-RT RIC (10 ms–1 s) · dApps (< 10 ms) co-located on DU/CU infrastructure. This hierarchical decomposition maps precisely onto the outcome requirements of Section II: the Mission-Critical Determinism outcome family requires the sub-10ms control that only dApps can deliver; the Sensing outcome family requires the direct user-plane data access that the E3 int… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Layered spectrum: sub-6 GHz coverage + ISAC, FR3 7–24 GHz upper-mid for 6G capacity, mmWave for hotspots, sub-THz for extreme research. The ITU-R TPR positioning accuracy targets of 0.75 meters in indoor factory environments and 6 meters in urban macro deployments are achievable through wideband signal processing in these bands. Rakuten Mobile’s nationwide deployment in Japan, built primarily on sub-6 GHz… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Three ETSI ZSM 017 [27] mechanisms span every Monitor → Analyze → Decide → Execute stage; PQC underpins the trust foundation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The pyramid integrates component-, system- and service-level metrics; ITU-R TPR makes energy efficiency a formal compliance criterion. The nGRG RS02 report [17] identifies AI/ML-driven O-DU consolidation – dynamically remapping O-RU traffic to fewer active processing units during low-demand periods – as a mechanism delivering measurable energy reductions at the RAN layer that scale in proportion to the de… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Three phases align infrastructure investment, standards milestones and commercial launches; the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Hub-and-spoke: 6G platform is the integration substrate; each stakeholder holds a specific, time-bound call to action. 6G Platform Operator-Owned Open · Cloud-native · Agentic Operators Adopt Control Compact · own AI substrate · CNCF AI Conformance · CNTi CNF in 6G procurement Vendors Compete on perf & openness · publish xApp/dApp SDKs · contribute to O-RAN SC, OAI, ONAP Hyperscalers Partner via CAMARA / … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sixth-generation mobile networks (6G) are approaching a structural inflection point. Five generations of vendor-led architectures have left operators procuring and operating networks they do not own, on platforms they cannot modify, with AI layers they cannot audit. This paper argues that 6G must reverse this trajectory by reordering operator priorities: Control First, Customer First, Business First, Operations First, and Technology Last. Technology should serve operator control, customer outcomes, monetizable guarantees, and software-driven operations, not dictate them.Two contributions operationalize this thesis. The 6G Control Compact defines a three-layer ownership taxonomy--own, federate, and consume--that allocates architectural sovereignty according to strategic value. The Guarantee Economy defines a five-tier, outcome-priced commercial model that converts operator control into enforceable service-level objectives. The framework is grounded in operational evidence from Rakuten Mobile, the world's first national-scale, fully cloud-native, fully Open RAN deployment, which reached full-year EBITDA profitability in FY2025. It is aligned with the ITU-R IMT-2030 framework, 3GPP 6G use cases and service requirements, NGMN recommendations, ETSI standards, O-RAN Alliance and AI-RAN Alliance specifications, IOWN Global Forum sustainability metrics, Linux Foundation initiatives, and leading industry and academic programs. A three-phase roadmap covering 2025-2027, 2027-2029, and 2029-2032 and beyond, together with seven stakeholder-specific calls to action, translates the architecture into industry commitments. The central claim is that Rakuten Mobile's deployment demonstrates the feasibility of operator-controlled 6G. Decisions made during 2026-2028 will determine whether 6G becomes a platform for guaranteed digital services or another vendor-dependent infrastructure cycle.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper argues that 6G must prioritize operator control over vendor-led architectures by reversing the historical trajectory of five generations of networks. It introduces two main contributions: the 6G Control Compact, a three-layer ownership taxonomy (own, federate, consume) that allocates architectural sovereignty by strategic value, and the Guarantee Economy, a five-tier outcome-priced commercial model that converts control into enforceable service-level objectives. These are grounded in operational evidence from Rakuten Mobile's national-scale cloud-native Open RAN deployment, which achieved full-year EBITDA profitability in FY2025. The framework is aligned with ITU-R IMT-2030, 3GPP, NGMN, ETSI, O-RAN, and other bodies; a three-phase roadmap (2025-2032+) and seven stakeholder calls to action are provided. The central claim is that Rakuten Mobile demonstrates the feasibility of operator-controlled 6G, with 2026-2028 decisions determining whether 6G becomes a platform for guaranteed digital services or remains vendor-dependent.

Significance. If the transferability of the single-deployment evidence holds and the proposed taxonomies prove generalizable, the work could provide a useful framing for shifting 6G discussions toward operator sovereignty and outcome-based monetization. Explicit credit is due for the comprehensive alignment with existing standards bodies and the inclusion of a phased roadmap with stakeholder-specific actions, which could help translate conceptual priorities into industry commitments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Rakuten Mobile deployment evidence] Abstract and Rakuten Mobile grounding section: the central feasibility claim that Rakuten Mobile's cloud-native Open RAN deployment demonstrates operator-controlled 6G rests on a single national-scale example reaching EBITDA profitability in FY2025, yet provides no detailed metrics, error analysis, comparative baselines against alternative architectures, or sensitivity analysis for transferability to other regulatory, spectrum, or competitive environments.
  2. [6G Control Compact definition] 6G Control Compact section: the three-layer (own/federate/consume) taxonomy is presented as allocating sovereignty according to strategic value, but the manuscript does not include quantitative modeling or validation showing how this taxonomy would perform under varying legacy infrastructure or vendor lock-in levels, leaving the generalization from the Rakuten case untested.
  3. [Guarantee Economy definition] Guarantee Economy section: the five-tier outcome-priced model is defined to convert operator control into SLO-based guarantees, but no concrete pricing examples, validation data, or falsifiable predictions are supplied beyond the single Rakuten reference, making the commercial model's load-bearing role for the feasibility claim difficult to assess.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists alignments with multiple standards bodies but does not provide specific section mappings or excerpts showing how the Control Compact or Guarantee Economy directly satisfies particular ITU-R or 3GPP requirements.
  2. [Framework sections] Notation for the three-layer taxonomy and five-tier model could be clarified with a summary table or diagram to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the proposed terms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report, which highlights important areas for strengthening the manuscript's claims. We respond to each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be incorporated in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Rakuten Mobile deployment evidence] Abstract and Rakuten Mobile grounding section: the central feasibility claim that Rakuten Mobile's cloud-native Open RAN deployment demonstrates operator-controlled 6G rests on a single national-scale example reaching EBITDA profitability in FY2025, yet provides no detailed metrics, error analysis, comparative baselines against alternative architectures, or sensitivity analysis for transferability to other regulatory, spectrum, or competitive environments.

    Authors: The manuscript presents Rakuten Mobile as an existence proof of a national-scale, cloud-native Open RAN deployment that achieved full-year EBITDA profitability, rather than as a comprehensive empirical study with comparative baselines or sensitivity analysis. Public financial disclosures from Rakuten Mobile provide the basis for the profitability statement. We agree that the current presentation would benefit from greater transparency on scope and limitations. In revision, we will expand the grounding section with additional citations to Rakuten's technical and financial reports, add an explicit discussion of transferability considerations across regulatory and competitive contexts, and include a dedicated limitations subsection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [6G Control Compact definition] 6G Control Compact section: the three-layer (own/federate/consume) taxonomy is presented as allocating sovereignty according to strategic value, but the manuscript does not include quantitative modeling or validation showing how this taxonomy would perform under varying legacy infrastructure or vendor lock-in levels, leaving the generalization from the Rakuten case untested.

    Authors: The 6G Control Compact is offered as a conceptual ownership taxonomy derived from observed practices and aligned with existing standards bodies, not as a quantitative performance model requiring simulation under varying legacy conditions. Its role is to structure decision-making around strategic value rather than to predict outcomes numerically. We will revise the section to clarify this scope explicitly and add a forward-looking paragraph on potential empirical validation methods, while retaining the taxonomy as a framing contribution grounded in the Rakuten deployment. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Guarantee Economy definition] Guarantee Economy section: the five-tier outcome-priced model is defined to convert operator control into SLO-based guarantees, but no concrete pricing examples, validation data, or falsifiable predictions are supplied beyond the single Rakuten reference, making the commercial model's load-bearing role for the feasibility claim difficult to assess.

    Authors: The Guarantee Economy is proposed as a five-tier commercial framework that links operator control to enforceable SLOs, with the Rakuten deployment serving as the operational foundation rather than a source of specific pricing data. We acknowledge that the section would be strengthened by illustrative examples. In revision, we will incorporate hypothetical but grounded pricing structures drawn from current 5G outcome-based offerings and add a statement clarifying that operator-specific pricing implementations lie outside the scope of this position paper. revision: yes

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper introduces two new conceptual frameworks and relies on the representativeness of a single commercial deployment plus alignment with multiple standards bodies without providing independent verification of those alignments.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Rakuten Mobile results are representative of operator-controlled 6G feasibility across markets
    Invoked in the abstract as grounding evidence without comparative data or sensitivity analysis.
  • domain assumption Alignment with ITU-R IMT-2030, 3GPP, NGMN, ETSI, O-RAN, and other bodies validates the framework
    Stated as alignment in the abstract; no mapping or compliance check is shown.
invented entities (2)
  • 6G Control Compact no independent evidence
    purpose: Three-layer ownership taxonomy (own, federate, consume) to allocate architectural sovereignty
    Newly defined construct that structures the operator-control argument.
  • Guarantee Economy no independent evidence
    purpose: Five-tier outcome-priced commercial model converting control into enforceable service-level objectives
    Newly introduced pricing and service model central to the business-first claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5858 in / 1614 out tokens · 69498 ms · 2026-05-20T16:54:48.001542+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The 6G Control Compact defines a three-layer ownership taxonomy--own, federate, and consume--that allocates architectural sovereignty according to strategic value. The Guarantee Economy defines a five-tier, outcome-priced commercial model that converts operator control into enforceable service-level objectives.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Future Technology Trends of Terrestrial IMT towards 2030 and Beyond,

    ITU-R, “Future Technology Trends of Terrestrial IMT towards 2030 and Beyond,” ITU-R Report M.2516-0, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Nov. 2022

    work page 2030

  2. [2]

    Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2030 and Beyond,

    ITU-R, “Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2030 and Beyond,” ITU-R Recommendation M.2160-0, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Nov. 2023

    work page 2030

  3. [3]

    6G Technical Performance Requirements (TPR),

    ITU-R WP5D, "6G Technical Performance Requirements (TPR)," ITU-R Working Party 5D, International Telecommunication Union, Feb. 2026

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Network for AI Experiences,

    Ericsson, “Network for AI Experiences,” Ericsson AB, Stockholm, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Framework for Network Simplification – An Operator View,

    NGMN Alliance, “Framework for Network Simplification – An Operator View,” v1.0, NGMN, Frankfurt, Feb. 2026

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    5G Evolution and 6G White Paper,

    NTT DOCOMO, “5G Evolution and 6G White Paper,” Version 5.0, NTT DOCOMO, Tokyo, Jan. 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    FY2025 Full Year Financial Results Presentation,

    Rakuten Group, Inc., “FY2025 Full Year Financial Results Presentation,” Rakuten Group, Inc., Tokyo, Feb. 2026

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    Study on 6G Use Cases and Service Requirements – Stage 1,

    3GPP, “Study on 6G Use Cases and Service Requirements – Stage 1,” 3GPP TR 22.870 v2.0.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, 2026

    work page 2026

  9. [9]

    A Survey on AI for 6G: Challenges and Opportunities,

    C. Chatzieleftheriou and E. Liotou, "A Survey on AI for 6G: Challenges and Opportunities," IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 7, pp. 3189–, 2026. DOI: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2026.3677293

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2026.3677293 2026

  10. [10]

    AI-Native 6G Physical Layer with Cross-Module Optimization and Cooperative Control Agents,

    X. Zheng, H. Xiao, S. Jin, Z. Wang, W. Tian, W. Liu, J. Cao, J. Shen, Z. Shi, Z. Zhang, and N. Yang, "AI-Native 6G Physical Layer with Cross-Module Optimization and Cooperative Control Agents," arXiv:2601.02827v2 [eess.SP], Jan. 2026. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02827

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [12]

    State-of-the-Art AI/ML Applications for Improvements in RAN Performance,

    AI-RAN Alliance, “State-of-the-Art AI/ML Applications for Improvements in RAN Performance,” WG1 AI-for-RAN Technical Report, AI-RAN Alliance, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [13]

    AI on RAN: Enabling Monetizable Differentiated Connectivity for AI,

    AI-RAN Alliance, “AI on RAN: Enabling Monetizable Differentiated Connectivity for AI,” Working Group 3 White Paper, AI-RAN Alliance, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [14]

    AI-Native O-RAN Architectures for 6G: Towards Real-Time Adaptation, Conflict Resolution, and Efficient Resource Management,

    S. Salmi, M. A. Ouameur, M. Bagaa, G. C. Alexandropoulos, A. Tahenni, D. Massicotte, and A. Ksentini, "AI-Native O-RAN Architectures for 6G: Towards Real-Time Adaptation, Conflict Resolution, and Efficient Resource Management," TechRxiv (preprint), posted Sep. 2025. DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.175825547.74922399/v1

    work page doi:10.36227/techrxiv.175825547.74922399/v1 2025

  14. [15]

    Evolution of Near-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller Towards 6G,

    O-RAN Alliance nGRG, “Evolution of Near-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller Towards 6G,” Technical Report nGRG-RR-2025-04, O-RAN Alliance, Jan. 2026

    work page 2025

  15. [16]

    dApps: Distributed Applications for Open RAN,

    O-RAN Alliance nGRG, “dApps: Distributed Applications for Open RAN,” Technical Report nGRG-RR-2025-05 v2.0, O-RAN Alliance, Jan. 2026

    work page 2025

  16. [17]

    Scalable and User-Centric RAN Architecture: Service Requirements and Design Considerations,

    O-RAN Alliance nGRG, “Scalable and User-Centric RAN Architecture: Service Requirements and Design Considerations,” Technical Report nGRG-RS02, O-RAN Alliance, Jan. 2026

    work page 2026

  17. [18]

    Flat UP: Toward RAN-Core Convergence for the 6G User Plane,

    H. Harkous, A. Kak, A. Urie, H. Straulino, H. Wu, M. Laitila, H.-T. Thieu, N. Choi, T. Van de Velde, and M. Kanerva, "Flat UP: Toward RAN-Core Convergence for the 6G User Plane," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 63, pp. 62–68, May 2025. DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.003.2400403

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.003.2400403 2025

  18. [19]

    Zero-touch Network and Service Management (ZSM); Reference Architecture,

    ETSI, “Zero-touch Network and Service Management (ZSM); Reference Architecture,” ETSI GS ZSM 002 v1.1.1, ETSI, Sophia Antipolis, Aug. 2019

    work page 2019

  19. [20]

    Zero-touch Network and Service Management (ZSM); ZSM Framework for Network- as-a-Service (NaaS),

    ETSI, “Zero-touch Network and Service Management (ZSM); ZSM Framework for Network- as-a-Service (NaaS),” ETSI GR ZSM 019 v1.1.1, ETSI, Sophia Antipolis, Jan. 2026

    work page 2026

  20. [21]

    Zero-touch Network and Service Management (ZSM); Study on the Utilization of Agents in Autonomous Networks,

    ETSI, “Zero-touch Network and Service Management (ZSM); Study on the Utilization of Agents in Autonomous Networks,” ETSI GR ZSM 020 v1.1.1, ETSI, Sophia Antipolis, Jan. 2026

    work page 2026

  21. [22]

    Autonomous Networks Levels Evaluation Methodology,

    TM Forum, “Autonomous Networks Levels Evaluation Methodology,” IG1252 v3.0.0, TM Forum, May 2025. Available at: https://www.tmforum.org/resources/standard/ig1252- autonomous-networks-levels-evaluation-methodology/

    work page 2025

  22. [23]

    Agentic AI-Based Operating Models,

    NGMN Alliance, “Agentic AI-Based Operating Models,” V1.0, NGMN, Frankfurt, Mar. 2026

    work page 2026

  23. [24]

    Advancing 6G: Survey for Explainable AI on Communications and Network Slicing,

    H. Sun, Y. Liu, A. Al-Tahmeesschi, A. Nag, M. Soleimanpour, B. Canberk, H. Arslan, and H. Ahmadi, "Advancing 6G: Survey for Explainable AI on Communications and Network Slicing," IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 6, 2025. DOI: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2025.3534626

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3534626 2025

  24. [25]

    Intent-LLM: A Framework for Automated Network Configuration Through Code Generation,

    C. Provvedi, L. Seidenari, B. Picano, and R. Fantacci, "Intent-LLM: A Framework for Automated Network Configuration Through Code Generation," IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 12, pp. 7246–7248, 2026. DOI: 10.1109/TCCN.2026.3683230

    work page doi:10.1109/tccn.2026.3683230 2026

  25. [26]

    Specialpublication800-207,NationalInstituteofStandardsandTechnology (NIST) (2020).https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-207

    M. Souppaya, K. Scarfone, and D. Yaga, “Zero Trust Architecture,” NIST Special Publication 800-207, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Aug. 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-207

    work page doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-207 2020

  26. [28]

    A Practical Approach to Transitioning 5G-AKA Toward Fully and Hybrid Post-Quantum Security for 5G and Beyond Communication,

    E. Choudhary, A. K. Yadav, R. Kumar, and M. Liyanage, "A Practical Approach to Transitioning 5G-AKA Toward Fully and Hybrid Post-Quantum Security for 5G and Beyond Communication," IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 7, pp. 2980–, 2026. DOI: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2026.3677962

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2026.3677962 2026

  27. [29]

    When Beneficial Intelligence Turns Hostile: A Survey of Adversarial Threats in AI-Native 6G,

    M. Altintaş, S. N. Karhan, Y. E. Tok, A. G. Toprak, and Ö. B. Mercan, "When Beneficial Intelligence Turns Hostile: A Survey of Adversarial Threats in AI-Native 6G," IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 7, pp. 3468–, 2026. DOI: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2026.3678511

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2026.3678511 2026

  28. [30]

    AI Surge and Its Implications for 6G,

    NGMN Alliance, “AI Surge and Its Implications for 6G,” v1.0, NGMN, Frankfurt, Feb. 2026

    work page 2026

  29. [31]

    GSMA Open Gateway, “A global framework of common network APIs that simplifies access to mobile operator networks and helps expose core capabilities of the open network to developers and cloud providers.” Available at: https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and- impact/gsma-open-gateway/

    work page

  30. [32]

    Driving Cloud-Native Adoption in Telecom,

    Cloud Native Telco Initiative (CNTi), “Driving Cloud-Native Adoption in Telecom,” The Linux Foundation Project. Available at: https://lfnetworking.org/cloud-native-telco-initiative-cnti- driving-cloud-native-adoption-in-telecom/

    work page

  31. [33]

    Study on 6G Scenarios and Requirements,

    3GPP, “Study on 6G Scenarios and Requirements,” 3GPP TR 38.914 v0.4.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Mar. 2026

    work page 2026

  32. [34]

    Cloud Native Network Automation,

    Nephio, “Cloud Native Network Automation,” The Linux Foundation Project. Available at: https://nephio.org/

    work page

  33. [35]

    A fundamental step to Telco Cloud & Edge homogenization and sustainability,

    Sylva, “A fundamental step to Telco Cloud & Edge homogenization and sustainability,” The Linux Foundation Project. Available at: https://sylvaproject.org/

    work page

  34. [36]

    eBPF-based Networking, Observability, Security,

    Cilium, “eBPF-based Networking, Observability, Security,” The Linux Foundation Project. Available at: https://cilium.io/

    work page

  35. [37]

    O-RAN Software Community (SC),

    O-RAN SC, “O-RAN Software Community (SC),” The Linux Foundation Project. Available at: https://o-ran-sc.org/

    work page

  36. [38]

    Bringing Agentic AI to Cloud Native,

    kagent, “Bringing Agentic AI to Cloud Native,” The Linux Foundation Project. Available at: https://kagent.dev/

    work page

  37. [39]

    Cloud Native Computing Foundation,

    CNCF, “Cloud Native Computing Foundation,” The Linux Foundation Initiative. Available at: https://www.cncf.io/

    work page

  38. [40]

    Transforming Radio Access Networks Towards Open, Intelligent, Virtualized and Fully Interoperable RAN

    O-RAN Alliance, “Transforming Radio Access Networks Towards Open, Intelligent, Virtualized and Fully Interoperable RAN.” Available at: https://www.o-ran.org/

    work page

  39. [41]

    Towards 6G-Enabled eHealth,

    SNS JU Technology Board, "Towards 6G-Enabled eHealth," Smart Networks and Services Joint Undertaking, Brussels, Feb. 2026

    work page 2026

  40. [42]

    Bharat 6G Vision,

    Government of India, Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communications, "Bharat 6G Vision," DoT, New Delhi, India, Mar. 2023. Available at: https://bharat6galliance.com/bharat6G/Home/content/Bharat-6G-Vision- Document/Bharat-6G-Vision-Document

    work page 2023

  41. [43]

    APIs enabling seamless access to Telco network capabilities,

    CAMARA, “APIs enabling seamless access to Telco network capabilities,” The Linux Foundation. Available at: https://camaraproject.org/

    work page

  42. [45]

    Horizon 2020 and Beyond: On the 5G Operating System for a True Digital Society,

    D. Soldani and A. Manzalini, “Horizon 2020 and Beyond: On the 5G Operating System for a True Digital Society,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, Vol. 10, Issue 1, March 2015, ISSN [20]Information: DOI: 10.1109/MVT.2014.2380581

    work page doi:10.1109/mvt.2014.2380581 2020

  43. [46]

    REST API Design Guidelines,

    TM Forum, "REST API Design Guidelines," TMF630, TM Forum. Available at: https://www.tmforum.org/resources/standard/tmf630-rest-api-design-guidelines/

    work page

  44. [47]

    Service Ordering Management API,

    TM Forum, "Service Ordering Management API," TMF641, TM Forum. Available at: https://www.tmforum.org/resources/standard/tmf641-service-ordering-management-api/

    work page

  45. [48]

    eBPF: A New Approach to Cloud-Native Observability, Networking and Security for Current (5G) and Future Mobile Networks (6G and Beyond),

    D. Soldani, et al., “eBPF: A New Approach to Cloud-Native Observability, Networking and Security for Current (5G) and Future Mobile Networks (6G and Beyond),” IEEE Access, May

    work page

  46. [49]

    Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10138542

    work page arXiv

  47. [50]

    Rakuten Mobile Adopts eBPF to Strengthen Anomaly Detection and Security in Cloud-Native Telecom Networks,

    D. Brown, “Rakuten Mobile Adopts eBPF to Strengthen Anomaly Detection and Security in Cloud-Native Telecom Networks,” August 12, 2025. Available at: https://ebpf.foundation/rakuten-mobile-adopts-ebpf-to-strengthen-anomaly-detection- and-security-in-cloud-native-telecom-networks/

    work page 2025

  48. [51]

    A collaborative program hosted by the Linux Foundation dedicated to accelerating open, secure, and interoperable Open RAN CU/DU implementations,

    OCUDU Ecosystem Foundation, “A collaborative program hosted by the Linux Foundation dedicated to accelerating open, secure, and interoperable Open RAN CU/DU implementations,” The Linux Foundation. Available at: https://ocudu.org/

    work page

  49. [52]

    Artificial Intelligence Act

    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, “Artificial Intelligence Act.” Available at: https://eur- lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng

    work page 2024

  50. [53]

    Generative AI in Network,

    O-RAN Alliance nGRG, “Generative AI in Network,” Technical Report nGRG-RR-2025-02, O- RAN Alliance, 2025

    work page 2025

  51. [54]

    The AI/ML Landscape for Smart Networks and Services: Taxonomy, Standards and Innovation Pathways,

    SNS JU Smart Networks Working Group, “The AI/ML Landscape for Smart Networks and Services: Taxonomy, Standards and Innovation Pathways,” SNS JU Reliable Software Networks Working Group, Dec. 2025

    work page 2025

  52. [55]

    Available at: https://colocatedeventseu2026.sched.com/overview/area/Cloud+Native+Telco+Day

    Cloud Native Telco Day EU 2026. Available at: https://colocatedeventseu2026.sched.com/overview/area/Cloud+Native+Telco+Day

    work page 2026

  53. [56]

    title Post-quantum cryptography standards: FIPS 203, 204, 205

    NIST, “Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard (ML-KEM),” FIPS 203, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Aug. 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203

    work page doi:10.6028/nist.fips.203 2024

  54. [57]

    Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard (ML-DSA),

    NIST, “Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard (ML-DSA),” FIPS 204, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Aug. 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204

    work page doi:10.6028/nist.fips.204 2024

  55. [58]

    Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard (SLH-DSA),

    NIST, “Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard (SLH-DSA),” FIPS 205, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Aug. 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.205

    work page doi:10.6028/nist.fips.205 2024

  56. [59]

    Available at: https://gdpr-info.eu/

    EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Available at: https://gdpr-info.eu/

    work page

  57. [60]

    Available at: https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space- regulation-ehds_en

    European Health Data Space Regulation (EHDS). Available at: https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space- regulation-ehds_en

    work page

  58. [61]

    EU Toolbox for 5G Security,

    European Commission, “EU Toolbox for 5G Security,” NIS Cooperation Group, Brussels, Jan

    work page

  59. [62]

    Operator-Controlled 6G: From Connectivity Infrastructure to Guaranteed Digital Services

    Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/eu-toolbox-5g-security arXiv identifier 2605.15553. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15553 81

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [63]

    CHIPS and Science Act,

    United States, “CHIPS and Science Act,” Public Law 117-167, Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4346

    work page

  61. [64]

    Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act,

    United States, “Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act,” Public Law 116-124, Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4998

    work page

  62. [65]

    Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Directive (EU) 2022/2464,

    European Union, “Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Directive (EU) 2022/2464,” Official Journal of the European Union, 2022. Available at: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company- reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en

    work page 2022

  63. [66]

    5G Advanced Overview,

    5G Americas, “5G Advanced Overview,” White Paper, July 2025. Available at: https://www.5gamericas.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/5G-Advanced-Overview.pdf

    work page 2025

  64. [67]

    The fastest-growing open-source community in cellular wireless

    OpenAirInterface, “The fastest-growing open-source community in cellular wireless.” Available at: https://openairinterface.org/

    work page

  65. [68]

    Available at: https://onap.org/

    Open Network Automation Platform (ONAP). Available at: https://onap.org/. Author DAVID SOLDANI (Senior Member, IEEE) received the M.Sc. degree (magna cum laude) in engineering from the University of Florence, Italy, in 1994, and the D.Sc. degree in technology (Hons.) from the Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, in 2006. Throughout his career, he h...

    work page 1994

  66. [69]

    He has held the positions of Chief Information and Security Officer (CISO), e2e, Global, as well as SVP Innovation and Advanced Research with Rakuten

    In his professional roles, he has served in significant leadership positions. He has held the positions of Chief Information and Security Officer (CISO), e2e, Global, as well as SVP Innovation and Advanced Research with Rakuten. Previously, he held the position of Chief Technology and Cyber Security Officer (CTSO) with the ASIA Pacific Region, Huawei. He ...

    work page