Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Multimodal Reasoning for Science: Technical Report and 1st Place Solution to the ICML 2025 SeePhys Challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2509.06079 v1 pith:CREQPQGX submitted 2025-09-07 cs.CL cs.CV

Multimodal Reasoning for Science: Technical Report and 1st Place Solution to the ICML 2025 SeePhys Challenge

classification cs.CL cs.CV
keywords reasoningchallengemultimodalicmlplaceseephysachievedaddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal reasoning remains a fundamental challenge in artificial intelligence. Despite substantial advances in text-based reasoning, even state-of-the-art models such as GPT-o3 struggle to maintain strong performance in multimodal scenarios. To address this gap, we introduce a caption-assisted reasoning framework that effectively bridges visual and textual modalities. Our approach achieved 1st place in the ICML 2025 AI for Math Workshop \& Challenge 2: SeePhys, highlighting its effectiveness and robustness. Furthermore, we validate its generalization on the MathVerse benchmark for geometric reasoning, demonstrating the versatility of our method. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/OpenDCAI/SciReasoner.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    MVI-Bench supplies the first taxonomy and dataset focused on misleading visual inputs to measure LVLM robustness, with tests on 18 models revealing clear weaknesses.

  2. MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new 1,248-instance paired benchmark shows 18 vision-language models drop substantially in accuracy when images contain misleading visual cues.

  3. OpenWorldLib: A Unified Codebase and Definition of Advanced World Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    OpenWorldLib offers a standardized codebase and definition for world models that combine perception, interaction, and memory to understand and predict the world.

  4. OpenWorldLib: A Unified Codebase and Definition of Advanced World Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    OpenWorldLib defines world models as perception-centered systems with interaction and long-term memory, and provides a modular inference codebase unifying interactive video, 3D, reasoning, and VLA tasks.

  5. Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey of physical AI that distinguishes theoretical physics reasoning from applied understanding and synthesizes advances in symbolic reasoning, embodied systems, and generative models to advocate for physics-groun...