Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Posterior predictive checking for gravitational-wave detection with pulsar timing arrays: II. Posterior predictive distributions and pseudo Bayes factors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.05559 v2 pith:CRNZYV6X submitted 2023-06-08 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IMgr-qc

Posterior predictive checking for gravitational-wave detection with pulsar timing arrays: II. Posterior predictive distributions and pseudo Bayes factors

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IMgr-qc
keywords predictivedetectionstochasticposteriorprocesscheckscorrelationdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The detection of nanoHertz gravitational waves through pulsar timing arrays hinges on identifying a common stochastic process affecting all pulsars in a correlated way across the sky. In the presence of other deterministic and stochastic processes affecting the time-of-arrival of pulses, a detection claim must be accompanied by a detailed assessment of the various physical or phenomenological models used to describe the data. In this study, we propose posterior predictive checks as a model-checking tool that relies on the predictive performance of the models with regards to new data. We derive and study predictive checks based on different components of the models, namely the Fourier coefficients of the stochastic process, the correlation pattern, and the timing residuals. We assess the ability of our checks to identify model misspecification in simulated datasets. We find that they can accurately flag a stochastic process spectral shape that deviates from the common power-law model as well as a stochastic process that does not display the expected angular correlation pattern. Posterior predictive likelihoods derived under different assumptions about the correlation pattern can further be used to establish detection significance. In the era of nanoHertz gravitational wave detection from different pulsar-timing datasets, such tests represent an essential tool in assessing data consistency and supporting astrophysical inference.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Posterior Predictive Checks for Gravitational-wave Populations: Limitations and Improvements

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Maximum-likelihood-based posterior predictive checks detect model misspecification better than event-level versions for uncertain spin tilts, but current detector sensitivity limits their power; the Gaussian Component...

  2. Mapping the Gravitational-wave Background Across the Spectrum with a Next-Generation Anisotropic Per-frequency Optimal Statistic

    astro-ph.IM 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new pulsar-timing-array pipeline maps the gravitational-wave sky per frequency, folds cosmic variance into significance estimates, and detects a simulated loud source at p=0.01 versus 0.2 broadband.