Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Spin fluctuation-mediated unconventional superconductivity in ThFeAsN from first-principles

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ThFeAsN is predicted to be a spin-fluctuation-driven superconductor with a dxy-wave gap and a Tc of 22.4 K, close to the measured 29 K.

desk verdict First-principles dxy prediction for ThFeAsN is new and credible, but the spin-fluctuation attribution rests on an uncontrolled toggle, and the µ jump needs explaining. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14677 v1 pith:CSOM5YBM submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-ph

Guang-Yu Guo , Jau-Wen Liu , Mitsuaki Kawamura This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-ph MSC 82D55 PACS 74.20.-z74.25.Kc74.70.Xa
keywords unconventionalsuperconductivityThFeAsNspinfluctuationsdxy-wavegapB2gsymmetrySCDFTiron-basedsuperconductorfirst-principles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses first-principles superconducting density functional theory to determine the pairing mechanism and gap symmetry of the iron-based superconductor ThFeAsN. It claims that spin fluctuations, not electron-phonon coupling, are responsible for superconductivity, and that the order parameter has B2g symmetry, forming dxy-waves with sign changes between Fermi surface sheets. The calculated critical temperature of 22.4 K agrees well with the experimental value of 29 K, and the predicted nodal gap structure yields a V-shaped quasiparticle density of states and anisotropic ultrasonic attenuation—both measurable fingerprints.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin-fluctuation pairing kernel K_SF, computed from the ab initio spin susceptibility within the adiabatic local density approximation. This kernel, together with the electron-phonon kernel and the screened Coulomb repulsion, enters the superconducting density functional theory gap equation. The magnetic susceptibility peaks near q = (π/a, π/a), linking hole and electron pockets and forcing a sign-changing dxy-wave solution; the nodal lines of this solution produce the predicted V-shaped density of states and non-exponential ultrasonic attenuation.

What would settle it

High-resolution ARPES of ThFeAsN in the superconducting state: if the gap on the largest hole pocket shows no nodes along the [100] direction, or if the gap on the electron pockets has the same sign as the hole pockets, the dxy-wave prediction is falsified. Likewise, ultrasonic attenuation along [100] that rises exponentially at low temperature rather than nearly linearly would disagree with the predicted nodal structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors establish that ThFeAsN is an unconventional multiband superconductor whose pairing is mediated by spin fluctuations. Solving the superconducting gap equation with electron-phonon, screened Coulomb, and spin-fluctuation kernels, they find a Tc of 22.4 K and a gap function of B2g symmetry: quasi-two-dimensional dxy-waves with vertical line nodes and opposite signs on different Fermi surface sheets. Controlled computer experiments show that switching off spin fluctuations drops Tc to 0.17 K, while switching off electron-phonon coupling leaves Tc at 31.4 K, demonstrating that spin fluctuations are the dominant pairing glue.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-fluctuation pairing strength computed from density functional theory is quantitatively reliable for iron-based superconductors, even though the method has only been benchmarked on simple elemental metals like vanadium and niobium.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, superconductivity in ThFeAsN is magnetic in origin, strengthening the case that spin fluctuations are a common pairing mechanism in iron-based superconductors.
  • The predicted nodal dxy-wave gap with sheet-dependent signs can be tested directly by scanning tunneling spectroscopy and high-resolution ARPES.
  • The anisotropic ultrasonic attenuation—nearly linear at low temperature along [100] and [110]—provides a clear experimental signature that distinguishes this state from nodeless s-wave.
  • The success of first-principles calculations including spin fluctuations would motivate applying the same method to other stoichiometric iron-based superconductors to predict their gap symmetries.
  • The large screened Coulomb repulsion (μ = 1.304) means the predicted Tc emerges from near-cancellation of competing terms, so quantitative agreement with experiment is a stringent test of the approach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension of this work would be to compute the spin-fluctuation kernel for other undoped iron-based superconductors, such as LiFeAs or NaFeAs, to see whether the B2g dxy-wave state is specific to ThFeAsN or a more general prediction.
  • The predicted vertical line nodes on all five Fermi sheets imply that low-temperature thermal conductivity should exhibit a quasi-linear T dependence; this could be checked against existing or future heat-transport data.
  • Because the screening parameter μ jumps from 0.687 to 1.304 when spin fluctuations are included, the method treats μ as an effective scheme-dependent quantity; a more transparent separation of static and dynamic screening could reduce this ambiguity.
  • If the dxy-wave state is confirmed, it would show that heavy hole doping is not the only route to nodal pairing in iron-based superconductors, broadening the phase diagram of gap symmetries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports superconducting density functional theory (SCDFT) calculations for ThFeAsN, including electron-phonon coupling, screened static and dynamic Coulomb repulsion, and spin-fluctuation (SF) mediated pairing. Using a parameter-free calculation, the authors obtain a superconducting transition temperature Tc = 22.4 K, close to the experimental 29 K, and predict an even-parity B2g (dxy-wave) order parameter with sign changes between Fermi-surface sheets. They also compute a V-shaped quasiparticle density of states and direction-dependent ultrasonic attenuation, presented as experimentally testable signatures. The central mechanistic claim is that superconductivity is driven by spin fluctuations, based on Table I: the EPC-only case gives Tc = 0.17 K, EPC + Coulomb gives 0 K, the full calculation gives 22.4 K, and the no-EPC case gives 31.4 K.

Significance. If the calculation is correct, this is a significant contribution: it provides a first-principles, parameter-free prediction that a stoichiometric Fe-based superconductor is magnetically mediated with nodal dxy pairing, alongside concrete experimental consequences. The internal comparisons cleanly show that phonons alone cannot explain 29 K, and the absence of any fit to the target Tc is a genuine strength. However, the reliability of the central claim rests on the spin-fluctuation kernel, whose benchmark is limited to weakly correlated V and Nb, and on the treatment of the large effective Coulomb parameter µ. The manuscript is therefore of high interest but requires strengthening on control experiments and sensitivity analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table I and 'computer experiments'] The core attribution of superconductivity to spin fluctuations is based on a toggle that is not controlled. Case (c) (EPC + µ + SF) uses µ = 1.304, while case (b) (EPC + µ, no SF) uses µ = 0.687. Removing the SF channel also changes the repulsive Coulomb kernel, so the comparison does not isolate the SF pairing interaction. Since Tc = 22.4 K arises from near cancellation between a large repulsive µ and the attractive SF kernel, this confound could materially affect both the value of Tc and the B2g solution. Please provide an operational definition of µ (equation and frequency dependence) and perform a controlled toggle with µ fixed at the full-calculation value, or decompose the total kernel into SF-dependent and SF-independent parts.
  2. [Appendix A (ALDA choice)] The manuscript states that RPA and ALDA calculations give similar SC properties but provides no numerical comparison. This is load-bearing because µ is much larger than λ (1.304 vs 0.127), so a modest relative change in the SF kernel could shift Tc by tens of kelvin and possibly alter the gap symmetry. The only benchmark cited (ref. [45]) covers V and Nb, which are weakly correlated metals; no Fe-based superconductor benchmark is given. Please include RPA versus ALDA results (at least Tc and gap symmetry) or a quantitative sensitivity analysis of the B2g solution to kernel variations.
  3. [Introduction, ref. [8]] The paper mentions that a multichannel Eliashberg calculation by Schrodi et al. predicted Tc = 3.15 K for ThFeAsN, and found no superconductivity down to 2 K when EPC and charge fluctuations were included. This factor-of-seven discrepancy with the present 22.4 K is directly relevant to the central claim, yet the manuscript never discusses why the two first-principles-based approaches differ so strongly. Please add a detailed comparison of the two methods (kernel definitions, treatment of spin fluctuations, and Coulomb repulsion) and, ideally, a benchmark on a common input to show that the SCDFT machinery is not producing an artefact.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption uses '×(1/2)' without clearly indicating which curves are scaled; this makes the temperature dependence hard to read. Please plot the raw gap values or add explicit panel labels.
  2. [Table I and Appendix D] The relation between the scalar µ in Table I and the k-resolved µee_nk defined in Eq. (6) is not explained. Please state how the momentum-dependent quantity is reduced to the single number µ, since this is central to the sensitivity discussion.
  3. [Fig. 6] The orange, yellow, and red arrows indicating nesting vectors and pairing interactions are difficult to distinguish in monochrome print. Consider using different line styles or labels in the figure.
  4. [Abstract and main text] The phrase 'fully taken into account' overstates the ALDA/RPA treatment of spin fluctuations and the approximate handling of the Coulomb kernel. Suggest softening to 'treated within the SCDFT approximation' to avoid overclaiming.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Tc and B2g dxy gap are parameter-free predictions; self-cited method benchmarks are external and do not force the result.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—Tc = 22.4 K, B2g/dxy gap symmetry, and SF-mediated pairing—are obtained by solving the SCDFT gap equation (Eq. 1) with K_ep, K_ee, and K_SF computed from DFT band structures, DFPT phonons, and ALDA/RPA susceptibilities. None of these inputs is fitted to the experimental Tc = 29 K or gap structure; the experimental value appears only as a comparison. The Table I toggles decompose the kernel into EPC, Coulomb, and SF channels; this is a physical decomposition, not a construction in which the output equals an input. The change in the effective mu value (1.304 with SF vs 0.687 without SF) is a robustness/control concern about the 'computer experiment', but it does not make the prediction reduce to a fitted parameter or to the experimental Tc. The SCDFT/SF framework is drawn partly from prior work by co-author Kawamura (refs. [27,45,50]), but that work is benchmarked against external elemental V/Nb superconductors, not against the ThFeAsN result itself, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the B2g solution. The absence of an FeSC benchmark is a transferability risk, not a circularity. The RPA/ALDA similarity claim is not numerically documented, but an omitted comparison is a completeness issue, not a circular reduction. No circular step is identifiable in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameter is fitted to ThFeAsN's Tc or gap; λ, µ, ωln, and Z are computed quantities, so the ledger's free-parameter count is zero. However, the central claim rests on the unverified-for-FeSC behavior of the spin-fluctuation kernel and on a delicate partitioning between residual Coulomb repulsion (µ = 1.304) and SF attraction. No new physical entities are postulated: spin-fluctuation pairing is established input physics.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The SCDFT gap equation and the kernels K^ep, K^ee, K^SF and renormalization Z from refs [24-27] are valid as applied to a multiband, strongly correlated Fe-based superconductor
    Invoked without derivation in the 'Theory and method' section (Eq. (1)); the method was previously benchmarked on elemental metals (refs [27,45]), not on Fe-based superconductors.
  • domain assumption Residual e-e repulsion beyond the DFT eigenvalues is captured by K^ee, with a clean separation between the charge (K^ee) and spin (K^SF) channels of the same Coulomb interaction
    Stated in 'Theory and method': 'the e-e Coulomb repulsion is already included in the DFT eigenvalues ξnk.' The unexplained increase of µ from 0.687 to 1.304 when SF is switched on (Table I) indicates the partitioning is not transparent.
  • domain assumption The ALDA spin-susceptibility kernel approximates the dynamic spin-fluctuation pairing interaction, and ALDA and RPA yield equivalent SC properties
    Appendix A: 'We find that the SC properties calculated with the RPA and ALDA do not differ significantly... we present the calculated SC properties using the ALDA only.' No quantitative comparison is shown, yet the SF kernel controls Tc and the gap symmetry.
  • domain assumption The superconducting order parameter is spin-singlet and even-parity (D4h IRREPs)
    Table II lists only spin-singlet even-parity basis functions; odd-parity or triplet channels are not considered. Standard for FeSCs, but an assumption nonetheless.
  • domain assumption The ultrasonic attenuation simplification: vν ≪ vF, a k-independent averaged EPC matrix element g, and the kinematic delta-function δ(|vF·ǫq|) in Eq. (4)
    Appendix C: 'we make the reasonable assumptions of...' These assumptions are not quantitatively justified for ThFeAsN; the predicted αS/αN anisotropy is a consequence of this approximation scheme (cited to ref [50]).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin fluctuation-mediated unconventional superconductivity in ThFeAsN from first-principles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CSOM5YBM

@misc{pith2026260714677,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin fluctuation-mediated unconventional superconductivity in ThFeAsN from first-principles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CSOM5YBM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14677}
}
abstract

Superconducting (SC) pairing mechanism, origin of high $T_c$ and symmetry of SC order parameter in Fe-based superconductors are among the important unsolved problems in condensed matter and materials physics. We study the SC properties of ThFeAsN, a Fe-based high $T_c$ superconductor, by {\it ab initio} superconducting density functional theory calculations with electron-phonon coupling, screened static and dynamic electron-electron Coulomb repulsion and spin fluctuation (SF) mediated pair-interaction fully taken into account. Our calculations reveal that ThFeAsN is a SF-mediated multiband superconductor with the calculated $T_c$ of 22.4 K and the $d_{xy}$-wave SC order parameter with different signs on different Fermi surface sheets, in consistent with experiments. We also present distinct SC properties such as quasiparticle density of states and ultrasonic attenuation coefficient which can be immediately verified by experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14677 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure and (b) Brillouin zone of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Averaged (solid symbols) and maximum (open sym [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Normalized longitudinal ultrasonic attenuation co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Bare susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references

  1. [8]

    Schrodi, F

    F. Schrodi, F. C. Kabeer, A. Aperis and P. Oppeneer, Exploring multichannel superconductivity in ThFeAsN, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094516 (2021)

    2021

  2. [45]

    Tsutsumi, Y

    K. Tsutsumi, Y. Hizume, M. Kawamura, R. Akashi and S. Tsuneyuki, Effect of spin fluctuations on superconduc- tivity in V and Nb: A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. B 102, 214515 (2020)

    2020

  3. [1]

    Kamihara, T

    Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O 1−xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05-0.12) with Tc = 26 K, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008)

    2008

  4. [2]

    G. R. Stewart, Superconductivity in iron compounds, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1589 (2011)

    2011

  5. [3]

    X. Chen, P. Dai, D. Feng, T. Xiang and F.-C. Zhang, Iron-based high transition temperature superconductors, Natl. Sci. Rev. 1, 371 (2014)

    2014

  6. [4]

    Shibauchi, T

    T. Shibauchi, T. Hanaguri and Y. Matsuda, Exotic su- perconducting states in FeSe-based materials, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 102002 (2020)

    2020

  7. [5]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957)

    1957

  8. [6]

    Boeri, O

    L. Boeri, O. V. Dolgov and A. A. Golubov, Is LaFeAsO1−xFx an electron-phonon superconductor? Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 026403 (2008)

    2008

Show all 52 references
  1. [7]

    Sen and G.-Y

    S. Sen and G.-Y. Guo, Electronic structure, lattice dy- namics, and magnetic properties of ThXAsN (X = Fe, Co, Ni) superconductors: A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224505 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    J. Dong, H. J. Zhang, G. Xu, Z. Li, G. Li, W. Z. Hu, D. Wu, G. F. Chen, X. Dai, J. L. Luo, Z. Fang, and N. L. Wang, Competing orders and spin-density-wave in- stability in La(O 1−xFx)FeAs, Europhys. Lett. 83, 27006 (2008)

    2008

  3. [10]

    R. M. Fernandes, A. V. Chubukov, and J. Schmalian, What drives nematic order in iron-based superconduc- tors? Nat. Phys. 10, 97 (2014)

    2014

  4. [11]

    I. I. Mazin, D. J. Singh, M. D. Johannes, and M. H. Du, Unconventional Superconductivity with a Sign Reversal in the Order Parameter of LaFeAsO 1−xFx, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 057003 (2008)

    2008

  5. [12]

    Kuroki, S

    K. Kuroki, S. Onari, R. Arita, H. Usui, Y. Tanaka, H. Kontani, and H. Aoki, Unconventional Pairing Originat- ing from the Disconnected Fermi Surfaces of Supercon- ducting LaFeAsO 1−xFx, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 087004 (2008)

    2008

  6. [13]

    A. D. Christianson, E. A. Goremychkin, R. Osborn et al., Unconventional superconductivity in Ba 0.6K0.4Fe2As2 from inelastic neutron scattering, Nature (London) 456, 930 (2008)

    2008

  7. [14]

    L. Ding, J. K. Dong, S. Y. Zhou et al. Nodeless supercon- ducting gap in electron-doped BaFe 1.9Ni0.1As2 probed by quasiparticle heat transport, New J. Phys. 11, 093018 (2009)

    2009

  8. [15]

    Thomale, C

    R. Thomale, C. Platt, W. Hanke, J. Hu and B. A. Bernevig, Exotic d-wave superconducting state of strongly hole-doped K xBa1−xFe2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 117001 (2011)

    2011

  9. [16]

    Okazaki, Y

    K. Okazaki, Y. Ota, Y. Kotani, W. Malaeb, Y. Ishida, T. Shinojima, T. Kiss, S. Watanabe, C. T. Chen, K. Kihou, C. H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, T. Saito, H. Fukazawa, Y. Kohori, K. Hashimoto, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda, H. Ikeda, H. Miyahara, R. Arita, A. Chainani and S. Shin, Octe...

    2012

  10. [17]

    Smidman, F

    M. Smidman, F. K. K. Kirschner, D. T. Adroja, A. D. Hillier, F. Lang, Z. C. Wang, G. H. Cao and S. J. Blundell, Nodal multigap superconductivity in KCa2Fe4As4F2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 060509 (2018)

    2018

  11. [18]

    Wang, Z.-C

    C. Wang, Z.-C. Wang, Y.-X. Mei, Y.-K. Li, L. Li, Z.-T. Tang, Y. Liu, P. Zhang, H.-F. Zhai, Z.-A. Xu, and G.-H. Cao, A new ZrCuSiAs-type superconductor: ThFeAsN, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 2170 (2016)

    2016

  12. [19]

    Adroja, A

    D. Adroja, A. Bhattacharyya, P. K. Biswas, M. Smid- man, A. D. Hillier, H. Mao, H. Luo, G.-H. Cao, Z. Wang and C. Wang, Multigap superconductivity in ThAsFeN investigated using µSR measurements, Phys. Rev. B 96, 144502 (2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    Shiroka, T

    T. Shiroka, T. Shang, C.Wang, G.-H. Cao, I. Eremin, H.-R. Ott, and J. Mesot, High- Tc superconductivity in undoped ThFeAsN, Nat. Commun. 8, 156 (2017). 6

    2017

  14. [21]

    M. A. Albedah, F. Nejadsattari, Z. M. Stadnik, Z.-C. Wang, C. Wang, and G.-H. Cao, Absence of the stripe antiferromagnetic order in the new 30 K superconductor ThFeAsN, J. Alloys Compd. 695, 1128 (2017)

    2017

  15. [22]

    H. Mao, C. Wang, H. E. Maynard-Casely, Q. Huang, Z. Wang, G. Cao, S. Li, and H. Luo, Neutron powder diffraction study on the iron-based nitride superconduc- tor ThFeAsN, Europhys. Lett. 117, 57005 (2017)

    2017

  16. [23]

    L. N. Oliveira, E. K. U. Gross and W. Kohn, Density- functional theory for superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2430 (1988)

    1988

  17. [24]

    Lueders, M

    M. Lueders, M. A. L. marques, N. N. Lathiotakis, A. Floris, G. Profeta, L. Fast, A. Continenza, S. Massidda and E. K. U. Gross, Ab initio theory of superconduc- tivity. I. Density functional formalism and approximate functionals, Phys. Rev. B 72, 024545 (2005)

    2005

  18. [25]

    M. A. L. Marques, M. Lueders, N. N. Lathiotakis, G. Profeta, A. Floris, L. Fast, A. Continenza and E. K. U. Gross, Ab initio theory of superconductivity. II. Applica- tion to elemental metals, Phys. Rev. B 72, 024545 (2005)

    2005

  19. [26]

    Essenberger, A

    F. Essenberger, A. Sanna, A. Linscheid, F. Tandetzky, G. Profeta, P. Cudazzo and E. K. U. Gross, Supercon- ducting pairing mediated by spin fluctuations from first principles Phys. Rev. B 90, 214504 (2014)

    2014

  20. [27]

    Kawamura, Y

    M. Kawamura, Y. Hizume and T. Ozaki, Benchmark of density functional theory for superconductors in elemen- tal materials, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134511 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    S. P. Keshri and G.-Y. Guo, Ab initio study of orbital- selective superconductivity in γ-BiPd, Phys. Rev. B 112, 214518 (2025)

    2025

  22. [29]

    D. Mou, S. Liu, X. Jia, J. He, Y. Peng, L. Zhao, L. Yu, G. Liu, S. He, X. Dong et al. , Distinct Fermi Sur- face Topology and Nodeless Superconducting Gap in a Tl0.58Rb0.42Fe1.72Se2 Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 107001 (2011)

    2011

  23. [30]

    Fischer, M

    O. Fischer, M. Kugler, I. Maggio Aprile, C. Berthod, and C. Renner, Scanning tunneling spectroscopy of high- temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 353 (2007)

    2007

  24. [31]

    Watanabe, M

    T. Watanabe, M. Nohara, T. Hanaguri and H. Takagi, Anisotropy of the superconducting gap of the Borocar- bide superconductor YNi 2B2C with ultrasonic attenua- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 147002 (2004)

    2004

  25. [32]

    Vekhter, E

    I. Vekhter, E. J. Nicol, J. P. Carbotte, Ultrasonic attenu- ation in clean d-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 59, 7123 (1999)

    1999

  26. [33]

    R. W. Morse and H. V. Bohm, Superconductivity energy gap from ultrasonic attenuation measurements, Phys. Rev. 108, 1094 (1957)

    1957

  27. [34]

    P. J. Hirschfeld, M. M. Korshumov and I. I. Mazin, Gap symmetry and structure of Fe-based superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 124508 (2011)

    2011

  28. [35]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  29. [36]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gi- annozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  30. [37]

    Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu, Comp

    A. Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu, Comp. Mater. Sci. 95, 337 (2014)

    2014

  31. [38]

    https://www.quantum-espresso.org/pseudopotentials

  32. [39]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, et al ., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modu- lar and open-source software project for quantum simula- tions of materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2...

    2009

  33. [40]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, et al ., Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matte r 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  34. [41]

    Kawamura, Y

    M. Kawamura, Y. Gohda and S. Tsuneyuki, Improved tetrahedron method for the Brillouin-zone integration ap- plicable to response function, Phys. Rev. B 89, 094515 (2014)

    2014

  35. [42]

    http://sctk.osdn.jp/

  36. [43]

    Gell-Mann and K

    M. Gell-Mann and K. Brueckner, Correlation Energy of an Electron Gas at High Density, Phys. Rev. 106, 364 (1957)

    1957

  37. [44]

    Zangwill and P

    A. Zangwill and P. Soven, Density-functional approach to local-field effects in finite systems: Photoabsorption in the rare gases, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1561 (1980)

    1980

  38. [46]

    Kawamura, FermiSurfer: Fermi-surface viewer pro- viding multiple representation schemes, Comp

    M. Kawamura, FermiSurfer: Fermi-surface viewer pro- viding multiple representation schemes, Comp. Phys. Commun. 239, 197 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    J. F. Annett, Symmetry of the order parameter for high-temperature superconductivity, Adv. Phys. 39, 83 (1990)

    1990

  40. [48]

    Yip and Anupam Garg, Superconducting states of re- duced symmetry: General order parameters and physical implications, Phys

    S. Yip and Anupam Garg, Superconducting states of re- duced symmetry: General order parameters and physical implications, Phys. Rev. B 48, 3304 (1993)

    1993

  41. [49]

    Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, Advanced Book Program Series, Advanced Book Program, Perseus Books, (1983)

    J. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, Advanced Book Program Series, Advanced Book Program, Perseus Books, (1983)

    1983

  42. [50]

    Kawamura, Anisotropic superconducting gaps in YNi2B2C: A first-principles investigation, Doctoral dis- sertation, University of Tokyo (2015)

    M. Kawamura, Anisotropic superconducting gaps in YNi2B2C: A first-principles investigation, Doctoral dis- sertation, University of Tokyo (2015). END MATTER Appendix A: Crystal structure and computational de- tails. ThFeAsN has the layered tetragonal ZrCuSiAs- type structure wit...

    2015

  43. [100]

    We believe that this prediction of uncon- ventional αS/αN (T ) will stimulate ultrasonic attenua- tion experiments on ThFeAsN in the near future

    and [110] directions increases nearly linearly with T and that along the [001] direction increases with T in a non-exponential manner, consistent with the nodal dxy-wave superconductivity [32] in ThFeAsN discovered in this work. We believe that this prediction of uncon- ventio...

  44. [129]

    1), which consists of Th 2N2 and Fe2As2 bilay- ers

    (Fig. 1), which consists of Th 2N2 and Fe2As2 bilay- ers. Its unit cell contains two formula units (f.u.). [18, 22] The experimental lattice constants are a = 4.0414 ˚ A and c = 8 .5152 ˚ A. [22] The Wyckoff positions of Th, Fe, As and N atoms are 2 c (1/4, 1/4, zT h), 2b (3/4,...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.